Orgone Channel Telegram

Where Did The Towers Go? - Judy Wood (2010)

Where Did the Towers Go? http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D. “The New Investigation,” is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. It was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case filed (2007) accusing the defendants of science fraud. .NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted: they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final. Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).

For the record, I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01 — nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01. This is not a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done. The order of crime solving is to determine 1) WHAT happened, then 2) HOW it happened (e.g., by what weapon), then 3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive). Let us remember what is required to convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it.

Judy Wood Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 Author's Preface

Preface to the Second Edition

The first edition of this book was published in 2000 in a very limited edition and at that time it was my intention to re-issue the book shortly thereafter as a paperback. These plans were delayed by the simple fact that I was so drained by the research and the subject material that it was impossible to pick it up for a long time. With the encouragement of Dr. James DeMeo of Natural Energy Works, this edition fulfills the original plan for an accessible edition. While a number of new books published over the last fifteen years have touched on the subject matter, nothing has been published that contradicts the essential theme of this book: most of Wilhelm Reich's troubles with the US government at the end of his life were instigated by Communists who viewed his work as a serious threat to their efforts to promulgate a Stalinist ideology and to influence world events. While no contradictory information has been published since the first edition of this book, much confirming evidence has been established. Some of this information has been included in this edition, including the telling "Document 20" in which Comintern agents in Russia compiled a list of German exiles to be arrested or "liquidated" as enemies of Stalinism. Wilhelm Reich's name is included in this 1936 hit-list in connection with a German associate who was arrested and spent five years in the gulags, primarily for his connection to Reich. Some writers continue to argue that Wilhelm Reich was a victim of "McCarthyism" or the alleged "right-wing, conservative" tenor of America in the 1950s. It is true that a few loan conservative individuals took issue with the content of Reich's writings, but nothing came of these efforts and they had no connection to each other. Meanwhile, the leftists who sprang to Stalin's defense had strong connections to each other through the international Communist web and fit perfectly into Reich's description of a "Red Thread of Conspiracy."

—James Edward Martin Wilhelm Reich and the Cold War The True Story of How a Communist Spy Team, Government Hoodlums and Sick Psychiatrists Destroyed Sexual Science and Cosmic Life Energy Discoveries Second Edition, Revised and Updated p.xi

"The Mount Vernon Affair" https://t.me/orgonecontinuum/2655 —a reading of The View from Eden, "Part Four," Jerome Eden, 1976

DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work is dedicated to the Students of the Future and to all who strive to Focus on Life, on the essential in Life—that is Love, Work, Knowledge. It is my hope that renewed interest will be kindled in the important work of the late Joseph Wheless, whose biblical critique Is It God's Word? reveals armored man's irrational conceptions of God. The View from Eden Jerome Eden, 1976 Talks to Students of Orgonomy — Practical Insights into the Vital Works of Dr. Wilhelm Reich

TRANTIFA IN A BURKA: This Eric Austin from Phoenix who is suing police for photographing him without his burka after he was arrested.

Black Swans and Just Black Ducks Alexander Unzicker The Higgs Fake, 2013, pp.38-'9 Almost all the greatest discoveries, those which significantly changed the path of history, came unexpected, or, as Nassim Taleb phrased it, as black swans. The message of the virtue of the unexpected has somehow sunk in within the research community, but in a very weird way. Many see any surprising outcome of an experiment as something positive. Sorry, but why is something you don't understand always positive? Any failure to predict can be declared a success, besides the "usual" success of being vindicated — a good strategy. The really unexpected things you cannot actively generate. When you build a huge collider with particle energies that surely go beyond your understanding, it is almost guaranteed that you will discover something. But this is where discovering something unexpected is perfectly expected. The history of high energy physics of the last few decades shows that there is a gullible attitude to planning the non plannable, and some find particular pleasure in this kind of coquetry. There is hardly a figure that better represents the thoughtlessness in high energy physics than the British theorist John Ellis. His career consisted of distributing the latest fashions, be it neutral currents, new quarks, or supersymmetry. Never having found out anything, he serves now as a caricature of a theorist, a kind of mascot for the media. In 1982, CERN had informally communicated its results to the British Prime Minister before the official release. (What science, if not corrupt, needs to stay so close to politics?) Ellis off-handedly told Margaret Thatcher that CERN, in its future experiments, hoped to discover the unexpected. It's a good thing that Thatcher's era is over, but she did have what you may call common sense, and she retorted, "Wouldn't it be better if you found what you expected?" With respect to the standard model, particle physicists have developed this ludicrous attitude we are all used to: either we find a wonderful confirmation of our models or — even more exciting — a contradiction. In any case a tremendous success. This is the prototype of a nonfalsifiable model, according to Karl Popper — the opposite of science. With the same kind of wacky philosophy, theorists had insured themselves until right up to the "discovery" of the Higgs boson in 2012. The standard model, with its complication, its ad-hoc patches of contradictory data, and its lack of predictive value, is the best example of a Kuhnian crisis, but at the same time the people involved have the least prospect of getting out of it. It is high time that the standard model became history.

Innovators are rarely received with joy, and established authorities launch into condemnation of newer truths, for... at every crossroads to the future there are a thousand self-appointed guardians of the past." Betty MacQuitty, Victory Over Pain: Morton's Discovery of Anesthesia

quoted in Christopher Bird, The Life and Trials of Gaston Naessens, The Galileo of the Microscope, Preface, p. 21