Python for Data Analysts
Find top Python resources from global universities, cool projects, and learning materials for data analytics. For promotions: @coderfun Useful links: heylink.me/DataAnalytics
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Python for Data Analysts
Channel Python for Data Analysts (@pythonanalyst) in the English language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 51 824 subscribers, ranking 2 511 in the Technologies & Applications category and 6 945 in the India region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 51 824 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 25 August, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 138 over the last 30 days and by 0 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 4.24%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 1.00% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 2 197 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 519 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 8.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as visualization, panda, analyst, sql, analytic.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Find top Python resources from global universities, cool projects, and learning materials for data analytics.
For promotions: @coderfun
Useful links: heylink.me/DataAnalytics”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 26 August, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
for → Iterates through each element
PART 2: if → Filters or transforms elements based on a condition
🚀 Beginner tip: Master normal for loops first, then List Comprehensions will become much easier to understand and use.
❤️ React if you want more Python concepts explained this way.df.isnull().sum()
This returns the number of missing values in each column.
3️⃣ What is the difference between loc and iloc?
💡 Answer:
loc → Label-based indexing.
iloc → Integer position-based indexing.
4️⃣ What is the difference between merge() and concat()?
💡 Answer:
merge() combines DataFrames using a common key (similar to an SQL JOIN).
concat() combines DataFrames by stacking them vertically or horizontally.
React ♥️ for more interview questionsThe GigaChat team has released GigaChat 3.5 Ultra as open source—a new 432B model under the MIT license. This is the first open-source hybrid of GatedDeltaNet and MLA scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, featuring a proprietary training recipe we refined through more than 1,500 experiments. The model has grown in terms of code, mathematics, agent scenarios, and application domains—yet it’s 40% smaller than GigaChat 3.1 Ultra.What’s inside: 🔘A proprietary hybrid MLA + Gated DeltaNet architecture with a dedicated stabilization framework, without which this hybrid setup would not train reliably at this scale; 🔘 Gated Attention: the model can locally down-weight overly strong signals from the attention layer; 🔘GatedNorm: normalization with an explicit gate that controls signal magnitude across features; 🔘Approximately 4x lower KV cache per token: with the same memory budget, the model can support 2.14x longer context and deliver a 20% throughput increase under load; 🔘Two MTP heads, enabling up to 2.2x faster generation; 🔘FP8 across all training stages with no quality degradation compared with bf16, enabled by custom Triton and CUDA kernels; 🔘A new online RL stage after SFT and DPO. Results: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Base outperforms DeepSeek V3.2 Exp Base and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on average across a set of general, math, and code benchmarks: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Instruct is comparable to DeepSeek V3.2 in terms of average score, despite having half the size; 🔘 According to the MiniMax-M2.7 LLM judge, the average win rate against GigaChat 3.1 Ultra is 75.9%, and against GPT-5 is 68.7%.
The entire stack — data (our own LLM-filtered Common Crawl, 600+ programming languages in the code), architecture, training methodology, and infrastructure — was built end-to-end by GigaChat team.➡️ HuggingFace
