Task Force - PPTF

From what I understand, when we became “bankrupts”, “citizens”, “enemy combatants”, and “belligerents” (which seem to have come out of things like The Trading with the Enemy Act, the 14th Amendment and the Emergency Banking Relief Act, The Reconstruction Acts, the international treaties for Rules of War on Land, the incorporation of Washington, D.C, the Lieber Code and the Civil Rights Act), we lost all standing in the courts. Is it enough to state that i, am a woman in order to regain standing ?

PAPER TERRORISM .. The KEY is to CLAIM against the insurance.. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/parents-mask-schools-surety-bonds-rcna16872

That the Executive branch, under the Commander in Chief as some prefer to call the President today, found “authority” to criminalize speech as a “military crime” in violation of the First Amendment was through the proclamation of martial law as regulated by G.O. No. 100, Lieber’s Code. General Henry W. Halleck, Union Army Chief of Staff, explained: “Martial law, which is built upon no settled principles, but is entirely arbitrary in its decisions is in truth and reality no law, but something indulged rather than allowed as a law.” This understanding of the law of war, or martial law, was echoed by US Supreme Court Justice Field, who wrote: “It may be true, also, that on the actual theatre of military operations what is termed martial law, but which would be better called martial rule, for it is little else than the will of the commanding general, applies to all persons, whether in the military service or civilians. . . . The ordinary laws of the land are there superseded by the laws of war. . . .” https://original.antiwar.com/todd_pierce/2014/04/06/the-dark-side-of-liebers-code-or-cheneyite-jurisprudence/

The Articles of Confederation was the outline for the Constitution and it spelled out their business plan to control America. https://patriots4truth.org/2018/04/29/nobody-won-the-american-revolutionary-war/

64 James A. Seddon, Letter to Robert Ould, Jun. 24, 1863, reprinted in FRED C. AINSWORTH & JOSEPH W. KIRKLEY, VI THE WAR OF THE REBELLION: A COMPILATION OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE UNION AND CONFEDERATE ARMIES, SERIES II, 41 (1899) (“Order No. 100 is a confused, unassorted, and undiscriminating compilation from the opinion of the publicists of the last two centuries, some of which are obsolete, others repudiated; and a military commander under this code may pursue a line of conduct in accordance with principles of justice, faith, and honor, or he may justify conduct correspondent with the warfare of the barbarous hordes who overran the Roman Empire, or who, in the Middle Ages, devastated the continent of Asia and menaced the civilization of Europe.”). 65 Refer to § 17.2.3 (Application of Humanitarian Rules and the Legal Status of the Parties to the Conflict). 66 Refer to § 3.3.3.2 (Assertion of War Powers by a State Engaged in Hostilities Against a Non-State Armed Group).

19.3 LIEBER CODE General Order No. 100, Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, 1863, issued on April 24, 1863, is often called the “Lieber Code” because it was prepared by Francis Lieber.58 It is an early example of the law of war being implemented through military instructions or regulations.59 The Lieber Code was the first comprehensive publication on the law of war for U.S. armed forces and is regarded as an important work of historical significance in the law of war.60 The Lieber Code established rules governing martial law, military jurisdiction, the treatment of spies and deserters, and the treatment of POWs. Many key law of war principles, such as the principle of military necessity, were codified in the Lieber Code.61 However, parts of the Lieber Code reflect 19th century understandings of the law of war that have been modified by treaties that the United States has ratified or by subsequent customary international law. For example, the Lieber Code permitted the denial of quarter in certain circumstances.62 However, denying quarter in those circumstances is no longer acceptable.63 The Lieber Code was prepared during the Civil War. The Confederate forces agreed with some provisions of the Lieber Code, but disagreed with others.64 The Lieber Code reflected rules for “regular war” or what today would be classified as international armed conflict. Such rules were applied to the Confederate forces for humanitarian reasons, even though the United States did not recognize the Confederacy as a legitimate government or State.65 In this way, the Lieber Code is an example of the application of the doctrine of recognition of belligerency.66 58 E. D. Townsend, Assistant Adjutant General, General Orders No. 100, Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, Apr. 24, 1863, reprinted in INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE FIELD, 2 (Government Printing Office, 1898) (“The following ‘Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field,’ prepared by Francis Lieber, L.L.D., and revised by a Board of Officers, of which Major General E.A. Hitchcock is president, having been approved by the President of the United States, he commands that they be published for the information of all concerned.”). 59 Refer to § 18.7 (Instructions, Regulations, and Procedures to Implement and Enforce the Law of War). 60 See, e.g., Kononov v. Latvia, European Court of Human Rights, App. No. 36376/04, ¶63 (May 17, 2010) (“The Lieber Code 1863 is regarded as the first attempt to codify the laws and customs of war. Although only applicable to American forces, it represented a summary of the laws and customs of war existing at the time and was influential in later codifications.”); Elihu Root, Francis Lieber, 7 AJIL 453, 457 (1913) (“In the Brussels Conference of 1874, convened at the instance of the Emperor of Russia for the purpose of codifying the laws and customs of war, the Russian delegate, Baron Jomini, as president of the conference, declared that the project of an international convention then presented had its origin in the rules of President Lincoln. The convention agreed upon at Brussels was not ratified, but in 1880 the Institute of International Law made the work of the Brussels Conference and the work of Lieber, which so far as it was of general application was incorporated in that convention, the basis of a manual of the laws of war upon land; and finally, in The Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907, the conventions with respect to the laws and customs of war on land gave the adherence of the whole civilized world in substance and effect to those international rules which President Lincoln made binding upon the American armies fifty years ago.”). 61 Refer to § 2.2 (Military Necessity). 62 LIEBER CODE art. 61 (“All troops of the enemy known or discovered to give no quarter in general, or to any portion of the army, receive none.”). 63 Refer to § 5.4.7 (Prohibition Against Declaring That No Quarter Be Given).

Never PLAY Jesus.

DauntlessDialogue Published May 27, 2022 6,446 Views 772 rumbles In ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING, filmmaker Mouthy Buddha investigates institutional pedophilia at the highest levels of politics, finance, and fame. ____ This is obviously an older film by Mouthy Buddha that needs to be recirculated for those who have never seen it because is just as relevant today. View the full series in 1080p: https://dauntlessdialogue.com/pedogate-2020-series/ https://rumble.com/v16d3qb-elite-human-trafficking-vol-4-edited-by-mouthy-buddha.html