LucasApe.eth degen calls
Open in Telegram
All content shared in this channel is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always DYOR before making any financial decisions. Dm for: -Promotions -Liquidity provider -Deploy service -Bundle service @LucasApeDotEth
Show more6 669
Subscribers
-1524 hours
-1247 days
-1 89330 days
Posts Archive
easy 2x on vlad hack coin , now ill wait for tweet delete and ill buy the nuke probably in case it turns next "4" like we had in BSC
send russell and brian to 0
enough with the chains rotation , focus on robinhood fuck brian
can we all bridge all our ETH from base to robinhood please?
https://x.com/brian_armstrong/status/2079211558769697163?s=46&t=jwfdtQ5dja4sFpzo-LA8Yw
i think good
eth chain gem ?
wait for dip and use LOW GAS
0xbc6c8e08c9f6c0a2cf1185763f5ad8f37aad86de
ok lets start again , what launchpads we can use that dont have "bonding curve" just like noxa?
Our understanding of the situation:
Noxa appears to be facing significant legal challenges, likely stemming from copyright disputes with Robinhood due to the proliferation of tokens mimicking their branding. Following mass reports against their primary website, the developer has migrated the platform to a static site on IPFS. This decentralized approach ensures the interface remains accessible and allows users to continue claiming fees without fear of takedowns.
In a major shift, the developer has voluntarily relinquished all volume fees. These revenues are now redirected entirely to token deployers and CTOs, meaning the founder is generating zero revenue from the protocol moving forward.
While the exact legal specifics remain unconfirmed, it is evident that the pressure from frequent new launches and potential trademark infringement became unsustainable for a small team. By stepping away from what was reportedly $1–2 million in daily fees, the developer has adopted a 'Robinhood-like' stance—prioritizing the community’s financial well-being over personal profit. Whatever the precise catalyst, forfeiting such substantial income was undoubtedly a difficult decision.
wow noxa devs
pretty sure this is not the real reason to avoid "pvp"
its something deeper probably fees issues between the team
wise words by best dev :
i personally thought the trenches and kols were a bit smarter after 7 years of trading 50 tokens a day but it’s insane how much slop they still fall for
Meanwhile they pumping 01 on eth chain like anyone care about it.
Just Move on bro
Even Vitalik aped presale and no one bought after him.
