𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀

Open in Telegram

Examining King James I with his quotes, his words and actions, and facts about his life and his books. Join @TheRealKingJamesI Join channels @AWESOMEKJBSOCIETY @EndinessCompendium

The country is not specifiedReligion & Spirituality112 182

368

Subscribers

No data24 hours

-17 days

+530 days

117

Post views

No data24 hours

No data48 hours

31.88%

Engagement rate

No data

Posts per day

Ads index

beta

Data loading in progress...

Similar Channels

1.6K

𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖎 𝕸𝖔𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖓 𝐕𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖘 (Anti Modern Versions - The KJB/The KJV Versus The Modern Versions)

1.4K

IFB Independent Fundamental Baptists

𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖙 𝖔𝖋 𝕽𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓

More channels

Tags Cloud

No data

Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.

Incoming and Outgoing Mentions

---

Attracting Subscribers

December '24

+10

in 1 channels

November '24

in 2 channels

Get PRO

October '24

+12

in 0 channels

Get PRO

September '24

+20

in 4 channels

Get PRO

August '24

+39

in 7 channels

Get PRO

July '24

+80

in 11 channels

Get PRO

June '24

+101

in 5 channels

Get PRO

May '240

in 4 channels

Get PRO

April '240

in 4 channels

Get PRO

March '24

+80

in 4 channels

Get PRO

February '240

in 5 channels

Get PRO

January '24

+88

in 4 channels

Date	Subscriber Growth	Mentions	Channels
21 December	0
20 December	+1
19 December	0
18 December	0
17 December	+1
16 December	0
15 December	+2
14 December	0
13 December	0
12 December	0
11 December	0
10 December	+2
09 December	0
08 December	0
07 December	+1
06 December	0
05 December	0
04 December	0
03 December	+2
02 December	0
01 December	+1

Channel Posts

Lancelot Andrews' (KJB Translator) funeral sermon said: "His admirable knowledge in the learned tongues, Latine, Greeke, Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriack, Arabick, besides other moderne Tongues to the number of fifteene (as I am informed) was such and so rare, that he may well be ranked in the first place, to be one of the rarest Linguists in Christendome; In which, he was so perfect and absolute, both for Grammar and profound knowledge therein, that he was so perfect in the Grammar and Criticismes of them, as if he had utterly neglected the matter it selfe; and yet he was so exquisite and sound in the matter and learning of these Tongues, as if he had ne∣ver regarded the Grammar. ...his Knowledge was great and rare, his Memorie greater, and his Iudgement profoundest and greatest of all; and over and above all these, Industria infinita, his paines and industry was infinite:" (A SERMON Preached at the FVNERALL of the R. R. Father in GOD, LANCELOT late Lord Bishop of WINCHESTER.) SOURCE+SOURCE

2	Lancelot Andrews, a KJB Translators, was provably one of the most brilliant translators who ever lived. At his funeral sermon, it mentioned: "His admirable knowledge in the learned tongues, Latine, Greeke, Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriack, Arabick, besides other moderne Tongues to the number of fifteene (as I am informed) was such and so rare, that he may well be ranked in the first place, to be one of the rarest Linguists in Christendome; In which, he was so perfect and absolute, both for Grammar and profound knowledge therein, that he was so perfect in the Grammar and Criticismes of them, as if he had utterly neglected the matter it selfe; and yet he was so exquisite and sound in the matter and learning of these Tongues, as if he had ne∣ver regarded the Grammar. Scientia magna, Memoria major, Iudicium maximum: his Knowledge was great and rare, his Memorie greater, and his Iudgement profoundest and greatest of all; and over and above all these, Industria infinita, his paines and industry was infinite:" (A SERMON Preached at the FVNERALL of the R. R. Father in GOD, LANCELOT late Lord Bishop of WINCHESTER.) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A19625.0001.001/1:109?rgn=div1;view=fulltext	23
3	Lancelot Andrews, a KJB Translators, was provably one of the most brilliant translators who ever lived. At his funeral sermon, it mentioned: "His admirable knowledge in the learned tongues, Latine, Greeke, Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriack, Arabick, besides other moderne Tongues to the number of fifteene (as I am informed) was such and so rare, that he may well be ranked in the first place, to be one of the rarest Linguists in Christendome; In which, he was so perfect and absolute, both for Grammar and profound knowledge therein, that he was so perfect in the Grammar and Criticismes of them, as if he had utterly neglected the matter it selfe; and yet he was so exquisite and sound in the matter and learning of these Tongues, as if he had ne∣ver regarded the Grammar. Scientia magna, Memoria major, Iudicium maximum: his Knowledge was great and rare, his Memorie greater, and his Iudgement profoundest and greatest of all; and over and above all these, Industria infinita, his paines and industry was infinite:" (A SERMON Preached at the FVNERALL of the R. R. Father in GOD, LANCELOT late Lord Bishop of WINCHESTER.) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A19625.0001.001/1:109?rgn=div1;view=fulltext	1
4	King James VI of Scotland and England Unjustly Accused https://archive.org/details/king-james-unjustly-accused/page/29/mode/2up	201
5	Early names' list of KJB Translators: An Order agreed upon for tranflation of the Bible The places and perfons agreed upon for the Hebrew with the particular Bookes by them undertaken Westminister Company Pentateuch: Dean Of Westminister Dean of Paules Dr. Saravia [or Sararia] Dr. Clark Dr. Lufecdo The story from Ioshua to the first booke of Chron: ex. Clufius Dr. Teich [or Teigh] Mr. Burfleigh Strerford Mr. King Sussin Mr. Thomfon Clarie Mr. Bedwell Cambridge From the history of the Chron. [f]orth the rest of the story of the hageographa (viz) Mr. Livelier Richardson Mr. Chaderton Mr. Dillingham Mr. Harrifon [Harrison] Mr. Andrewes [Lancelot Andrews] Mr. Spalding Mr. Bing Oxford Dr. Harding Dr. Reinolds Dr. Holland Dr. Kilby Mr. Smith Hereford Mr. Britt Mr. Farreclower (The picture is from and contained in an early manuscript named BL [British Library Board] MS Harley 750 scanned into Manifold Greatness: the Making of the King James Bible). The other translators' names will be typed out tomorrow	334
6	In his book Basilikon Doron, King James I believed in the biblical rule of the Scriptures, namely the Old Testament and New Testament, to instruct the Church (aka saved believers), believed in salvation by believing on Christ, and in the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. King James I also believed we are not saved by works since he said "that fince [since] we could not be saved by doing, we might (at leaft [least]) be faued [saved] by beleeuing [believing]." (Basilikon Doron, The First Booke, Pages 10-11). 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀 & 𝕎𝕠𝕣𝕜𝕤-𝔹𝕒𝕤𝕖𝕕 𝕊𝕒𝕝𝕧𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕚𝕤𝕥 (https://t.me/AntiWorksSalvation)	257
7	King James I believed the Scriptures bore testimony of Christ, that faith cometh by hearing the word of God, and that Scripture contains a command to do certain things and prohibition to not do certain things: "Search the fcriptures (faith [saith] Chrift) for they will bear teftimiony of me: And * the whole Scriptures (faith PAVL) are profitable to teach^ to improoue, to correct, & to inftruct in righteoufness, that the man of God may be abfolute being made per it vnto al good works. I ioyne to this, the careful hearing of the doctrine with attendance and reuerence: For * faith commeth by hearing (faith [saith] PAVL^" ... "The whole Scripture contayneth two things: a command, and a prohibition; to do fuch [such] things, and abftaine [abstain] from the contrarie. Obey in both;" (From Basilikon dōron, Pages 6 and 7) https://archive.org/details/cu31924097402626/page/n53/mode/2up? 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	350
8	(Part 3 continued) On Lancelot Andrews the famous KJB Translator: "But we are chiefly concerned to know what were his qualifications as a Translator of the Bible. He ever bore the character of “a right godly man,” and “a prodigious student.” One competent judge speaks of him as “that great gulf of learning!” It was also said, that “the world wanted learning to know how learned this man was.” And a brave old chronicler remarks, that, such was his skill in all languages, especially the Oriental, that, had he been present at the confusion of tongues at Babel, he might have served as Interpreter-General! In his funeral sermon by Dr. Buckeridge, Bishop of Rochester, it is said that Dr. Andrews was conversant with fifteen languages." https://www.earnestlycontendingforthefaith.com/Books/AlexanderMcClure/AlexanderMcClure'sKJVTranslatorsRevived02.html#LANCELOT_ANDREWS_ For the book pdf, see The [KJV] Translators Revived by Alexander McClure https://t.me/TheRealKingJamesI/157 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	261
9	Skills of the KJB Translators Part 3: And Lancelot Andrews, who knew 15 languages, had private devotions in Greek and Latin! Who usually does that unless they are fluent and skilled in reading and speaking multiple languages? This is a great example that shows that the KJB Translators were very qualified to translate the Bible from Hebrew & Greek into English perfectly. In the above document, page 29 out of page 249 is where Lancelot Andrews' devotions were copied down in 1892. This was copied from a manuscript owned by Bishop Laud (Pages 5 and 8-9, 10) and that one was transcriped by Samuel Wright who saw the original manuscript shortly after 1625 https://archive.org/details/greekdevotionsl00andrgoog greekdevotionsl00andrgoog.pdf 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	183
10	Skills of the KJB Translators Part 2: Lawerence Chaderton annonatated read and studied real Hebrew, read Hebrew rabbis' commentaries, and made annonatations to the Bombrrg Masoretic Text editions (see bottom of page 14 and page 15 from a 1700 book that talks about Lawrence Chaderton: "He made himself familiar with the Latin, Greek, and Hebrew tongues, and was thoroughly skilled in them. Moreover he had diligently investigated the numerous writings of the Rabbis, so far as they seemed to promise any aid to the understanding of the Scriptures. This is evident from the annotations in his handwriting appended to the Biblia Bombergi, * (An edition of the Hebrew Bible, printed by Bomberg, at Venice, in 1518.) which are still preserved in the library of Emanuel College.' (Vita Laurentii Chadertoni, a W. Dillingham, S. T. P. Cantab. 1700. Pp. 15, 24.)" https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1641-1700_vita-laurentii-chaderton_dillingham-william_1700/page/14/mode/1up https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1641-1700_vita-laurentii-chaderton_dillingham-william_1700/page/15/mode/1up	188
11	Skills of KJB Translators Part 1: KJB Translator John Bois literally read the Bible in Hebrew by himself by the time he was 6 years old and he also was one of the 12 final revisors of the KJB! The scholarship of the KJB Translators was very talented yet ignored by critics who wnated to downplay and attack the KJB: "JOHN BOIS This devoted scholar was a native of Nettle-stead, in Suffolk, where he was born January 3rd, 1560. His father William Bois, a convert from papistry, was a pious minister, and a very learned man; and at the time of his death, was Rector of West Stowe. His mother, Mirable Poolye, was a pious woman, and a great reader of the Bible in the older translations. He was the only child that grew up. He was carefully taught by his father; and at the age of Jive years, he had read the Bible in Hebrew. By the time he was six years old, he not only wrote Hebrew legibly, but in a fair and elegant character. ... When the work had been carried through the first stage, he was one of the twelve delegates sent, two from each of the companies, to make the final revision of the work at Stationers’ Hall, in London. This occupied nine months," https://www.earnestlycontendingforthefaith.com/Books/AlexanderMcClure/AlexanderMcClure'sKJVTranslatorsRevived03.html#JOHN_BOIS_	204
12	+2 In the Hampton Court Conference, King James I wished to have "one uniforme tranflation..and this to bee done by the beft [best] learned in both the Univerfities, after them to bee reviewed by the Bifhops, and the chiefe learned of the Church" [The svmme and svbstance of the conference which it pleased His Excellent Majestie: to have with the Lords Bishops and others of his clergie (at which the most of the Lords of the Councell were present) in his Majesties Privie-chamber at Hampton Court, Ianu. 14, 1603) Pages 46 Link+47 Link+see 48 at Top Link] King James I "freely gave assent that there should be one translation of the Bible consonant to the originall Greeke and Hebrew" (The reconstruction of the English church by Usher, Roland G., Page 345 Link) King James DID NOT write the 1611 Holy Bible He simply wanted the "one correct translation" that was "answerable to the truth of the Originall" from the Hebrew Old Testament & Greek New Testament into English, which we have today-the KJB 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	594
13	Great read: King James VI of Scotland and England Unjustly Accused? by Stephen A. Coston Sr. Book Link Pdfd Download Sections 👉Acknowledgements Link 👉Contents Link 👉Index of Illustrations Link 👉Introduction Link 👉Preface Link 👉Prelude Link 👉Prologue Link 👉Foreword Link 👉Chapter 1 A Christian King and A Family Man Link 👉Chapter 2 A Sentimental King Link 👉Chapter 3 The King's Bedchamber [Proves King James I was not a sodomite]Link 👉Chapter 4 Law & History Link 👉Chapter 5 James and Shakespeare [documents their distinct lives]Link 👉Chapter 6 The Language of Love (Shows King James I was not homosexual +proves James treated George Villers with father-to-son/family type of love]Link 👉Chapter 7 The Mechanics of Character Assassination Link 👉Chapter 8 "He Said, She Said" [On Rumours]Link 👉Chapter 9 Homosexual And Revisionist Historical Methodology & The Libeling of James VI & I Link 👉Chapter 10 Historical and Biographical Source Review Regarding the Character of James VI & I Link 👉Epilogue Link 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	1 030
14	+2 In the Hampton Court Conference, King James I wished to have "one uniforme tranflation...and this to bee done by the beft [best] learned in both the Univerfities, after them to bee reviewed by the Bifhops, and the chiefe learned of the Church" [The svmme and svbstance of the conference which it pleased His Excellent Majestie : to have with the Lords Bishops and others of his clergie (at which the most of the Lords of the Councell were present) in his Majesties Privie-chamber at Hampton Court, Ianu. 14, 1603), Pages 46 Link & 47 Link]. King James I "freely gave assent that there should be one translation of the Bible consonant to the originall Greeke and Hebrew" (The reconstruction of the English church by Usher, Roland G., Page 345 Link)	1
15	+1 King James I appointed Dr. John Rainolds [Reynolds] to "note thofe Chapters in the Apochrypha booke [Ecclefiafticus], where those offensive places were"[The svmme and svbstance of the conference which it pleased His Excellent Majestie: to have with the Lords Bishops and others of his clergie (at which the most of the Lords of the Councell were present) in his Majesties Privie-chamber at Hampton Court, Ianu. 14, 1603].Clearly (for those who promote the Apocrypha as so-called knowledge), King James I & translator John Rainolds did not believe the Apocrypha was either morally right or considered Scriptures. The right side picture is from above mentioned account of Hampton Court Conference SOURCE) The left side picture has similar info and is from a manuscript named "A Report of the conference at Hampton Court, betwene the Prelates & Minifters, before the King"(Source-title is at bottom right corner under 828. 9) catalogued as "Harleian MSS. 828, f. 32"Source 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀 & 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕬𝖕𝖔𝖈𝖗𝖞𝖕𝖍𝖆: 𝕿𝖗𝖚𝖙𝖍 𝕺𝖗 𝕷𝖎𝖊𝖘?	918
16	Good information on Erasmus and his work and New Testament editions here	185
17	The KJB translators did not promote modern versions but wrote: " Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one (for then the imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that our people had been fed with gall of dragons instead of wine, with whey instead of milk); but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one, not justly to be excepted against." (Page 16) The notes never go against KJB Only at all. The translators simply said they wanted to make a good one better, and out of many translations one principle good one. From the KJB Preface Saying "out of many good ones, one principal good one," is literally the KJB Translators giving their full support to have and use ONE principle Bible translation, which is the King James Bible that the 54 KJB Translators worked on from 1604 to 1611. Nothing against KJB Only is in the above quote from Page 16 of the KJB Preface. What the modern versions do say many times, is say that their course was marked from the KJB, but then the modern versions do not even follow the KJB or Tyndale Example: ESV Preface on Page vii says: "The English Standard Version (ESV) stands in the classic mainstream of English Bible translations over the past half-millennium. The fountainhead of that stream was William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526; marking its course were the King James Version of 1611 (KJV)". Then the ESV departs from both Tyndale and the KJB by removing 16 verses. 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	232
18	👉This Saturday, the Real King James I channel will document some details of the Hampton Court Conference involving the KJB Translators, the Apocrypha, and more. 💥On next Saturday, we will go over the names of the KJB Translators from a British manuscript 💥During the following Saturday, we will show the fascinating Rule 15 of the 1611 KJB translation. 💥Subsquently, we will display real-life testimonies of King James I's character/behavior and actions from men who saw and talked with him face to face. 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀	201
19	The KJB translators did not promote modern versions but wrote: " Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one (for then the imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that our people had been fed with gall of dragons instead of wine, with whey instead of milk); but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one, not justly to be excepted against." (Page 16) The notes never go against the KJB or the KJB Only position at all. The KJB translators simply said they wanted to make a good one better, and out of many translations one principle good one. Nothing about for or against KJB Only in the above quote from Page 16 of the KJB Preface. (Extra note: the KJB only position is use KJB only & this position is for English speakers & readers only; everybody else should read the Bible in their own langauge that they speak and read in) 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕂𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀 & ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪	373
20	the KJB translators did not promote modern versions but wrote: " Truly, good Christian reader, we never thought from the beginning, that we should need to make a new translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one (for then the imputation of Sixtus had been true in some sort, that our people had been fed with gall of dragons instead of wine, with whey instead of milk); but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one, not justly to be excepted against." (Page 16) The notes never go against KJB Only at all. The translators simply said they wanted to make a good one better, and out of many translations one principle good one. Nothing about for or against KJB Only in the above quote from Page 16 of the KJN Preface. What the modern versions do say many times, is say that their course was marked from the KJB, but then the modern versions do not even follow the KJB or Tyndale Example: ESV Preface on Page vii says: "The English Standard Version (ESV) stands in the classic mainstream of English Bible translations over the past half-millennium. The fountainhead of that stream was William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526; marking its course were the King James Version of 1611 (KJV)". Then the ESV departs from both Tyndale and the KJB	7

View all posts