CONSCIOUSNESS

NEVER SLEEP AGAIN It hovered still, a white sphere high, No sound, no wings, just watching sky. It marked the bounds you could not see, A cage disguised as clarity. It whispered rules in silent tone, “Stay small, stay safe, stay not alone.” But something stirred beneath your skin A spark, a code, a pull within. You broke the line, you felt the sting, It saw you move, it clipped your wing. The price was pain, the cost was sight, But now you burn with inner light. No lullabies, no dusk, no dawn The veil is ripped, illusion gone. What once was safe is now terrain. You saw the truth. Never sleep again.

"I myself designed the SCANATE experiment, which tested whether psychic perception could respond to abstract coordinates rather than only to physical, objective targets. At the time, my colleagues at SRI were skeptical and reluctant to support the idea. Only Dr. Hal Puthoff agreed to run a short 10-day test after long arguments. Russell Targ outright refused to participate, convinced the experiment would fail. (And I point out, by the way, that Targ holds no doctorate.)"

“I never felt bound by binary ideas of love or attraction. When you engage seriously with Remote Viewing, with art, or with the inner journey, you begin to realize: • Consciousness is not gendered. • Love is not tied to forms. • Resonance is greater than bodies. Therefore, I would never have reduced myself to a label like “gay” or “straight.” I was — and still am — resonant.” (Ingo Swann)

N.S.A.

my new single NEVER SLEEP AGAIN w/ RAZANTE out today on all streaming stations.

wel´ll never be the same - we´ll never sleep again.

“In Dianetics, an engram refers to a mental record of a traumatic past event that occurred while a person was partially or fully unconscious. Only those who have cleared most of these engrams can become effective Remote Viewers.”

Whoever you are — I feel you. I respect you as a soul, I love you, and I truly wish you nothing but the best. If you’re reading this, it’s meant for you. Get better.

time ?

INGO SWANN ABOUT ENVELOPE TARGETS (PENETRATION): "However, at Ft. Meade there was some experimentation with photos as actual targets. This was conducted both as an in-house training exercise, and at one or two other times as part of one of the rare instances when the operations unit was asked to participate long-distance in an SRI experimental series during the mid-to-late '80s. Across the board operational viewer results dropped off when targeted against "static" photographic targets. At the time, video clips were not avalable as an option (or so I presume, as participating viewer received only terse feedback), so I can render no judgement as to whether they would have been more effective. Indeed, to a remote viewer accustomed to accessing actual sites in fourdimensional space, a static photograph is not a representation of the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor or Mount Pinatubo during an eruption. It is in reality only a colored piece of paper in a manila envelope. It's not surprising that results from operational viewers suffer when targeted under such circumstances. To be sure, an experienced viewer CAN access a photograph-- the positive results of several of the SAIC's experimental RV sessions demonstrate this. But if the focus had been on "real"-- and therefore naturally dynamic--sites as opposed to two- dimensional representations, May and his colleagues might not have had to bother about testing the use of "dynamic" moving images (the videos) to provide greater change and variety to improve remote viewer detection; or about mapping the "change in entropy" of the static images to enhance researchers' ability to decode viewer results, as was done for these experiments. Perhaps there were experimental control reasons why such a fixed target pool was desired. In my mind, however, the drawbacks far outweigh the possible benefits."

Target: Describe, as a neutral reporter, the reason for homosexuality in humans. Viewer Summary: In the target, there are two beings. Both appear to be made of light. They do not touch with force, but through mirroring. This is not “attraction through otherness,” but “recognition through similarity.” It’s about a shared field of resonance. “I see myself in you, because you remind me of something we both have lost.” It increasingly feels like a desire for reintegration. I see a symbol: two identical spirals — not rotating against each other, but reflecting into one another. This creates a golden in-between space — a kind of third field. Within it, a form of creativity arises that is not based on reproduction, but on reintegration. “I am a remembrance of wholeness,” I hear very clearly.