Data Analytics
Perfect channel to learn Data Analytics Learn SQL, Python, Alteryx, Tableau, Power BI and many more For Promotions: @coderfun @love_data
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Data Analytics
Channel Data Analytics (@sqlspecialist) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 110 115 subscribers, ranking 1 107 in the Technologies & Applications category and 2 303 in the India region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 110 115 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 13 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 614 over the last 30 days and by 7 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 3.42%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 1.66% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 3 766 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 1 832 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 9.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as row, sql, analytic, analyst, visualization.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Perfect channel to learn Data Analytics
Learn SQL, Python, Alteryx, Tableau, Power BI and many more
For Promotions: @coderfun @love_data”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 14 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
SELECT
employee_id,
total_projects
FROM (
SELECT
employee_id,
COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) AS total_projects,
DENSE_RANK() OVER (
ORDER BY COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) DESC
) AS rnk
FROM employee_projects
GROUP BY employee_id
) ranked
WHERE rnk = 1;
💡 Explanation:
This query counts the number of unique projects each employee has worked on and identifies those with the highest count.
• COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) counts unique projects for each employee
• GROUP BY employee_id creates one record per employee
• DENSE_RANK() ranks employees based on the number of projects
• The outer query returns all employees tied for the highest number of projects
This question tests your understanding of:
✅ COUNT(DISTINCT)
✅ GROUP BY
✅ Window Functions DENSE_RANK
✅ Ranking Aggregated Results
🎯 Expected Output Example
Employee ID | Total Projects
101 | 12
205 | 12
Both employees have worked on the highest number of distinct projects.
🚀 Alternative Without Window Functions
SELECT
employee_id,
COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) AS total_projects
FROM employee_projects
GROUP BY employee_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) = (
SELECT MAX(project_count)
FROM (
SELECT
COUNT(DISTINCT project_id) AS project_count
FROM employee_projects
GROUP BY employee_id
) t
);
This solution uses nested subqueries and MAX() instead of window functions.
🚀 Tip for SQL Job Seekers:
Many interview questions involve ranking aggregated results, such as:
Highest number of projects, Most orders, Maximum sales, Highest attendance, Most logins
Practice combining GROUP BY with window functions like DENSE_RANK() to solve these efficiently.
❤️ React with ❤️ for more interview challenges!WITH salary_changes AS (
SELECT
employee_id,
salary,
effective_date,
salary - LAG(salary) OVER (
PARTITION BY employee_id
ORDER BY effective_date
) AS salary_increment
FROM salary_history
)
SELECT
employee_id,
salary_increment
FROM (
SELECT
employee_id,
salary_increment,
DENSE_RANK() OVER (
ORDER BY salary_increment DESC
) AS rnk
FROM salary_changes
WHERE salary_increment IS NOT NULL
) ranked
WHERE rnk = 1;
💡 Explanation:
This query calculates each employee's salary increment and then finds the highest increment across all employees.
• LAG(salary) retrieves the employee's previous salary
• The difference between the current and previous salary gives the increment
• DENSE_RANK() ranks increments from highest to lowest
• The outer query returns all employees tied for the highest salary increment
This question tests your understanding of:
✅ LAG() Window Function
✅ Common Table Expressions (CTEs)
✅ DENSE_RANK()
✅ Time-Series Data Analysis
🎯 Expected Output Example
Employee ID | Salary Increment
101 | 20,000
205 | 20,000
Both employees received the largest salary increase.
🚀 Why Interviewers Ask This?
This is a classic window function interview question. It evaluates your ability to compare a row with its previous row—a common requirement in payroll, finance, and audit systems.
🚀 Tip for SQL Job Seekers:
Master these analytical window functions:
LAG() / LEAD() / FIRST_VALUE() / LAST_VALUE() / NTILE()
These functions are frequently tested in product-based companies and data-focused interviews because they simplify complex row-by-row comparisons.
❤️ React with ❤️ for more interview challenges!SELECT
customer_id
FROM orders
WHERE YEAR(order_date) = 2025
GROUP BY customer_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT MONTH(order_date)) = 12;
💡 Explanation:
This query identifies customers who placed at least one order in every month of 2025.
• WHERE YEAR(order_date) = 2025 filters orders from the year 2025
• GROUP BY customer_id groups all orders by customer
• COUNT(DISTINCT MONTH(order_date)) counts the unique months in which each customer placed an order
• HAVING ... = 12 ensures the customer has orders in all 12 months
This question tests your understanding of:
✅ Date Functions (YEAR, MONTH)
✅ GROUP BY
✅ HAVING
✅ COUNT(DISTINCT)
🎯 Expected Output Example
| Customer ID |
|-------------|
| 101 |
| 205 |
These customers placed at least one order in every month of 2025.
🚀 Alternative (Database-Agnostic SQL)
SELECT
customer_id
FROM orders
WHERE EXTRACT(YEAR FROM order_date) = 2025
GROUP BY customer_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT EXTRACT(MONTH FROM order_date)) = 12;
This version works with databases like PostgreSQL and Oracle that support the EXTRACT() function.
🚀 Tip for SQL Job Seekers:
Whenever you see interview questions containing phrases like:
"Every month" / "Every quarter" / "Every year" / "Every category"
Think of COUNT(DISTINCT ...) combined with GROUP BY and HAVING. This is a very common SQL interview pattern.
❤️ React with ❤️ for more interview challenges!The GigaChat team has released GigaChat 3.5 Ultra as open source—a new 432B model under the MIT license. This is the first open-source hybrid of GatedDeltaNet and MLA scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, featuring a proprietary training recipe we refined through more than 1,500 experiments. The model has grown in terms of code, mathematics, agent scenarios, and application domains—yet it’s 40% smaller than GigaChat 3.1 Ultra.What’s inside: 🔘A proprietary hybrid MLA + Gated DeltaNet architecture with a dedicated stabilization framework, without which this hybrid setup would not train reliably at this scale; 🔘 Gated Attention: the model can locally down-weight overly strong signals from the attention layer; 🔘GatedNorm: normalization with an explicit gate that controls signal magnitude across features; 🔘Approximately 4x lower KV cache per token: with the same memory budget, the model can support 2.14x longer context and deliver a 20% throughput increase under load; 🔘Two MTP heads, enabling up to 2.2x faster generation; 🔘FP8 across all training stages with no quality degradation compared with bf16, enabled by custom Triton and CUDA kernels; 🔘A new online RL stage after SFT and DPO. Results: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Base outperforms DeepSeek V3.2 Exp Base and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on average across a set of general, math, and code benchmarks: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Instruct is comparable to DeepSeek V3.2 in terms of average score, despite having half the size; 🔘 According to the MiniMax-M2.7 LLM judge, the average win rate against GigaChat 3.1 Ultra is 75.9%, and against GPT-5 is 68.7%.
The entire stack — data (our own LLM-filtered Common Crawl, 600+ programming languages in the code), architecture, training methodology, and infrastructure — was built end-to-end by GigaChat team.➡️ HuggingFace
