Travellers Amulet Tribe

Alexander Downer gave $25 million of Australian taxpayer money to the Clinton Foundation to “fight AIDS/HIV in Asia.” Where did the money go❓ ‘The Australian taxpayer shovelled at least $88 M into the Clinton Foundation and associated entities from 2006 to 2014, reaching a peak of $10.3 M in 2012-13, Gillard’s last year in office. On the Clinton Foundation website, AusAID and the Commonwealth of Australia score separate entries in the $10 M plus donors.. In 2009-10 Kevin Rudd handed over another $10 M to the foundation for climate research, part of $300 M he squandered on a Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute. Gillard also donated $300 M of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education She became chairman in 2014 and has been ­actively promoting Clinton as president ever since The Abbott government topped up their coffers with another $140M in 2014, bringing total Aus donations to $460 Million Parasites in power May the truth set us free❤️‍🔥 t.me/gabbichoong

No one is coming to save you especially Elon Musk, it is up to us ‘The People’. ❗️ 𝑹𝑬𝑴𝑬𝑴𝑩𝑬𝑹 ❗️ They create the 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎 ➡️ you provide the Emotional 𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ➡️ and they give you a planned 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ⚠️ Never forget! Trust in God only 🙏

Massive protests are taking place in Israel to demand the resignation of Netanyahu. https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

💥💥💥THE MIGHTY HEALING POWER OF ALOE VERA 👍👍👍 [Barbara O’Neil] #crohns #skinproblems #ibs #ulcers #detox #bloodpressure #teethandgums #sunburn #wounds #digestivetract #cardio https://t.me/hiddeninplainsight1

Aligned Council of Australia. Another cool place to download flyers, particularly to inform people about the importance of exiting the W.H.O. Go to the website here: https://alignedcouncilofaustralia.com.au/action/ Follow us @didyouknow_ink

Urgent concerns raised by the UK Cass report have been roundly dismissed by Australian gender clinicians. After almost four years of work, Dr Cass’s report reflects a meticulous analysis of all relevant international research including systematic reviews of the weak evidence base for treatment of gender-distressed young people. Yet the best response that gender clinicians in Australia can muster is an eerily identical chorus that “Australia is not the UK” and a hollow refrain that gender dysphoria management is “complex and evolving.” The acknowledgement of this uncertainty does not appear to cause restraint or circumspection as gender clinicians continue to initiate radical hormonal regimes in children; regimes which are, by design, required for the remainder of the child’s life. Gender clinicians are eager to reassure the Australian public that international research is not relevant to their practice. Somehow, the echoed reassurance of “multidisciplinary teams” is supposed to assuage mounting concerns by Australian doctors, young people, parents, journalists, politicians, academics and the legal profession. This emphasis on multidisciplinary care is tactical. The public is not being told that Australia’s general practitioner doctors (GPs in primary care) are increasingly starting lifelong cross-sex hormones for 16- to 17-year-olds independently of specialists such as endocrinologists or psychiatrists. These GPs are celebrated by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners as a “Special Interest Group”. What Australia’s gender clinicians have not done is respond, in any way, to the specific concerns raised by the Cass report, much of which is directly applicable to unacceptable practice in Australia. It is arguable that Australian gender clinics have some of the most egregious examples of substandard care and malpractice in the world. This is why parents and detransitioners, burdened with regret about past medical interventions recommended by trusted clinicians, are starting to bring claims to court. Simply claiming that Australia’s “gender-affirming care” is holistic doesn’t make it true. Even if a patient’s history is carefully noted and a multidisciplinary team is involved, it falls short of holistic care when a gender clinic offers only a narrow pathway of hormonal intervention. Genuine holistic care would mean best practice management of all relevant conditions, not just the gender distress presented as the key problem. Do Australia’s health ministers know the clinical reality that lies behind the slogan of “holistic gender-affirming care”? Consider the case of Maple Leaf House, a gender clinic in NSW’s Hunter region which takes young people under the age of 25. This clinic has a growing reputation for internal staff problems, hauling the reluctant parent in a family before a court to force treatment of the child, and allowing ideological presuppositions to override clinical discretion. On the surface, Maple Leaf House can be viewed as a success, with 986 young people seen in the past year, more than 12 full-time staff and a very large number of patients initiated on puberty blockers and “gender-affirming” hormones. While 91 otherwise pubescent children were receiving puberty blockers as at September 24 last year, Maple Leaf House is understood to have refused to report the number of young people prescribed cross-sex hormone treatments, despite clear Freedom of Information requests. Clinicians in the Hunter region have noted that Maple Leaf House fails to engage with the complexities present in a young person’s life. Serious medical and mental health issues are documented in letters from referring doctors, but then ignored or dismissed by Maple Leaf House as unrelated to gender distress or inexplicably unimportant. Issues such as autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, major depression, anxiety, a history of sexual violence, other childhood trauma and family issues appear to go unaddressed by Maple Leaf House, despite their staff including a paediatrician, child and

markable that health ministers, hospital managers and otherwise careful clinicians have placed such faith in these irresponsible guidelines. The Australian medical community, parents and children deserve robust healthcare anchored in evidence, eager to improve clinical practices and learn from thoughtful recommendations based on the highest quality international research. The Cass report and its concerns have direct relevance to Australia. Our children’s hospital gender clinics and other community-based gender clinicians should be subject to independent ethical oversight and safeguards for child wellbeing. The prescription of puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones for young people should only occur with complete transparency in a supervised, ethical and methodologically sound clinical trial. Such trials should have regular independent reviews of each young person’s wellbeing, their response to the intervention, any adverse effects and their ongoing suitability to continue with treatment. Australia has trusted gender clinicians with thousands of our children. We need to return to normal medical principles of thorough assessment, evidence-based medicine, the avoidance of harm, recognition of gaps in knowledge and openness to scrutiny and correction. To hide behind gender-affirming terminology, or to insinuate that without hormonal intervention young people might refuse to go to school, engage in self harm or commit suicide is irresponsible, manipulative and untrue. Young people with gender and identity concerns deserve the very best of care. At present, evidence-based care is not available despite generous public funding for Australia’s gender clinics. Intoning the mantra that “Australia is not the UK” is an excuse to continue to expose children to the risks of experimental treatment; it betrays the lack of a credible rejoinder to the considered findings of Dr Cass. Australian kids deserve care that is just as good as in the UK. If our country’s gender medicine was as excellent and holistic as is proclaimed, it would have nothing to fear by learning from thoughtful international colleagues. Surely only clinics with indefensible, unbalanced care would shy away from the best available evidence. The author is an Australian clinician writing anonymously in order to speak honestly without becoming a target for activist smears.