en
Feedback
Ecce Verbum

Ecce Verbum

Open in Telegram

Catholic reading material archive

Show more
886
Subscribers
No data24 hours
+67 days
+1830 days
Posts Archive
Mary's perpetual Virginity Biblical evidence The Greek word for brother in the New Testament is adelphos. The well-known linguistic reference An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, defines it as follows:
Adelphos: denotes a brother, or near kinsman; in the plural, a community based on identity of origin or life. It is used of: 1. male children of the same parents.. 2. male descendants of the same parents, Acts 7:23, 26; Hebrews 7:5; .. 4. people of the same nationality, Acts 3:17, 22; Romans 9:3 .. 5. any man, a neighbour, Luke 10:29; Matthew 5:22, 7:3; 6. persons united by a common interest, Matthew 5:47; 7. persons united by a common calling, Revelation 22:9; 8. mankind, Matthew 25:40; Hebrews 2:17; 9. the disciples, and so, by implication, all believers, Matthew 28:10; John 20:17; 10. believers, apart from sex, Matthew 23:8; Acts 1:15; Romans 1:13; 1 Thessalonians 1:4; Revelation 19:10 (the word sisters is used of believers, only in 1 Timothy 5:2) ..202 [202 Vine, An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, Vol. 1, 154-155.]
It is evident that Jesus' "brothers" need not necessarily be siblings of Jesus on linguistic grounds, as many commentators seem to assume uncritically. By examining the use of adelphos and related words in Hebrew, and by comparing Scripture with Scripture ("exegesis"), one can determine the most sensible explanation of all the biblical data taken collectively. Many examples prove that adelphos has a wide variety of meanings: * In the King James Version, Jacob is called the "brother" of his Uncle Laban (Gen. 29:15; 29:10). The same thing occurs with regard to Lot and Abraham (Gen. 14:14 / 11:26-27). The Revised Standard Version uses "kinsman" at 29:15 and 14:14. * Use of brother or brethren for mere kinsmen: Deuteronomy 23:7, 2 Samuel 1:26, 1 Kings 9:13, 20:32, 2 Kings 10:13-14, Jeremiah 34:9, Amos 1:9. * Neither Hebrew nor Aramaic has a word for cousin. Although the New Testament was written in Greek, which does have such a word, the literal rendering of the Hebrew word ach, which was used by the first disciples and Jesus, is indeed adelphos, the literal equivalent of the English "brother." But even in English, brother has multiple meanings as well. Moving on to more direct biblical evidences of the perpetual virginity of Mary: * In Luke 2:41-51: the story of Mary and Joseph taking Jesus to the Temple at the age of twelve, it is fairly obvious that Jesus is the only child. Since everyone agrees he was the first child of Mary, if there were up to five or more siblings, as some maintain (arguing, for example, from Matthew 13:55), they were nowhere to be found at this time. This passage alone furnishes a strong argument for the implausibility of the "literal brothers" theory. * Jesus Himself uses brethren in the larger sense. In Matthew 23:8 He calls the "crowds" and His "disciples" (23:1) "brethren." In other words, they are each other's "brothers" (that is, the brotherhood of Christians). In Matthew 12:49-50 he calls his disciples and all who do the will of his Father "my brothers." * By comparing Matthew 27:56, Mark 15:40, and John 19:25, we find that James and Joseph -- mentioned in Matthew 13:55 with Simon and Jude as Jesus' "brothers" -- are also called sons of Mary, wife of Clopas. This other Mary (Matthew 27:61, 28:1) is called Our Lady's adelphe in John 19:25 (it isn't likely that there were two women named "Mary" in one family -- thus even this usage apparently means "cousin" or more distant relative). Matthew 13:55-56 and Mark 6:3 mention Simon, Jude and "sisters" along with James and Joseph, calling all adelphoi. Since we know for sure that at least James and Joseph are not Jesus' blood brothers, the most likely interpretation of Matthew 13:55 is that all these "brothers" are cousins, according to the linguistic conventions discussed above. At the very least, the term brother is not determinative in and of itself.

Mary's perpetual Virginity François Turretin François Turretin (1632-1687) was a major figure in Reformed Protestant (Calvinist) theology.
This is not expressly declared in Scripture, but is yet piously believed with human faith from the consent of the ancient church. Thus it is probable that the womb in which our Savior received the auspices of life (whence he entered into this world, as from a temple) was so consecrated and sanctified by so great a guest that she always remained untouched by man; nor did Joseph ever cohabit with her. Hence Helvidius and the Antidicomarianites (so-called because they were opponents of [antidikoi] Mary) are deservedly rebuked by the fathers for denying that Mary was always a virgin (aei Parthenon). They held that she cohabited with Joseph after delivery; yea, also bore children from him. As Augustine remarks, they rely on the shallowest arguments, i.e., because Christ is called the ‘firstborn’ of Mary (cf. De Haeresibus 56, 84 [PL 42.40, 46]). For as Jerome well remarks, she was so called because no one was begotten before him, not because there was another after him. Hence among lawyers: ‘He is the first whom no one precedes; he is last, whom no one follows.’ The Hebrews were accustomed to call the firstborn also only begotten; Israel is called ‘the first-born of God’ (Ex 4:22), although the only people chosen of God. Thus ‘the firstborn’ is said to be ‘holy unto God’ (Ex 13:2), who first opened the womb, whether others followed or not. Otherwise the firstborn would not have to be redeemed until after another offspring had been procreated (the law shows this to be false because it commands it to be redeemed a month after birth, Num. 18:16). Not more solidly have they been able to elicit this from the fact that in the New Testament certain ones are called ‘the brothers of Christ.’ It is common in Scripture not only for one’s own and full brothers by nature to be designated by this name, but also blood relatives and cousins (as Abraham and Lot, Jacob and Laban). Thus James and Joses, Simon and Judas are called brothers of Christ (Mt. 13:55) by a relation of blood. For Mary (who is called their mother by Matthew and Mark) is called by John the sister of the Lord’s mother. However what is said in Jn. 7:5 that ‘neither did his brethren believe him’ must be understood of more remote blood relations. Nor is it derived better from this-that Joseph is said ‘not to have known Mary till she had brought forth her firstborn son’ (Mt. 1:25). The particles ‘till” and ‘even unto’ are often referred only to the past, not to the future (i.e., they so connote the preceding time, concerning which there might be a doubt or which it was of the highest importance to know, as not to have a reference to the future-cf. Gen 28:15; Pss 122:2; 110:1; Mt.28:20, etc.). Thus is shown what was done by Joseph before the nativity of Christ (to wit, that he abstained form her); but it does not imply that he lived with her in any other way postpartum. When therefore she is said to have been found with child ‘before they came together’ (prin e synelthein autous), preceding copulation is denied, but not subsequent affirmed. Although copulation had not take place in that marriage, it did not cease to be true and ratified (although unconsummated) for not intercourse, but consent makes marriage. Therefore it was perfect as to form (to wit, undivided conjunction of life and unviolated faith), but not as to end (to wit, the procreation of children), although it was not deficient as to the raising of the offspring. Institutes of Elenctic Theology, vol. 2, 345-346

Mary's perpetual Virginity St. Jerome “When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him to do. He took Mary to be his wife. He did not have marital relations with her before she gave birth to a son. Joseph named the child Jesus.” But as regards Victorinus, I assert what has already been proven from the gospel- that he [Victorinus] spoke of the brethren of the Lord not as being sons ofary but brethren in the sense I have explained , that is to say, brethren in point of kinship, not by nature. [By discussing such things we] are discussing tiny streams of opinion. Might I not array against you the whole series of ancient writers? Ignatius, Polycarp, Iraeneus, Justin Martyr, and many other apostolic and eloquent men, who against [the heretics] Ebion, Theodotus of Byzantium, and Valentinus, held these same views and wrote volumes replete with wisdom. If you ever read what they wrote, you would be a wiser man" Against Helvidius: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary 19 [AD 383] However, I shall say briefly, in reply to those  that it was tue fury of envy that have prompted me to write this work, that I have never spared heretics, and have endeavoured in every possible manner to make the enemies of the Church my own enemies. Helvidius wrote a treatise against the perpetual virginity of Holy Mary." The dialogue against Pelagians, 415 AD

Ten popes in a row over the course of more than a century and a half denied that Catholicism on the one hand and Marxism or related doctrines on the other can have any common mission:
“The unspeakable doctrine of Communism, as it is called, [is] a doctrine most opposed to the very natural law” (Pius IX, Qui Pluribus)
“There is nothing in common between Social and Christian Democracy. They differ from each other as much as the sect of socialism differs from the profession of Christianity” (Leo XIII, Graves de Communi Re)
“The audacity and frivolity of men who call themselves Catholics and dream of re-shaping society
 and of establishing on earth, over and beyond the pale of the Catholic Church, ‘the reign of love and justice’ 
 A mere verbal and chimerical construction in which we shall see, glowing in a jumble, and in seductive confusion, the words Liberty, Justice, Fraternity, Love, Equality, and human exultation, all resting upon an ill-understood human dignity... Yes, we can truly say that the Sillon, its eyes fixed on a chimera, brings Socialism in its train” (Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique)
“It is not our intention here to repeat the arguments which clearly expose the errors of Socialism and of similar doctrines. Our predecessor, Leo XIII, most wisely did so in truly memorable Encyclicals; and you, Venerable Brethren, will take the greatest care that those grave precepts are never forgotten” (Benedict XV, Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum)
“Socialism, if it remains truly Socialism, even after it has yielded to truth and justice on the points which we have mentioned, cannot be reconciled with the teachings of the Catholic Church because its concept of society itself is utterly foreign to Christian truth
 Religious socialism, Christian socialism, are contradictory terms; no one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist” (Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno)
“Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever” (Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris)
“The Church has condemned the various forms of Marxist Socialism; and she condemns them again today, because it is her permanent right and duty to safeguard men from fallacious arguments and subversive influence that jeopardize their eternal salvation” (Pius XII, Evangelii Praecones)
“Pope Pius XI further emphasized the fundamental opposition between Communism and Christianity, and made it clear that no Catholic could subscribe even to moderate Socialism” (John XXIII, Mater et Magistra)
“Too often Christians attracted by socialism tend to idealize it in terms which, apart from anything else, are very general: a will for justice, solidarity and equality. They refuse to recognize the limitations of the historical socialist movements, which remain conditioned by the ideologies from which they originated” (Paul VI, Octogesima Adveniens)
“The fundamental error of socialism is anthropological in nature
 The sincere desire to be on the side of the oppressed and not to be cut off from the course of history has led many believers to seek in various ways an impossible compromise between Marxism and Christianity” (John Paul II, Centesimus Annus)
“An objection has been raised to the Church's charitable activity, subsequently developed with particular insistence by Marxism: the poor, it is claimed, do not need charity but justice
 Marxism had seen world revolution and its preliminaries as the panacea for the social problem
 Christian charitable activity must be independent of parties and ideologies. It is not a means of changing the world ideologically, and it is not at the service of worldly stratagems
 [Marxism] is really an inhuman philosophy. People of the present are sacrificed to the moloch of the future” (Benedict XVI, Deus Caritas Est)

The unity of the Church in Christ's priestly prayer
"The central request of the priestly prayer of Jesus dedicated to his disciples of all epochs is that of the future unity of those who will believe in him. This unity is not a worldly product. It comes exclusively from the divine unity and reaches us from the Father, through the Son and in the Holy Spirit. Jesus invokes a gift that comes from Heaven and has its effect — real and perceptible — on earth. He prays “that they may all be one; even as you, Father are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me” (Jn 17:21). Christian unity, on the one hand, is a secret reality that is in the heart of believers. But, at the same time, it must appear with full clarity in history, it must appear so that the world may believe, it has a very practical and concrete purpose, it must appear so that all may really be one. The unity of future disciples, in being united with Jesus— whom the Father sent into the world — is also the original source of the efficacy of the Christian mission in the world. “We can say that the founding of the Church takes place” in the priestly prayer of Jesus... In this very place, in the act of the Last Supper, Jesus creates the Church. “For what else is the Church, if not the community of disciples who through faith in Jesus Christ as the one sent by the Father”, receives his unity and is involved in Jesus’ mission to save the world, leading it to knowledge of God? Here we really find a true definition of the Church. “The Church is born from Jesus’ prayer. But this prayer is more than words; it is the act by which he ‘sanctifies’ himself, that is to say, he ‘sacrifices’ himself for the life of the world” (cf. Jesus of Nazareth, II, p. 101). Jesus prays that his disciples may be one. By virtue of this unity, received and preserved, the Church can walk “in the world” without being “of the world” (cf. Jn 17:16) and can live the mission entrusted to her so that the world may believe in the Son and in the Father who sent him. Therefore the Church becomes the place in which the mission of Christ itself continues: to lead the “world” out of man’s alienation from God and out of himself, out of sin, so that it may return to being the world of God."
🔗 #unity

Against anger and hate St. Augustine, sermon 49, pg 337-339 Don't pass your anger on to your brother
You have heard a word from an angry man, from someone who's been deeply hurt, who has flared up in a temper. Let it die in you. Why disclose it, why pass it on? After all, if it stays in you, it won't burst you.
Chronic anger becomes hatred
Anger is a speck, hatred is a beam. But nurse a speck, and it becomes a beam. Anger grown chronic becomes hatred, the speck that is nursed becomes a beam. So to prevent the speck becoming a beam, do not let the sun go down upon your wrath (Eph 4:26). You can see, you know perfectly well that you are riddled with hate, and you find fault with someone for being angry? Eliminate the hatred, and you are quite right to reproach anger.
The one who hates is blind
There's a speck in his eye, a beam in yours. After all, if you are busy hating, how can you see what you are to pull out? There's a beam in your eye. Why is there a beam in your eye? Because you made light of the speck that was planted there. You went to sleep with it, you got up with it. You cultivated it in yourself, you watered it with groundless suspicions; by believing the words of flatterers and people telling you nasty tales about your friend you nursed the speck instead of whipping it out. Are you getting very frightened, or aren't you? I'm telling you: Don't hate, and you've nothing to worry about. And you answer me and say to me, "What does hating matter? And what's wrong with a man hating his enemy?" You are hating your brother. But if you make light of hatred, listen to something you are failing to take into account: Whoever hates his brother is a murderer (1 Jn 3:15). Whoever hates is a murderer.10 Can you now say, "What do I care about being a murderer?" Whoever hates is a murderer. You haven't prepared any poison, you haven't gone so far as to strike your enemy with a sword, you haven't hired a hit-man for the crime, or worked out a place and a time. Finally, you haven't committed the crime yourself. You have only hated — and you have killed yourself before him. So learn justice, to hate only vices, and to love people. If you stick to this, and practice this sort of justice, so that you prefer even vicious people to be cured rather than condemned, then you have been doing good work in the vineyard. But mind you work at this, my brothers.
Forgive with all your heart
Look at yourself, observe yourself. You are shortly going to pray; forgive with all your heart. If you want to quarrel with your enemy, quarrel first with your own heart. Quarrel, I tell you, quarrel with your own heart. Tell your heart, Don't hate. But that heart of yours, those feelings of yours — are still hating. Tell your soul, "Stop hating. How will I pray, how will I be able to say Forgive us our debtsl Well, I can say this, of course, but how can I say what follows? Just as we too." We too what? "Just as we too forgive." Where is your faith? Do what you say: Just as we too. But your soul doesn't want to forgive, and is made miserable by your saying to it, Stop hating. Answer it, "Why are you miserable, my soul, and why do you upset me? (Ps 42:6). Why are you miserable? Stop hating, or you will destroy me. Why do you upset me? Hope in God. You are very ill, you are gasping, you're crippled with disease. You're unable to rid yourself of hatred. Hope in God, he's the doctor. For your sake he hung on the cross, and he hasn't yet avenged himself. Why do you want to avenge yourself? That's what your hating means, you see, a desire for revenge. Look at your Lord hanging, look at him hanging, and giving you a directive from that kind of judicial bench which is the cross. Look at him hanging there, and concocting a medicine for you in your illness from his own blood. Look at him hanging there. You want revenge? You want to get even? Look at him hanging there, and listen to him praying, Father, forgive them, because they do not know what they are doing (Lk 23:34).

[10] Then he said to them, "Go your way, eat the fat and drink sweet wine and send portions to him for whom nothing is prepared; for this day is holy to our Lord; and do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength." [11] So the Levites stilled all the people, saying, "Be quiet, for this day is holy; do not be grieved." Nehemiah 10:31 and if the peoples of the land bring in wares or any grain on the sabbath day to sell, we will not buy from them on the sabbath or on a holy day; and we will forego the crops of the seventh year and the exaction of every debt.
2 Maccabees 6:11 Others who had assembled in the caves near by, to observe the seventh day secretly, were betrayed to Philip and were all burned together, because their piety kept them from defending themselves, in view of their regard for that most holy day.
The early Christians observed the Jewish feasts (e.g., Jn 4:45; 5:1; 7:1-2,11,37; 12:20), including Passover (Matthew 26:17-19; Mk 14:12-16; Lk 22:1-15; Jn 2:13,23). The Last Supper was a Passover ceremony. Therefore, the explicit Old Testament evidence for holy days was carried over into the New Covenant, with the express sanction (by their own practice) of Jesus and St. Paul.

Biblical evidence for Holy Days St. Paul gives believers freedom to think one day "better than another":
Romans 14:5-6a One man esteems one day as better than another, while another man esteems all days alike. Let every one be fully convinced in his own mind. [6] He who observes the day, observes it in honor of the Lord. . . .
By analogy to the Old Covenant and early Christian adherence to its particulars, the Church has the prerogative to set mandatory holy days. Moreover, there is biblical evidence for the notion of a holy day. The most obvious is the Sabbath itself:
Exodus 16:23 he said to them, "This is what the LORD has commanded: 'Tomorrow is a day of solemn rest, a holy sabbath to the LORD . . . Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy Exodus 31:15 Six days shall work be done, but the seventh day is a sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the LORD (cf. 35:2; Lev 23:3; Deut 5:12-13; Neh 13:22; Is 58:13; Jer 17:22, 24, 27) Leviticus 23:8 . . . on the seventh day is a holy convocation . . .
Additional days are described as especially "holy" too:
Leviticus 23:15-16, 21 "And you shall count from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that you brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven full weeks shall they be, [16] counting fifty days to the morrow after the seventh sabbath; then you shall present a cereal offering of new grain to the LORD. . . . [21] And you shall make proclamation on the same day; you shall hold a holy convocation; you shall do no laborious work: it is a statute for ever in all your dwellings throughout your generations. Leviticus 23:24-25 "Say to the people of Israel, In the seventh month, on the first day of the month, you shall observe a day of solemn rest, a memorial proclaimed with blast of trumpets, a holy convocation. [25] You shall do no laborious work; and you shall present an offering by fire to the LORD." Leviticus 23:27-28 "On the tenth day of this seventh month is the day of atonement; it shall be for you a time of holy convocation, and you shall afflict yourselves and present an offering by fire to the LORD. [28] And you shall do no work on this same day; for it is a day of atonement, to make atonement for you before the LORD your God. Leviticus 23:33-37 And the LORD said to Moses, [34] "Say to the people of Israel, On the fifteenth day of this seventh month and for seven days is the feast of booths to the LORD. [35] On the first day shall be a holy convocation; you shall do no laborious work. [36] Seven days you shall present offerings by fire to the LORD; on the eighth day you shall hold a holy convocation and present an offering by fire to the LORD; it is a solemn assembly; you shall do no laborious work. [37] "These are the appointed feasts of the LORD, which you shall proclaim as times of holy convocation, for presenting to the LORD offerings by fire, burnt offerings and cereal offerings, sacrifices and drink offerings, each on its proper day; Leviticus 23:39-41 "On the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when you have gathered in the produce of the land, you shall keep the feast of the LORD seven days; on the first day shall be a solemn rest, and on the eighth day shall be a solemn rest. [40] And you shall take on the first day the fruit of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and boughs of leafy trees, and willows of the brook; and you shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days. [41] You shall keep it as a feast to the LORD seven days in the year; it is a statute for ever throughout your generations; you shall keep it in the seventh month. (cf. Num 28:18, 25-26; 29:1, 7, 12) Nehemiah 8:9-11 And Nehemi'ah, who was the governor, and Ezra the priest and scribe, and the Levites who taught the people said to all the people, "This day is holy to the LORD your God; do not mourn or weep." For all the people wept when they heard the words of the law.

Judge yourself before you judge your neighbour St. Augustine, Sermon 49
Judge yourself before you judge your neighbour St. Augustine, Sermon 49

Extant Works of S. Pacian, Bishop of Barcelona Epistles to Symptonian, Exhortation on repentance and baptism Epistle I, Of the Catholic name Saint Pacian (Pacianus) (Catalan: Sant Pacià) (c. 310–391 AD) was a bishop of Barcelona during the fourth century. He was bishop from about 365 AD to 391 AD, succeeding Praetextatus (Pretextat), who had attended a church council at Sardica in 347 AD and who is the first recorded bishop of Barcelona His writings are extant only in part in three letters and a short treatise, Paraenesis ad Poenitentiam.[2] In his writings, he discussed ecclesiastical discipline, baptism, papal primacy, and teachings on penance against Novatianism, which was then flourishing in Spain. He is also remembered from a phrase from one of his letters: Christianus mihi nomen est, catholicus vero cognomen ("My name is Christian, my surname is Catholic."). St. Jerome praised Pacian for his eloquence and deep sanctity. Pacian's son, Flavius Dexter, became a praetorian prefect under the Western Roman Emperor Honorius https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/pacian_1_letter1.htm #unity #earlychurch

"The epistles of S. Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage and martyr : with the Council of Carthage on the baptism of heretics ; to which are added the extant works of S. Pacian, Bishop of Barcelona" by Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage; Pacianus, Bishop of Barcelona, 4th cent "..Of the Epistles which are preserved, one at least, which is chiefly taken up with the Sacramental meanings of Holy Scripture, indicates, as well as his Testimonies, a full possession of the system of Scriptural interpretation, which, whether by intuition or by tradition, was the heritage of the Ancient Church, as he in his turn aided to fix that meaning. That Epistle is like one flash from a mind we love, disclosing to us as it were a new world within it, enlarging and re arranging all our previous thoughts of it, and deepening our reverence towards it.."

On the use of qualifying terms (like "traditionalist") preceding the simple description of "Catholic" A statement by Benedict XV saying that Catholics ought not to use those such labels:
It is, moreover, Our will that Catholics should abstain from certain appellations which have recently been brought into use to distinguish one group of Catholics from another. They are to be avoided not only as "profane novelties of words," out of harmony with both truth and justice, but also because they give rise to great trouble and confusion among Catholics. Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected: "This is the Catholic faith, which unless a man believe faithfully and firmly; he cannot be saved" (Athanas. Creed). There is no need of adding any qualifying terms to the profession of Catholicism: it is quite enough for each one to proclaim "Christian is my name and Catholic my surname," only let him endeavour to be in reality what he calls himself.(Pope Benedict XV, Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum 24)
*The last phrase, "only let him endeavor to be in reality what he calls himself" is very important as a qualifier, so that we know that "Catholic" in reality is not the same thing as subjective use of the adjective "Catholic", which means to "accept all that the Church dogmatically and infallibly teaches and to submit oneself to her authority." *But what happens in cases when whole parishes are not endeavoring to be in what reality what they call themselves? A theologian has to precisely identify the group he is critiquing, and so labels cannot completely be avoided. * Historically, labels tend to be used by groups placing themselves outside the Church (Arians, Pelagians, etc). But, at the same time the Church has occasionally appropriated labels to refer to orthodox Catholics during times of heretical confusions, hence the terms "Chalcedonian Catholics" or "Ultramontanes", which seemed appropriate only when used in opposition to heretical movements that had been formally defined as such. 

of fathers upon children, upon the third and upon the fourth generation.' [19] Pardon the iniquity of this people, I pray thee, according to the greatness of thy steadfast love, and according as thou hast forgiven this people, from Egypt even until now." [20] Then the Lord said, "I have pardoned, according to your word;

Biblical evidence for prayers of the righteous having more effect and power *Some falsely claim: "God does not answer prayers based on who is praying. God answers prayers based on whether they are asked according to His will (1 John 5:14-15)." The second sentence is true but the first is not, and, moreover, the first doesn't follow from the truth of the second. They are two distinct propositions. *All of this clashes with the Bible. God's inspired revelation repeatedly states that prayers of holy people are far more powerful and that God is more inclined to answer them. Once this is grasped, and once it is understood that saints who are in heaven are aware of us and can and do pray and intercede for us, then the Catholic rationale for asking saints to intercede is made abundantly clear as an eminently biblical practice. Genesis 18:22-32
So the men turned from there, and went toward Sodom; but Abraham still stood before the Lord. [23] Then Abraham drew near, and said, "Wilt thou indeed destroy the righteous with the wicked? [24] Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; wilt thou then destroy the place and not spare it for the fifty righteous who are in it? [25] Far be it from thee to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from thee! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?" [26] And the LORD said, "If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will spare the whole place for their sake." [27] Abraham answered, "Behold, I have taken upon myself to speak to the Lord, I who am but dust and ashes. [28] Suppose five of the fifty righteous are lacking? Wilt thou destroy the whole city for lack of five?" And he said, "I will not destroy it if I find forty-five there." [29] Again he spoke to him, and said, "Suppose forty are found there." He answered, "For the sake of forty I will not do it." [30] Then he said, "Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak. Suppose thirty are found there." He answered, "I will not do it, if I find thirty there." [31] He said, "Behold, I have taken upon myself to speak to the Lord. Suppose twenty are found there." He answered, "For the sake of twenty I will not destroy it." [32] Then he said, "Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak again but this once. Suppose ten are found there." He answered, "For the sake of ten I will not destroy it."
Genesis 20:7 
Now then restore the man's wife; for he is a prophet, and he will pray for you, and you shall live..
Numbers 11:1-2  
And the people complained in the hearing of the Lord about their misfortunes; and when the Lord heard it, his anger was kindled, and the fire of the Lord burned among them, and consumed some outlying parts of the camp. [2] Then the people cried to Moses; and Moses prayed to the Lord, and the fire abated.
Numbers 14:11-20 
And the Lord said to Moses, "How long will this people despise me? And how long will they not believe in me, in spite of all the signs which I have wrought among them? [12] I will strike them with the pestilence and disinherit them, and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they." [13] But Moses said to the Lord, "Then the Egyptians will hear of it, for thou didst bring up this people in thy might from among them, [14] and they will tell the inhabitants of this land. They have heard that thou, O Lord, art in the midst of this people; for thou, O Lord, art seen face to face, and thy cloud stands over them and thou goest before them, in a pillar of cloud by day and in a pillar of fire by night. [15] Now if thou dost kill this people as one man, then the nations who have heard thy fame will say, [16] Because the Lord was not able to bring this people into the land which he swore to give to them, therefore he has slain them in the wilderness.' [17] And now, I pray thee, let the power of the Lord be great as thou hast promised, saying, [18] The Lord is slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity

How does marriage contain grace? - has to have two aspects: presence, but not merely presence *to* but also presence *in* (Most accounts do not recognize this and only give presence to) - the senses in which something can be in a contractual relationship - perhaps mutual habituation (marriage as habitual act) is relevant - perhaps analogy between the way things can be 'store of value' and presence in marriage qua sign How does marriage cause grace? - Several points here -- needs to be instrumental cause, appropriate to effect, involving the covenant itself, and retaining marriage's preeminence as sign - the senses in which contracts and covenants are instruments - signs as instruments in communication - spouses as mutual signs within covenant principiation as the most fundamental ground of ownership and belonging Marriage must be: free -- age, abduction, coercion, incapaicty full -- disparity of cult, public perpetual vow of chastity, lack of form faithful -- prior bond, orders, crimen, propriety, exclusion of fidelity fruitful -- impotence, refusal to have childre. --> the relationship impediments (consanguinity, affinity, public propriety, adoption, spiritual relationship) don't really fit this well --> of course, some of these are cautionary, by ecclesiastical law, and others intrinsic, by divine institution

Rule of St. Benedict [of Nursia] - Chapter IV - The Instruments of Good Works, circa 530 AD 🔗
(1) In the first place to love the Lord God with the whole heart, the whole soul, the whole strength (2) Then, one's neighbor as one's self (cf Mt 22:37-39; Mk 12:30-31; Lk 10:27) (3) Then, not to kill (4) Not to commit adultery (5) Not to steal (6) Not to covet (cf Rom 13:9) (7) Not to bear false witness (cf Mt 19:18; Mk 10:19; Lk 18:20) (8) To honor all men (cf 1 Pt 2:17) (9) And what one would not have done to himself, not to do to another (cf Tob 4:16; Mt 7:12; Lk 6:31) (10) To deny one's self in order to follow Christ (cf Mt 16:24; Lk 9:23) (11) To chastise the body (cf 1 Cor 9:27) (12) Not to seek after pleasures (13) To love fasting (14) To relieve the poor (15) To clothe the naked (16) To visit the sick (cf Mt 25:36) (17) To bury the dead (18) To help in trouble (19) To console the sorrowing (20) To hold one's self aloof from worldly ways (21) To prefer nothing to the love of Christ (22) Not to give way to anger (23) Not to foster a desire for revenge (24) Not to entertain deceit in the heart (25) Not to make a false peace (26) Not to forsake charity (27) Not to swear, lest perchance one swear falsely (28) To speak the truth with heart and tongue (29) Not to return evil for evil (cf 1 Thes 5:15; 1 Pt 3:9) (30) To do no injury, yea, even patiently to bear the injury done us (31) To love one's enemies (cf Mt 5:44; Lk 6:27) (32) Not to curse them that curse us, but rather to bless them (33) To bear persecution for justice sake (cf Mt 5:10) (34) Not to be proud (35) Not to be given to wine (cf Ti 1:7; 1 Tm 3:3) (36) Not to be a great eater (37) Not to be drowsy (38) Not to be slothful (cf Rom 12:11) (39) Not to be a murmurer (40) Not to be a detractor (41) To put one's trust in God (42) To refer what good one sees in himself, not to self, but to God (43) But as to any evil in himself, let him be convinced that it is his own and charge it to himself (44) To fear the day of judgment (45) To be in dread of hell (46) To desire eternal life with all spiritual longing (47) To keep death before one's eyes daily (48) To keep a constant watch over the actions of our life (49) To hold as certain that God sees us everywhere (50) To dash at once against Christ the evil thoughts which rise in one's heart (51) And to disclose them to our spiritual father (52) To guard one's tongue against bad and wicked speech (53) Not to love much speaking (54) Not to speak useless words and such as provoke laughter (55) Not to love much or boisterous laughter (56) To listen willingly to holy reading (57) To apply one's self often to prayer (58) To confess one's past sins to God daily in prayer with sighs and tears, and to amend them for the future (59) Not to fulfil the desires of the flesh (cf Gal 5:16) (60) To hate one's own will (61) To obey the commands of the Abbot in all things, even though he himself (which Heaven forbid) act otherwise, mindful of that precept of the Lord: "What they say, do ye; what they do, do ye not" (Mt 23:3) (62) Not to desire to be called holy before one is; but to be holy first, that one may be truly so called (63) To fulfil daily the commandments of God by works (64) To love chastity (65) To hate no one (66) Not to be jealous; not to entertain envy (67) Not to love strife (68) Not to love pride (69) To honor the aged (70) To love the younger (71) To pray for one's enemies in the love of Christ (72) To make peace with an adversary before the setting of the sun (73) And never to despair of God's mercy
Behold, these are the instruments of the spiritual art, which, if they have been applied without ceasing day and night and approved on judgment day, will merit for us from the Lord that reward which He hath promised: "The eye hath not seen, nor the ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love Him" (1 Cor 2:9). But the workshop in which we perform all these works with diligence is the enclosure of the monastery, and stability in the community.

On PietyđŸ§” 1. Where the love of God rules, there, too, rules the love of our neighbour ‘By this shall all men know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another’ (John 13:35). And St. John, commenting on this word of the Master, says in turn: ‘If any man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar. For he that loveth not his brother, whom he seeth, how can he love God, whom he seeth not? And this commandment we have from God, that he, who loveth God, love also his brother.’ (1 John 4:20-21) It seems as if God would not accept an abstract love on our part; He only considers real and puts down to our credit the concrete love that we yield to Him in the persons of our brethren. Furthermore, He does not want us to put on merely an appearance of love, and merely to imitate its generous promptings; He wishes this love to be real. Ostentatious piety, which is lacking in depth, does not inspire real love, but only produces imitations of it, whereas true piety, that stirs the heart to its depths, makes true love spring up in it.” “There are pious hearts, like that of St. Vincent de Paul, which are moved by the distress of others, which gather cast-off children, which protect innocence, which visit the sick and clothe the naked, which provide work or bread for those who are dying of hunger, and which extend the hand of sympathy to all who are weak. When I see hearts untouched by the sufferings of others, and which pass by in indifference or even turn away from those in rags, I say that true piety has never imbued them.” “There are pious hearts, like that of St. Francis of Sales, belonging to those who, with a smile on their lips, and with benevolence within, fill those who have recourse to them with peace and joy. There is no true piety in those whose sullen mien and arid speech breathe selfishness and strike cold into the soul.” “Those, too, have pious hearts, who, by their friendliness offer a warm and sure shelter to the discouraged or disillusioned, to repentant prodigals and the wounded in life’s battle, and to those whose steps are beginning to be insecure. ‘He that hath found a friend, hath found a treasure’ (Sir 6:14), says Holy Scripture. And a human heart becomes this inestimable treasure when it is permeated through and through by piety.” source 🔗Jean Guibert, On Piety (London: R. & T. Washbourne, Ltd., 1911). 🔗 2. Piety moves will to action 🔗 3. Piety presupposes faith 🔗 4.The bond between piety and virtue 🔗 5. What hinders piety #charity

Penance_and_the_anointing_of_the_sick_Poschmann,_Bernhard,_1878.pdf9.76 MB

The Sacrament of Penance Poschmann, Penance and the Anointing of the Sick The sacrament of penance as we find it in the Apostolic Fathers tends to be presented as a one-time restoration for grave sins. (However, it was not the exclusive penitential practice, because deathbed repentance was recognized even for recidivists, at least as far as we can tell, and penitence outside that of the restorative was also practiced.) It was also public, primarily in mortification, but also requried open confession to the community in order to receive their prayers. In some cases, it also seems ot have required taking up a vow of religious life, with a vow of perpetual chastity, in an order of penitents. Slowly an alternative developed for clergy and religious -- private secession or withdrawal into solitude - to deal with the practical complications in those cases, as well as to conform to the theology of ordination and of monastic vow; and taking a monastic vow (benedictio penitentiae) likewise comes to be seen as an equivalent to joining an order of penitents, if done by permission of the Church for that reason. Private penance arises in fifth or sixth century in remote areas (e.g., Britain and Ireland), where penitential matters had to be handled by priests with often scattered flocks rather than bishops in city centers. This then flows back to the center and, because it puts more emphasis on confession than mortification, intersects with developing practices of spiritual direction. Attempts to crack down on this and return to public canonical penance failed, due to the difficulty of the latter, so instead the procedures for private penance were standardized, although public penance continued for notorious sins. IV Lateran introduces the requirement of periodic private confession, although in this it was supporting an already spreading practice. Reconciliation to communion, however, continued for a long time to be a separate process but (again for practical practical reasons) in the second millenium faded. *Note that Jesus Himself is the model of private confession and absolution. *At the same time that private confession is spreading, penitential pilgrimage (in which one goes on an extended pilgrimage to receive at the end a penance imposed by a bishop, especially the Pope) also began to be popular as a substitute for canonical penance. (cf. Njal's Saga) *Early mortification for penance seems primarily to have been social, but corporal chastisement (esp. flagellation) keeps springing up, especially in monastic contexts.

A Thomistic Case for Tolerance In his influential work, A Theory of Justice, John Rawls accuses Thomas Aquinas of not advocating “even a limited tolerance.” (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p.216) It seems plausible to accuse Rawls in this matter of a superficial reading of Thomas, depending on one passage in the Summa Theologiae (II-II, q. 11, a. 3) without placing that passage in its larger context. Upon closer examination, one can see that Thomas in fact advocates more than just a limited tolerance, while explicating that a true theory of tolerance is not a theory of neutrality, but rather an admission that the objects of toleration are not themselves positive goods. -“The Church is intolerant in principle because she believes; she is tolerant in practice because she loves. The enemies of the Church are tolerant in principle because they do not believe; they are intolerant in practice because they do not love.” Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange -"Whether we ought to love sinners out of charity... I answer that, two things may be considered in the sinner: his nature and his guilt. According to his nature, which he has from God, he has a capacity for happiness, on the fellowship of which charity is based, wherefore we ought to love sinners, out of charity, in respect of their nature. On the other hand their guilt is opposed to God, and is an obstacle to happiness. Wherefore, in respect of their guilt whereby they are opposed to God, all sinners are to be hated, even one's father or mother or kindred, according to Lk. 12:26. For it is our duty to hate, in the sinner, his being a sinner, and to love in him, his being a man capable of [eternal] bliss; and this is to love him truly, out of charity, for God's sake." Summa Theologica II-ii Q25 Art6 https://aquinasonline.com/tolerance/