cookie

We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. By clicking Β«Accept allΒ», you agree to the use of cookies.

avatar

Ethical Skeptic

Show more
Advertising posts
3 319
Subscribers
-124 hours
+257 days
+21630 days
Posting time distributions

Data loading in progress...

Find out who reads your channel

This graph will show you who besides your subscribers reads your channel and learn about other sources of traffic.
Views Sources
Publication analysis
PostsViews
Shares
Views dynamics
01
Good news in that we are 57% below last year's Covid Mortality for weeks 15-17 of 2024. That is the largest YoY drop aside from the extinction of SARS-CoV-2b by 2a's background variant reemergence in early 2022. @EthicalSkeptic
9009Loading...
02
Just a reminder, with troll-tricks one can make the entire pandemic disappear in a graph. These griefers don't know how to - prosecute an inquiry - pursue a probatitve critical path - conduct deductive inference - detect signal - draw intelligence But they sure know how to lie... @EthicalSkeptic
92412Loading...
03
STUDY - @pfizer mRNA COVID-19 injections cause brain damage in the offspring of pregnant rats, resulting in pronounced autism-like behavior after birth. WNT gene expression and BDNF levels were deleteriously altered and neuronal counts were substantially decreased in critical brain regions. It's deeply worrisome that the @CDCgov is still saying "COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective" without investigating if the results of this study translate to humans. #MFScholar https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-023-04089-2 @EthicalSkeptic
1 55171Loading...
04
This is the 5th-grade level explanation about cancer: A. More young people are dying of cancer now (left). B. Fewer older people are dying of cancer now, because they are already dead from Covid (right). These two effects cancel each other out because one is up and the other is down - This is called an 'age bracket Simpson effect'. This does not mean that cancer is 'flat...' Even if you force your graph to look flat by a variety of data tricks. We have another whole article listing those tricks and how they work to make flat-looking graphs. Since cancer is up 25% in younger ages, then because it appears flat overall, likely ALL ages are up in rate as well, but the excess is just temporarily hidden by the Simpson effect. Application Questions: 1. What if a skilled analyst tried to un-hide these deaths now, so that we knew about them and could examine this issue closer? Would that be wise? 2. What if this made very powerful people very angry - people who don't want any cancer increase to be considered possible. And these people threatened the analyst and his family. Should this analysis still be attempted? 3. Are the people who post graphs hiding the cancer death increase by means of this Simpson effect and the other tricks we cited, telling the truth? 4. See if you can think of some reasons why those powerful people and graph fabricators might want to lie about this issue. @EthicalSkeptic
1 96058Loading...
05
If you see me restricting replies to 'verified accounts' - it is an effort to reduce the suppression effect from crypto-trading, porn, and bot replies (which are a level of magnitude more intelligent than pharma troll replies...) @EthicalSkeptic
1 0201Loading...
06
My perception extends now to those experts who sit quietly alone at night, sipping fine bourbon distilled from the blood of those who died, and contemplate, 'Oh my God, what if we made a mistake?' We were correct. And this has not ended... @EthicalSkeptic
6 62788Loading...
07
My perception extends now to those who sit quietly alone at night, sipping fine bourbon borne from the blood of those who died, and contemplate, 'Oh my God, what might we have done?' @EthicalSkeptic
1 2585Loading...
08
There are students who have never failed at anything. There are students who know how to manipulate the system just enough. There are students who realize their shortcomings, and the effort necessary to overcome them, but lack the right cause which justifies that effort. Neither will they cheat, for that same reason. The world is run by the first two. @EthicalSkeptic
1 33415Loading...
09
When you run a constant dollar analysis, there are 5 distinct things you adjust for: Economic inflation Sector inflation Cost escalations (including syndicate payments) Pricing adjusts If you are in a low productivity/credit rating nation (BBB+ or lower), then you must add currency dilution as well. You will not find this in a textbook. @EthicalSkeptic
5 41847Loading...
10
Cancer Mortality continues to be elevated, featuring a novel CAGR. Not 'skyrocketing' - don't use that term. Rhetoric specialists shift the focus to that word and distract from the critical path issue, as would a stage magician. "Cancer exhibits a 6.7% elevation in excess mortality, along with a novel 2.7% growth rate." This is extraordinary... because of the nature of cancer. @EthicalSkeptic
6 81854Loading...
11
The reason I have confidence in my projections (not just this one) is because I use methods learned from decades of hard work doing this for realz in business, strategy, and national advisement. Hundreds of projects featuring stark levels of visibility/accountability/profit impacts. The superior fit (NO paltering allowed) between the baseline and actual here is not an accident. This is not a least squares or linear regression. Growth must be derived and adjusted from the stable (saddle) period - not all data points. A later severe flu winter for instance can introduce a paltered baseline. This is also how I am able to catch DFT trends, inflections, and categorical manipulation in the ICD numbers. This trend already reflects salient generational effects and population growth πŸ‘ however, excludes non-salient generations trends which have ended, and non-relevant population boosting (which imparts a false dilution). Again - because if I did this wrong in the past, I would go out of business. The penalties for doing this the wrong (academic) way, were severe. @EthicalSkeptic
1 2286Loading...
12
We are in the spring lull. This is the same excess mortality level we were at last year, and the year before. It is not trend data - so take commentary during this period with a grain of salt. - Nominal Excess ACM = 2.7% - Actual Excess ACM = 5.0%
1 2935Loading...
13
The Nelsonian Ignorance Trap This is where syndicate science dead-ends to, when guided by agency. A ferocious and ironically-costumed form of cultivated ignorance. You Are Here @EthicalSkeptic
2 26232Loading...
14
Saline-like Effect, described. @EthicalSkeptic
2 29368Loading...
15
Never accede to the plaintive pleas of God or Science's representative on Earth. Rob them of their problem, or you will become subject to their solution. @EthicalSkeptic
1 66010Loading...
16
Pull Forward Effect What the pharma trolls used to conceal the excess cancer mortality. Now we see the harm they caused. Far worse than gas chambers... these cretins should be prosecuted. Folleagues were not fooled. @EthicalSkeptic
1 79521Loading...
17
There exists a distinction between Pathological Denial and Dissent. Dissent - an evidenced-based disagreement with the prevailing Narrative. Pathological Denial - the act of baselessly denying that an identified risk-hazard exists, which then results in harm. When wrong, especially while employing appeals to ignorance, ridicule, or authority - is unethical/immoral. @EthicalSkeptic
5 36656Loading...
18
What they are doing is a shell game between the cancer terms 'cases' and 'deaths' in younger persons (calling it 'rates' and hoping you don't catch the magician's trick) ...hoping that you will conflate a rise in cases into deaths as well... and subsequently dismiss the sudden early 2021 increase in younger person cancer deaths, as merely being an extension of 'cases'. This is a sign of desperation, and why we have the term 'unequivocal' used when the data is employed in a disciplined fashion. @EthicalSkeptic
10 092117Loading...
19
"They called it encephalitis, encephalopathy." Ever hold your infant son, screaming for 6 weeks after their DTaP vaccinations, only to never be fully eye or verbal responsive again? I have. One's Pollyanna view of the world is shattered thereafter. You know humanity's dark underbelly of agency - and the fake religions, syndicates, and science which kisses its ass. They called that encephalitis, encephalopathy as well. Was 'just a coincidence' that it arrived 6 hours after the vaccination. Took them another 6 years to finally admit, 'yeah, vaccine injury most likely'. Sorry, you cannot seek restitution, 'cuz virtue (flowers fall from the sky). So I worked 16 hour days for decades, to make up for this shortfall in his life. I am no longer your fool. @EthicalSkeptic
6 017100Loading...
20
Medical coder speaks up and she is stating truth. @EthicalSkeptic
7 972358Loading...
21
"Our review of more currentΒ CDC dataΒ suggest the society’s findings on young cancers are the tip of an emerging iceberg. Compared to pre-pandemic 2019, cancer deaths in 2023 rose strikingly in 15-to-44-year-olds: Uterine cancer, up 37%; colorectal, up 17%; liver, up 8%, and β€”suggestive of quickly growing diseaseβ€”β€œunspecified” metastatic cancer, up 14%. A group of under-the-radar physiciansΒ suspected Covid vaccines when in 2021 theyΒ noticed many more advanced malignancies." realclearhealth.com/blog/2024/04/2… @EthicalSkeptic
1 68833Loading...
22
Don't be one of these... This might have even appeared swooft in 1988. But now, you are the only one who thinks you are clever with these memorized deflections... @EthicalSkeptic
1 53615Loading...
23
Already did (left panel), and already recovered to the correct ICD group (right panel). About 230 deaths per week tucked away nicely, thinking no one would ever find them. @EthicalSkeptic
1 74720Loading...
24
The State of Things Pandemic - Wk 15 2024 πŸ”»Cancer hits 7.0% Excess at novel 3.1% CAGR πŸ”»Lockdown Deaths hit 3.5 years of sustained excess (as we warned would happen) - and is still ongoing πŸ”»575 Sudden Cardiac Deaths per week in younger persons - ongoing and not decreasing πŸ”»29% Excess cancer death rate in younger persons - and this is still rising theethicalskeptic.com/2024/04/16/the… @EthicalSkeptic
1 98637Loading...
25
We observed this years ago. 😎 CAPE(s) "Within 14 days of the wind blowing into an area, case rate trends downwind differed from that of [adjacent regions]. This suggests that viral particles carried by the wind can lead to an increase in infections..." https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1741081/v1 @EthicalSkeptic
1 42211Loading...
26
Excess Cancer Mortality Hits 7% Last year NCHS hid the cancer increase inside Covid and MCoD deaths (red annotation in left panel). This year there aren't enough Covid deaths in which to hide the cancer signal. Nor do we allow the MCoD concealment trick now. @EthicalSkeptic
1 44416Loading...
27
Very few men have taken on the responsibility of revealing an uncomfortable truth to an entire nation, risking their life both in the disclosure and its outcome. Such an endeavor, residing in the crosshairs of malicious agency, fundamentally alters who you are... @EthicalSkeptic
5 38018Loading...
28
An important thing to note in the Excess Cancer Mortality DFT Chart -> The agreement between inception and inflection. This agreement is FAR stronger than mere correlation. It is NOT a correlation at all. It suggests a specific cause as being the lead hypothesis. Inception - Week 51 2020 - is where the Law of Large Numbers forces the vaccine effect to show almost immediately because of the sheer size or specific vulnerability of the population (older citizens) which is impacted. This begins 7 days after the vaccine was introduced. Inflection - Week 14 2021 - is where the fastest uptake in effect occurs - this point introduces a new inertia (trend) in the arrival of deaths, a trend which is now sticky. This is the week of fastest administration of the vaccine. These represent the arrival of margin cases - they happen fast - and are not representative of the 'average' case. The average case may not arrive for a decade or more yet. So avoid thinking in terms of averages in this (Gaussian Blindness). This curve will peak and start back down, sometime near when we hit the 'average' case. Pray that this happens soon. @EthicalSkeptic
1 99630Loading...
29
The number of persons willing to lie in support of the prevailing Narrative far exceeds those willing to lie in dissent. A conspiracy is not required. @EthicalSkeptic
1 90616Loading...
30
If you had the mRNA vax and lose weight by taking fat burning stimulants (as secretly do most fitness buffs), you are at risk of Sudden Cardiac Death. An 'unspecified drug overdose' statistic (in chart below). The intersecting dysethics of the diet-blame and vaccine-virtue cartels. @EthicalSkeptic
2 16845Loading...
31
Helpful in spotting formal/informal logical fallacies, crooked arguing, skilled lying, coercion, irrelevance, rhetoric, flawed inference, ignoratio elenchi, narrative shtick, & syndicate/agency thinking on the part of those who seek cultivated ignorance. https://theethicalskeptic.com/the-tree-of-knowledge-obfuscation/ @EthicalSkeptic
1 93537Loading...
32
I mean, some of these pharma trolls are paid to do this, or are PhD's in biostatistics and do this. The number of people they have misled/harmed is staggering. Unlike possessions, your innate nature does follow you to the other side... @EthicalSkeptic
1 47412Loading...
33
What Pandemic? The art of the professional data liar - and how Pharma Trolls make clear signals magically disappear... This is the HARDEST data set to conceal - yet this is easily done. As the data signal gets less defined, it is even easier to pull this trick of obfuscation. @EthicalSkeptic
1 33719Loading...
34
Note: I neither seek nor accept compensation for my analytics, whether through direct payment or institutional funding. The trolls are paid/funded for their position, and often exploit the work of others to make money for themselves. Take that as a hint. @EthicalSkeptic
1 4409Loading...
35
Cancer Mortality up 26% in younger age brackets - shows no signs of abating. No matter the rhetoric or deflection one offers, if you cannot see this CLEAR INFLECTION caused by the mRNA vaccine, you are just maliciously dishonest. You see why I have no respect for such clowns. @EthicalSkeptic
6 370139Loading...
36
New preprint validates TES findings 😎 πŸ”»29 NT/F Zone nations show solid relationship between vaccination rate and excess mortality (we show 32 similar nations which exhibit this solid relationship) πŸ”»Excess Mortality persists after Covid has declined and continues to increase even now (we show 6% to 18% EM in NT/F Zone nations as of end of 2023) πŸ”»Lack of use of pull forward effect (PFE) has led to underestimation of excess mortality (we contend lack of PFE use shows incompetence, Society of Actuaries agreed) πŸ”»The more vaccinated, the greater the likelihood of Covid infection/reinfection (we showed 2.6x more likely) πŸ”»Causal association is established between vaccination and Excess Mortality (we show Wk 14 2024 inflection and rise thereafter) πŸ”»Excess Mortality is currently 3+ x greater than is Covid Mortality (we show 4.5x) πŸ”»Mortality from vaccine is 1.7 x the mortality from Covid (we show 1.8 x) πŸ”»Vaccine injury sequelae is excellent predictor of excess mortality osf.io/preprints/osf/… @EthicalSkeptic
1 53037Loading...
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
Good news in that we are 57% below last year's Covid Mortality for weeks 15-17 of 2024. That is the largest YoY drop aside from the extinction of SARS-CoV-2b by 2a's background variant reemergence in early 2022. @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ™ 10❀ 9πŸ‘ 6🀑 5
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
Just a reminder, with troll-tricks one can make the entire pandemic disappear in a graph. These griefers don't know how to - prosecute an inquiry - pursue a probatitve critical path - conduct deductive inference - detect signal - draw intelligence But they sure know how to lie... @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ”₯ 34❀ 4πŸ‘ 2
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
STUDY - @pfizer mRNA COVID-19 injections cause brain damage in the offspring of pregnant rats, resulting in pronounced autism-like behavior after birth. WNT gene expression and BDNF levels were deleteriously altered and neuronal counts were substantially decreased in critical brain regions. It's deeply worrisome that the @CDCgov is still saying "COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective" without investigating if the results of this study translate to humans. #MFScholar https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11064-023-04089-2 @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
🀬 41πŸ‘ 4🀯 3
This is the 5th-grade level explanation about cancer: A. More young people are dying of cancer now (left). B. Fewer older people are dying of cancer now, because they are already dead from Covid (right). These two effects cancel each other out because one is up and the other is down - This is called an 'age bracket Simpson effect'. This does not mean that cancer is 'flat...' Even if you force your graph to look flat by a variety of data tricks. We have another whole article listing those tricks and how they work to make flat-looking graphs. Since cancer is up 25% in younger ages, then because it appears flat overall, likely ALL ages are up in rate as well, but the excess is just temporarily hidden by the Simpson effect. Application Questions: 1. What if a skilled analyst tried to un-hide these deaths now, so that we knew about them and could examine this issue closer? Would that be wise? 2. What if this made very powerful people very angry - people who don't want any cancer increase to be considered possible. And these people threatened the analyst and his family. Should this analysis still be attempted? 3. Are the people who post graphs hiding the cancer death increase by means of this Simpson effect and the other tricks we cited, telling the truth? 4. See if you can think of some reasons why those powerful people and graph fabricators might want to lie about this issue. @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ”₯ 52πŸ‘ 9❀ 9πŸ’Š 4πŸ‘Œ 1
If you see me restricting replies to 'verified accounts' - it is an effort to reduce the suppression effect from crypto-trading, porn, and bot replies (which are a level of magnitude more intelligent than pharma troll replies...) @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
😁 15πŸ‘ 7🀑 3πŸ‘Œ 1
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
My perception extends now to those experts who sit quietly alone at night, sipping fine bourbon distilled from the blood of those who died, and contemplate, 'Oh my God, what if we made a mistake?' We were correct. And this has not ended... @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ”₯ 31πŸ’― 19πŸ‘ 2πŸ™ 2
My perception extends now to those who sit quietly alone at night, sipping fine bourbon borne from the blood of those who died, and contemplate, 'Oh my God, what might we have done?' @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
😒 19πŸ”₯ 9πŸ€” 7πŸ’― 6πŸ™ 5🀨 3
There are students who have never failed at anything. There are students who know how to manipulate the system just enough. There are students who realize their shortcomings, and the effort necessary to overcome them, but lack the right cause which justifies that effort. Neither will they cheat, for that same reason. The world is run by the first two. @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ”₯ 23πŸ’― 11πŸ’” 5πŸ‘ 4πŸ‘ 1
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
When you run a constant dollar analysis, there are 5 distinct things you adjust for: Economic inflation Sector inflation Cost escalations (including syndicate payments) Pricing adjusts If you are in a low productivity/credit rating nation (BBB+ or lower), then you must add currency dilution as well. You will not find this in a textbook. @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ‘ 25😨 7πŸ”₯ 5πŸ‘Œ 2
Photo unavailableShow in Telegram
Cancer Mortality continues to be elevated, featuring a novel CAGR. Not 'skyrocketing' - don't use that term. Rhetoric specialists shift the focus to that word and distract from the critical path issue, as would a stage magician. "Cancer exhibits a 6.7% elevation in excess mortality, along with a novel 2.7% growth rate." This is extraordinary... because of the nature of cancer. @EthicalSkeptic
Show all...
πŸ‘ 24πŸ™ 8πŸ”₯ 2