en
Feedback
Supreme Court Observer

Supreme Court Observer

Open in Telegram

Supreme Court Observer is a living archive of the Supreme Court of India. Subscribe to this channel for legal updates and incisive journalism on the Court.

Show more
4 906
Subscribers
+324 hours
+97 days
+6430 days
Posts Archive
🌄 Good Morning! *Here's news you cannot miss:* 1️⃣ Top court slams YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia for 'obscene' remarks: https://bit.ly/42VSeOS 2️⃣ Union asked to submit timeline on implementing Social Security Code in plea seeking social security for gig workers: https://bit.ly/4gPEBnJ 3️⃣ SC commences monitoring implementation of its 2024 judgement prohibiting discrimination in prisons: https://bit.ly/3CN2T3Q 4️⃣ Today, a 5-judge bench is expected to conclude hearings in a case about court's power to modify an arbitral award: https://bitly.cx/eIGC2 5️⃣ Today, the SC is also scheduled to hear challenges to the Election Commissioners Act, 2023 and an Andhra law barring non-Hindu vendors from leasing property in temple premises: https://bit.ly/3BwUSyT

☕ Good Morning! ⚖️ Today, a 5-judge bench will resume hearings in a case to decide if courts can modify an arbitral award. Our latest newsletter summarises everything you need to know: https://bitly.cx/tHMWn 🛵 The Court is also expected to hear a plea to recognise gig workers as “unorganised workers”. Here are updates from the last hearing: https://bit.ly/3E4R6Ov ⛓️ The Court is also scheduled to continue monitoring the steps taken by the Union and state govts to address discrimination in Indian prisons. Here's our case background: https://bit.ly/41mdyfj 🎟️ Recently, the top court ruled that the Union cannot impose service tax on distributors purchasing lottery tickets from a state govt for resale. Our explainer: https://bit.ly/42ZvFcb

🗞️ Good Morning! 🕌 Today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear challenges to the Places of Worship Act. In December, the Court had stayed the filing of new suits seeking surveys of religious places across India: https://bit.ly/3ZSo2C4 🏛️ Last week, a Constitution Bench led by CJI Khanna heard arguments on courts' power to modify an arbitral award. Our report: https://bitly.cx/8D9S ✍️ Our latest newsletter contextualises the case and the Supreme Court's conflicting jurisprudence on the issue: https://bitly.cx/tHMWn 📈 In January, the top court's disposal rate was the highest so far in its 2024-25 term. Read more in our data story: https://bitly.cx/AEwB

🌄 Good Morning! ⚖️ Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the extent of courts' power to modify arbitral awards. The Union government argued that under the Arbitration Act, 1996, courts can only remit or set aside an award—not modify it. 🗣️ The Union further submitted that if Parliament had intended to grant courts the power to modify awards, it would have explicitly included such a provision. Meanwhile, respondents contended that the ability to partially set aside an award could also be interpreted as the power to modify it. More: https://bit.ly/4jZtOtW 📩 Don’t forget to subscribe to our newsletter, where we will explore the context of this case: https://bit.ly/3rvqmRa 👨‍⚖Until then, catch up on last week’s newsletter: https://bitly.cx/y5Uv

🗞️ Good Morning! 🏛️ Today, a 5-judge Constitution Bench will assemble for the first time under CJI Sanjiv Khanna's tenure to hear a case on whether courts can modify arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1996: https://bitly.cx/eIGC2 💨 The Court will also continue hearing the Delhi pollution case. In the last hearing, it directed the Commission for Air Quality Management to draft a plan to curb stubble burning—one of the NCR's biggest polluters: https://bit.ly/4aNoJAB 👨🏻‍⚖ The SC has initiated an in-house inquiry against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad HC, over alleged hate speech at a VHP event in December 2024. We explore the history of disciplinary proceedings and the options available: https://bitly.cx/Zh1H

☀ Good Morning! 🗳 Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard miscellaneous applications in the VVPAT case. Petitioners contended that the ECI’s standard operating procedure for vote verification contradict the Court’s 2024 directions on EVM tampering: https://bit.ly/4gBG8h8 📄 This week, the top court reserved judgement in Tamil Nadu's petition arguing that the Governor of the state cannot use discretionary powers to withhold assent for state bills: https://bit.ly/41mbKD7 👨🏽‍⚖A recent order of the Supreme Court endorsing appointment of retired high court judges as ad hoc judges gives us an opportunity to look back on the intent of the framers when it came to the temporary judges provision in the Constitution: https://bitly.cx/y5Uv

🌄 Good Morning! 🛵 Today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a plea to recognise gig workers as “unorganised workers”. In the previous hearing, the Court had noted the delay by the Union in filing a reply: https://bit.ly/3E4R6Ov 📃 The Court is also scheduled to hear challenges against the Governor of Kerala for delays in granting assent to state legislature bills. More here: https://bit.ly/4apXIBV ⚖️ Yesterday, the Court reserved judgement in a similar case against the Governor of Tamil Nadu. Here's our case background: https://bit.ly/3vBZa5j 👩🏻‍⚖️In our latest newsletter, we explore the history of temporary judge appointments in light of the Court's recent decision on ad hoc judges in High Courts: https://bitly.cx/y5Uv

🗞️ Good Morning! 🏛️ Today, the Supreme Court will resume hearing arguments in a case against the Tamil Nadu Governor over delays in granting assent to state legislature bills. 🗣️ On Friday, the Attorney General stated that since the bills were repugnant, the Governor didn't technically withhold assent. The hearing focused on the Governor's powers and duties under Article 200: https://bitly.cx/2rgY3 ✍️ Our latest newsletter analyses the Court’s recent order easing conditions for appointing ad hoc judges in High Courts. We use the order as a jumping off point to trace the history of the temporary judge provision, from the Constituent Assembly to the 2021 Lok Prahari case. Read here: https://bitly.cx/y5Uv

☕ Good Morning! 🏛️ Today, the Supreme Court will continue hearing the case against the Tamil Nadu Governor for delays in withholding assent to bills passed by the state legislature. Yesterday, the Court asked the Union to provide reasons for the delay: https://bit.ly/4gDoMAw 📈 In January 2025, pendency in the top Court increased by over 2600 cases compared to last January. However, pendency dropped by 527 cases compared to December 2024 as the Court resumed regular hearings. Here's our report: https://bit.ly/4185M8M 👨‍⚖ Justice Hrishikesh Roy retired from the Supreme Court on 31 January. 🗓️ He had a tenure of 5.33 years at the Court: https://bit.ly/40NuCZZ ✍🏾 During his career, he authored 46 judgements: https://bit.ly/416y2bP

🪴 Good Morning! ✍️ Today, the Supreme Court will continue hearing arguments in a case against the the Tamil Nadu Governor for delays in granting assent to state assembly bills. 🗣️ Earlier this week, the Tamil Nadu government argued that under Article 200, the Governor can withhold assent to a bill and send it back for reconsideration, but if the assembly re-passes the bill, he has no choice but to approve it: https://bit.ly/414d11e 📖 In 2024, a seven-judge bench the Supreme Court set parameters to determine an institution’s minority status. Our judgment matrix breaks down the key issues and each judge’s stance: https://bit.ly/40PGudU

🍃 Good Morning! 👨🏽‍⚖ Yesterday, CJI Sanjiv Khanna said that the Court will hear the issue of judicial vacancies in the district courts of Bihar, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh in April 2025: https://bit.ly/42KTPH5 🗳 Delhi votes in its Assembly elections today. One of the city's biggest civic challenges is its pollution crisis, to which stubble burning in neighbouring states is a major contributor. 🏛 On Monday, the Supreme Court directed the Commission for Air Quality Management to develop an action plan for preventing stubble burning in the NCR states. https://bit.ly/4aNoJAB 🗓 In January, the Court completed 75 years. A juvenile justice case and a split verdict also made headlines. Our monthly review: https://bit.ly/4aKKZel

🌿 Good Morning! 🪦Last week, the operative part of a split verdict delivered by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and S.C. Sharma directed that a Christian pastor from a predominantly Adivasi village in Chhattisgarh be buried in a different village. We analyse the decision in our latest newsletter: https://bit.ly/42CkZ2Z 🏛 Today, the Court is scheduled to continue monitoring the judicial vacancies in lower courts. It had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue in 2018. Our case background: https://bit.ly/3SKEHDc 📩 If you enjoy reading a crisp weekend newsletter on the highlight of the week, SCO’s Desk Briefs are for you. Sign up here: https://bit.ly/3rvqmRa

🌇 Good Morning! 📊 Justice Hrishikesh Roy retired last week on 31 January after five years at the Supreme Court. During this time, he authored 46 judgments and was a part of 326 benches. We analyse his tenure in numbers here: https://bit.ly/3CCSwzl ✍️ We also list his notable judgements which include one where he upheld the suo moto powers of the NGT and others that emphasised party autonomy in arbitration: https://bit.ly/40Tmx7f 📅 Last month, the Supreme Court celebrated the completion of 75 years. January also saw two judge retirements and one appointment. We bring you a round-up of the January highlights at the top court: https://bit.ly/4jSiLCO

🍃 Good Morning! 👨🏽‍⚖ Today, Justice Hrishikesh Roy retires from the Supreme Court after a tenure of over five years. Justice Roy’s notable judgements included one that upheld the suo moto powers of the Natiobal Green Tribunal and several that promoted party autonomy in arbitration. Read: https://bit.ly/40Tmx7f 🏛️ After graduating in 1982, Justice Roy enrolled in the Bar and began practising in Delhi. He soon moved his practice to the Gauhati High Court. More in our profile: https://bit.ly/3WBF2uE 🔎 On 6 November 2024, he authored a five-judge bench verdict which unanimously confirmed that Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence-holders can drive transport vehicles whose weight is less than 7500 kgs. Our judgement summary: https://bit.ly/3CsT8Yk

🌄 Good Morning! ⚖️ Yesterday, the Supreme Court directed the Union to submit details about the cases filed under the Muslim Woman Protection Act, 2019 which criminalises triple talaq. Petitioners argued that the Act discriminates against Muslim men: https://bit.ly/4hrVo0O 🥼The top court also heard the R.G. rape and murder case for the ninth time yesterday. The bench reiterated that doctors who were protesting and had returned to work after the Court's Order on 22 August 2024 would not be considered absent from duty: https://bit.ly/3WCJh8Y 🏛️ In a Ceremonial Bench commemorating the completion of the Court's 75th year, CJI Sanjiv Khanna stated that the institution embodied the aspirations of 1.4 billion people: https://bit.ly/4aC9rhY

✨ Good Morning! ⚖️ Today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the R.G. Kar rape and murder case. In the previous hearing, the top court had directed stakeholders to respond to the National Task Force's draft report on pan-India guidelines for doctor safety: https://bit.ly/3ZQj6hq 🏛️ Yesterday, a Ceremonial Bench assembled to commemorate the completion of 75 years of the Supreme Court. CJI Sanjiv Khanna, AG R. Venkataramani and SCBA President Kapil Sibal delivered speeches. We bring you the highlights: https://bit.ly/4aC9rhY 🏭 On Monday, the Court pushed for strict implementation of solid waste management rules in the NCR. The Court also took note of pollution caused by thermal power plants & and vehicle emissions. More: https://bit.ly/40Cb6iV

🌸 Good Morning! 🌳 Today marks the completion of 75 years since the Supreme Court was inaugurated. On this day, we close out our special series commemorating this milestone with an in-depth exploration of the winding trajectory of the Court's environmental jurisprudence: https://bit.ly/40zknZb 🏛 Today, the Court is scheduled to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the 2019 amendment to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Read about the case: https://bit.ly/3NSKAvL 🗳 Yesterday, the Supreme Court appointed Justice Jaishree Thakur, former judge of the Punjab & Haryana HC, as an independent observer to oversee the mayoral elections in Chandigarh. Read: https://bit.ly/40y503l

🇮🇳 Good Morning! 👨🏻‍⚖️ Since the Court's establishment 75 years ago, its sanctioned strength of 8 judges has increased six times to reach 34 today. The reason? To deal with increasing case load. But does increasing bench strength address backlog? We explore in a newsletter: https://bit.ly/42reijZ 🏛️ Over the years, the Court has seen several changes and its lawyers have adapted to them. What do they have to say about practising in the top court? Find out in our latest video: https://bit.ly/40DNHho 📃 Our special series commemorating 75 of the Supreme Court features 12 articles analysing the Court's evolving jurisprudence and its impact on public life. Read them here: https://bit.ly/46SHAID

🌇 Good Morning! 📑 Last year, the Supreme Court delivered several judgements favouring party autonomy, equality and enforceability of arbitration agreements. Here's a rundown of key judgements: https://bit.ly/42qmBMY 🚙 In November 2024, a Constitution Bench unanimously held that persons holding a light motor vehicle licence may also drive transport vehicles weighing less than 7500 kg. Our matrix breaks down the decision: https://bit.ly/4gaoD75 🎥 In our latest video, we unpack the US Supreme Court's decision upholding a law banning TikTok and what it means for free speech and global tech platforms. Watch now: https://bit.ly/3E9eACd

🕊️ Good Morning! 💍 In 2024, Supreme Court judgements brought clarity to several fuzzy areas around marriage and divorce in India. 🏛️ Some of these judgements indicated a bend towards a more conservative strain of personal law interpretation while others pointed to a progressive view of gender parity: https://bit.ly/4g8nEEI 👨‍🦽 In the latest addition to our special series commemorating 75 years of the Supreme Court, Prof. Vijay Tiwari explores how the Court has struggled to accommodate disabled persons who don’t fit the pre-decided rubrics of the neo-liberal nation-state: https://bit.ly/40FeJ97