Election Data Analyzer

I am reposting this. By far the most positive feedback I have received on Substack. Given that the deadline for asking for CVR data is upon us, maybe worth another read. https://electiondataanalyzer.substack.com/p/cast-vote-records-for-non-math-minds

🔥There is no stopping the truth🔥

Greg Phillips posted a teaser for tomorrow's release of #Ripcord.

Here here.... https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/chinese-influence-scotland-could-curtailed-27579691

QR Codes Can Inject Nefarious Code https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjc-Xs-1fq8 This is a somewhat technical video but the essence of it is this. QR codes can have information encoded in them that is nefarious and when scanned, can inject code or take other nefarious actions. Watch the video if you have doubts. Let me propose a test for any hacker at the next DefCon Conference 1. Get hold of a BMD and hack the QR code printing function 2. Cast a vote 3. Print out the ballot with a QR Code 4. Scan the ballot 5. Encode commands to turn on the wifi for the tabulator 6. Encode commands to run a piece of code on the tabulator The programmer on this video makes it seem like this would be child’s play. If this is true, can you really trust the “Election Experts” who sell us this equipment?

Subnational Influence by the CCP https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2021/11/15/all-over-the-map/ This is not a conspiracy theory, it is happening. Is this what we elected our local and state officials to do? Our elected officials are sacrificing long term sovereignty for short term economic gain. “Beijing sees subnational relationships first as means to influence U.S. economic, technological, and narrative environments, and second as means to increase China’s national-level influence in the United States. In the short term, subnational governments can exert pressure on the federal government. In the longer term, Beijing views subnational officials as future national leaders to be cultivated so they become favorably predisposed toward China.”

Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries Why is this group (CPAFFC) permitted to be in the United States? They are an influence operation of the CCP that bypasses the federal government and focuses on state and local governments. To put it a different way, if the CPAFFC wants to be HERE, then they ought to let another organization into THEIR cities and towns on THEIR lands. Let me come up with a name for this new organization: American People’s Association for the Liberation of Foreign Countries. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. If they want to be HERE, then we need to be over THERE. Otherwise, GET OUT of our country. https://invasionusa.news/2021-11-18-bill-gates-praising-ccp-groups-friendship.html

What a horrible idea. States hand over their driver license issuance to a globalist technology overlord. And then wait for the globalist control of the voter registration roll right after this via NVRA. States, don't give up your sovereignty!...https://apnews.com/article/3db24f145e3a5f8f69f895bc12ddf2db

Hmm, I wonder of any of these licenses are being used for vote fraud....https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/08/20000-fake-licenses-mostly-from-china-seized-at-chicago-ohare-airport-in-2020/

Folks, this trends need to be turned around. http://electionlab.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2021-03/HowWeVotedIn2020-March2021.pdf

2020 Post Mortem – A Lib Perspective https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-miracle-and-tragedy-of-the-2020-u-s-election/ The circles are states won by Biden. Squares are won by Trump. You can see the decided shift to the lower left hand quadrant This is something we already know but this quantifies it. This is my favorite quote. “Absentee voting rescued the Wisconsin primary from complete disaster. Nearly 60 percent of the 1.5 million voters who turned out cast their ballots absentee, compared to 3.6 percent in the 2016 primary. Wisconsin reported that....The percentage rejected for “certification insufficient,” was a miniscule 0.07 percent (1,434 ballots out of nearly two-million returned).” So, the absentee voting INCREASED by 56.4% but the percentage of ballots rejected as certifiable went down from 2.3% to 0.7%? Any discussion of fraud is just dismissed. CTCL are regarded as hero's. This logic is so twisted…and they say it with a straight face and expect you to believe it. #VoteNoCode

Become and Election Worker https://workelections.org/ This is put together by Democracy Works, but so what. It is a good starting point to research about how to become an election worker. Wouldn’t it be nice to have equal representation from all parties as poll workers for the mid-terms?

If a printer drops a drip of ink or the printer misses some ink in the QR code it will change the way the ballot is read or even void the ballot information, this is bad. What is worse is that tabulators that read only the QR code are set to "accept" all ballots coming from a BMD as the tabulator assumes the BMD will only print whatever choices the voter makes because the BMDs are designed to correct the over / under vote the way the voter wants it, before the BMD prints the ballot. So if it is a messed up or changed QR code the tabulator accept all and cast the vote as it reads the ballot, even if it is a voided ballot.

RABET-V for Non-Voting Election Technology – Funded by The Democracy Fund https://www.cisecurity.org/about-us/media/press-release/the-center-for-internet-security-unveils-new-approach-to-verify-non-voting-election-system-security My cliff note version: After 50 years of trying to figure out a secure voting machine and spending billions of tax payer dollars, we are happy to announce, we FINALLY figured it out. (LOL) To Quote: RABET-V is a unique approach to verifying the security of internet connected election technology, like voter registration databases and e-pollbooks, with a single standard. While the Help America Vote Act defines voting systems and ways of testing them, there has been no equivalent method of testing non-voting technology. “The Center for Internet Security is committed to preserving the integrity of the US election process, and has spent the last two years working with federal, state and election technology industry partners to develop RABET-V. This new process for testing is based on modern software development and testing practices, and allows for rapid changes in those products and services that could otherwise leave systems vulnerable,” says Mike Garcia, Senior Cybersecurity Advisor for CIS. The pilot, which was funded by a grant from the Democracy Fund, was publicly evaluated by two expert committees: a steering committee comprised of elections officials and federal officials who work on elections; and a technical committee of cybersecurity experts from government, industry and academia. #VoteNoCode

Cast Vote Records Common Data Formats – NIST 1500-103 published in 2019 https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1500-103.pdf The private industry technical experts who wrote this standard include ES&S Dominion Voting Democracy Fund - 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) Private industry and NGOs are pulling some strings with NIST. Just posting this here for your consideration… #VoteNoCode

The Election “Business Process Model” by NIST and EAC https://pages.nist.gov/ElectionModeling/ElectionProcessModel.pdf https://pages.nist.gov/ElectionModeling/diagrams.html#Diagrams___18_5_1_11940316_1502569624248_921480_25637 The NIST and EAC are looking at our elections the same way as a business. To quote: “The primary goal of this work is to describe processes and their associated data flows, such that use-cases for common data formats can be identified...and convey the current operating reality of election authorities to those outside the field. This understanding will lead to confidence in the process, as well as identification of areas for potential business process improvement.” I don’t want “business process improvement”. Election should be a decentralized CIVIC DUTY run by citizens and our elected officials in the most DECENTRALIZED and non-computerized manner possible. In my view, this effort is a Trojan horse for a take-over of our elections by Big Tech. #VoteNoCode

Election Night Results Reporting – What do We the People want? Choice 1 Hand count in precinct. Report at precinct first. Then report up to County, State etc. Have the counting and reporting widely distributed and non-centralized. Choice 2 A computer data model written by a few people associated with NIST and Google. https://pages.nist.gov/ElectionResultsReporting/index.html https://developers.google.com/civics-data/guides https://github.com/usnistgov/ElectionResultsReporting Imagine that, a few people are responsible for developing a standard, adopted by the NIST that could be responsible for election night reporting for the entire country! Technical standards are boring to look at, but, they represent a HUGE leverage point for control. #VoteNoCode

That about sums it up. This is labelled as mis-information in 2022 but was mainstream in 2018. https://tech.ava360.com/how-to-hack-an-election-according-to-a-former-nsa-hacker_46e3ce4f0.html