Builders
Telegram-native tools, open source & independent tools.tg @tools_community
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Builders
Channel Builders (@builders) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 3 531 789 subscribers, ranking 21 in the Cryptocurrencies category and 27 in the International region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 3 531 789 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 25 August, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -121 390 over the last 30 days and by -4 438 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Verified (Officially confirmed by Telegram)
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 0%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 0 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Telegram-native tools, open source & independent
tools.tg
@tools_community”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 26 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Cryptocurrencies category.
1. Channel Stats In our view, the best approach for channel analytics is MTProto’s method stats.getBroadcastStats — it gives you subscribers, avg views, Premium ratio, language breakdown, growth charts, all from one call. That said, we were open to other original solutions that could reliably deliver the same data — as long as the implementation was your own, not a call to an external analytics API. In practice, most submissions claimed «verified channel stats» but only called getChatMemberCount via Bot API — which gives you subscriber count and nothing else. 2. Payments and Escrow The most common area of weakness. Most projects did integrate with TON in some form, but the implementation quality varied a lot. Some of the recurring issues: – All deals sharing one wallet with no fund isolation — one security breach and everything is compromised – Fund release and refund operations that aren’t safe to retry — if the service crashes mid-process, funds can be sent twice or never sent – No locks or atomicity in background workers handling payments — race conditions leading to duplicate transactions – Transaction verification that doesn’t actually check the blockchain In general, any operation involving money needs to be designed for the worst case: crashes, retries, concurrent calls. This applies also to ad posting, not just escrow. Some of these are understandable in an MVP context, but they still influenced how we evaluated the submissions. 3. Broken demos Some demos weren’t functional, and self-deploy instructions were missing or incomplete. In those cases, hands-on product testing wasn’t conducted. 4. Overengineered Flows Surprisingly common. Many projects added unnecessary complexity on top of the core deal flow – extra entities, extra verification steps, approval stages, duplicated logic. In some cases, both sides had to create separate entities before a deal could even start. Simpler would have been better. 5. AI-Generated Code Without Review Nothing wrong with using AI as a development tool — most strong submissions did. The issue is when AI generates 90–100% of the code and no one reviews the result. Several projects had that pattern: boilerplate architecture, identical comments, extremely long and overcomplicated functions, code that doesn’t actually work when you run it. AI can speed things up significantly, but it shouldn’t fully replace the work of developer.Thank you to everyone who participated — we appreciate the time and effort. Even if you didn't win this time, we noticed your work. Strong contributors stay on our radar for future opportunities, whether that's future contests or contributing to our open-source tools. More news on the Ads Marketplace tool coming next week. @builders 🌐
The tool is in MVP stage. It does not store user assets, and prize distribution stays fully on the organizer side.
Github | Tools.tg
@builders