Mukhammad Abrayev | English

1) 60 million kontrakt to'lasen 2) ishindi chopib, o'qishiga kesen 3) 5chi kursda — ukeni o'zini orningga yuborsen! 4) Soqolini olsen ham Ne dopusk desa, alam qilarkan🤯😤

Agar amallab shu Narxo'zni bitirsam, bitta xo'roz so'yaman😂🤯

Courses and general online study have recently become very popular. However, some people still prefer to attend classes in person. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The popularity of online courses and remote learning platforms has exponentially grown recently. While these courses are taking precedence over face-to-face classes, some people are still sticking to traditional learning style. I believe, that blending both online and offline learning is optimal. Practically, online education provides convenience. Virtual learning eliminates geographical barriers and offers greater flexibility, allowing students to learn at their own pace. This method is primarily beneficial for working adults and caregivers. Take Udemy — online learning platform — as an example, this course has enabled thousands of individuals to acquire new qualifications without leaving their jobs or homes. Classroom-based education, however, is still highly effective for fostering engagement and discipline. In-person settings encourage active participation, real-time feedback, and heated discussion, all of which can deepen understanding. For example, universities with top rankings usually achieve top student results facilitating collaborative environment — something that online classes often fail to provide. I believe that a blended learning approach appears to be the most beneficial. Combining the accessibility of online resources with in-person classes leads to a well-rounded education. Take my country — Uzbekistan — as an example, many institutions have adopted hybrid models where theoretical explanation is provided online while practical sessions take place on a university campus. In conclusion, while online learning offers unparalleled flexibility, it cannot entirely supersede interpersonal engagement and structured discipline of offline learning. Collaboration between both offline and online education is the most effective in academic journey.

#ninersvocab

It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Preserving historic architecture has always sparked debate, particularly over whether such buildings should take precedence over the construction of modern ones.. While some believe that maintaining old structures is a costly burden, I strongly disagree with the notion that such investments are unjustified since the historical buildings carry cultural, green, and functional values. Culturally, historic buildings represent a nation's heritage and identity. Demolishing them to make way for modern structures can result in a loss of cultural sustainability and collective memory. Take cities like Rome and Kyoto as examples, they attract millions of tourists annually largely due to their well-preserved architecture, which narrates centuries of history. Destroying these landmarks would sever the emotional and historical ties that bind generations. Environmentally, restoring older buildings can be more sustainable than constructing new ones. Contrary to popular belief, retrofitting old structures often consumes fewer raw materials and reduces carbon emissions associated with demolition and new construction. The renovation of the Tate Modern in London, for example, transformed an old power station into a world-renowned museum, all while minimizing environmental impact and costs through adaptive reuse. Practically, old buildings can serve functional purposes while maintaining their historical character. With advancements in engineering and design, it is now feasible to upgrade these structures to meet modern safety standards and utilities without compromising their authenticity. In Paris, a number of pre-20th century apartments have been modernized both internally and externally while preserving their historic façades, striking a balance between tradition and progress. In conclusion, although the maintenance of old buildings entails significant investment, their cultural, environmental, and functional benefits far outweigh the financial burden. Rather than replacing the past with sterile modernity, we should view these structures as irreplaceable assets that enrich society in ways modern buildings cannot. 292 words #task2

It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Preserving historic architecture has always sparked debate, particularly over whether such buildings should take precedence over the construction of modern ones.. While some believe that maintaining old structures is a costly burden, I strongly disagree with the notion that such investments are unjustified since the historical buildings carry cultural, green, and functional values. Culturally, historic buildings represent a nation's heritage and identity. Demolishing them to make way for modern structures can result in a loss of cultural sustainability and collective memory. Take cities like Rome and Kyoto as examples, they attract millions of tourists annually largely due to their well-preserved architecture, which narrates centuries of history. Destroying these landmarks would sever the emotional and historical ties that bind generations. Environmentally, restoring older buildings can be more sustainable than constructing new ones. Contrary to popular belief, retrofitting old structures often consumes fewer raw materials and reduces carbon emissions associated with demolition and new construction. The renovation of the Tate Modern in London, for example, transformed an old power station into a world-renowned museum, all while minimizing environmental impact and costs through adaptive reuse. Practically, old buildings can serve functional purposes while maintaining their historical character. With advancements in engineering and design, it is now feasible to upgrade these structures to meet modern safety standards and utilities without compromising their authenticity. In Paris, a number of pre-20th century apartments have been modernized both internally and externally while preserving their historic façades, striking a balance between tradition and progress. In conclusion, although the maintenance of old buildings entails significant investment, their cultural, environmental, and functional benefits far outweigh the financial burden. Rather than replacing the past with sterile modernity, we should view these structures as irreplaceable assets that enrich society in ways modern buildings cannot. 292 words #task2

Bitta yomon xabar bor😑😤🤯

📌 Accepted! 🎓 University: Queen Mary University of London (UK🇬🇧) 🏅 QS Rank: #120 📚 Degree: BSc Biomedical Sciences 💰 Scholarship: EYUF in process 🗣 Language of Study: English 🧭 Achieved with Everest Go Global! 📱Instagram 📍Manzil

🤫

🇵🇹

🇵🇹