Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK

Study: Gardasil HPV Vaccine Contains Chemical Used in Biological Warfare The expanding cocktail of harmful ingredients in human papillomavirus vaccines The HPV vaccine is one of the most harmful vaccines offered to children •The Gardasil (HPV) vaccine is linked to undeniable death and undeniable severe injuries •HPV vaccines contain an "upgraded" version of a toxin that's been used in vaccines for the past 90 years •Trials Showed a 27% Miscarriage Rate, Sterilises Women •HPV vaccine-induced systemic illness is a genuinely novel disorder that likely encompasses dozens of biochemical and physiological disruptions orchestrated by the presence of multiple HIDDEN TOXIC vaccine ingredients. Source: They Keep Saying Its Rare on X T.me/childcovidvaccinjuriesuk

BBC pushing another toxic and deadly injection onto our children : HPV is one of the most dangerous and harmful vaccines given to our children Right on cue as they roll it out to children at school Undeniable Toxic Ingredients in HPV Vaccines https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cv2x2en4lpro T.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

Couldn’t agree more with Dr.Mike Yeadon. Anyone still pushing COVID-19 & the pandemic narrative needs to be avoided (imho). There was no virus, lab leak etc etc. Only fear propagandised by the media. Yet doctors and so called experts are still enthusiastically selling the theory that lives could have been saved with early treatment protocols. Therefore fuelling the fraud of pandemics, past and future. What they’re missing (perhaps purposefully?) is that no one was sick, they were murdered by lethal protocols, by the state.

As you may know, I’ve developed a severe allergy to the proposition of “early treatment for covid19”. I’m absolutely fine with early treatment for anything provided it’s rational. It’s the tag “for covid19” that I can’t tolerate. It’s much more than an academic argument about whether there was a new syndromic illness in some people, in the opinion of some physicians. I think those promoting early treatments for covid19 have first to concede all the major points the perpetrators seek to nail in people’s minds. Otherwise, their treatment paradigm doesn’t work. Is that what they want? -New disease. -New virus. -GOF research & leaks. -Viruses as cause of acute respiratory illnesses. -Since there are no widely accepted clinical signs & symptoms differentiating “covid19” from the broad swathe of influenza-like illnesses, this whole business reinforces the utility of PCR as a reasonable diagnostic. -Unavoidably, reinforces the myth of contagiousness.  These are all things I’m working hard to show people are all not true. They are most of the heart of the deception that will be used to destroy what’s left of our freedoms and all of our medical autonomy. So I hope knowing that helps you understand why I have little patience for the concept.  Do those promoting early treatment for covid19 really want to gift all those lies to the perpetrators? I so much don’t believe any rational person would want to do that I’m struggling to credit such as stance as being benign, because it doesn’t look that way to me. If I was one of the perpetrators and I wanted to reinforce the deception, I’d been highly motivated to prompt at least some physicians to do it.  The plus of “promoting early treatment of covid19” is the real possibility that certain acute respiratory illnesses respond to certain pharmaceutical treatments. However, it would be both more precise as well as correct to “promote early treatment for influenza-like illnesses”. I don’t think this is a minor point of difference. I confess that my first thought about the claims that drug X or Y “worked” in “covid19” was that what was being treated was a non specific ILI, a treatment paradigm previously unexplored.  Clinical research into ILI has been a non-sexy area all my professional life, because it was considered a drug development graveyard (nothing works), beyond being the largest single source of revenue for oral antibiotics for suspected bacterial pneumonia.  Best wishes  Mike 

In case people are wondering if the VAERS data can be reliable after the CDC deleted 500,000 records in November 2022, I have repeated the analysis with the VAERS files released by ICAN showing all the data immediately prior to the Nov 2022 deletions. The pattern still holds.

BLOOD MONEY; How Doctors Profit From Vaccinating Your Child Is your doctor really working in your child’s best interest? Is informed consent given when your child is vaccinated? Do doctors uphold their Hippocratic oath? A paediatrician in the US receives $400 per fully vaccinated child up to age 2. Most doctors have an average of 1,546 patients. That’s a big financial incentive. $80,000 in bonuses received if 200 children under 2 are FULLY VACCINATED However,to qualify for these bonuses, 63% of patients must be FULLY VACCINATED. UK GPs must hit a 95% target to receive their FULL financial incentives (& a minimum of 80% to qualify) £10.06 for each dose administered ON TIME UK Children receive almost 40 vaccines before the age of 5 https://wellnessandequality.com/2016/06/20/how-much-money-do-pediatricians-really-make-from-vaccines/ https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/practice-personal-finance/some-gp-practices-face-losing-up-to-66k-in-child-immunisation-payments/ T.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

How Doctors are financially bribed to harm and kill our children with untested, toxic injections T.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

Internet access has been restored, though not by fixing the cables, but rather by finding alternative routes. Further incidents of cutting may result in resumed outages.

Updated

Here is the 2022 data. It shows the same sudden drop after the age of 17, but this time down to a more or less constant plateau until the age of 70. Boosters were only authorised for 18 and over.