Atropa_Logged IRC

[mariarahel] it would have to award ehex more than phex

[mariarahel] the % could be based on the holding of assets rather than from bonding

[mariarahel] probably bond with annabelle and japanese teddy bear

[mariarahel] probably bond with annabelle

[mariarahel] Royalty Hex

[mariarahel] Royalty/RHEX

[mariarahel] Maybe ROYALTY/TRY ME

[mariarahel] with perfectly defined order

[mariarahel] $ROYALTYtm

[mariarahel] so you buy a portion of the bond, then register for residuals

[mariarahel] it could be mintable based on a bond strategy

[mariarahel] you would have to buy it based on distribution of an initial mint before registration would have any return

[mariarahel] 0.00014%

[mariarahel] it could just pay out a fixed configurable % for each new registration

[mariarahel] and the equation for 4

[mariarahel] i bet there are lots of tm for those securities based on how the equation for A is constructed

[mariarahel] that includes the queries of all balances

[mariarahel] presume that the list traversed is constructed in contract as an ordered list

[mariarahel] and every time any new wallet that is not already in the list registers, the list is traversed such that at iterator A, user A recieves the cumulate balance of users A through user A+4 divided by 4 ?

[mariarahel] and everybody that registers goes into an ordered list of type address