Jimeone Roberts

I don't agree with everything in this post, nevertheless I shared it because it's a perspective worth considering. My position on this is more aligned with that of Schmitt, as I discussed in my Why Nationalism Needs National Socialism essay. My position is that due to the inherent contradiction between liberalism and the notion of popular sovereignty, liberalism was inevitably going to turn against nationalism and that the only way to actually protect popular sovereignty is with an illiberal form of nationalism. Unlike Mike from Imperium Press, I actually support the concept of popular sovereignty - I just don't think it can be achieved through parliamentarianism or constitutions, but requires an authoritarian form of government. Hence why I am a National Socialist.

The regime uses the term "democracy" in a confusing way—they categorically reject majoritarianism which is what most people think of when they think "democracy". But what they actually mean is protection of minorities from the majority. This is what they call "liberal" democracy, and it opens up a space for "illiberal" democracy, AKA "populism", which doesn't care about minorities. This is how they differentiate populism from democracy. This all sounds really stupid; it sounds like just a way to say that democracy isn't the will of the majority, but this is actually quite traditional. In fact, it goes back to "enlightenment" classical liberalism. Understanding this is essential for establishing a dissident minimum which requires that we reject liberalism (yes, including classical liberalism) in order to meaningfully dissent against a system that is destroying our folk. Early liberals were extremely concerned about the "tyranny of the majority". Montesquieu, Madison, and Mill all emphasized the need for institutional checks—like upper houses, courts, and property qualifications—to prevent majorities from governing minorities. Except in their case it was a class minority instead of an ethnic minority. But classical liberalism methodologically recognizes only the individual abstracted away from all context, so it was inevitable that the minority thus protected would eventually come to include the ethnic minority. Federalist No. 10 (James Madison) explicitly discusses how factions, especially majority factions, must be controlled to protect "the rights of property"—i.e., the minority. Countless other primary sources can be cited supporting this fact: classical liberalism favours the minority. In colonial America, Jews and Protestants were protected in Catholic states and Jews and Catholics were protected in Protestant states, all in the name of protecting individual rights over collective rights. "Liberal" "democracy" is the worst of both worlds. It marries the minoritarianism of liberal philosophy to the retarded fever dreams of democracy, such as popular sovereignty, consensual governance, rule of law, etc. Either one is a threat to ethnic solidarity, but the two together are fatal to it. Minoritarianism is at the heart of classical liberalism, to say nothing of modern liberalism. If you want to protect majorities—especially ethnic majorities—rejecting liberalism of any kind whatsoever is an absolute minimum.

The Banner High An Australian National Socialist anthem sung to the tune of Horst Wessel Lied. Australia for the White man! The rest must go!

Civilians: >Rude >Entitled as f >Oblivious to the possibility of consequences >Female-centric and simps (women are always right) VS Violent criminal: >Polite >Accomodating >Offers reasonable solutions >Refuses to concede to women; thinks simping is gay This is where we’re at, as a society

The Banner High An Australian National Socialist anthem sung to the tune of Horst Wessel Lied. Australia for the White man! The rest must go!

“Despite ‘hate-speech’ laws being rushed through under a false pretence, without knowledge or consent of the public, they will not be repealed because reasons.” –NSW Premier Chris Minns. https://t.me/NoticerNews/1365

Disturbing scenes at a Labor event in Box Hill, Melbourne, tonight where White Australian ticket holders were refused entry while Chinese attendees were let in. https://www.noticer.news/melbourne-labor-event-box-hill-chinese/ Follow: @NoticerNews

Matt Trihey and members of the National Workers Alliance showed up and crashed the Labor Party's "Chinese Town Hall" event at Box Hill last night. Solid work! White Australians who had tickets were denied entry, all tickets booked on the English-speaking internet were cancelled and only tickets booked on the Chinese 'WeChat' app were considered valid. Blatant racial discrimination against Whites by the ruling party of our country, a party that was founded to represent the White Australian worker but now represents literally everyone BUT the White Australian worker. Blatant example of how multiculturalism only represents you if you aren't White.

Follow my new uncensored channel. Let's see how long it stays uncensored https://t.me/+Rscm00tFI21jNWE1

The survival of White Australia is on the line

"Like the intense fire that transforms iron into steel, as we remain faithful during the fiery trial of our faith, we are spiritually refined and strengthened."

Another Roberts W.

NSW MP Rod Roberts says he was sceptical of the implication that graffiti incidents were acts of antisemitism because the offenders “couldn’t spell Israel” and “sprayed swastika back-to-front.” He did the meme. I can’t believe it.

This is a terrible report and raises more questions than it answers, such as: >Why were criminals under the impression they could have existing charges & sentences dropped, if they staged anti-Semitic attacks around the country? Where were they getting these ideas & assurances? >Why have the ‘foreign actors’ who according to earlier reports paid these criminals to stage the attacks been omitted from the story? >Why wasn’t Chris Minns challenged by journalists, about rushing ahead to declare the caravan hoax ‘a mass casualty event’ and shilling more hate-speech laws? >How exactly have Australian laws been changed in response to this hoax and what is being done to repeal those changes?

If you’re late to the party, this is huge news in Australia. Last month, radical new ‘hate-speech’ laws were rushed through parliament amidst claims of an ‘anti-Semitic crisis’. But Federal Police & ASIO recently confirmed that local meth-heads were paid by ‘foreign actors’ to stage anti-Semitic crimes throughout the country. The crimes include a fire in a synagogue, criminal damage, graffiti and a conveniently discovered caravan full of explosives. It’s not clear if some or all of the crimes were staged, but none of them seem legit. But this didn’t stop NSW Premier Chris Minns seizing on the opportunity to mess with Australian law, further cracking down on freedom of expression. The government also announced a ‘special taskforce to combat anti-Semitism’ in response to the fake crimes. In my opinion, it’s likely Minns (and other MPs) knowingly and deliberately played a part in this process. Minns should resign immediately pending an investigation into what amounts to straight up fucking treason.

Part of White Australia's Victorian chapter travelled to test their endurance with a 13km pack march, climbing 500m elevation in the mid day sun. Rewarded by a trip to a waterfall and time away from the discomforts of multicultural urban life, we continue to push our limits and capabilities while forging stronger bonds along the way. 📍Kinglake National Park, Victoria⚡️ 📱 Follow |  📱 Follow  | Gab  💬GET INVOLVED:   @WhiteAusBot