Frontline Workers Speak Out! 💉❤️‍🩹 #AU

A groundbreaking investigation into the COVID dossier reveals that the pandemic response was not led by public health officials but by global military and intelligence agencies. Investigative researchers Sasha Latypova and Debbie Lerman uncover documents proving that COVID was treated as a national security threat, not a public health crisis. Why was the military involved? Who truly controlled the response? And what does this mean for the future of global health policies, digital IDs, and government control? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The COVID Dossier is a compilation of the evidence we have amassed over the last three years supporting the following claim: COVID was not a public health event, although it was presented as such to the world’s population. It was a global operation, coordinated through public-private intelligence and military alliances and invoking laws designed for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) weapons attacks. https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/the-covid-dossier-a-record-of-military 📱 ROBINMG

Too good to be true? 🙏🏽🕊️💙

It seems Laboratories in Australia are shielding Pfizer, Big Pharma and Government Health Agencies like the TGA from the fall out and liability that would occur from verifying DNA contamination. Katie Ashby-Koppens is one of the Lawyers involved in the Australian GMO case against Pfizer and Moderna, with Dr Julian Fidge. They had to send the vials all the way to CANADA, because all "Independent" Australian Labs refused to test them. Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

Trump withdraws from the World Health Organisation. About time!

We have a number of concerns about what the WHO is proposing under the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulation 2005 (2024 IHRs). The most concerning can be summarised into 5 topics: Choice – the right to make choices for you and your family Censorship – the right to be able to speak freely and receive information Surveillance – in the form of tracking and tracing Control – countries will have to implement the changes into their domestic legislation Cost – both financial and social The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCT) is an Australian government committee that has asked for your feedback on the 2024 IHRs. It’s easy and we encourage you to give your feedback, which closes 23 January 2025. Click on the link below - we've made lodging your submission simple with the five simple steps you can find here - https://alignedcouncilofaustralia.com.au/2024ihrs/

We have a number of concerns about what the WHO is proposing under the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulation 2005 (2024 IHRs). The most concerning can be summarised into 5 topics: Choice – the right to make choices for you and your family Censorship – the right to be able to speak freely and receive information Surveillance – in the form of tracking and tracing Control – countries will have to implement the changes into their domestic legislation Cost – both financial and social The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCT) is an Australian government committee that has asked for your feedback on the 2024 IHRs. It’s easy and we encourage you to give your feedback, which closes 23 January 2025. Click on the link below - we've made lodging your submission simple with the five simple steps you can find here - https://alignedcouncilofaustralia.com.au/2024ihrs/

I’ve written to the Health Minister outlining my concerns about the proposed trial with genetically modified mosquitoes in Queensland. If you wish to make your concerns known can you please email the Office of Gene Technology directly on this address ogtr@health.gov.au rather than my office as this decision is out of my control. I don’t have a lot of faith in Raj Bhula based on prior questioning in estimates. I’ve attached an article from 2017 and I quote: “Australia's gene technology regulator Raj Bhula has proposed reducing regulations around gene editing techniques such as CRISPR, following a 12 month technical review into the current regulations. The most radical change put forward by the regulator is that some of the more efficient and newer genetic technologies, known as gene editing, would not be considered "genetic modification". Quote from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-01-19/gene-tech-regulator-proposes-shakeup-for-genetic-modification/9341354 #auspol

Dr. David Martin explains how Peter Hotez has warned that the next pandemic will start for H5N1 around Jan 21, 2025. There are over 3000 patents related to this and injections falsely called "vaccines" going back over a decade. These patents all take about 18-24 months to process. Another criminal conspiracy to disrupt the orderly transition of Trump into office and to harm all those who are tricked into taking the "vaccine". Be aware and be ready. If we get this story out to enough people ahead of time it may disrupt their plans.

JUST IN - Court orders FDA to produce an additional "million pages" of Pfizer C19 injection trial documents. Decision: https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/177117313088.pdf

Dr. David Martin explains how Peter Hotez has warned that the next pandemic will start for H5N1 around Jan 21, 2025. There are over 3000 patents related to this and injections falsely called "vaccines" going back over a decade. These patents all take about 18-24 months to process. Another criminal conspiracy to disrupt the orderly transition of Trump into office and to harm all those who are tricked into taking the "vaccine". Be aware and be ready. If we get this story out to enough people ahead of time it may disrupt their plans.

These are the released Pfizer Documents with the thousands of Side Effects that they desperately tried to have Sealed and Hidden from YOU, for 75 years. Pause video to read 👁

Dr William Bay reveals the truth about the Ahpra gag order on Outsiders with Rowan Dean

“At the individual level it is usually not possible to establish a definite causal relationship between a particular AEFI and a particular vaccine on the basis of a single AEFI case report. However, it is important to try assessing this relationship in order to identify a possible new vaccine product-related reaction, as well as to determine if the event is preventable or remedial – such as a product-related quality defect or immunization error. ㅤ Identifying a coincidental AEFI that is falsely attributed to a vaccine product is vital as otherwise the coincidence may result in loss of public confidence in the vaccine, with the consequent return of vaccine-preventable disease. ㅤ The scientific basis for the criteria which are assessed in the process include: • Temporal relationship: The vaccine exposure must precede the occurrence of the event. • Definitive proof that the vaccine caused the event: Clinical or laboratory proof that the vaccine caused the event is most often found for live attenuated vaccines.” ㅤ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ㅤ Well it’s no wonder the TGA uses the WHO guidelines when it comes to determining causality of a vaccine. ㅤ Their view is it’s not usually possible to establish a definite causal relationship between a particular AEFI and a particular vaccine. ㅤ Really how so? The WHO didn’t mind establishing a link between Covid and just about every death that took place a few years back. ㅤ And when it comes to vaccines causing the AEFI the scientific basis requires definite proof as in clinical or laboratory proof. ㅤ That's funny because the WHO didn’t require clinical or laboratory proof when it came to ascribing death to Covid via a dodgy PCR test. ㅤ Talk about double standards! ㅤ The TGA should not be following the WHO's guidelines as they are clearly designed to downplay vaccine injuries. ㅤ It’s just another example of how unelected foreign organisations have too much influence over the Australian government. ㅤ Quote from: See page 24 (or 10)- https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516990 peoplefirstparty.au ㅤ #auspol

IT’S TIME FOR ALLY TO APOLOGISE If she is to retain any creditability, Ally Langdon must apologise to Australian public for her dangerously misleading, factually incorrect and poorly researched comments on Ivermectin. We will never know exactly how Australians died unnecessarily from Covid because of people like Ally Langdon declared war on Ivermectin. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be his next secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services) : "Yesterday the chief attorney for FDA admitted because he lost the case in court against the doctor, but there was no reason to discourage people from taking ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very, very devastating cure. or COVID, it literally obliterated COVID. And by depriving people of ivermectin, many, many people, millions of people around the globe died." "And they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day one and very effective cures. But they didn't want that.

A pro-vaccine doctor, who used social media to shame people who were not Jabbed with COVID mRNA shots, has died suddenly at just 43 years old leaving 2 children. Dr. Vicky Jennings reportedly dropped dead after suffering a sudden heart attack. According to reports, she was presumed to be in good health when she died and was not suffering from any illnesses and kept up to date with all of her shots with a total of 6. Jennings, an internationally recognized trauma surgeon, was said to be a fitness enthusiast and enjoyed several sports in her free time, including running and swimming. 🙏🏽🕊️💙