MLB INTEL LAB ⚾️
Open in Telegram
BIG DOG DATA Unique betting intel across all major leagues 🚀 More value than a thousand cappers can offer 🧠💰 Main channel 👉 https://t.me/+OYYFXlIerrI1MzZi 💰 https://cappersintel.com/
Show more1 003
Subscribers
No data24 hours
-127 days
-3130 days
Posts Archive
1 003
GUARDIANS OFF 3 LOSSES SINCE 2023:
22 WINS
4 LOSSES
62.9% ROI
🔨 TIME — GUARDIANS ML +100
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/18
DODGERS -1.5 (-190)
ORIOLES ML (+113)
REDS ML (-110)
GUARDIANS ML (+100)
ASTROS ML (+133)
UNDERS:
GUARDIANS UNDER 9 (-115)
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/17
ORIOLES +1.5 (-182)
CARDINALS +1.5 (-117)
UNDERS:
REDS UNDER 9 (-110)
GUARDIANS UNDER 9 (-123)
PADRES 8.5 (-110)
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/16
ORIOLES +1.5 (-170)
TIGERS ML (-102)
CARDINALS +1.5 (-140)
MARINERS ML (-110)
MLB LAB UNDERS:
GUARDIANS UNDER 8.5 (-102)
PADRES UNDER 8 (-125)
METS UNDER 8.5 (-110)
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/15
ORIOLES ML (+190)
CARDINALS ML (+120)
MLB LAB UNDERS 8/15:
REDS UNDER 9 (-115)
GUARDIANS UNDER 8.5 (-105)
PADRES UNDER 9 (+105)
1 003
Repost from Big Dog Intel🐾
STATS YOU DIDN'T ASK FOR BUT I DELIVERED (PART 3515)
I thought it'd be fun to see how Yankees & Mets perform on the same days. And what if you parlay these two teams...
Well, you already see the whole graph is red. So yeah — the Yankees + Mets parlays are not healthy for your bankrolls.
Especially on Saturdays: 13-56... Out of 69 times Yankees and Mets played on the same Saturday, they both won only 13 times. That's 18.8% win rate since 2023.
And the longest losing streak of both teams NOT winning on the same day is ... 33 days!
So it might be interesting to fade the other NY team after the first one wins.
However, in reality it might hard to do this, since they might play at the same time.
1 003
Also testing new Kelly criterion system based off my team trends:
https://t.me/kelly_betting/922
https://t.me/kelly_betting/922
https://t.me/kelly_betting/922
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/12
Dodgers -1.5 (-130)
Guardians UNDER 9 (-120)
Twins +1.5 (-110)
Astros UNDER 8.5 (-115)
Padres UNDER 7.5 (-110)
Mets ML (-140)
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/11
DODGERS -1.5 -115
REDS ML -117
REDS UNDER 9.5 -113
TWINS +1.5 -130
PADRES UNDER 7 +105
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/9
Dodgers -1.5 +120
Brewers ML -135
Mets / Brewers under 8.5 +100
Tigers OVER 8.5 -115
Guardians UNDER 8.5 -110
Astros UNDER 7.5 +100
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/7
Dodgers -1.5 +145
Astros ML -109
Astros under 7.5 -102
Padres under 7.5 +105
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/6
DODGERS -1.5 -105
RANGERS ML +118
GUARDIANS UNDER 7.5 -110
ASTROS UNDER 8.5 -118
PADRES UNDER 9.5 -115
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/5
DODGERS -1.5 +103
ORIOLES +1.5 -165
GUARDIANS UNDER 8.5 +100
ASTROS UNDER 8.5 -110
PADRES UNDER 9 -125
1 003
+1
MLB LAB 8/4
DODGERS -1.5 +108
ORIOLES +1.5 -116
RANGERS +1.5 -145
GUARDIANS UNDER 8 -110
1 003
Briefly on how I select the MLB LAB plays
The plays that I post here I select through this little sheet. If a team has some parameter that reaches 1U then I add the play to the list. For example, Dodgers spreads are 37-21 in August for +26.8% ROI.
That's how I've been selecting plays since the start of the season and I want to finish it this way so we can see for the future if this model is sustainable or not.
But now I also have an AI sheet (see previous post) where I don't interfere. You see the list of plays and you select any plays you like.
So it's really up to you but I still think that the UNDERS that I select manually are still good on their own.
