Hacking Library
Open in Telegram
Library of PDF Books, Papers, Podcasts, Documentaries
Show moreThe country is not specifiedMedicine23 603
890
Subscribers
No data24 hours
+57 days
+1130 days
Posts Archive
Colorado Revised Statutes 2020
TITLE 39
TAXATION
PROPERTY TAX
General and Administrative
PDF - 882 PAGES
#legal #Colorado
The Elements of Style (4th Edition)
William Strunk, E.B. White
PDF -
To "master" the English language, get
"The Elements of Style" by
Strunk and White.
Small book.
Read a bit each day.
In a month you will be a master,
no matter what level you are today.
Very, very easy to read and
very, very easy to follow.
Get it in paperback at Amazon.
Reconciling State Sovereign Immunity with the Fourteenth Amendment
#legal
https://harvardlawreview.org/2016/02/reconciling-state-sovereign-immunity-with-the-fourteenth-amendment/
Repost from This Health Journey Weāre On
Fake Olive Oil
Fake Olive Oil: Which Brands to Steer Clear of
Brands That Failed to Meet the Extra Virgin Olive Oil Standards:
ā Bertolli
ā Carapelli
ā Colavita
ā Star
ā Pompeian
ā Santa Sabina
ā Primadonna
ā Antica Badia
ā Sasso
ā Coricelli
When your employer tells you that you have to be vaccinated, make the attempt, and take this form with you.
Ask whomever is administering the vaccine to sign this form.
Of course, they won't sign it and then you tell your employer that they won't give you the vaccine.
#vaccines
DNA DISCOVERY, EXTRACTION AND STRUCTURE. A CRITICAL REVIEW
#dna
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
Project A119 - Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
PDF - 7 Pages
https://bit.ly/ProjectA119
Because these Youtube truthers, in some way are still a diversion and misdirection, away from the truth. Generally, YouTube Truthers will "expose" the official story, in order to give the skeptics some content and keep them busy.
But these YouTruthers will never actually go ALL THE WAY BACK to the beginning to study the very foundations and circumstances around the birth of Virology and the existence of the āpathogenic virus.ā So they're easy to discredit and dismiss because they're not armed with detailed information, historical context and evidence.
Even if the so-called āvirusā existed - not as they define it per se, but as a quantifiable and identifiable form, it is most likely the result of disease and not the cause of it.
But the way they define it, the āVirusā is the greatest gift that any tyrant could have ever hoped for, because it can be used as an excuse to do almost anything in the name of āPublic Health and Safety.ā
WHO IS WENDELL MEREDITH STANLEY?
Wendell Meredith Stanley (16 August 1904 ā 15 June 1971) was an American biochemist, virologist and Nobel laureate. His researches on the virus causing the mosaic disease in tobacco plants led to the isolation of a nucleoprotein which displayed tobacco mosaic virus activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Meredith_Stanley
Stanley is actually the scientist who claims to have physically seen a virus, which in my opinion is BS. If scientists canāt see viruses with all of todayās modern, advanced technology, I find it very suspicious that this person could have seen a virus so many decades ago without the wonders of modern tech. So, letās start with his awards.
1936 - Newcomb Cleveland Prize
1946 - Nobel Prize in Chemistry
1947 - Willard Gibbs Award
1948 - Franklin Medal
1966 - Order of the Rising Sun. ?????
He is also affiliated with The Rockefeller Institute and the University of California, Berkeley, 2 huge red flags.
The first sentence of his bio doesnāt really make much sense except to illustrate that he was already on the National Research Council before the age of 27, with no career accomplishments to his name. As soon as he returned from Germany (still with no career accomplishments), he joined the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. In 1948, he moved to the University of California, Berkeley to become a Professor of Biochemistry. There is almost no information about what he won all of these awards for, and his bio then goes on to say that what he won the awards for were soon later to be proven false anyway.
Stanley got married in 1929, when he was supposed to have been in Germany which is odd and almost no information is available. His daughter married the team doctor for the Golden State Warriors and Oakland Raiders.
It is claimed that he had the worldās largest magic collection. Fitting for Stanley, I suppose, given that viruses are nothing but smoke and mirrors. The science of illusion.
It is also claimed that he was an amateur athlete and worked for Walt Disney (another red flag), after high school. He was also offered a contract with the New York Giants but turned it down to become a doctor and then later sold his magic collection to David Copperfield.
As far as the āOrder of the Rising Sunā award - I had never heard of this award, so I had to look it up. Apparently it is given out by the Japanese Emperor, but itās not explained why Stanley received the award in 1966. Before WWII, the award was reserved specifically as a military medal and even today it is given out as a military award. Curious.
The magic collection also suggests that there may have been some hidden money or money laundering along the way because in order to have the WORLDāS LARGEST COLLECTION OF ANYTHING requires some serious coin. Probably not impossible for Rockefeller spooks though.
There are Red Flags all over this story, including the Berkeley connection which is a known Spooktown. Google seems to lead you down a strange path with very little information if you do a cursory and shallow search. It seems like they should have a lot more information and answers about the actual science of the Tobacco Mosaic Virus discovery or details on the careers of these spooks, but instead they just give you minutiae about cryptic European āscientistsā, Magic Collections and that his daughter married the team physician for an NBA and NFL team. Weird.
When first researching this in 2020, I felt like there could be some connection and explanation as to why there seemed to be a growing number of YouTube videos that claim the Coronavirus is a hoax and as to why these videos are allowed to stay online, despite the fact that Susan Wojcicki (CEO) specifically stated that information that doesnāt line up with the W.H.Oās official narrative would be removed.
They probably realized that they could use these ātruthersā to their advantage by ridiculing their shallow research and discrediting the Hoax/Psyop theory in the minds of the average citizen.
SPOOK āSCIENTISTSā AND THE FRAUD OF VIROLOGY
As we've come to learn, it is very likely that the entire field of Virology is a manufactured project, thought up by the minds of Rockefeller scientists, dating back well over 100 years. In order to see if this theory holds any water, it naturally makes sense to study the very first virus, the Tobacco Mosaic Virus. As detailed bove, the Tobacco Mosaic āVirusā is most likely an invention to cover for environmental related disease due to toxic chemicals. For some background and context, let's look at the so called European scientists who "discovered" the Tobacco Mosaid Virus.
The three European scientists who are credited as ādiscoveringā the Tobacco Mosaic Virus are Adolf Mayer, Dimitri Ivanovsky and Martinus Beijerinck.
Whether or not these people actually existed, is unknown. They certainly could have but there's really not much information on them and the available information is sometimes cryptic. In my skeptical view, there's a good chance they could have been entirely made up entities, or - if they did exist, just agents for the agenda with fictitious backstories and achievements.
Martinus Willem Beijerinck ... was a Dutch microbiologist and botanist who was one of the founders of virology and environmental microbiology. He is considered one of the founders of virology. In 1898, he published results on the filtration experiments demonstrating that tobacco mosaic disease is caused by an infectious agent smaller than a bacterium.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinus_Beijerinck
There is only one reference I could find, related to Martinus Beijerinckās alleged personal life, which is a Dutch Article, published in March of this year, which has no sources.
https://www.historischnieuwsblad.nl/de-man-die-het-virus-bedacht
Dmitri Iosifovich Ivanovsky ⦠was a Russian botanist, the discoverer of viruses (1892) and one of the founders of virology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitri_Ivanovsky
Adolf Eduard Mayer ⦠was a German agricultural chemist whose work on tobacco mosaic disease played an important role in the discovery of tobacco mosaic virus and viruses in general.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Mayer
Adolph Mayer could have been an invented person as well. It doesnāt really matter though since they didnāt put forward the idea of a virus as it is defined and claimed to exist today.
They just didnāt think that whatever was making the tobacco plants sick was a bacteria. They could just be random people whose work was dug up later to fill the gaps and make the entire theory sound more āscientific.ā
The only English references to any of their work were all translated by āJ. Johnsonā, in 1942.
Go to their Wikipedia pages and look at who translated the one and only paper of all three who were referenced.
The problem with this is that Beijerinck was Dutch, Mayer was German, and Ivanovsky was Russian.
There is no explanation given as to why or how āJ. Johnsonā could translate the works of all 3 of these so-called scientists., but I suppose itās possible that he was fluent in all 3 languages (spoken and written). Iām skeptical.
It's also possible that the entire body of work is fictional and "J. Johnson" is a fabricated entity.
Example from Beijerinckās Wikipedia page:
āTranslated into English in Johnson, J., Ed. (1942) Phytopathological classics (St. Paul, Minnesota: American Phytopathological Society)ā
This comes up on all 3 of their WikiPedia pages, sourced as āoriginalā articles.
In any case, These 3 so-called scientists never actually claimed that they had discovered anything new but when examining their histories and writings, it seems like they could have invented all of this out of thin air.
In my view, they could very well be manufactured people, with false backstories, used to sell the lie of Virology.
Their careers amounted to not much more than setting up the supposed groundwork for Wendell Meredith Stanley.
Who discovered the first virus?
From Wikipedia:
"In 1882, Adolf Mayer (1843ā1942) described a condition of tobacco plants, which he called "mosaic disease" ("mozaĆÆkziekte"). The diseased plants had variegated leaves that were mottled.[32] He excluded the possibility of a fungal infection and could not detect any bacterium and speculated that a "soluble, enzyme-like infectious principle was involved".[33] He did not pursue his idea any further, and it was the filtration experiments of Ivanovsky and Beijerinck that suggested the cause was a previously unrecognised infectious agent. After tobacco mosaic was recognized as a virus disease, virus infections of many other plants were discovered.[33]
The importance of tobacco mosaic virus in the history of viruses cannot be overstated. It was the first virus to be discovered, and the first to be crystallised and its structure shown in detail."
"Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is a positive-sense single stranded RNA virus in the genus Tobamovirus that infects a wide range of plants, especially tobacco and other members of the family Solanaceae. The infection causes characteristic patterns, such as "mosaic"-like mottling and discoloration on the leaves (hence the name). TMV was the first virus to be discovered. Although it was known from the late 19th century that a non-bacterial infectious disease was damaging tobacco crops, it was not until 1930 that the infectious agent was determined to be a virus. It is the first pathogen identified as a virus."
Mosaic n.
c. 1400, āprocess of making patterns of inlaid work in hard materials,ā from Old French mosaicq āmosaic work,ā from Italian mosaico, from Medieval Latin musaicum āmosaic work, work of the Muses,ā noun use of neuter of musaicus āof the Muses,ā from Latin Musa (see Muse). Medieval mosaics often were dedicated to the Muses. #virology
In the late 1800ās, tobacco crops were experiencing disease characterized and observed by yellowing of the leaves. Chemical industry scientists naturally looked for the "infectiousā agent(s) responsible, ignoring the fact that their own arsenic based presiticdes were likely causing the disease. As one researcher puts it:
āTobacco mosaic disease is another example of all this, the first case of blaming a toxin disease on virus. After that, it worked so well that it was continued. Whenever a toxic disease needed to look infectious a virus was invented.
āIt is clear that scientists were going out of their way to make tobacco mosaic disease look like an infectious disease. They tried to show it was caused by bacteria or fungi. When no bacteria or fungus could be found they made up the idea of a virus, which was said to be a very small bacteria that could pass through fine filters. When nothing could be grown on a petri plate they said that this new virus bacteria could only reproduce in its host. When the disease was found to be caused by a protein they said viruses were self replicating particles that were kind of alive and kind of not alive, in a half way state."
By blaming the tobacco mosaic disease on a virus the chemical companies that were causing damage to farmers tobacco would not be sued. This new idea of the virus was then used again and again for the same purpose to this very day.ā
They have continued to move the Goal Posts for over 100 years. Making the virus almost impossible to actually prove by adding more and more caveats.
Every āviralā epidemic since then, has demonstrably toxic causes. No virus can be found, but the toxicity is apparent when considered and looked for...at least for the ones that I've researched (Polio, HIV for example).
As far as "COVID-19" - Did they isolate (purify) the virus? No. Did they sequence the full genome of some supposed virus collected? No. Did they detect tiny, random pieces of genetic material? Maybe. But even that is inconclusive. They are also very vague about how they did so, or why they make the claim of āviruses with nearly identical genomesā. How can you know the genome of a previous virus without ever having properly isolated it?
Consider the comment of David Crowe - āThe RT-PCR test only reacts to about 1% (or less) of the 30,000 base genome. And thereās no proof those sequences arenāt in human RNA, because although thereās a big database of DNA, thereās no such database for RNA.ā
They have no basis for their claims.
Even the corrupt Dr. Gallo admitted that Viruses and Extracellular Vesicles may be "Close relatives". He has been pushing the HIV lie for decades now. Still no cure for HIV? Still can't isolate it? Why do you suppose that is????
āExtracellular vesicles (EVs) released by various cells are small phospholipid membrane-enclosed entities that can carry miRNA. They are now central to research in many fields of biology because they seem to constitute a new system of cellācell communication. Physical and chemical characteristics of many EVs, as well as their biogenesis pathways, resemble those of retroviruses. Moreover, EVs generated by virus-infected cells can incorporate viral proteins and fragments of viral RNA, being thus indistinguishable from defective (noninfectious) retroviruses. EVs, depending on the proteins and genetic material incorporated in them, play a significant role in viral infection, both facilitating and suppressing it. Deciphering the mechanisms of EV-cell interactions may facilitate the design of EVs that inhibit viral infection and can be used as vehicles for targeted drug delivery.ā
This is a much more logical explanation as to what these so-called scientists are observing in a test tube and under a microscope. The concept of a half-dead and half-alive virus that wreaks this much havoc on the entire planet is not logical, not supported by evidence and goes against everything else we see in Nature.
If the VERY FIRST VIRUS - Tobacco Mosaic Virus is a lie, then why believe anything virology has claimed since then?
