en
Feedback
Old Glory Vortex

Old Glory Vortex

Open in Telegram

News from the Land of the Free. We only post what matters. @Old_Glory_Vortex_bot

Show more

πŸ“ˆ Analytical overview of Telegram channel Old Glory Vortex

Channel Old Glory Vortex (@old_glory_vortex) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 20 943 subscribers, ranking 11 073 in the News & Media category and 1 888 in the USA region.

πŸ“Š Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on Π½Π΅Π²Ρ–Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎ, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 20 943 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 30 June, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 1 670 over the last 30 days and by -48 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 21.03%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 14.16% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 4 408 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 2 967 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 254.
  • Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as vortex, u.s, greenland, donald, tariff.

πŸ“ Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
β€œNews from the Land of the Free. We only post what matters. @Old_Glory_Vortex_bot”

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 01 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the News & Media category.

20 943
Subscribers
-4824 hours
-1447 days
+1 67030 days
Posts Archive
β€œNot fit for office”: medical professionals call for Trump’s removal from office A group of medical professionals β€” including
β€œNot fit for office”: medical professionals call for Trump’s removal from office A group of medical professionals β€” including psychiatrists and professors from Harvard and other leading institutions β€” has issued an urgent warning about President Trump's health. They describe a rapidly deteriorating condition that they believe makes him unfit for office. While they have not personally examined him, their assessment is based on years of observing his public behavior, speech patterns, and physical appearance. Among the episodes that have raised alarms: Trump's threat to destroy Iranian civilization, which drew international condemnation, as well as increasingly disorganized remarks and erratic behavior in the White House. Physically, the president has shown persistently swollen ankles and extensive bruising on his hands, which he has tried to cover with makeup. He has also been seen appearing to doze off during meetings, though he has said he was just resting his eyes. The doctors' main concern is national security. They have told Congress that Trump's cognitive decline and poor judgment pose an unacceptable risk, especially given his sole control over the U.S. nuclear arsenal, and have called for his removal under the 25th Amendment. The White House has pushed back, and Trump continues to insist his health is perfect. But the medical experts describe his decline as genuine, dangerous, and ongoing. #Trump #gerontocracy #impeachTrump Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Republicans put Hegseth in the hot seat, question war strategy and spending Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faced unusual crit
Republicans put Hegseth in the hot seat, question war strategy and spending Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faced unusual criticism from his own party during back-to-back House and Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearings. Republicans vented frustrations over the Pentagon’s funding strategy, the war in Iran, and America’s dwindling munitions stockpiles. The biggest point of contention is President Trump’s proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget, which funds $1.1 trillion through regular appropriations and $350 billion through a complex reconciliation process. Key Republicans, including Senate Appropriations Chair Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Defense Subcommittee Chair Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), expressed serious doubts about using reconciliation for core Pentagon programs like missile defense, F-35 jets, and munitions. McConnell warned that relying on a party-line process leaves critical defense efforts on β€œshaky fiscal footing.” On the Iran war, now in its 11th week with the Strait of Hormuz still closed, Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine repeatedly declined to detail U.S. strategy. Under sharp questioning from senators including Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Hegseth insisted the U.S. has the military means to reopen the strait but prefers a long-term approach. He also dismissed Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s (R-Alaska) push for a war authorization vote, arguing Trump already has sufficient executive authority. The Pentagon’s acting CFO revealed the Iran war’s cost has reached $29 billion β€” up from $25 billion just two weeks earlier β€” not including repairs to damaged bases. Hegseth also labeled Cuba a national security threat, citing alleged Russian spy ships and submarines using Cuban ports. Senate Republicans, in turn, warned against opening another military front. #republicans #Iran #USmilitary #Pentagon #PeteHegseth Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Trump gets picky: the president’s selective midterm strategy leaves republicans guessing President Donald Trump is reengaging
Trump gets picky: the president’s selective midterm strategy leaves republicans guessing President Donald Trump is reengaging with the midterm elections, but his approach is notably more selective and strategic than in past cycles. According to interviews with lawmakers and Republican operatives, Trump is picking his battles carefully β€” endorsing some candidates while steering clear of primaries where his involvement might deepen intraparty divisions or where his chosen candidate risks losing. The biggest shift is Trump's renewed focus on helping Republicans hold the House majority, triggered by a recent Virginia Supreme Court decision that scrapped a Democrat-friendly congressional map. That ruling, combined with a Supreme Court decision weakening the Voting Rights Act, has opened new pickup opportunities that have Trump "reevaluating" earlier assumptions that the House would be lost in a midterm year. Trump has also helped clear Senate fields in key states like North Carolina, Iowa, Michigan, and Montana, saving the party millions and avoiding costly infighting. However, he has notably stayed out of contested races in Texas and Georgia, where a Trump endorsement could backfire or where the political calculus is more challenging. Some Republicans see Trump's selective strategy as more about shaping his legacy than winning the midterms. Others question his commitment, noting his intense focus on foreign policy and trade deals. The White House insists Trump is committed to maintaining GOP majorities, but critics point to his blunt admission this week that he is "not even a little bit" considering voters' financial situations as he negotiates with Iran. Trump's approach remains a balancing act: deploying his influence where it matters most, avoiding risky endorsements, and occasionally indulging personal grudges β€” all while keeping one eye on his long-term legacy. #Trump #midterms #republicans Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Trump’s China showdown fizzles: now he’s just begging for stable relations US President Donald Trump lands in Beijing today f
Trump’s China showdown fizzles: now he’s just begging for stable relations US President Donald Trump lands in Beijing today for a high-stakes summit, yet his ambitions have notably shrunk since the campaign trail. During the 2024 race, Trump promised to hit China with tariffs harder than any other nation, but he has since adopted a far more cautious posture. Plans to force a restructuring of China's economy have given way to a more modest goal: ensuring stable relations. The shift follows Beijing's effective retaliation against Trump's earlier trade pressure. When the administration threatened steep tariffs, China responded by cutting off supplies of rare earth minerals and magnets β€” critical materials for U.S. manufacturing of everything from cars and weaponry to power tools. Facing the prospect of factory shutdowns and widespread economic damage, Trump backed down. China itself has been transformed since the president's last visit to Beijing in 2017. The country is now confident in its place as a global leader and expects to extract its own concessions from Washington. China has moved beyond extreme dependence on U.S. exports by diversifying its trade relationships, and it now boasts a trade surplus exceeding $1 trillion. Xi Jinping will arrive with his own clear agenda, centered on what Beijing calls the "3Ts": Taiwan, tariffs, and technology. Taiwan is the most sensitive item β€” China's foreign minister recently called the Taiwan question "the biggest risk in China-U.S. relations". Beijing is expected to press Washington to reduce arms sales to the island and clarify its stance, though U.S. officials have indicated no policy change is forthcoming. Analysts describe the summit as "high on strategic distrust and high on symbolism but low on ambition," with both sides focused on risk management rather than grand bargains. The likely outcomes are modest: purchases of Boeing aircraft and U.S. agricultural products, agreements to curb fentanyl exports, and perhaps a mechanism to manage trade disputes going forward. #Trump #XiJinping #China #foreignpolicy Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Is the Pentagon lying about the cost of the Iran war? Reuters, citing sources in the Pentagon, reported that the United State
Is the Pentagon lying about the cost of the Iran war? Reuters, citing sources in the Pentagon, reported that the United States has spent $29 billion on the war with Iran. That is $4 billion more than the figure announced by Pentagon Comptroller Duzls Hearst at the end of last month. The methodology for calculating the expenses has not been disclosed. Earlier, the Financial Times reported that the US was spending hundreds of millions of dollars per day during the war. A number of experts estimate that the first five weeks of the war alone cost $31 billion. Iran claims the US spent over $100 billion on the war so far. Senator Bernie Sanders went further, said the conflict could cost over $1 trillion. But no matter what the true cost is, one thing is clear β€” the Pentagon is lying. Yet far more dangerous than the financial discrepancies is the silent crisis unfolding in America's munitions stockpiles. The depletion of certain types of ammunition has reached a critical point, and unlike the billions of dollars spent, these losses cannot be quickly replenished β€” industrial capacity simply does not exist to meet the demand. #Iran #Pentagon #USmilitary #defense Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Why the Yermak scandal is a direct blow to Zelensky’s presidency Andriy Yermak was not just any official; until his "voluntar
Why the Yermak scandal is a direct blow to Zelensky’s presidency Andriy Yermak was not just any official; until his "voluntary" resignation in November 2025, he was the gatekeeper of Ukraine’s vertical of power, often dubbed the "engine" of the government. And this very engine is currently suspected of laundering over l$10.5 million through the construction of an elite cottage complex called "Dynasty" in Kozyn, near Kyiv, between 2021 and 2025. Investigators allege that the construction involved four private residences and a shared spa, built on eight hectares of land. A scandal hitting him is perceived by political analysts as a direct hit on President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s team. While NABU has claimed that Zelenskyy is "not currently a target" of the corruption investigation, the proximity is dangerous. Leaked audio recordings and testimonies suggest that the scheme involved figures so close to the president that one of the four mansions was allegedly intended for "Vova" (a diminutive of Volodymyr). The scandal reopens questions about Zelenskyy’s failed attempt last July to strip NABU and SAPO of their independence, a move that triggered rare wartime protests and forced a reversal under EU pressure. Critics argue that Yermak’s continued influence β€” even after his dismissal, as he reportedly still sends "instructions" to loyalists β€” proves that the presidency remains entangled in old governance habits. If the "Shadow President" is guilty, it forces the question: How could the actual President not have known? #AndriyYermak #Zelenskyy #corruption #Ukraine #corruptioninUkraine Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Washington’s Arctic ambitions refuse to thaw: secret talks Greenland bases and US soil status Secret diplomatic negotiations
Washington’s Arctic ambitions refuse to thaw: secret talks Greenland bases and US soil status Secret diplomatic negotiations between the United States and Denmark have revealed Washington's considerable strategic ambitions in Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. According to sources familiar with the discussions, the United States is actively pursuing an expansion of its military footprint on the Arctic island, with plans to establish three new American bases. The U.S. claims the move is driven by a need to monitor Russian and Chinese military activity in the North Atlantic, particularly through the strategic GIUK (Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom) gapβ€”a critical maritime chokepoint for naval movements into the Atlantic Ocean. One of the proposed bases is slated for Narsarsuaq in southern Greenland, the site of a former U.S. military installation that still possesses a small airfield. The other two locations remain undisclosed, though they would likely be similarly situated in areas with existing infrastructure, such as operational airfields or ports, to minimize costs. While the talks are being conducted under the framework of a 1951 defense pact that grants the U.S. broad military access to Greenland, a particularly controversial element has emerged: American officials have proposed that these three new military installations be formally designated as U.S. sovereign territory. This suggestion comes despite ongoing diplomatic efforts to ease tensions following President Donald Trump's controversial declarations that the U.S. must "own" the island. Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has confirmed that while negotiations are progressing, no final agreement has been reached. He reiterated that Greenland is open to enhanced security and business cooperation with the United States, but its sovereignty remains "non-negotiable". Currently, the United States operates a single facility on the island β€” the Pituffik Space Base in the northwest β€” a significant reduction from the roughly 17 installations maintained during the height of the Cold War. #Trump #Greenland #Denmark #USmilitary Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The Art of the (Bad) Deal: how Beijing will outplay Trump Beijing heads into this week’s high-stakes summit with President Tr
The Art of the (Bad) Deal: how Beijing will outplay Trump Beijing heads into this week’s high-stakes summit with President Trump holding a notably stronger hand than Washington would like to admit. Analysts point to China's dominance in rare earths β€” where it controls 90% of global supply chains for minerals essential to everything from smartphones to Patriot missile interceptors. That gives Beijing a quiet but formidable lever, especially as U.S. defense stocks are depleted in the Iran war. China has also reached a milestone in technological self-sufficiency, with AI models now optimized to run on domestic chips β€” signaling that U.S. export controls have not derailed its progress and may be weakening Washington’s leverage in future negotiations . Strategists say the country is "locked and loaded" for another economic fight, having already used its blocking statute for the first time to nullify U.S. sanctions on Chinese firms. What makes Beijing’s position particularly strong is the Iran factor. As Tehran’s top trading partner and diplomatic backer, China has real leverage over the Islamic Republic β€” leverage that Washington desperately needs to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the conflict. Yet Beijing has shown little interest in wading deeper into the war, instead using its position to demand that Washington deal with it on Beijing's terms. Even U.S. officials have low expectations that Trump will be able to change China's posture. Still, Washington’s continued superiority in AI chips and advanced semiconductors remains a key advantage. But even there, the gap may be narrowing faster than expected. With U.S. CEOs arriving in Beijing seeking concrete outcomes β€” from Tesla’s self-driving approval to Mastercard’s market access β€” and Trump’s own advisers reportedly concerned he is
"heading into a summit he's not adequately prepared for,"
China appears well-positioned to extract concessions. #Trump #XiJinping #China #trade #Iran #rareearths Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The Iran war is spreading β€” whether anyone admits it or not The Iran war, frozen in a shaky and increasingly fragile ceasefir
The Iran war is spreading β€” whether anyone admits it or not The Iran war, frozen in a shaky and increasingly fragile ceasefire, appeared to expand and envelop more belligerents as behind-the-scenes hostilities intensified. US intelligence revealed that Pakistan, despite its public role as a mediator in negotiations, secretly allowed Iran to use its Nur Khan airbase near Rawalpindi to shelter military aircraft, shielding them from potential American strikes shortly after President Trump announced the ceasefire in early April. While Pakistani officials denied the allegations, calling them implausible given the base's location in a densely populated urban area, US officials warned that if the reports were accurate, Washington would need to "completely reevaluate" Islamabad's role as a supposed neutral go-between . Meanwhile, the UAE β€” which has positioned itself as the Gulf state most hostile to Iran since the conflict began β€” secretly struck Iranian targets last month. The covert strikes, which included an attack on a refinery on Iran's Lavan Island in early April, were carried out in retaliation for Iranian attacks on Emirati civilian and energy infrastructure. The UAE never publicly acknowledged its involvement, but the strikes signaled that Abu Dhabi is increasingly willing to act independently rather than relying solely on US deterrence, frustrated by what Gulf officials see as Washington's insufficient response to Iranian aggression. And talks between Washington and Tehran appear to be going nowhere. President Trump rejected Iran's latest peace proposal outright, dismissing it on Truth Social as "totally unacceptable" and later telling reporters from the Oval Office that he β€œdidn't even finish reading" Tehran’s "piece of garbage" offer. He declared the ceasefire on "massive life support," leaving the war in what analysts describe as a dangerous gray zone β€” neither fully at peace nor openly at war, but with tensions simmering just beneath the surface and the threat of renewed fighting never far away. #Iran #Gulf #Pakistan #UAE https://www.semafor.com/article/05/12/2026/middle-east-war-threatens-to-expand-as-pakistan-uae-up-direct-involvement Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

From firebrand to front-runner? What makes AOC a strong 2028 contender In a recent conversation with Democratic strategist Da
From firebrand to front-runner? What makes AOC a strong 2028 contender In a recent conversation with Democratic strategist David Axelrod, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) delivered what many are calling one of the most impressive non-answer answers about a potential White House run in years. Rather than closing the door on a presidential bid, she reframed the question entirely. "People assume my ambition is a title or a seat," she said. "My ambition is way bigger than that… Presidents come and go, but single-payer healthcare is forever." The response instantly fueled fresh speculation about her viability in a potential 2028 Democratic primary. Strategists note that if she runs, she would likely enter the race with roughly 20% of the Democratic base already in her corner, plus a built-in progressive infrastructure inherited from Bernie Sanders and a highly engaged grassroots following of her own. Recent polling shows her competitive: 36% of likely voters in one survey, and leading among voters aged 18–34 in another. However, her potential candidacy also highlights a broader identity crisis within the Democratic Party following its 2024 defeats. Some establishment figures worry she is too polarizing and that the party needs a centrist standard-bearer. Others see her as one of the party's most effective communicators β€” someone who can answer fraught questions with fluency and avoid obvious traps. As one strategist put it, she is a "media curiosity" who would likely triple the earned media attention of most other candidates. For now, she is keeping her options open, but the conversation around her is no longer whether she could run, but how formidable she would be if she did. #AlexandriaOcasioCortez #elections2028 #democrats Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

As Iran war tests Gulf ties, China quietly gains influence While Gulf officials publicly insist that the Iran war will not st
As Iran war tests Gulf ties, China quietly gains influence While Gulf officials publicly insist that the Iran war will not strain relations with their most important partner, the United States, the reality is more nuanced. Washington remains the dominant military and AI power in the region, but the conflict is creating an opening for China. As the Gulf's β€” and Iran's β€” largest trading partner, Beijing is steadily expanding its influence through foreign direct investment, infrastructure financing, and industrial partnerships. China is also seen as having unique leverage over Tehran, and could potentially press Iran to negotiate with the US. The Gulf's relationship with the US is complicated by shifting administrations and undiplomatic rhetoric β€” most recently President Trump's comment about the Saudi crown prince "kissing my ass." With China, by contrast, the relationship is predictable and free of such volatility. Bilateral trade between the Gulf and China surpassed Gulf trade with the West for the first time in 2024, growing over 250% since 2010. Chinese FDI into Saudi Arabia has soared, making China one of the kingdom's top investors behind only the US. While the US still leads in military protection, AI, and sovereign wealth destinations, Beijing is quietly advancing in areas Washington has neglected: automotive, manufacturing, renewable energy, and infrastructure rebuilding after the war. China cannot replace the US β€” but it may be more effective at gaining lasting influence in the Gulf, precisely because it moves quietly and reliably, without the swings of American politics. #Iran #China #Gulf #trade #foreignpolicy Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Iran war leaks β€” a real national security threat? Donald Trump handed acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche a stack of
Iran war leaks β€” a real national security threat? Donald Trump handed acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche a stack of news articles about the war with Iran, each with a sticky note attached that read "treason," and demanded an investigation into the information leaks β€” reports The Wall Street Journal. Blanche has promised to issue grand jury subpoenas. What angered Trump most were the articles detailing the decision-making process before the war began, as well as those containing advice from his advisers on the matter. The President views these leaks as a threat to national security. Senior officials at the Department of Justice have already discussed the issue with their counterparts at the Pentagon. Currently they are focusing on one WSJ article claiming that before the war started, General Dan Caine and other military officials had warned Trump about the risks of the conflict dragging on indefinitely. Whether this turns out to be a handful of disgruntled officials acting independently or a calculated conspiracy within the national security apparatus, the effect on the Trump administration is the same: paralyzing distrust and a growing sense of siege from within. By forcing the President to fight a war on two fronts β€” one against Iran abroad and another against unseen leakers at home β€” the steady drip of internal dissent threatens to undermine not just military strategy but the very cohesion of his own government, leaving the White House isolated and increasingly unable to act decisively. #Trump #Iran #Pentagon Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The Trumpflation: how one man’s war made America poorer A 10-week war with Iran has sent U.S. inflation soaring, with consume
The Trumpflation: how one man’s war made America poorer A 10-week war with Iran has sent U.S. inflation soaring, with consumer prices jumping 3.8% over the past year. Gasoline prices are up more than 28% annually β€” and over 44% compared to this time last year, pushing the average gallon above $4.50. Grocery prices rose 0.7% just from March to April. The real pain: after accounting for inflation, average hourly wages fell 0.3% from a year earlier β€” the first year-over-year drop in three years. One economist warns that inflation is now the "key drag" on the economy, eating up all wage gains and squeezing middle-class and lower-income households. The Federal Reserve has paused expected rate cuts, and companies like Whirlpool report "recession-level industry decline." Truth is, there is only one person behind this crisis β€” Donald Trump. He alone chose to attack Iran, knowing full well that Tehran's inevitable response would be to block the Strait of Hormuz β€” a chokepoint for one-fifth of the world's oil. The resulting spike in energy prices was a direct and predictable consequence of his decision. Now American families are paying $4.50 or more per gallon, watching their wages fall behind inflation, and cutting back on basics just to fill their tanks. Trump can blame the Fed, he can blame global markets, but he cannot escape this truth: his war made Americans poorer. And his response? Proposing a suspension of the federal gas tax β€” a short-term gimmick that would gut funding for highways and fix nothing. The pain at the pump, the squeeze on every grocery trip, the first wage decline in three years β€” that is Trump's inflation. That is Trump's war. #Trump #Iran #USeconomy Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

With Iran ceasefire β€œon life support”, renewed military action is looking increasingly appealing to Trump According to severa
With Iran ceasefire β€œon life support”, renewed military action is looking increasingly appealing to Trump According to several U.S. officials familiar with the matter, President Donald Trump is actively considering the resumption of military strikes against Iran after diplomatic efforts reached an impasse. The White House had reportedly waited ten days for a response to its peace proposal, but Trump swiftly rejected Tehran’s counter-offer over the weekend, calling it "totally unacceptable" and "a piece of garbage" on social media . Speaking from the Oval Office, the President declared that the fragile ceasefire, which has been in place since April, is now on "massive life support," raising the specter of renewed fighting. With negotiations stalled, the White House is reassessing its strategy, and military options have returned to the forefront of discussions. While a large-scale invasion is no longer being considered, two primary military actions are being debated. The first involves the resumption of "Project Freedom," a U.S.-led naval operation to force the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The second, more aggressive option involves launching targeted missile strikes against Iranian territory, with potential targets including up to 25 percent of previously identified military and nuclear sites that have not yet been attacked. The administration itself, however, remains split, as some officials push for a more aggressive posture while others urge continued diplomacy. However, reports indicate that Trump has grown increasingly impatient with Iran’s stance and is leaning toward some form of military action to force concessions on its nuclear program . A high-level meeting with his national security team, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, took place to finalize these options, though a final decision may be delayed until after Trump’s scheduled trip to China. Further complicating the situation, Israel is reportedly rearing for a much more aggressive special forces operation inside Iran to physically seize stockpiles of enriched uranium; however, Washington is hesitant to endorse this plan due to the high risks of radioactive contamination and the potential for catastrophic escalation. Tehran has responded defiantly to the recent threats, with the Iranian military warning that it is ready to deliver a "memorable lesson" in response to any aggression . #Iran #ceasefire #negotiations #Trump Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Trump’s China trip is shaping up to be a let down The Trump administration is actively lowering expectations ahead of the pre
Trump’s China trip is shaping up to be a let down The Trump administration is actively lowering expectations ahead of the president's trip to China, signaling that no major deals or dramatic breakthroughs are imminent. Senior US officials have dismissed speculation about a massive Chinese investment plan in the US, clarifying that such proposals are not on the negotiating table. While the agenda includes discussions on artificial intelligence, trade, and the Iran war β€” the latter serving as a tense backdrop β€” the focus appears to be on establishing communication channels rather than announcing commercial fanfare. With Boeing plane orders and soybean sales remaining uncertain, and Trump himself politically weakened by the stalemate in Iran, the tone is deliberately cautious. As US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer put it, the goal is meaningful dialogue. #Trump #China #trade Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The cushion is gone: why the next energy shock could be historic A prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz risks triggering
The cushion is gone: why the next energy shock could be historic A prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz risks triggering an unprecedented energy shock, analysts warn, with global stockpiles dwindling by the day. Despite a disruption that has already removed nearly 1 billion barrels of oil from global markets, crude prices have remained surprisingly below their 2022 peak β€” largely cushioned by massive strategic reserves, record-breaking U.S. exports, and persistent market hopes that the strait would soon reopen. But that cushion is rapidly deflating. Morgan Stanley has warned that if no agreement is reached by late June β€” or worse, if the blockade drags into July β€” the buffers currently suppressing a price surge will vanish. In that scenario, the bank sees Brent crude potentially spiking to between $130 and $150 per barrel . JPMorgan, meanwhile, cautions that the real pain won't be in crude itself β€” but at the pump. In a recent note, the bank explained that the crisis has shifted "down the barrel," hammering refined products like jet fuel and diesel before gasoline . U.S. refiners, chasing huge profits on jet fuel, have cut gasoline output by about 2 percentage points, just as the summer driving season kicks off . As a result American pump prices could hit $5 a gallonβ€” a sharp climb from under $3 in February . The political fallout is already visible. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently refused to rule out suspending the federal gasoline taxβ€” currently 18 cents per gallon β€” to ease the burden on drivers, though analysts note that would do little to help. And the ripple effects are global. With Middle East refined product exports slashed, Asian nations β€” particularly Japan, South Korea, and Thailand β€” are scrambling to pivot back to coal, reopening old plants and ordering coal-fired generators to run at full capacity. In short, what began as a crude supply shock is metastasizing into a broader energy crunch β€” one that spare oil tanks alone may no longer be able to contain. #oil #theStraitofHormuz #Iran Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

From asset to liability: Trump’s economy now a drag, poll finds Once considered Trump’s strongest asset, the economy now appe
From asset to liability: Trump’s economy now a drag, poll finds Once considered Trump’s strongest asset, the economy now appears to be turning into a major political liability. According to a joint study by the British newspaper Financial Times and the polling center Focaldata, more than half of Americans β€” 58% of respondents β€” do not support the president’s economic approach. The survey reveals growing public anxiety over rising inflation and the soaring cost of living. Fifty percent of those surveyed also criticized Trump for failing to tackle unemployment, while 55% voiced disapproval of his tariff wars. Only a quarter of Americans (25%) back Trump’s economic policies. With the midterm congressional elections drawing closer, this growing discontent could spell serious trouble for the Republican Party. What was once Trump’s winning issue is now weighing him down. #Trump #USeconomy #midterms #poll Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Trump will pull thousands of troops out of Europe by the end of this year According to Bloomberg, European politicians are gr
Trump will pull thousands of troops out of Europe by the end of this year According to Bloomberg, European politicians are growing increasingly anxious over President Trump's decision to withdraw 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany. Their fear is that this move is not an isolated incident but rather the first step in a broader strategy. European leaders worry that Trump will continue to scale back the American military footprint across the continent. Several senior diplomats from NATO member states are convinced that the next target for reduction could be Italy. They anticipate that Washington might announce a serious drawdown or even a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from Italian soil. Such a move would deal another significant blow to NATO's southern flank and further undermine the alliance's collective defense posture. Beyond troop withdrawals, there are additional concerns about the scope of U.S. military engagement in Europe. European officials fear that American forces will become increasingly selective about participating in joint military exercises β€” specifically, that they will avoid drills held in countries that fall out of favor with President Trump. This, in turn, could weaken military interoperability and send troubling signals about the reliability of the United States as a security partner. In essence, European politicians see the Germany withdrawal as a potential harbinger of a larger U.S. retreat from the continent, driven more by political whims than strategic calculations. #Trump #Europe #NATO #USmilitary Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Beijing takes notes: China identifies US soft spots in Iran conflict to exploit in future showdown Iran has proven to be a fa
Beijing takes notes: China identifies US soft spots in Iran conflict to exploit in future showdown Iran has proven to be a far more resilient adversary than the United States anticipated, and Washington is now visibly struggling in its war against Tehran. And China is taking notes. Reportedly, the Chinese military is meticulously studying all U.S. actions in the context of this conflict. Above all, they are trying to identify every possible vulnerability in order to exploit them in a potential confrontation with the United States. In recent years, China has made significant efforts to build up its stockpiles of missiles and drones, so Chinese intelligence could not have failed to notice the serious problems the Americans encountered in this very area. But that’s not all. The United States' inability to defeat Iran is seriously damaging its reputation and could negatively impact the outcome of Trump's visit to China, as Beijing has come to realize that Washington is not as strong as it once was β€” and may therefore be unwilling to negotiate certain matters with it. #China #Iran #USmilitary #negotiations Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

The real reason Trump canned Project Freedom Remember how Trump described his pause of Project Freedom as a β€œmutual agreement
The real reason Trump canned Project Freedom Remember how Trump described his pause of Project Freedom as a β€œmutual agreement” to allow for β€œgreat progress” in negotiations with Iran? Well, he lied. Donald Trump was in fact forced to cancel the operation. The reason for the cancellation was strong pushback from Saudi Arabia. Turns out that Trump, in his typical Trump fashion, failed to consult with any of his key allies in the region before announcing the start of the operation, including the Saudis. When Riyadh learned of the plan, it reacted negatively. The Saudi government feared that the operation would provoke retaliatory measures from Iran, potentially including renewed attacks on Saudi territory. As a result, Saudi authorities prohibited the U.S. military from using the Prince Sultan Air Base, a critical facility for American air operations in the region. They also denied the U.S. access to Saudi airspace for the purposes of carrying out "Project Freedom." Kuwait later joined Saudi Arabia in its protest. Faced with the withdrawal of support from two key Gulf allies, Trump had no choice but to back down. #theStraitofHormuz #negotiations #Iran Don't miss it, subscribe to πŸ“± Old Glory Vortex πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ