Middle Nation Discussion

Dont worry my proffessor doesnt even know who the admin of Middle Nation is, and he thinks the things that we talk about here are nonexistent

Nick fuentes is anti Israel and he is part of the Christian right

I'm against shias but i don't make takfir on them all

Why are people turning a political thread into a religious one? Anyway, replying to original message: Well it depends on what you mean by Iran being "behind" Hamas incursion. There is no doubt that Iran is supporting Hamas, be it intelligence, weapons, etc. I wouldn't exclude the possibility of Iran having a major role in the event simply because Western governments are saying they are. I would, however, say with certainty that Iran has and is continuing to support Hamas in the ways mentioned above. The extent of their support in this particular incident should be revealed when/if Irani and/or Hezbullah officials say something of significance in the next few days.

Mental illness 🫣

Only brutal force is able to put and end to the Khawarij. Here is an authentic Sahih Hadith Volume 4, Book 55, Number 558: I quote: "Among the off-spring of this man will be some who will recite the Qur'an but the Qur'an will not reach beyond their throats (i.e. they will recite like parrots and will not understand it nor act on it), and they will renegade from the religion as an arrow goes through the game's body. They will kill the Muslims but will not disturb the idolaters. If I should live up to their time' I will kill them as the people of 'Ad were killed (i.e. I will kill all of them)."

"All wars are bankers' wars" I'd recommend everyone to watch this some time. This guy also acknowledges why we are portrayed as the boogie man (because we won't be usury/debt slaves as usury is haram) https://youtu.be/5hfEBupAeo4?si=-g1f94JvSkSvOHEW

Masha'Allah, Jou can always to turn anything into a way to attack Muslims

What's a CBDC?

The evacuation of Saudis from Lebanon would indicate that the war will expand, if there has indeed been coordination

Brother shahid...i just received a PM from spammer / scammer pretending to be u. But luckly i know it was not u. He was very politely spoken, something that i feel so strange. This couldnt be shahid bolsen. I ask him to spell your name, something that he couldnt do. Must be some random guys comes across the group because of the high traffic in the telegram.

Can israel be destroyed in the first place?

What/Where are you talking about?

That is a purely legal question and can vary for every state. Turkey's legislation is like this https://www.nvi.gov.tr/turk-vatandasliginin-kazanilmasi

Estaizubillah brother I live in Türkiye have friends here, real persons who have wife and child. Think what you want just stop talking what you don't know. I am not talking about some western puppets we have millions of Uyghur here, their situation should really have to put us into shame. You are not helping the Shahid's cause either with these statements. Problem there, is Uyghurs mixed their nationalist separatism with religiosity. Their reaction to China's oppression is neither helping them nor beneficial to ummah. But what is happening is clear cut.

Just address the trite when it can be added as part of your overall analysis, but other than that you'll sink into their cespit

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.haberturk.com/gundem/haber-amp/866474-568-sene-onceki-ilk-devaluasyon Well the first devaluation of coins in Ottoman Empire was done when Muhammed Fatih ascended to the throne for the first time at the age of twelve. Devaluation was one of the main causes that he was dethroned and his father Murat II returned. But I couldn't find Roman revolts right now.

Asking questions, speculating skillfully about life. That is philosophy. But it's not just the metaphysical kind. I don't think the contrast you mention is so great. Science used to be knowns as 'natural philosophy'. And while it does provide us with an approximation of true and false ( at least, in the realm of cause / effect on material level of course it says nothing about the ultimate cause of material level existing in the first place ) it's all too easily misused for bad ends. To say, as you do here that it's possible to draw a limit to define what is right and wrong, when speaking of science without a genuinely moral grounding of some kind, is incorrect in my view. However you may be using right and wrong in its modern sense, as in true and false whereas it also has the meaning of good and bad. This says a lot about how language has become debased as the issue of morality became linked to scientific progress. Let's face it, you can't question progress it's the religion of our time which has replaced Christianity. Basically this means the idea that having more knowledge about the world is inherently good, progressive, allowing progress. But as we have removed morality from the law of the land (basically do what the state says. Because it says so, and that is that) the opportunity for using knowledge for bad ends has obviously increased dramatically... Often seen to be a founding father of modern science, the Tudor (16th/17th C) Royal courtier politician and thinker Roger Bacon ( to whom Thomas Hobbes, the great theorist of the all powerful state was secretary and something of a disciple as a young man) wrote, for example about 'nature to be commanded' at the same time coining the famous phrase 'knowledge is power' "Human knowledge and human power meet in one; for where the cause is not known the effect cannot be produced. Nature to be commanded must be obeyed; and that which in contemplation is as the cause is in operation as the rule." Thus from science's triumph, as a means of understanding, but also actually overcoming and manipulating the world in ways of material benefit to some, but not all can reasonably be seen as a cause of much suffering, misused to transgress the bounds of what is acceptable, alongside its many benefits. Both from its effects and also the philosophical position which helped to drive it forward. So where / how do we put the brake on this way of thinking ? How do we know when to stop? The western answer is to never stop asking questions. Is that correct, or is there something to be said for reigning science in. And if so, how? We can see where that leads, especially without any prohibition on financial experimentation, the invention of the corporation, the ban on usury finance lifted, the rise of the centralised militarized state and the coming of the machine age. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientia_potentia_est

I see the French authorities have started cracking down on pro Palestinian demonstrators in the nation.

Hezbollah is interested in Lebanon only