Primal Literature

The lack of worth of the flu vaccine is shown in a nutshell. First Vaccinations were given in World War 2, but the number of vaccinations rise significantly in 1990.

The graphs below are based on official death toll figures recorded in the Central Yearbook of the Commonwealth of Australia and are taken from Greg Beattie's book "The Vaccination Parent's Dilemma." The graphs represent the decline in infectious disease deaths in Australia and clearly show that vaccination has nothing to do with the decline mortality. The leading causes of child death in Australia between 1911 and 1935 were diphtheria, whooping cough, scarlet fever and measles. By 1945, in which mass vaccination programs had not yet been introduced, the combined mortality from these causes had dropped by as much as 95%. The author goes on to state that graphic evidence of the decline in mortality from infectious diseases in the USA, England, New Zealand and many other countries shows exactly the same trend. For both disseases we vaccinate for, and disseases we dont vaccinate for.

1. Look at typhoid a scarlet fewer, which's mortalities dropped despite no widespread vaccination for them. 2. More detail on Measles in US. 3. England and Wales, no vaccination for Scarlet Fewer, and it dropped, vaccines for other disseases came when there was basically nothing to vaccinate form. 4/5. More detail for England and Wales, no contribution concievable.

Attached to this post, there are images of graphs showcasing decreasing mortality of various infectious diseases from several different countries, and when was the vaccine for such dissease implemented Most of the time, it was implemented After the mortality was reduced drastically. Top right in every image, you can see the sources from which the data were taken.

Vaccines 2: Dr. Exley looked into brains of autistic people, and they were full of aluminium, which the body dumps into the brain through lympathic system when it recieves aluminum (in form of vaccine): https://youtu.be/lvIwnKK2k9Y https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32385326/ Couple that with Thomas Burbacher study that shown that mercury from vaccines goes to the brain tissue as well. Mortality from infectious disseases was drastically lowering with modernisation of our lives decades before vaccinations were implemented, and vaccines did not contribute to the decrease: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/413067/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9892452/#:~:text=Results%3A%20Infectious%20disease%20mortality%20declined,deaths%20per%20100000%20in%201996. 1 in 1750 children injected with DTP jab may experience adverse effects: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12345538/ While one in millions might die from whooping cough, making it statistically unreasonable to undergo such treatment. A Slovak study pointing out that there is no proof for vaccines working to give us a collective immunity: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://rizikaockovania.sk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kolektivna_imunita-myty_a_fakty.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjCk-3N-c2KAxU1hf0HHRgWOmgQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0B1mjPLVb_ZI_--K4Yv9rC The study reached a conclusion, that if the vaccination works, the vaccinated individuals have nothing to fear from the unvaccinated, and if it does not work reliably, it is not permissible to force anyone to do it.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=895932010819650&set=a.108744009538458&type=3&theater When asking your doctor for vaccine ingredients of vaccine for your child, the ingredients will be similar. There is no dispute that Vaccines contain Thimerasol (mercury) "Shot in th Dark", the linked documentary contains more sources.

• 188 µg of potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer) • 260 µg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) • 70 µg sodium borate (borax) • 54.1 µg sodium chloride (table salt) • Unknown amount of sodium citrate (food additive) • Unknown amount of sodium hydroxide (dangerous) • 2.8 µg sodium phosphate (toxic for any body) • Unknown amount of sodium phosphate monohydrate (toxic to any body) • 32 µg sorbitol (additive - not necessary) • 0.6 µg streptomycin (antibiotic) • More than 40 µg sucrose (cane sugar) • 35 µg protein from yeast (yeast) • 5 µg urea (metabolic waste from human urine) • Other chemical waste

What do children recieve in the form of vaccines before the age of 6? • 17.5 µg phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) • 5.7 µg aluminum (nerve toxin) • Unknown amount of fetal bovine serum (aborted bovine blood) • 801.6 µg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent) • 23.25 µg gelatin (ground animal bodies) • 500 µg of human albumin (human blood) • 760 µg sodium L-glutamate (obesity and diabetes) • unknown amount of MRC-5 cells (aborted human embryos) • More than 10 µg of neomycin (antibiotic) • More than 0.075 µg polymyxin B (antibiotic) • More than 560 µg of polysorbate 80 (carcinogen) • 116 µg of potassium chloride (lethal injection)

Global Warming: In 1540, it didn't rain for 11 months, the temperature was 7 degrees above average, lot of rivers and lakes dried out, and half a million people died. All of that, without millions of cars and coal factories affecting the climate like today. It seems like human activity might not be the driver of such changes. After all of this, Earth was able to go back to normal. Supposedly, we can find remnants of tropical fauna in the Arctic, hinting that Arctic didn't use to be frozen in the first place. Carbon makes up about 0,4% of the atmosphere, and a volcano eruption releases more of it than years of worldvide human activity. Carbon is denser than air (it goes down), and dissolves in water, therefore most of it is in the Oceans, and can't cause any greenhouse effect. Methan from cows farting is about 0.00002% of the atmosphere, and is created by natural processes, if cows didn't fart, it would be created by the grass smoldering anyway. Again, plenty of it comes from the Ocean. If you look at New York's statue of liberty, you can observe that the sea level didn't rise a bit for tens of years. Global Warming is a Trojan Horse for taxes.

No way. Bacteria present in fermented raw milk degrade and decrease the content of BPA (a plastic endocrine disruptor) in your blood: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0023643819301124#:~:text=Lactobacillus%20reuteri%20has%20a%20significant,degradation%20products%20of%20Lactobacillus%20reuteri.

Love: In Eric Dubay's Spiritual Sciene, 2 studies which I am TOO LAZY to find right now, one in Kirlian Photography, other in I believe PSY Science, showed -light emited by couples in love radiated way stronger than individual lights, and merged -Light emited by couples not in love sort of rejected each other -If one set his intention, he could influence a computer generating 2 kinds of results, to generate more of certain results, just by willing it to. -Couples in love doing the same experiment, increased the amount of certain results generated 12 fold - 6 times fold for each of them. That one blows my mind. Studies showing that people with plenty of love live longer: https://ccare.stanford.edu/psychology-today/the-best-kept-secret-to-longevity-love/ I am not going to look about studies showing that having higher oxytocin in blood reduces stress hormones and having lot of love makes you more relaxed and less stressed in life. Because, DUH, OBVIOUSLY. I am instead going to point out, that vast majority of divorces ever, happened only to people, who haven't hugged their partner while telling them they love them and asking them what can they do for them to make them happier every day they were together. I do not understand, how can people be in relationships, without constantly hugging, cuddling with, caressing nor expressing affection to their partner. The more you will do theese things, the happier your lives will be. Oxytocin, the hormone of love literally makes you feel good. Increase in oxytocin - increase in feeling good, joy, happiness, the feeling of love. There is no downside to oxytocin, it just makes you feel happy, and the more you have of it, the more you will be happy. Increasing it, is like increasing happiness, and it's free and limitless, just like the sun. If you have a partner, then maximising bonding activities with that partner, to maximise the amount of oxytocin you produce makes you both happier, for free. There is no reason to not completely take advantage of this free source of happines, besides laziness and lack of love towards your partner. Hug, and express affection with your partner every day. Not doing so, is exactly like not going into the sun every day. Love against pain. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5545613/

Coffee: Caffeine is an insecticide the plant has to kill bugs trying to eat it, the energy you get is a stressfull adrenaline rush of your body getting shocked from being poisioned. Coffee doesn't make you stoobeing tired, it blocks your brain receptors that monitor how tired you are, but your body remains just as tired as before, you are just better at ignoring it. https://www.google.com/amp/s/laidbackgardener.blog/2017/11/29/caffeine-a-powerful-organic-insecticide/%3famp=1 Coffee makes you sh*t faster and more, presumably because your body is trying ti get rid of it. How caffeine works: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1356551/#:~:text=Caffeine%20increases%20energy%20metabolism%20throughout,inducing%20a%20relative%20brain%20hypoperfusion. Coffee has acrylamides in it: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24325083/ Acrylamides are neurotoxic: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35216144/#:~:text=Acrylamide%20(ACR)%20is%20a%20chemical,connection%20with%20the%20cholinergic%20system. They are toxic for your reproductive system as well https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10825678/ Coffee has a molecule in it, that antagonises receptors that make you manage pain = it makes you manage pain worse, anti morphine effects, worse pain: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15088081/#:~:text=4%2DCaffeoyl%2D1%2C5,effects%20of%20morphine%20in%20mice https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6296693/ Ingesting coffee raises your blood pressure, and this doesn't go away, it happens every time you drink it to most of people: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14967827/ Coffee increases rate of bone loss: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916523063906#:~:text=Intakes%20of%20caffeine%20in%20amounts,effect%20of%20caffeine%20on%20bone. IT'S A DRUG PEOPLE DRINK IT BECAUSE THEY ARE ADDICTED

Same conclusion as previous review, but not only on theese nutrient's effects of reversing hairloss, but on premature hair graying as well: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6380979/ Supplementation of many nutrients, predominantly found in animal helps to reverse hairloss: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37357646/ Increasing hairloss patient's who are deficient zinc serum levels in theblood helps to reverse hairloss https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20523772/ Hairloss is caused by toxicity detoxing through the scalp, and you can ibserve it getting worse when yiu drink alcohol and eat toxic things. Putiting coconut oil and raw eggs in your hair and scalp as shampoos help to absorb the toxicity and nourish your hair follicles. The healthier you are, the less hairloss you will have.

Hairloss 2: Possible side effects of taking anti-hairloss, DHT lowering medication: (In attached image) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32317131/ Zinc helps reverse hairloss: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7277952/ L-Carnatine, in meat found amino acid helps hair growth https://www.jdsjournal.com/article/S0923-1811(07)00248-4/abstract#:~:text=Recently%2C%20we%20have%20shown%20that,scalp%20hair%20follicles%20%5B4%5D. Zinc and L-carnatine supplementation helps to reverse hairloss: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337578174_The_Effect_of_a_Food_Supplement_and_a_Hair_Lotion_on_the_Progression_of_Androgenetic_Alopecia ,,Vitamin B, vitamin D, iron, and zinc appear to play critical roles in hair growth and maintenance. Deficiencies in these micronutrients have been associated with increased risk of AGA, while supplementation with these nutrients has shown potential benefits in improving hair growth and preventing hair loss" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39440586/

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/pornography-and-adolescents-studies/adolescent-pornography-use-a-systematic-literature-review-of-research-trends-2000-2017-2018/ Effects of Pornography on Marriage and the Family: A Review of the Research: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10720160600870711 Summary of the paper: Impact on Individuals Pornography’s effect on individuals is the most researched area related to impact. The following effects are viewed as having the most bearing on marital and family relationships: 1. Distorted perceptions and beliefs about relationships and sexuality. 2. Devaluation of marriage, monogamy, and child rearing. 3. Increased aggression and the trivialization of criminal behavior (e.g., rape). 4. Increased risk for sexual deviancy, sexual perpetration, experiencing negative intimate relationships, and accepting rape myths (e.g., be- lieving rape isn’t a serious crime or assigning responsibility to the victim). Impact on Marital Relationships The following effects of Internet pornography consumption are viewed as having the most bearing on marital relationships: 1. Internet pornography consumption threatens the economic, emotional, and relational stability of marriages and families. 2. Qualitative and quantitative research shows that pornography consump- tion, including cybersex, is significantly associated with decreased sexual satisfaction and sexual intimacy in couples. 3. Men and women perceive online sexual activity as an act of betrayal that is as authentic and real as offline infidelity. 4. In light of the social science data regarding healthy, stable marriages, In- ternet pornography consumption in a growing number of relationships may be considered incompatible with the characteristics of stable, healthy marriages; a relationship that benefits the social good. Indirect Impact on Children and Adolescents The following effects are considered to have the most impact on children who live in a home where pornography use occurs: 1. Internet pornography consumption by a parent threatens a child’s well- being by undermining the stability of the marital and family relationships, and increasing the child’s risk of exposure to sexually explicit content and/or behavior. 2. The disclosure or discovery of problematic sexual behavior often necessi- tates the need for sexual dialogue prior to the parent and/or child being ready. Direct Impact on Children and Adolescents The following effect are considered to have the most impact on children and adolescents who use or encounter pornography themselves: 1. In spite of the illegalities, youth have easy access to pornographic material and this can have traumatic, distorting, abusive, and/or addictive effects. 2. Youth are commonly being solicited, tricked, misled, or “mouse trapped” into viewing sexually explicit content online. 3. Research shows that exposure to pornography can make a lasting impres- sion in young people and that this impression is most often described using emotions such as disgust, shock, embarrassment, anger, fear, and sadness. 4. The consumption of Internet pornography and/or involvement in sexu- alized chat can harm the social and sexual development of youth and undermine their success in future relationships. 5. Pornography consumption in youth has been associated with earlier onset of sexual intercourse, as well as increased likelihood of engaging in anal sex and sexual relations with people they are not romantically engaged with How to spot biased articles: They cite Prause et al., 2015 (falsely claiming it explains porn addiction) while omitting 50 neurological studies supporting porn to be addictive: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/brain-studies-on-porn-users-sex-addicts/how-to-recognize-biased-articles-they-cite-prause-et-al-2015-falsely-claiming-it-debunks-porn-addiction-while-omitting-over-3-dozen-neurological-studies-supporting-porn-addiction/

Harm of Pornography: Last post talked about how losing semen is making you weaker, even without consuming pornography. If anyone here keeps consuming pornography, because he is falsely convincing himself he can handle it with a nutrient dense diet that makes him very fertile, this post will put and end to it. Every single link will contain list of studies with name of the study, direct link to it, and excerpts from each one. If I was to post each study and meta analysis of harm that pornography causes manually, there would be more studies about porn in my channel than all other topics combined. Studies debunk claims that sex and porn addicts 'only have high sex drive: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/studies-falsify-the-claim-that-sex-porn-addicts-just-have-high-sexual-desire/ 60+ Neurological studies proving pornography to be addictive like other drugs, by imaging the brain under a MRI scan: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/brain-studies-on-porn-users-sex-addicts/#brain 50+ studies estabilishing pornography's addictive nature performed through other means than MRI scans: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/brain-studies-on-porn-users-sex-addicts/#brain 130 Studies Linking Porn Use or Sex/Sex Addiction to Sexual Dysfunctions and Poorer Sex and Relationship Satisfaction: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/studies-linking-porn-use-or-porn-sex-addiction-to-sexual-dysfunctions-and-poorer-sexual-and-relationship-satisfaction/ 60 Studies reporting findings consistent with escalation of porn use (tolerance), habituation to porn, and withdrawal symptoms: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/studies-find-escalation-and-habituation-in-porn-users-tolerance/ Studies Reporting Withdrawal Symptoms (only withdrawal, unlike the previous) in Porn Users: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/studies-reporting-withdrawal-symptoms-in-porn-users/ Studies showing pornography use or Internet use "cause" negative effects or neurological changes: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/internet-video-game-addiction/studies-demonstrating-porn-use-or-internet-use-causing-negative-effects-or-neurological-changes/ Pornography harms female users too: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/porn-use-studies-involving-female-subjects-effects-on-arousal-sexual-satisfaction-and-relationships/ Studies linking pornography use to poorer mental-emotional health and poorer cognitive outcomes: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/studies-linking-porn-use-to-poorer-mental-emotional-health-poorer-cognitive-outcomes/ Study links pornography to 'non-egalitarian attitudes' towards women: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/porn-use-sex-addiction-studies/studies-linking-porn-use-to-un-egalitarian-attitudes-toward-women/ A Meta-Analysis of several studies showing Pornography Consumption to be correlated with Acts of Sexual Aggression: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcom.12201 Studies linking porn use to sexual offending, sexual aggression and sexual coercion: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cs/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/studies-linking-porn-use-to-sexual-offending-sexual-aggression-and-sexual-coercion/ Studies about Pornography's effects on Adolescents: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/pornography-and-adolescents-studies/

Melatonin is produced by Mitochondria of all your cells: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8621753/#:~:text=Melatonin%20is%20synthesized%20in%20the,glucose%20metabolism%20in%20all%20cells. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024320522003125#:~:text=Melatonin%20is%20synthesized%20in%20mitochondria,mitochondrial%20transfer%20through%20tunneling%20nanotubes. Just wanted to throw this out there Melatonin makes you stronger, and makes you recover and afapt to exercise better: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.803126/full https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722591/ Body releases Melatonin in the blood for a brief period after exercise: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7240379/

Red Light Theraphy: Remember that red light is present in the sun for free. Infrared light, more gains, meta analysis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5167494/ Infraredlight, better eyesight; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02311-1 Infrared light, better skin: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4126803/ https://bit.ly/3viUlJW Red light (present in sunlight) reduces blood sugar; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38378043/ Red light increases alertness and performance: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166432814005294 Red light aids in reversing hairloss: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8577899/ Red light reduces blood sugar 2: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbio.202300521#:~:text=This%20study%20has%20shown%20that,2%20consistent%20with%20elevated%20respiration. Red light shun to eyes improves vision: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2021/nov/morning-exposure-deep-red-light-improves-declining-eyesight Bees that recieved red light therapy were able to survive deadly pesticides better than bees who didn't: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2016/nov/light-therapy-could-save-bees-deadly-pesticides Red light therapy is good against Parkinson's dissease: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26456231/