IELTS WITH SAMADBEK 8.0
Imerrsion-based approach to learning English and IELTS. Hard work always beats any talent.
Show more7 840Subscribers
-4724 hours
-3677 days
-3 25030 days
- Subscribers
- Post coverage
- ER - engagement ratio
Data loading in progress...
Subscriber growth rate
Data loading in progress...
The bar chart shows mobile phone usage in a country by age group between 1998 and 2000
❤🔥 1
The double graph describes the weekly student expenses in four distinct countries. The table graph shows the amount of money students spend while studying abroad, whereas the accompanying bar graph illustrates how money was distributed among three different expenses. Overall, it is evident that the spending patterns of students studying in countries A and B were noticeably higher than those in C and D. Furthermore, the distribution of money across expenses followed somewhat similar patterns in all regions except D, where tuition emerged as the biggest expense.
The expenditure figures of students studying in A and B followed a somewhat identical pattern. There was a slight discrepancy between the spending patterns of students in A and B, with each student covering their expenses with $874 a week in the former, while in the latter, this accounted for $735. A similar pattern, though with a smaller disparity, was observed in countries C and D, where students' weekly expenditures constituted $540 and $435, respectively.
These expenditure figures were positively related to the money distribution across three different expenses, with students in the first two countries allocating more money to accommodation, tuition, and living costs. Out of $875, students in country A allocated $430 to accommodation, while the combined total spent on tuition and living costs accounted for the other half.
The money allocation figures were fairly distributed among the three expenses in countries B and C. For example, there was only a small discrepancy in the amount of money spent by students in country B, where they spent $280, $320, and $350 on accommodation, tuition, and living costs, respectively. Similarly, the weekly expenditure rates of students in country C were as follows: almost the same amount of money was allocated to housing and tuition fees, while that for other living costs was the highest.
Students studying in country D bucked the trend, with emphasis placed on tuition fees. A precise $200 was spent on housing, a figure then increased by $235 for tuition fees, and saw a small drop of $10 for living costs.
❤ 3👍 2
The double graph describes the weekly student expenses in four distinct countries. The table graph shows how much money students spend while studying abroad, whereas the accompanying bar graph shows how money was distributed to three different expenses.
Overall, it is clear that the spending patterns of students studying in countries A and B were noticeably higher than those in C and D. Moreover, money distribution across expenses followed somewhat similar patterns in all regions except D, where tuition emerged as the biggest expense.
The expenditure figures of students studying in A and B followed a somewhat identical pattern. There was a small discrepancy between the spending patterns of students in A and B countries, with each student covering their expenses with $874 a week in the former, while in the latter, this accounted for $735. A similar pattern, though with a smaller disparity, was observed in countries C and D, where students’ weekly expenditures constituted $540 and $435, respectively.
These expenditure figures were in a positive relationship with the money distribution across three different expenses, with students in the first two countries allocating more money to accommodation, tuition, and living costs. Out of $875, students in country A allocated $430 on accommodation, while the combined total of money spent on tuition and living costs accounted for the other half.
The money allocation figures were fairly distributed on three expenses in countries B and C. For example, there was only a small discrepancy in the amount of money spent by students in country B, where students spent $280, $320, and $350 on accommodation, tuition, and living costs, respectively. Similarly, the weekly expenditure rates of students in country C were as follows: almost the same amount of money was allocated to housing and tuition fees, while that for other living costs was the highest.
The provided bar chart compares the proportions of women in terms of when they gave birth to their first child from 1966 to 2006. Overall, women proved to be more supportive of later parenthood as the years passed, and an overwhelming majority of women decided to become mothers in their middle ages. Moreover, there has been a gradual drop in the proportions of those who gave birth in their early twenties, while women from the rest of the age groups saw noticeable increases.
There were two distinct age groups in which the rates of women who gave birth to their first children decreased: 19 or under and 20-24. While almost a third of the women aged 19 or younger had their first baby in 1966, these figures almost doubled in the consecutive age bracket, with just over 60% of the women deciding to be mothers. Then, the proportions of the former decreased almost threefold by 2006, to 10%, while that of the latter almost halved, declining from just over 60% to a precise 30%.
The percentages of women having their first baby in other age ranges gradually increased, though with varying degrees. There was a huge discrepancy in the proportions of women who became mothers for the first time in the age ranges of 25-29 (40%) and 30-34 (10%) in 1966, and this disparity became even more pronounced the next year, with more than half of women aged 25-29 having their first baby, while only 18% of those aged 30-34 gave birth to their first child. However, the trend reversed in the last year, with a 10% difference between these two age groups.
The figures of the remaining two groups were rather minimal compared to the rest, though both of them saw their figures rising. For example, only 8% of women aged 35-39 became mothers in 1966, a figure that then increased to roughly 15% in 1986 and further rose to 30% in the last year. A similar pattern was observed in the final age group, where maternal figures of women increased by a mere 5% over four decades, rising from a percent to approximately five percentage points.
🔥 3