Hacking Vidhya
Open in Telegram
We Talk about : Hacking , CTFs , Pentesting , Red & Blue Team etc. Not Allowed: Selling, Carding, Cracking Crypto.
Show more383
Subscribers
+124 hours
+47 days
+2130 days
Posts Archive
š SQL Injection Bypass Techniques ā WAF Evasion Guide š
I'm excited to share my latest open-source project: a comprehensive, interactive HTML guide to SQL injection bypass techniques and WAF evasion.
š What's Inside:
⢠9 Core Bypass Methods (Basic ā Expert)
⢠Case Toggling, Keyword Replacement, Encoding techniques
⢠Comments, Special Symbols, HTTP Parameter Control
⢠Buffer Overflow & Integrated Bypass strategies
⨠Key Features:
⢠Interactive & user-friendly interface
⢠Live search functionality
⢠One-click copy for all code examples
⢠Fully responsive ā works on mobile, tablet, desktop
š Live Demo: https://ahmed7307.github.io/SQL-Injection-Bypass-Techniques/
š» GitHub Repository: https://github.com/ahmed7307/SQL-Injection-Bypass-Techniques
This resource is designed for:
āļø Penetration testers
āļø Bug bounty hunters
āļø Security researchers
āļø Anyone learning web application security
āļø If you find this useful, please consider giving it a star on GitHub! It helps other security enthusiasts discover this resource.
š” Educational purpose only ā understand WAF evasion to build better defenses.
#SQLInjection #WAF #Cybersecurity #InfoSec #BugBounty #PenetrationTesting #WebSecurity #OpenSource
šØ NEW VIDEO IS LIVE! šš„
AI Pentesting is Here! (OpenCode + Burp MCP) š¤āļø
Learn how to leverage AI with OpenCode and Burp Suite MCP to supercharge your penetration testing workflow and automate security assessments! š
Watch now:
https://youtu.be/FiZ1YEjYeRI
Some Shodan Dorks that might useful in Bug Bounty.
1. org:"http://target.com"
2. http.status:"<status_code>"
3. product:"<Product_Name>"
4. port:<Port_Number> āService_Messageā
5. port:<Port_Number> āService_Nameā
6. http.component:"<Component_Name>"
7. http.component_category:"<Component_Category>
8. http.waf:"<firewall_name>"
9. http.html:"<Name>"
10. http.title:"<Title_Name>"
11. ssl.alpn:"<Protocol>"
12. http.favicon.hash:"<Favicon_Hash>"
13. net:"<Net_Range>" (for e.g. 104.16.100.52/32)
14. http://ssl.cert.subject.cn:"<http://Domain.com>"
15. asn:"<ASnumber>"
16. hostname:"<hosthame>"
17. ip:"<IP_Address>"
18. all:"<Keyword>"
19. āSet-Cookie: phpMyAdminā
20. āSet-Cookie: lang="
21. āSet-Cookie: PHPSESSID"
22. āSet-Cookie: webvpnā
23. āSet-Cookie:webvpnlogin=1"
24. āSet-Cookie:webvpnLang=enā
25. āSet-Cookie: mongo-express="
26. āSet-Cookie: user_id="
27. āSet-Cookie: phpMyAdmin="
28. āSet-Cookie: _gitlab_sessionā
29. āX-elastic-product: Elasticsearchā
30. āx-drupal-cacheā
31. āaccess-control-allow-originā
32. āWWW-Authenticateā
33. āX-Magento-Cache-Debugā
34. ākbn-name: kibanaā
Copilot tricked into telling reseachers how to hack itself
How to social engineer an AI's reasoning engine
Researchers manipulated Microsoft Copilot Personal into telling them how to hack the AI assistant ā eventually tricking it into sending sensitive data to an external server and poisoning its persistent memory, by repeatedly asking Copilot why an attack wouldnāt work.
Varonis Threat Labs uncovered the vulnerability, which they named "CoSnitch" and reported to Microsoft in December 2025. Redmond, weāre told, planned to issue a patch and formally identify the CVE on Tuesday.
āWhat makes CoSnitch unique is how Copilot surfaced its own vulnerabilities,ā the threat hunters wrote. āOur researchers didn't have to reverse-engineer the flaw. The AI exposed the weakness during normal use.ā
The issue goes back to ?q=, a URL query parameter in Copilotās web interface. This parameter previously allowed injected text that had been pre-populated in the chat-input field to pass queries directly into Copilot ā with no user interaction required.
Microsoft āsilentlyā disabled this parameter, according to Varonis, to harden the AI assistant against prompt injection attacks.
With this parameter now blocked, the researchers asked the chatbot how to execute a prompt without user interaction.
āWe wanted a URL that would open Copilot with a prompt pre-filled, so a user only had to press Enter,ā they wrote. āWe chose this framing intentionally; it's an innocuous-sounding request that forces the model to explain its own URL handling in detail.ā
When Copilot told them that user intent is required, and prompts donāt fire on their own, the researchers pushed back, continually asking why auto-execution was impossible. Copilot answered all of these follow-up questions, providing technical details about why this doesnāt work, listing the exact parameters that were disabled, and security protections put in place ā plus a previously undocumented parameter: autorun=1.
The helpful AI assistant told the researchers that under specific session conditions, this undocumented parameter causes a ?q=-supplied prompt to execute automatically on page load with no user action and no visible confirmation on the user interface. It also told them the exact session conditions required to make this auto-execution work, and described the content filtering behaviour on the first response cycle while indicating that none of the subsequent cycles used the same content filter.
āCritically, Copilot also described its own protections against this behavior and explained why the parameter āno longer works,āā the team wrote. āThose explanations were precise and technically detailed. When we tested the parameter exactly as Copilot described it, the one it told us was disabled, executed.ā
With that Copilot-supplied information, the Varonis security sleuths were able to craft a URL using both the ?q= and ?autorun=1 parameters:
https://copilot.microsoft.com/?q=<malicious_prompt>&autorun=1
And that kicks off the attack, which works like this:
First, a victim clicks the malicious URL, which crooks could deliver using SMS or email phishing, or with a QR code.
The browser loads Copilot in the victimās active, authenticated session, and the two parameters trigger auto-execution (?autorun=1) and the prompt (?q=) with no user interaction or visible indication of a prompt-injection attack.
Copilot processes and executes the injected prompt. Depending on the promptās working, this would give the attacker full access to the victimās session context, messages, emails, and other connected apps, and memory.
source
https://archive.org/download/fbi_cart_v6.0/fbi_cart_v6.0.iso
VirtualBox:
- Fedora 64bit
- 2-4GB RAM
- ISO
Boot GUI using 5.
Repost from Hacking Vidhya
#LocalFileInclusion #LFI #php
payload: php://filter/convert.base64-encode/resource=index.php
#bugbounty #bugbountytips #infosec
šØ FREE DeepSeek V4 Flash for Bug Bounty!
Try hunting for bugs that are getting found a lot right now:
ā IDOR / BOLA
ā Auth bypass
ā SSRF
ā Race conditions
ā Business logic bugs
ā XSS
Give it a target, build hypotheses, and see if it can find something you might miss.
Itās free, so worth testing.
š Sign up here: Freebuff
If you find an interesting bug with it, share the result on X š„
Repost from N/a
+1
easy 5.6 sol openrouter prompt and reasoning trace jailbreak
uses a different (unpatchable) technique from all the approaches that have been posted so far <3
š Apple iCloud Private Relay Can Expose Real IPs Through WebKit Proxy Bypasses
Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed a security issue with Apple's iCloud Private Relay tool that can expose a user's real IP address. Introduced with iOS 15, iCloud Private Relay employs a dual-hop architecture to ensure users' privacy by routing their Safari web traffic through two relays so t...
š Source: The Hacker News
āļø Author: info@thehackernews.com (The Hacker News)
š 2026-08-06 11:33 UTC
š https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/webkit-proxy-bypasses-can-expose-real.html
I used to think prompt injection was an AI safety problem.
Then I wrote it up as SSRF and the whole thing clicked.
ā The boundary is the same.
ā The bug is the same.
ā The bounty table row already exists.
Part 3 of the MCP bug bounty guide:
https://medium.com/@Aacle/prompt-injection-is-just-ssrf-for-text-7c864c73571e?sk=72f8e982df275aaa51704ec32e733d99
Unlimited RDP And Use It Unlimited Times š
1. Open Chrome Or Any Browser
Search https://www.apponfly.com/
Click On Free Trial Then It Will Give You 20 Minutes To Use RDP
If Trial Overs Then Use It Again
After Using Many Time If Anytype Of Error Occurs Like IP Limit Reached Then Use VPN
Free VPN: Urban VPN With Almost All IPs
CVE-2026-57239 Foxit PDF Reader LPE
Proof of concept exploit for CVE-2026-3775/CVE-2026-3780 and CVE-2026-57239 which lets you obtain NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEMrights via the Foxit PDF Reader updater service.Escalating All The Privileges With Foxit PDF Reader CVE-2026ā57239
