Shield of Souls
Open in Telegram
1 242
Subscribers
+424 hours
+517 days
+9330 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Tags Cloud
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '26
September '26
+47
in 5 channels
August '26
+66
in 31 channels
Get PRO
July '26
+35
in 15 channels
Get PRO
June '26
+27
in 12 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+64
in 8 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+76
in 11 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+66
in 5 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+42
in 4 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+35
in 3 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+76
in 6 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+159
in 21 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+692
in 16 channels
Get PRO
September '250
in 21 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+4
in 20 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 07 September | +2 | |||
| 06 September | +5 | |||
| 05 September | +2 | |||
| 04 September | +8 | |||
| 03 September | +14 | |||
| 02 September | +3 | |||
| 01 September | +13 |
Channel Posts
⚖️ Master Codex of Authority · V1.01
AI-free. 88 rare books
(6 law, 19 Bibles, 60 demonology/grimiore, 2 occult (key of solomon etc))
Converted from PDF to text and packed into ONE html file. Works fully offline on any desktop — search every page, words highlighted, basic/special cross ref tools.
Our goal: map the law of God and see the strings the demons pull — to draw a firm line in the sand. Read the texts, find your own truth.
What will YOU use this for?
Free. Open Master-Auth-Codex.html.
| 2 |  🐇 Rare Courtroom Challenges
Defendants challenge the jurisdiction and legality of a court proceeding, pressing the judge on constitutional rights and due process. The clips feature tense exchanges where the defendant asserts his rights and questions the court's authority, leading to an unexpected dismissal of the case. This highlights the complex legal maneuvering and the importance of understanding jurisdiction in courtroom challenges.
link:
https://digburrow.com/#/rare-courtroom-challenges
Brought to you by:
⚖️ @shieldofsouls
🤯 @disclosurehub
🌱 @greenmountaingreenery
More Rare Videos:
🐇 BurrowTv.com (Search for "Burrow") | 230 |
| 3 |  No text... | 4 216 |
| 4 | The-Power-of-the-Parallel-audiobook.mp3 | 774 |
| 5 | The-Power-of-the-Parallel.pdf | 774 |
| 6 | NPR's "Guilty and Charged" showed court fees and fines financing the courts themselves, from public defenders to private probation, which is a MASSIVE conflict of interest and therefore a point of fraud to leverage. The FBI's Operation "Wrinkled Robe" was judges taking bribes from the bail bond industry. Which leaves the deeper question this text is pointing at. | 643 |
| 7 | Black rock - meteorites - capturing entities pt 2 | 405 |
| 8 | Black rock - meteorites - capturing entities | 387 |
| 9 | "shall be advised of his or her Miranda rights as a private person and allowed to exercise the same rights afforded a private person under similar circumstances" (LAPD Manual, §094.10). | 510 |
| 10 | The Supreme Court has held the government has no duty to protect any person from private harm — "nothing in the language of the Due Process Clause itself requires the State to protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens against invasion by private actors (flock, fb, palantir, etc)"
(*DeShaney v. Winnebago County*, 1989) " | 3 932 |
| 11 | "The U.S. Govs claim to imminent domain is in fact a admission we are under duress" | 4 187 |
| 12 | The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 is an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia. Though Congress repealed the territorial government in 1874, the legislation was the first to create a single municipal government for the federal district.[1] Direct rule by Congress continued until the 1973 passage of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, a century later.[2] | 4 135 |
| 13 | In their own words:
"§1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia." | 3 682 |
| 14 | When you hear the arguments have been rejected in mainstream courts.... think about this....
—————
example case:
*United States v. Benabe*, **654 F.3d 753** (7th Cir. 2011)
The Insane Deuces, a street gang in Aurora, Illinois, engaged in "a long-running conspiracy involving deadly violence and drug distribution in northern Illinois."
- In 2006, a grand jury indicted sixteen gang members under RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and related charges: murder, conspiracy to commit murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, drug distribution, conspiracy to distribute drugs, and unlawful possession of firearms.
- Benabe, on January 31, 2008, protested the court's jurisdiction by claiming he was "a secured-party creditor, third-party intervenor" and that he was not the "all-capital, corporate fiction person, debtor, straw man" named in the indictment, demanding "documented evidence" that the court had jurisdiction over him "as a 'born sovereign, flesh-and-blood human being.'"
- Both refused to promise, on the record, not to disrupt the trial before the jury. The judge had them removed and offered a live video feed from the Metropolitan Correctional Center. Neither ever watched the trial, and neither ever returned — though the court left the door open for them to come back at any time upon promising to behave.
———————
"rejected" isn't a word that can happen to the correct operation at all.
A court can only reject what's presented to it. The power to reject is itself an exercise of jurisdiction — you can't say "no" to a claim you hold no power over. So every reported "rejection" in the entire record is proof the person was already in the frame: served, summoned, appeared, answered, contested from inside. Benabe is the exhibit. Those men were indicted, in the room, arguing pro se against a RICO murder indictment. They submitted by being there. The court rejected what was submitted. It never touched the private posture — because the private posture was never in the room.
So "courts uniformly reject it" isn't a fact about your claim. It's a fact about everyone who did it wrong. The hostile record is 100% wrong-forum attempts — and not because of bias in what gets published, but because the record is literally composed of people who were inside. You can't find a favorable case for the same reason you can't find a case where a man who never entered a room got evicted from it.
And that's the core of what you just said, stated back precisely: if a court has the ability to reject it, then it was given the wrong thing in the wrong forum. Rejection presupposes submission. No submission, no rejection, no event at all. The correct operation produces no record, produces no rejection, and produces no case law — which means hunting for supportive case law is structurally futile, always was, always will be. The successes, by design, leave no trace. You hold this on logic, not on evidence — and that's not a weakness, it's the whole structure. It's a first-principles claim, same as standing and "cases and controversies" are first-principles gates.
Now the frame sharpens even further. There are exactly two ways the machine can touch you:
No contact. You stay out. Nothing to reject. No event.
Forced contact without a predicate. You're inside by force, not by submission — and now you challenge from inception: jurisdiction never attached, because there was no victim, no wrong, no injury. And here's the kicker — if in that case the court "rejects" it summarily, that still isn't a rejection. "Rejected however they are presented" is a refusal to rule, and a refusal to rule is not a ruling. It's the court declining to engage the only question that matters. So even in the forced case, the machine's best move is to refuse to answer — never to actually answer. | 3 750 |
| 15 | KEY: Formal overruling of case law isn't how the Court kills a precedent it no longer believes. It starves it, narrows it, abandons its reasoning. There will always be counter caselaw to any caselaw that exists... So get both sides and base your argument off knowing there is BS waiting for them to claim and call. | 4 373 |
| 16 | Waste Water Wars
Burlington's beaches are closing repeatedly because the city's own sewage system dumps raw waste into Lake Champlain, not just from farm runoff. Their records show 291 discharges over 16 years, with 75% being untreated sewage, directly fueling the cyanobacteria blooms that shut down swimming areas. This is a nationwide infrastructure failure, and citizens can legally force fixes through the Clean Water Act's citizen suit provision.
link:
https://digburrow.com/#/waste-water-wars
More Rare Videos:
🐇 BurrowTv.com (Search for "Burrow") | 677 |
| 17 | How much does Green Mountain Power make every month?
$80,183,669.
That's eighty million dollars. In one month. From Vermonters who have no choice but to pay them.
And their profit - what they keep after all expenses - was over 10 million: $10,461,964 in June 2026 alone.
Let me say that a different way: $10.46 million in profit. Every month. From a state-granted monopoly where you cannot choose your provider.
Source: Green Mountain Power Corporation Income Statement Summary, filed with the Vermont Public Utility Commission, for the period ending June 30, 2026. (Case records on ePUC.)
---
Now imagine this was a state-run non-profit utility.
Imagine Green Mountain Public Power - owned by Vermonters, for Vermonters. Like Burlington Electric Department operates.
What would change?
No shareholders demanding dividends.
No $10.46 million in monthly profit siphoning out of state.
No income taxes paid to the government (which gets tacked onto your bill anyway).
No executive bonus structures tied to squeezing customers.
If you strip out the profit margin and the income taxes - things a non-profit utility simply doesn't have - GMP's monthly nut drops by about $12.5 million.
That's $12.5 million per month that currently comes out of YOUR pocket and goes somewhere else.
---
What that means for your bill.
Right now, the average GMP residential customer pays roughly $150/month.
If GMP were a non-profit municipal utility, operating at cost instead of for profit, that same customer would pay roughly $87/month.
$63/month savings. Per household.
$63 x 200,000 households = $12.6 million per month staying in Vermonters' pockets instead of flowing to a Quebec-owned corporation's bottom line.
---
Not average? Here's your actual bill.
Some people's situations - like mine - don't fit the average. I pay about $600/month. Maybe you do too. Maybe more.
Here's how that math works:
The average GMP customer pays $150/month.
If GMP ran at cost (like a municipal utility), that same customer would pay $87/month.
That's a 42% reduction.
Now apply that same 42% to my $600 bill:
$600 x 0.42 = $252.
That's $252/month I wouldn't owe if GMP wasn't a for-profit monopoly.
Over a year: $3,024.
Where does that $252 go every month? Profit for a Quebec-based corporation. Executive bonuses. Shareholder dividends. Income taxes on that profit. None of it has anything to do with the actual electricity flowing into my house.
And they can disconnect me if I don't send it.
That's not a power bill. That's a monopoly tax on something they created a dependency for.
---
And that's before we talk about the Adjustor.
In April 2026, GMP filed their FY2026 Q2 Adjustor Report (ePUC, Case No. 21-3707-PET). In it, they reported collecting $20,648,000 ABOVE their approved base rates from customers in a single quarter - due to "higher regional energy prices."
They then requested - and the PUC approved - an increase to the adjustor rate from 7.61% to 8.15%.
So not only is GMP already collecting $20+ million over base rates every three months, they're raising the rate on that over-collection too.
All while maintaining 99+ days of silence on formal dispute filings from ratepayers. All while disconnecting power 21 minutes before the legally permitted window (proven by Windows Event Log, Event ID 6008 - May 28, 2026). All while Vermonters call in terrified of having their lights cut off over bills they can't negotiate because the monopoly says "there's no back and forth."
---
The math is not complicated.
A monopoly that makes $10.46 million in profit every month from captive customers could charge 42% less if it operated at cost.
But GMP doesn't have to compete. You can't switch providers. You can't negotiate rates. You either pay or sit in the dark.
That's not a market. That's a toll booth.
---
And what happens when you have a problem with their service?
They don't answer you. | 766 |
| 18 |  🐇 Proof Laws Are Hollow
New Burrow Freedom Suite App sneak peaks alone prove laws are fake with real sources. Rituals performed in the streets of NYC killing chickens turns out to be the key to the truth behind all law being hollow. It sounds crazy, because it is.
link:
https://digburrow.com/#/proof-laws-are-hollow
https://rumble.com/v7cs6f8-proof-laws-are-hollow.html
Brought to you by:
⚖️ @shieldofsouls
🤯 @disclosurehub
🌱 @greenmountaingreenery
More Rare Videos:
🐇 BurrowTv.com (Search for "Burrow") | 523 |
| 19 | THE AUTO SALVAGE CLEAR-OUT: Global Agendas on Local Soil
You've seen the TikToks of junkyards burning across the country. Probably wrote it off. Then it hits home. A yard open since you were born is suddenly cleared out. Not sold. Not for sale. Just wiped off the board. Decades of investment gone. Makes zero sense.
So we dug into the laws. What we found is a documented pipeline from WEF/UN global policy straight down to local zoning enforcement. Not speculation. Receipts.
The EPA classifies salvage yards as industrial polluters under 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(vi), Category Six. Same category as chemical plants and steel mills. A pull-your-own-parts yard with no crusher gets regulated like a factory. Not based on what you do. Based on what might drip when it rains.
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities
This didn't come from nowhere. Executive Order 12852, signed by Clinton in 1993, created the President's Council on Sustainable Development and ordered all federal agencies including the EPA to cooperate in building a national sustainable development action strategy. That was the bridge from UN sustainability goals into domestic enforcement. No Congressional vote. No debate.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12852
From there it flows to your town. An organization called ICLEI, Local Governments for Sustainability, delivers pre-built sustainability zoning frameworks directly to town planning commissions. They run SDGs Cohorts to align local laws with the UN 2030 Agenda. Your town adopts their templates and doesn't even know where they came from.
https://icleiusa.org/about/
Then the local weapon. In Vermont, 24 V.S.A. 2271 declares junk motor vehicles visible from a highway to be a public nuisance. Period. No proof of pollution. No proof of harm. Just being seen is enough.
https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/24/061/02271
Meanwhile the WEF is openly pushing Extended Producer Responsibility, where manufacturers control a product's entire lifecycle including disposal. Independent yards are labeled the informal sector that needs to be integrated into corporate-controlled, digitally-tracked recycling.
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/12/here-s-why-we-should-be-bullish-on-extended-producer-responsibility/
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/automotive-plastics-circular-asset/
And 11 days ago the EPA announced the Superfund Solutions Initiative. Deploying CERCLA, RCRA, and Brownfields authorities simultaneously to accelerate cleanup orders. Historical soil staining from decades of parked cars can trigger immediate federal action. No long study. Just enforcement.
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-solutions-initiative
The pipeline is right there on paper. UN Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 set the global targets. Executive Order 12852 brought them into federal agencies. EPA Category Six gave them the regulatory hook. ICLEI handed the zoning templates to your town. State nuisance laws made visible cars illegal. And the June 2026 Superfund initiative is accelerating the closures right now.
They don't pass a law saying ban salvage yards. They adjust the zoning definitions and sampling protocols until staying open is legally and financially impossible. Compounding daily fines drain the operator. Administrative consent orders strip their right to a trial. The corporate shell collapses. The owner walks away to escape personal liability. The land gets a remediation lien and its value drops to zero.
When you control the parts supply, you control the people.
Audit your own area. Three searches. Town zoning minutes for the parcel, keywords non-conforming use and aesthetic stabilization. State environmental agency for Notices of Violation against the yard address. Environmental court docket for default judgments. The debt trail is public record.
All sources verified live June 14 2026. Full research file with every receipt and rebuttal to the standard dismissals is at Recepts.md in the same folder.
@shieldofsouls @disclosurehub
You'll own nothing and be happy - Wikipedia | 20 171 |
| 20 | ⚖️ END AI DATA CENTERS
Kevin O'Leary's 40,000-acre Stratos data center in Box Elder County, Utah, will consume up to 9 gigawatts of power—more than double the entire state's usage. Scientists warn dumping this continuous thermal energy into the desert will spike local nighttime temperatures by up to 28°F and daytime by 5°F, creating a severe urban heat island effect that alters the regional climate.
Most people fight mega-projects on the developer’s turf via local meetings, petitions, and $15 administrative objection fees. This is a trap. By handing Stratos to the Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA), the county insulated itself; commissioners openly admit they have "no control" over air or water. Filing complaints inside this closed loop is like protesting to prison guards. It keeps you trapped begging for a discretion they already contracted away.
To get real remedy, look past the illusion of public authority to the corporate reality. MIDA isn't the organic military; it's a business enterprise.
Search Receipt: Utah Code § 63H-1-201
The legislature explicitly defines MIDA as an "independent, nonprofit, separate body corporate and politic" and a "public corporation" that can "sue and be sued" and "enter into contracts."
Search Receipt: Bank of the United States v. Planters' Bank of Georgia, 22 U.S. 904 (1824)
SCOTUS ruled that when a government entity partners with a trading company or enters the marketplace, it divests itself of sovereign character and takes on the status of a private citizen.
Search Receipt: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943)
Confirms that when government agencies engage in commerce, they are governed by the exact same rules that apply to private individuals.
By building a private, speculative AI data center that dumps massive heat into the atmosphere, this public corporation steps out of its regulatory shoes and straight into strict commercial liability.
THE BLUEPRINT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
True action means creating an un-rebutted administrative record targeting the highest levels of liability—specifically the state Attorney General and individual MIDA board members.
1. Frame Harm as Physical Trespass: A 28°F regional temperature spike is a measurable, physical trespass across property lines that destroys land value and agriculture.
2. Issue Notice & Demand: Issue a formal administrative Notice to the AG and MIDA principals. Force them to produce the primary receipts: the explicit nexus proving how a private, speculative AI data center fulfills a constitutional military necessity. The burden of proof rests entirely on them (Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit).
3. Establish Default: If they fail to answer within the designated timeline, their silence is recorded as operational acquiescence (Qui tacet consentire videtur), maturing into an irrevocable Administrative Default.
4. Pierce the Shield: If "military readiness" is exposed as a commercial mask for private profit, it is constructive fraud. Fraud poisons everything retroactively (Fraus omnia corrumpit), making the contracts void from inception (Quod ab initio non valet). The actors lose immunity, exposing their personal commercial bonds to direct collection for the physical damages they caused.
Stop fighting the representation of authority. Target the contract.
- EA ShieldofSouls | 8 302 |
