NS Heathenry

𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐈𝐍 𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐍 𝐇𝐀𝐃 𝐀 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐘 𝐓𝐎 𝐍𝐎𝐓𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑'𝐒 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐒 𝐃𝐔𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐔𝐄𝐒 Martin Bormann's son recalled the following: "He [Bormann] always had a jacket pocket full of blank cards or sheets, cards, slightly stiffer paper. And he also always had pencils, short stubs of pencil so to speak, which were easy to carry in his pocket without breaking anything. He always had them with him and immediately jotted down his thoughts or these snippets of conversation or whatever." — 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐧 𝐉𝐫, citation from the film "Hitlers Helfer" Bormann - Der Schattenmann This is corroborated by Albert Speer's experience being a member of Hitler's inner circle and being at various table talks: "If in the course of such a monologue Hitler had pronounced a more negative judgment upon the church, Bormann would undoubtedly have taken from his jacket pocket one of the white cards he always carried with him. For he noted down all Hitler's remarks that seemed to him important; and there was hardly anything he wrote down more eagerly than deprecating comments on the church. At the time I assumed that he was gathering material for a biography of Hitler." — 𝐀𝐥𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐞𝐫, citation from his memoirs p.95 @NSHeathenry

According to Bormann's adjutant Henry Picker, Hitler remarked that the churches in recent times had saved face somewhat by retreating to the position that biblical stories could be interpreted symbolically. He took the side of evolution over Church doctrines: 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: 𝟮𝟰.𝟭𝟬.𝟭𝟵𝟰𝟭 "Today at 10.00 a.m. in the religion lesson, the story of creation is told using the words of the Bible, while in the natural history lesson at 11.00 a.m. the theory of evolution is presented. The two are absolutely contradictory. As a schoolboy, I sensed the contradiction and got stuck into it, and I held up to the professor the second lesson what the first lesson had said, so that the teachers were in despair! The church helps itself by explaining that the depiction of the Bible is to be understood symbolically. If someone had claimed this 400 years ago, they would have been roasted to death amidst pious hymns. [...] Science is nothing more than a ladder that you climb. With each step, you see a little further. But science cannot see to the end of things either." [1] Alfred Rosenberg's representative at the FHQ, Werner Koeppen, confirms this table talk to be legit when he reports Hitler to be saying the same sentiment on the same exact day: 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: 𝟮𝟰.𝟭𝟬.𝟭𝟵𝟰𝟭 "The Führer then spoke about the relationship between the church and foreign science. The dogmatic church no longer has the power and strength to oppose the findings of science with the stake as it did in three centuries. [...] in the first hour of geology class, schoolchildren are taught the formation of the earth according to our current scientific knowledge. In the second hour, the priest comes and teaches the formation of the earth according to the creation account in the Bible. No scientific knowledge is final, like an infinite ladder, after every step there is a new one, and the church takes advantage of this fact by contrasting this change with its supposedly eternal doctrine of salvation." [2] @NSHeathenry

According Bormann's adjutant Heinrich Heim, he recalled Hitler saying the following at the table: 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: 𝟭𝟰.𝟭𝟮.𝟭𝟵𝟰𝟭 "Minister Kerrl wanted to create a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity in the NOBLEST sense. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE; the reason lies in Christianity itself. The one thing I could still accept is the Christianity of papal decay; factually speaking it is dangerous, propagandistically it is a lie. But a pope who, even if he was a criminal, employed great masters and created many beauties, is more sympathetic to me than a Protestant pastor who goes back to the original state of Christianity. Pure Christianity, so-called ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY, aims to make Christian theory true: It leads to the annihilation of humanity, is naked Bolshevism in metaphysical disguise" [1] But how exactly can we confirm that Hitler had actually said this? Alfred Rosenberg, who is documented to be a witness of this specific table talk, writes in his diary on the exact day it happened paraphrased the exact same thoughts of what Heim reports: 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: 𝟭𝟰.𝟭𝟮.𝟭𝟵𝟰𝟭 "The Führer said that Kerrl's motives were certainly only NOBLE, but that it was a hopeless attempt to unite National Socialism and Christianity. Me: There have been so many attempts to save the "pure doctrine", but these experiments have all failed. The Führer: This restoration of ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY would be the worst thing, as Julius II etc. who promoted great artists, were still less dangerous than primitive Christianity, despite all their crookedness." [2] [facsimile of the entry] @NSHeathenry

According Bormann's adjutant Heinrich Heim, he recalled Hitler saying the following at the table: 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝: 𝟏𝟎. 𝐎𝐤𝐭𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟒𝟏 "... This corresponds to Nature's principle of allowing selection to occur eternally anew through struggle: the law of existence demands uninterrupted killing so that the better lives. Christianity is REBELLION against this basic law, protest against creation; If carried out consistently, it would lead to the breeding of the inferior" [1] How do we know Hitler had said this? Hitler's personal friend Walther Hewel documented this same exact conversation within his personal diary confirming that Hitler did in fact say such things. This is his identical recollections: 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝: 𝟏𝟎. 𝐎𝐤𝐭𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟒𝟏 "Führer at the table: Christianity is REBELLION against creation. It is the reversal of all natural laws, which, even in the smallest process of fertilization, are based on struggle and selection of the best." [2] @NSHeathenry

𝐀𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐟 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫: "... the Jew now wants to start again with the ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY, Bolshevism. " 𝐀𝐥𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠: "The Führer: This restoration of ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY would be the worst thing..." @NSHeathenry

"Wotan, Thor, Balder and Freya are coming back today, but in completely different forms than when they once walked through Germania" — Alfred Rosenberg Source: NS 8/280 "Religion und Kirche" Von Alfred Rosenberg p.136 @NSHeathenry

𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚𝐧 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐞 "𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐳𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐟𝐭𝐞": "The first encyclical of Pius XI. on the Peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ on December 23, 1922 was written in such a way that it could serve as a spiritual basis for Catholic pacifism, 3. E.g. the infamous Peace Association of German Catholics. The circulars on the establishment of the feast of Christ of December 11, 1928 ("Statesmen have the sacred duty to ensure that the Volt recognizes Christ's supremacy", "The church must, by an inherent right which it cannot renounce, "claim complete freedom and independence from state power" ), on Catholic youth education from December 31, 1929, on Catholic marriage from December 31, 1930, on the Catholic social order from May 18, 1931 ("According to law and duty "We rule over social and economic questions by virtue of our highest authority of the office of judge" ): all of these circulars served to conquer the world for the Catholic ideal of state and society, not to mention the encyclicals against fascist Italy "Non abbiomo bisogno" of December 29th . June 1931 AND AGAINST NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMANY “MIT BRENNENDER SORGE” FROM MARCH 14, 1937. [...] Pius XI launched his attacks against National Socialism. in a particularly violent form in recent years in numerous pilgrim speeches." Source: Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte (Zentrale politische und kulturelle Zeitschrift der NSDAP) 1939 p.257 and p.270 (Official NSDAP literature) @NSHeathenry

"Now that those who have recovered have regained confidence in their own kind, in their own destiny, and thus experience providence and faith in God anew, from the inside out, they need neither Peter nor Paul, nor Jesus Christ, who was once a great phenomenon and still is today, BUT IS NO LONGER AN EDUCATOR OF RELIGION FOR US. Jesus Christ is, after all, the man of the crucifix, his pus wounds, his pain-distorted limbs are historical symbols of the great sickness of Europe's soul. Those who looked for the life of Jesus Christ searched with the probe of the healthy. He often found himself. But that was never enough for the long term, because the Crucified One was the decisive characteristic of Christianity - after 2000 years of development, that is what counts, not our touching attempts over the centuries to make this tortured man healthy again. These attempts, in which we may all have participated before the moment of full recovery, have come to an end. A millennium has passed. Let us not vilify it, let us not condemn it. In the struggle with, for and around Christianity, not only have countless people died, but forces have been awakened that might otherwise not have come to full fruition. However, the fact that we were able to venerate the crucifix was a sign of SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS." — Alfred Rosenberg Source: NS 8/280 "Religion und Kirche" Von Alfred Rosenberg p.143-144 @NSHeathenry

(((𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥))) 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚 𝐨𝐟 𝐉𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐬'𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 "In Ephesians Paul attributes to Jesus all power, force, and rule of this world and the future world. It cannot even be disputed that he [Paul] wished for a world upheaval with the help of the declassed of all states and peoples, with the aim of a theocracy. Paul’s false humility was coupled with a desire for world dominion. He displayed an overheated religious longing, as with all Orientals. He desired to march at the head of the rebels. Such was the PAULINE FALSIFICATION of the great figure of Christ." — Alfred Rosenberg Source: Myth of the Twentieth Century p.430 @NSHeathenry

𝐀𝐥𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 "As such, death was brought to Gethsemane and the “testimonies” of the resurrection and ascension of Jesus of Nazareth. This new “reality” was decisive for the Mediterranean as THE CONTENT OF PAULINE RELIGIOUS TEACHING, then shaped and codified as historical belief by Constantinople and later by Rome. Many sects became more solidified. Without Rome, Christianity would have remained an oriental sect. In Germania, on the other hand, we had to deal with Christianity as a limited Mediterranean phenomenon, as later with Mohammedanism and with an African-Near Eastern phenomenon. [...] Christianity rejected the doctrine of race, well we want to consider and evaluate it as race and nationless. Christianity teaches the indissoluble connection with the Old Testament, well - let's leave it to the ancient Jews and their Bible, as well as all those who wear the Jewish star today in Europe as worthy descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Christianity still teaches the contrived virgin birth, the ascent to hell and the rise of its founder. Now, we would like to write down for you THIS ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT AGAINST THE WHOLE OF EUROPEAN SCIENCE. Christianity rejected the proud, combative and warlike nature as a contradiction to the doctrine of love. Now let us recognize meekness as a purely Christian morality." — Alfred Rosenberg Source: NS 8/280 "Religion und Kirche" Von Alfred Rosenberg p.14 and p.136-137 @NSHeathenry