Covid Truth Documents

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization Join Us https://t.me/CovidTruthDocumentsGroup

Cancer victim shares her timeline with J&J vaccine and diagnosis.

👉Moderna Operating System 👉DNA Hacked & Tracked How long have they been working on 'curing cancer'? No mention of cancer NOR cMRNA patents? "we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system.." on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein. The following are protected by patents in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions for ModernaTx, Inc. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 VACCINE US 10,898,574 US 10,703,789 US 10,702,600 US 10,577,403 US 10,442,756 US 10,266,485 US 10,064,959 US 9,868,692 https://bit.ly/30tSOpk #Bioweapon Series 1

The WHO has worked with the Rockefeller Foundation on FERTILITY REGULATING VACCINES to medically STERILIZE people for decades. We are supposed to trust these people to inject us with mystery fluids for our "health"? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1874951/

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only”. Can you please confirm if the PCR test used in Australia is the same or similar to the PCR test that the CDC is requesting to be withdrawn? If so, will the PCR test be withdraw in Australia? The “CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses”. Can you confirm that the PCR test used in Australia can distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses? If not, how is SARS-CoV-2 being differentiated from influenza viruses? If the PCR test used in Australia is unable to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses, the number of cases being reported as ‘COVID-19 cases’ is grossly inaccurate. The policies that have been implemented are therefore based on incorrect and misleading data. Can you confirm if the policies that have been implemented have been based solely on positive cases of SARS-CoV-2? Why does Australia continue to use a cycle threshold (CT) of 35-45 cycles when the false positive rate is up to 97% at 35 cycles and above? Has SARS-CoV2 been isolated, purified and demonstrated to be the cause of COVID19? https://www.researchgate.net/post/Has_SARS-CoV2_been_isolated_purified_and_demonstrated_to_be_the_cause_of_COVID19 https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603 https://youtu.be/EWNkJUDctdk Isolate the virus https://principia-scientific.com/even-cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-of-covid19-virus-isolate/ Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” Since that is the case, that there are no quantified virus isolates, how can one be sure of what is being determined as COVID-19 is, in fact, COVID-19?” Dr Qureshi‘s main point being that, if no one has isolated and proven the existence of any such novel coronavirus as a unique pathogen, how on earth can any pharmaceutical company provide a vaccine? The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020. Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…” Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS. A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE. Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS. NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS. THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS. As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist. And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification. Science is not assumptions. This is how governments are controlling Covid-19 case numbers.

Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17194199/ Mice: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18941225/ The initial trials were short and flawed: More information on the vaccines is shown in the links below: Pfizer Trials AZ Trials Covid-19 Injection information leaflet What is the latest scientific evidence saying on the efficacy/ effectiveness of these Vaccines: Absolute Risk Reduction i.e. the true impact that the injection itself was shown to have at reducing your chances of getting sick with Covid-19 was just 0.84% for Pfizer and 1.28% for AZ (per the Lancet study linked below). Link https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext The injections have numerous serious and fatal short term side effects and no long term safety data Link Adverse Reaction :https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions If the injections don’t work on “the variants” (given people are still getting sick and dying and indeed in increasing numbers) , why continue to inject people with these same experimental injections that has shown themselves not to work? People are having their livelihoods being destroyed and Aussie Mums and Dads are struggling to put food on the table for their children. We also CANNOT in all good conscience follow thru on vaccination of our children. It is absolutely clear that you as politicians are being misled by health bureaucrats and it is time that governments, State and Federal, appoint completely new expert groups, free from industry influences, to rely on. Over 55,000 medical experts advocate against lockdowns in the Great Barrington Declaration: https://gbdeclaration.org/ How do we know Lockdowns are not necessary with confidence? The following explains a few points. 1. Covid-19 PCR +ve tests do not mean sick people and community screening of asymptomatic (healthy) people with this unreliable technique must stop. Please note, Dr. Anthony Fauci said early last year that asymptomatic transmission cannot drive a pandemic – and he was right on that occasion. Yet, he has since acted contradicting his own words and there are so many ‘experts’ disseminating this newly invented lie that healthy people without symptoms are contributing to the Covid-19 pandemic. This was proven to be a false claim by a city-wide test in Wuhan on nearly 10 million people (after the initial outbreak last year)- they found 300 +ve cases of asymptomatic people but there was not a single transmission from them - 100% false positives as they were not contagious. None of the 300 gave a positive state to close contacts. Here's the peer-reviewed publication in Nature Communications: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33219229/ Experts such as Prof. Carl Heneghan, Director of Evidence-based Medicine at Oxford have been urging the governments to stop community testing with this test which does not have the specificity to prevent too many false positives: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-many-covid-diagnoses-are-false-positives Even in the middle of the pandemic in Europe, highly experienced experts in France who had conducted over a quarter million Covid-19 PCR tests by May 2020, hence at the forefront of clinical laboratory medicine showed that over 97% of PCR positive cases were in fact false positives, i.e. that could not give rise to a virus culture when the standard PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of 35 or more was used (number of cycles of exponential amplification by PCR). They reported: “At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive” which means less than 3% of the PCR positive cases could potentially infect others (with something, not proven to be a novel virus in these experiments) (https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603 ). Could you please provide evidence in regards to the following questions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a statement recently that they will “withdraw the request to the U.S.

The following is happening now. A well known doctor from the Norfolk area is suing Sentara Hospital for not allowing them to administer his Covid treatment protocols in The ICU that have saved many!! Court case on Thursday 11/18, show up and support in Norfolk. https://t.me/WandaAlgerOfficial/269

BREAKING: Friday a federal court put a halt on The Biden mandate that was going to come through OSHA About 30 minutes ago the 5th Circuit court of appeals reaffirmed, so it remains stopped Applies nationwide. POTUS can’t mandate vaccines on private companies. #FJB and all the communists https://electionwiz.com/2021/11/12/breaking-5th-circuit-reaffirms-stay-bidens-vaccine-mandate/

MORE - Biden's vaccine mandate "raises serious constitutional concerns" and "exceeds the federal government’s authority," the ruling of the federal appeals court continues. The court orders OSHA to refrain from implementing or enforcing the mandate in any way. Full text here: https://dl.airtable.com/.attachments/db446ada300c17b1c8e3a6530561a46f/e7ff5065/BSTHoldingsvOSHAOrder.pdf @disclosetv

"Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-breakthrough infections to time-from-vaccine" "we found a significant 1.51 fold (95% CI, 1.38-1.66) increased risk for infection for early vaccinees compared to those vaccinated later that was similar across all ages groups." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34737312/ 📌 Follow and Share👇🏻 @RWMaloneMD