Sterlin Builds 🛠️💡💻
Adtech × AI. Building VibeVO in public. - Vadim Sterlin. EN Channel: @sterlinbuilds RU: @sterlinbuild Founder: @vibevo_io @adsgram_ai @fantongamebot
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Sterlin Builds 🛠️💡💻
Channel Sterlin Builds 🛠️💡💻 (@sterlinbuilds) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 59 951 subscribers, ranking 1 946 in the Cryptocurrencies category.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 59 951 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 07 September, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -1 759 over the last 30 days and by -48 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 0%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 0 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Adtech × AI. Building VibeVO in public.
- Vadim Sterlin.
EN Channel: @sterlinbuilds
RU: @sterlinbuild
Founder:
@vibevo_io
@adsgram_ai
@fantongamebot”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 08 September, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Cryptocurrencies category.
💵 Profit from trading operations 💵 Selling tokens for investors and teams 💵 Fixed fees for managing trades and providing liquidity 💵 The price difference between a certain volume of tokens at the start and the end of the contractBy the way, market makers generally follow two main models: 🃏Retainer Model In this model, the MM provides software for placing orders for a fixed fee. They may also take an additional commission from trading profits or a percentage on withdrawals. 👉 This model is suitable for smaller projects, as MMs don’t take tokens or affect the price. Examples: Gotbit, Kairon Labs. 🃏Loan-Type Model Here, MMs profit from the token price increase. They buy tokens at a fixed price and sell them at market price. The advantage of this model is that the risks are shared between the MM and the project — if the price doesn’t rise much, the MM doesn’t need to pay much for their services. 👉 But if the price skyrockets, their profit can be enormous. Examples: DWF, GSR.
A market maker (MM) is a large trader with significant liquidity reserves who ensures that there are always enough buy and sell orders in the market to prevent excessive price volatility.✏️ The main goal is to make sure that anyone can buy or sell the token at any time without causing drastic price swings. Without this, launching a token would feel like a rollercoaster ride… 👉 A simple example: a large holder decides to sell their tokens at night, when the market is quiet. Without an MM, such a sale could crash the token price, and the community might think the asset has suddenly dropped in value, even though it’s just market volatility. BUT, I’d recommend postponing the choice of an MM until the last moment, as it can significantly limit your project during the launch! (Some exchanges don’t like certain MMs, and investors can feel the same way🤫) ❗️ FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE: Investors have offered me funding on the condition that I choose their market maker. But I’ve always declined, as it would create a conflict of interest where the investor's or MM's priorities come first, disrupting the balance at launch.
It’s important to remember that a token can’t just be a tool for distributing profits — otherwise, it risks being classified as a security and falling under regulatory scrutiny.🟪 Token Distribution It’s crucial to know where and how the tokens are allocated. Here are the main categories:
🟡 Various investment rounds (pre-seed, seed, private, public, strategic, KOL, etc.).
🟡 IDO — also known as the Public round.
🟡 Airdrops / community / marketing — tokens that will be given to the community.
🟡 Team — tokens for the project team.
🟡 Treasury — tokens held by the project for liquidity and as a “reserve fund” for the project.Key points to consider: 🟨Investor allocation: usually no more than 30% of the tokens to avoid a massive sell-off after launch. 🟨Community/marketing/airdrop allocation: at least 10%, and in some projects, it can reach up to 50%. 🟨Team allocation: no more than 25% to prevent the developers from concentrating too many tokens. 🟪 Vesting Vesting controls how quickly tokens become available. This is essential for preventing large-scale sales at launch. Vesting ensures that tokens are yours, but they don’t become available immediately — instead, they’re released after a certain period or based on milestones.
By the way, an interesting fact — all the top exchanges are Chinese. So having a Mandarin-speaking team member in crypto can really help with negotiations :)🟡Bybit — growing rapidly and catching up to OKX in terms of trading volume, especially in some regions. 🟡Kucoin — offers solid trading volume and great growth opportunities for tokens. Tier-3 exchanges👇 🟡Gate and Bitget — while they rank lower, they can still show decent trading volumes and have active communities. Decentralized exchanges (DEX)👇 Listing on DEXs is much easier, and access to these platforms is unrestricted — any project can appear there. However, the presence of a token on a DEX doesn’t necessarily indicate its quality❗️
Their goal is for their community to profit too
💵🟨The Project and the Team The team wants to profit and launch the token in a way that keeps the community happy.
But❗️if they sell too many tokens, it can negatively impact the price, so teams are often given KPIs for token price growth after listing.To sum it up, every participant has their own expectations, and the team's task is to ensure that no one walks away disappointed 👌🏽
👉 This is decentralized architecture — in simple terms, this is the crypto world!The advantages of working in crypto: ➕ Easier capital raising These startups are often valued higher, and the process of attracting investments is more accessible. The due diligence process is simpler here. ➕ Unique tools for building a community Using NFTs and tokens helps form an active community that feels like a part of the project. This is a huge growth driver in crypto. ➕ Higher earnings Successful founders and employees of Web 3 startups often earn more than in traditional Web 2. But of course, there are downsides too: ➖ Regulatory gray area Crypto is largely unregulated, and bringing a company into a “white” (fully legal) zone can be quite challenging. ➖ Security risks Web 3 is prone to cyberattacks and hacks, with minimal legal protection available. ➖ Hiring challenges Finding a skilled team to work in Web 3 is harder — not everyone is ready to enter this industry. Conclusion: Both paths have their advantages, but I lean toward the idea that Web 3 currently offers more opportunities for growth and profit. Yes, crypto comes with higher risks, and it’s not for everyone, but based on my experience and that of my colleagues, I can say it’s definitely worth the gamble 😉
Web 2 is the Internet we're all familiar with, where companies dominate by offering services in exchange for your personal data. The main downside is the centralization of data.Now, let’s look at the pros of Web 2 startups: ➕ Easy registration and documentation Setting up a company and opening a bank account is simpler here, and you can work “by the book” right from the start. ➕ Access to traditional investors You can collaborate with with traditional ventures, corporations, and take advantage of the global economy's opportunities. ➕ Convenient payment methods Your clients and partners can use familiar payment systems. ➕ Government support In some countries, you can access startup support programs. Now for the cons: ➖ Competition The Web 2 startup market is a real "red ocean" (a highly competitive market). Breaking into the global scene is no easy task. ➖ Bureaucracy and accounting From day one, you'll need to pay close attention to bookkeeping and compliance. ➖ Expensive hiring Officially hiring employees can increase costs by 30-70%! — a heavy burden for a startup in its early stages. Friends, soon we’ll dive deep into Web 3 — the crypto world! In the meantime, I’d love to hear your thoughts on starting a Web 2 startup. Would you give it a try? 😁
