Zac ~ Power of the Pulse

Are you familiar with the 'Graphene Gurus'? There aren't many, but one or two have a semi-large following. Anything they look at, has to be about graphene. They insist that everything under the sun is graphenated, forgetting the hundreds of other nanomaterials that are part of the nanotech assault. https://t.me/powerofthepulse/301 Here's a real life transcript of a conversation with a Graphene Guru: 👋 "Hi, how are you?" 😓 "Bad!" 😯 "Oh no, why?" 😭 "Graphene!!" 😀 "Do you like vitamin C?" 😐 "NO, it will activate graphene?" 🤔 "Magnesium is an important mineral in the body" 😱 "NO, it's bad for you, it causes graphene nanotubes to form in you." 😮 "5G is pretty nasty" 😔 "It's graphene!" 🧐 "The proteins our body uses are made up of amino acids" 😩 "Amino acids like L-arginine form electro chemical sensors with graphene" 🤔 "Sir, would you like some Herbal Elderberry tea?" 😡 "NO, it will cause you to become a graphene cyborg." 😌 "Umm, I love our bodys naturally produced anti-oxidant: glutathione (important for maintaining cellular balance)" 🤪 "NO, it activates graphene." 🤯 "Do you breathe?" 😱 "NO I DON'T, breathing air ACTIVATES GRAPHENE!!!!" Of course upon a closer look, their whole understanding of the nanotech assault clearly has massive holes in it 🧐 Today I saw a discussion regarding borax & graphene. Again the out-of-touch Graphene Guru claims borax 'enhances graphene assembly' https://t.me/Borax4Healing/703 People have tried this trick with me in the past. You need to be able to examine the scientific experiment, and understand the chemistry. Upon further examining the experiment they use to 'prove' this, you find it refers to a process where the composition of graphene is altered at ridiculously high temperatures. Nothing to do with borax enhancing graphene. This is why understanding 'science' is so important. Learn to recognise BS when you see it 🧐👀 https://t.me/powerofthepulse

And please stop talking about lipids being robots. There certainly is a programmable element, but at the end of that day: Lipid = fat. You scared of olive oil and butter? https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Mainstream narrative: Lipid nanoparticle used for delivery of mRNA -> resulting in the cells of your body producing 'Spike protein' Results: Some people dead. Sick. Suffering. Heart attack. Emitting an empty Bluetooth network signal Something isn't adding up here. https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Methylene Blue used to build CONVID Biosensors https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925400522008590 The entire paper is riddled with extremely concerning statements. Funny coincidence isn't it 🤪 No further comments today https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Methylene Blue used to build CONVID Biosensors https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925400522008590 The entire paper is riddled with extremely concerning statements. Funny coincidence isn't it 🤪 No further comments today https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Determining Assembly or Agglomeration Saying that something is nasty is easy. ➡️ Look at some foreign structures... and say "no thanks, I don't want that in my blood" But to determine whether something has been programmed to intentionally assemble or not... you first need to identify what the material is. This is the part that freedom researchers conveniently skip. Usually they cite the elusive 'spike protein', graphene, or entirely re-invent terminology and come up with some trendy and appropriately terrifying word that sounds good. Determining what actually makes up the thing you're looking at requires extremely expensive equipment. You then need to observe what the structure does, how it acts, how it reacts etc This has to be done to assess the structure. Say a material assembles, dis-assembles, and re-assembles. Is this change triggered somehow? Environmentally? Does this change have a functional utility? Does this material do that naturally? And if it does, how could that be used to perform certain functions? But let's say a material just forms these structures naturally. The fact that it is in the injectable means that they KNOW it's in there, meaning they KNOW what it will do in your body. ➡️ So even if these materials technically don't programmatically self-assemble, everything in these vials has been placed there for a reason. And it's probably not a nice reason. https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Determining Assembly or Agglomeration Saying that something is nasty is easy. ➡️ Look at some foreign structures... and say "no thanks, I don't want that in my blood" But to determine whether something has been programmed to intentionally assemble or not... you first need to identify what the material is. This is the part that freedom researchers conveniently skip. Usually they cite the elusive 'spike protein', graphene, or entirely re-invent terminology and come up with some trendy and appropriately terrifying word that sounds good. Determining what actually makes up the thing you're looking at requires extremely expensive equipment. You then need to observe what the structure does, how it acts, how it reacts etc This has to be done to assess the structure. Say a material assembles, dis-assembles, and re-assembles. Is this change triggered somehow? Environmentally? Does this change have a functional utility? Does this material do that naturally? And if it does, how could that be used to perform certain functions? But let's say a material just forms these structures naturally. The fact that it is in the injectable means that they KNOW it's in there, meaning they KNOW what it will do in your body. ➡️ So even if these materials technically don't programmatically self-assemble, everything in these vials has been placed there for a reason. And it's probably not a nice reason. https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Industry Terminology within Nanosciences Self assembly specifically refers to directed, or 'programmed' assembly of components. When nanoparticles are attracted to eachother and bind together without performing a specific function, this is known as agglomeration Nano agglomeration is a 'natural' process, and one of the many reasons nanomaterials are toxic Programmatic self-assembly exploits these natural processes for programmed functions. Example: "Instead of some gold nano & carbon nano haphazardly agglomerating, what if we can program the assembly to form in a controllable and repeatable way into a metamaterial with special properties we can exploit in electronic equipment or a new biosensor" A programmed function is simply making the particles assemble for a functional reason Funny how some of the biggest names in the game don't seem to know this 🤔 https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Over a decade ago... Big pharma realised something - "Oh no, some people are leaving our system" Even 1% of people leaving a multi-trillion dollar industry is A LOT of money So what did they do? They bought out the health-food & supplement industry Why? Well, if they can't profit from poisoning you through the doctor... They will make sure they profit from poisoning you through the natural 'alternative' doctor Most people don't comprehend how hijacked their supplements are. Just look at the extra ingredients, fillers and colors https://t.me/powerofthepulse

It's like asking if limestone really contains calcium... limestone is a calcium carbonate

People keep asking me - "Is Zeolite really sourced from aluminium?" "I didn't know Zeolite has aluminium in it" "Is there any Zeolite without aluminium?" Zeolite is an aluminium silicate. Zeolite isn't sourced from aluminium, it doesn't just contain aluminium, IT IS aluminium I genuinely want to know: how can I make this clearer and easier to understand? Literally just google "chemical composition of zeolite" or "chemical composition of clinoptilolite" It's not secret information. It's just like asking if Epsom salts contains magnesium. It is a form of magnesium (magnesium sulphate) Epsom Salts is just a name. So is Zeolite, and Clinoptilolite. https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Ignore the Trends ~ Focus on what works https://independz.podbean.com/e/the-nicotine-naivety/

Nanotech Effects on The Brain & Nervous System ~ Pt 7 One of the most dangerous nanoparticles, although lesser used, is nano copper. Many are fooled into using nano copper in: * supplements * wound care * plant products => Crosses blood brain barrier => Damages blood brain barrier => Causes neuronal degeneration => Causes swelling in important nerve cells => Disrupts voltage gates in the brain => Destroys the 'garbage-cleaners' of the brain Sure, use copper supplementation, just make sure the particle size is not nano. https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Pay close attention Aluminium Hydroxide in injections! Used as an adjuvant. Conclusion? Toxic! BAD!!! 🛑 Aluminium Silicate (also known as Zeolite) used in injections. Used as an adjuvant. Conclusion? IT'S A DETOX SUPPLEMENT BUY YOUR DETOX SUPPLEMENT NOW. LINK IN BIO 5% OFF WITH SPECIAL DISCOUNT CODE. 🥳 🤑 HURRY DON'T MISS OUT Do you understand? https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Been distilling water for the last decade. This is the first time in 10 years the distiller foams when cleaned with vinegar. What are they putting in our water? https://t.me/powerofthepulse

Sunscreen, using Zinc, petrochemicals and iron Notice how they don't specify that the Zinc isn't nano Bonus tip: Notice how it says "Iron oxides" Plural This is a combination of 3 irons. One of which is nano-sized. Insanely toxic! https://t.me/powerofthepulse

The dualities & conflicts in this poll are worth noting. Being under a Social Credit System won't matter if you're dead from a nano product causing you cancer. On the other hand, even if your life expectancy is only another 10 years, you certainly don't want to live those years in a digital slavery system. Finally, have you considered the connections between 'Quax Shedding 💉' & 'Social Credit System'? https://t.me/powerofthepulse https://rumble.com/playlists/PsuoLo0xJ_g

Nanotech Effects on The Brain & Nervous System ~ Pt 6 Nano Zinc As discussed many times, while regular-size Zinc is wonderful, nano-Zinc becomes extremely toxic. Used in: SPF makeup, sunscreen, dietary supplements, paints, food production equipment and occasionally food packaging. => causes mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death in neural cells => damage may be delayed to hours or days after ingestion or absorption => causes inflammation in the brain, particularly in the memory centers of the brain => disrupts nerve cell connections => damages the nervous system => bypasses the blood brain barrier due to nano-size => changes neuronal structure YES, it is absorbed... even when applied on your skin. Also for some reason, women absorb more nano zinc than men. The biggest red flag is 'Zinc Oxide'. Always ensure this ingredient is non-nano. If it is in SPF makeup or mainstream cosmetics, you can guarantee it will be nano https://t.me/powerofthepulse