Data Secrets
Главный по машинному обучению Сотрудничество: @veron_28 РКН: clck.ru/3FY3GN
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Data Secrets
Channel Data Secrets (@data_secrets) in the Russian language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 91 201 subscribers, ranking 1 371 in the Technologies & Applications category and 6 147 in the Russia region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 91 201 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 12 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 821 over the last 30 days and by 36 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Verified (Officially confirmed by Telegram)
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 25.31%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 18.36% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 23 087 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 16 749 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 267.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as claude, openai, контекст, стартап, llm.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Главный по машинному обучению
Сотрудничество: @veron_28
РКН: clck.ru/3FY3GN”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 13 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
"Функция может обнаружить некоторые ошибки, но она также может усыпить бдительность пользователей, заставив их думать, что модели оказываются правдивыми чаще, чем это есть на самом деле. Допустим, она даст 99% безопасности против 90% без нее. Но ведь проблема никогда не была в этих 9%. Она всегда будет в 1% ошибок, которые мы не обнаруживаем".
