…

We need to find the exact place where the sole proprietorship was essentially started. I've heard a lot of 1903 or 1913. Using AI and copying and pasting what is says helps us locate maybe where to look. But we need to find the actual text of it's basic structure. Please stop doing that because it's basically just spam and not helpful. There are lots of cases talking about a PROPRIETOR, there are also lots of cases talking about a SOLE STOCK OWNER. But the term "sole proprietorship" is a specific and exact term. We need to dig into THAT term. But what we specifically need to find to take full control over the franchise, is we need to make a timeline of where the term originated... which is probably the Revenue Act of 1913. Then we need to make a timeline of all the case law based off of that. Then we can rebut all those assumptions and break it down. What we are trying to acheive is simple: To separate ourselves as a legal entity while also being able to legally represent the entity in court without an attorney-at-law. Once we pull that off, we're going to move into the courts in an invulnerable position. Also, we will not be committing perjury... because right now, everyone saying they are "representing themselves" is essentially (not quite because it's not willful, but a razor's edge) perjury. For example, i would NEVER say that I'm "representing myself." That's like me saying I'm a purple people eater. Absolutely asinine. So once we break all this down and get a full timeline put together, we can then begin to build out these cases properly. We can standardize our standing in the courts. You can use Google Scholar and then you will see two little bubbles below the search bar. One says "case law." You can click that then you can even choose what courts and court systems to search in. THIS IS HOW YOU DO RESEARCH, NOT USING DUMBASS AI PROMPTS. AI is used as distant, directional assistance. For example, "what is the California State law version of 42 USC 1994" would be a great AI question. It helps you sort of look in the right direction. That's all.

If you are looking to apply for grant kindly contact me Let’s access your Trust funds Up to 30million Note: Tax Fees are paid upfront T.me/ChristopherHauserOfficial

Growing

Growing

If you have completed the grant process kindly send me a message T.me/ChristopherHauserOfficial

Submission of application comes to an end

I'm talking to several dealerships and sales people. We also have several people who quit their jobs to sell cars. We'll pump this thing up to where tens of thousands of cars are getting sold, then we'll move all that momentum over to properties such as land, homes, etc.

Today is filled with Joy and testimonies

If you are looking to apply for grant kindly contact me Let’s access your Trust funds Up to 30million Note: Tax Fees are paid upfront T.me/ChristopherHauserOfficial

One positive thing about the Federal Reserve system is that the country can never go bankrupt. So we just get everyone performing properly and there will be no economic crash. I'm personally more interested in a gold and silver coin based system. But truthfully, in that system, bankruptcy is possible. But i feel like bankruptcy and dissolution is the price of bad management. To try to negate that law of nature is simply one more attempt to say that man is superior to God. When i look over all the abortion organizations, banking cartels, drug companies, big pharma, etc... what i see is a giant enterprise that is desperately trying to manipulate nature to subvert nature to it's will. It seems to me almost like the ultimate rebellion against God. But it is so funny to me because destruction will still come, no matter which way you twist it, by violating these laws. It may just take a little longer. But if everyone voted and wanted to keep the Fed and give everyone Window access, i would be perfectly ok with that too. It comes down to whatever the majority of people want to do.

The idea of "saving money" is a trap. It's a trap to shift your thinking over to a scarcity programming (that's why it is so prevalent). "Money" is defined as "unconditional promises and orders to pay." You can promise and order all you want. You have infinite "money" as long as you retain the ability to PROMISE and ORDER. Also you should be able to perform when other people promise or order and you are involved. It's quite simple. There is no "specie," which is what judges used to call gold and silver coins (I've been reading a lot of judgments from the 1800s). If you can promise and order, "saving" is hilariously irrelevant.

The most fascinating aspect of everything we do, of which i know we are DEFINITELY the only group that will be talking about this, is the "balance of problems." Do people have the right to involve themselves in problems? Of course. Could you go so far as to classify someone's problems as "assets"? Most definitely. Problems are highly valuable. They prevent boredum and are useful excuses. So we need to ask ourselves: "do we have the right to take away everyone's problems?" The objective answer is... no. We do not. So how do we solve the situations we want to solve while simultanously leaving behind the necessary framework that allows people to continue to be lost if they so choose? This is why i believe that both systems should operate simultanously: the de jure and the de facto. Bored people are terrifying. Bored people are probably the ones who created this whole mess.

If you are looking to apply for grant kindly contact me Let’s access your Trust funds Up to 30million Note: Tax Fees are paid upfront T.me/ChristopherHauserOfficial