Gail Golec

New book explains the who, why when and how of our kidnapping. Two sons still in prison! It will be 6 years in July! Get the book and give us more exposure for our case!

Will Brian Ramirez become famous yet? We have the database administrator on video deleting database files and he is still employed at the Recorders Office with no arrests. https://x.com/gailgolec/status/1553585674778882051?s=46

A “Make Elections Great Again” bill just dropped. This is a step in the right direction. Our current election systems have been compromised and remain vulnerable to hacking. Any system that cannot be independently secured and verified must be prohibited. Reforms are meaningless if election data can still be accessed or changed. Election integrity begins and ends with immutable results. We must ban the machine counts. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5712698-house-republicans-election-reform-bill/amp/

Awesome Work by @yehuda_miller ! 2020 Detroit Election Investigation, Part 1: Over 10K Detroit "Voters" Made Same Bizarre "Ghost Vote" Marks On Ballots In 2020 Election-Were Mismarked Ballots Sending A Message To Voting Machines or Meant to Trigger "Adjudication"? https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/not-normal-10k-voters-made-same-bizarre-ghost/

There is no real citizen right of action. The bill explicitly protects the state, and it does not clearly protect citizens’ rights to sue for harm. The simplest question every legislator should be asked: If this is so safe, so proven, and so harmless, why does the state need immunity from liability and why are citizens denied the right to consent? My core objection: This bill should not exist in a “permission and licensing” form at all. If anything, it should be prohibition-first or moratorium-first pending long-term independent study. If legislators want a responsible approach, it would look more like: • A 5 to 10 year moratorium • A ban on atmospheric aerosol dispersal • County-level voter approval requirements • Full environmental impact statements • A private right of action for harmed citizens • No immunity clause • No military or federal experimental programs • No operations that cross watershed boundaries Bottom line: HB2125 does not protect Arizona. It locks Arizona into a future where the atmosphere becomes an industrial testing ground and citizens are subjected to chemical and environmental interventions without consent and without real accountability.

Friends, I need to flag some things that are very important in this Weather Modification Bill. https://apps.azleg.gov/BillStatus/BillOverview/83765 HB2125 is being presented as a “regulatory” bill for weather modification. It is not a protective bill. It authorizes, normalizes, and legally entrenches weather modification in Arizona. Once this passes, Arizona will have a state-sanctioned atmospheric modification industry with approved chemicals, a licensing pipeline, and legal immunity for the state. If the goal were public safety, this bill goes in the opposite direction. This also raises a serious federal constitutional issue: people are being subjected to environmental and chemical exposure without their consent, which conflicts with long-established federal principles of informed consent and bodily integrity. Here is why this should concern everyone, regardless of politics: 1. This bill doesn’t restrain weather modification. It institutionalizes it. The moment the state creates a licensing system, a chemical approval process, and a renewal pathway, this becomes a permanent, state-approved activity. This is not oversight. It is formal adoption. From then on, every future legislature will be told: “It’s already legal, already regulated, already in use.” That is exactly how controversial industries become untouchable. 2. The state gives itself total immunity from liability. (Section 45-1608) This bill explicitly says that if licensed weather modification causes harm, the State of Arizona cannot be sued. That should alarm every homeowner, farmer, and municipality. Flooding? No state liability. Watershed damage? No state liability. Environmental or health impacts? No state liability. This removes the only real accountability government ever has. If this were truly safe, why does the state need immunity? 3. Communities do not get to consent. They only get “notified.” This raises federal rights issues. This bill allows chemicals to be dispersed into the atmosphere over communities without the consent of the people who live there. People get notice and can comment, but they have no veto and no opt-out. Public comment is not public permission. More importantly, this conflicts with federal constitutional protections of bodily integrity and informed consent. Government cannot simply expose people to chemical or environmental interventions and call it “notice.” 4. “Approved chemicals” is not a safety guarantee. History should make us very cautious here. DDT, PFAS, leaded gasoline and many others were once “approved.” This bill does not require: • Long-term epidemiological studies • Cumulative impact analysis • Multi-year environmental modeling • Any real downstream liability 5. There is no solid proof of net benefit. Cloud seeding and weather modification are not settled science in terms of downstream impacts and unintended consequences. This bill treats it as if they are. Legislators should be forced to answer one basic question: Where is the long-term, peer-reviewed proof that this does not harm neighboring regions, watersheds, or climate patterns? 6. This creates a classic regulatory capture structure. The state collects fees, licenses the operators, and then grants itself immunity. The regulator becomes financially and politically aligned with the activity it is supposed to oversee. That is a known failure pattern in public policy. 7. Local governments and property owners lose real control. Counties, cities, and landowners get no veto power. Their only role is to comment after plans are already drafted. 8. This opens the door to federal and corporate programs. Once Arizona has a formal legal framework, it becomes much easier for federal programs, defense contractors, and large-scale atmospheric projects to operate here under “state approval.” 9. This quietly changes the legal status of the sky itself. You are moving weather from an “act of God” to a state-managed industrial system. That is a profound legal and philosophical shift that should not be done casually or quietly. 10.

🏡 Phoenix Opportunity | Priced to Sell Move-in ready home in a highly desirable North Phoenix location, close to shopping, dining, and convenient freeway access. ✔️ Clean and well maintained ✔️ Functional layout with great natural light ✔️ Excellent option for owner-occupants or investors ✔️ Lock-and-leave lifestyle If you or someone you know is looking for a well-priced property in a strong location, this one deserves a look. 📍 19601 N 7th St #1029, Phoenix 🔗 Full listing details: https://www.flexmls.com/.../19601-N-7TH-ST-1029-Phoenix...

Happy New Year Patriots! May God restore Our Constitutional Republic in 2026! May Truth, Justice and Freedom RING!

Merry CHRISTmas and God's blessings to you and yours. 🙏✝️🎁

@ShadowofEzra: A U.S. Army veteran tells Candace Owens he is 99 percent certain he saw Erika Kirk, Turning Point USA security chief Brian Harpole, and Nevada Congressman Mark Amodei attending a high level meeting at a military base in Arizona. He says the meeting took place just days before the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

@ProjectConstitu: 🚨EXPOSED: Frangible Bullet, Missing Footage & Multiple Prints On Gun: Candace Debunks Tyler as Charlie Kirk Lone Killer 🕵️‍♂️ Candace Owens just demolished the "overwhelming evidence" lie they're feeding us about Tyler Robinson being Charlie Kirk's lone shooter. Her verdict: Anyone claiming "overwhelming evidence" is straight-up lying. The only "proof"? Those weird, timestamp-less texts that read like ChatGPT fanfiction. What we actually know raises massive red flags pointing away from Tyler: 🔘Surgeon never said "steel neck" or 30-06—suggested frangible bullet (disintegrates, no ricochet). Official story? Claims it ricocheted. 🔘Sole confirmed rooftop eyewitness (gun range instructor) describes professional in black tactical gear + mask, shorter weapon—never contacted by investigators or defense. 🔘Bomb dogs searched area—found nothing. Feds arrive, send rookie cops... gun "miraculously" appears. 🔘Feds blocked surgeon from re-entering OR to clean Charlie for Erika—had to call DC to override. Feds seized hospital cameras during active manhunt. 🔘Charlie's SUV never impounded—rushed to auction, evidence potentially destroyed. 🔘Multiple fingerprints on "murder weapon"—not just Tyler's. 🔘Footage of Tyler "turning himself in"? Missing. Local news requested—told it's "expired." Candace: This isn't a lone wolf case—it's a coordinated federal disaster with holes big enough to drive a truck through. They're gaslighting us while protecting the real players. Tyler as patsy? Increasingly plausible. The truth isn't "overwhelming"—it's being buried.

Twelve Days of Christmas - including an Election National Emergency and Tina Peters Free! Perfect! A song from Jeff O'Donnell @FSociety_1942 with Lyrics by @LauraScharr Merry Christmas 🎄 🎶 ✝️. https://rumble.com/v7360hm-the-twelve-days-of-trump.html

✨ JUST LISTED in North Phoenix! ✨ 📍 19601 N 7th St #1029, Phoenix AZ 85024 Beautifully maintained 2 bedroom / 2 bathroom condo in a convenient North Phoenix location near the 101 & 51, offering quick access to shopping, dining, Desert Ridge, and Mayo Clinic. 🔥 Property Features: ✔️ Well-kept interior with a functional, open layout ✔️ Ground-level unit with private patio ✔️ Community pool ✔️ Covered parking ✔️ Great option as a primary residence or investment property Take a closer look 👇 🎥 Virtual Tour: https://dashboard.rocketlister.com/.../virtual.../753597... 🏡 MLS Listing: https://www.flexmls.com/.../19601-N-7TH-ST-1029-Phoenix... If you’d like to schedule a showing or receive more information, I’m here for you. 📲 Gail Golec, REALTOR® | West USA Realty

On November 17, 2025, I, respectfully, spoke at the Scottsdale City Council requesting the City Council hold off on their vote until they either produce the specific documents and calculations showing how Scottsdale is meeting the 100-year requirement for this Axon project, or publicly acknowledge that such documentation does not exist. Previously on multiple occasions in writing, the City Manager, City Attorneys and City Public Records, publicly acknowledged to me that they do not have the following documents, which are required by law in order to approve a large development project such as this. 1. Identification of the actual water sources (CAP, SRP, reclaimed water, groundwater, storage credits) that would serve this project. 2. The mathematical analysis or demand modeling demonstrating a 100-year supply under A.R.S. § 45-576. 3. Confirmation that Axon’s projected demand has been incorporated into Scottsdale’s DAWS and approved by ADWR PRIOR to authorization of the development. Accordingly, when the Scottsdale City Council voted to proceed with the development of 1200 residential units, a world headquarters for Axon, as well as a hotel and other amenities, they were knowingly violating the law. While I believe they will figure out a way to make the numbers work in the future, they were supposed to have these numbers and this plan PRIOR to approving this development. The law is very clear on this. https://rumble.com/v71vfjq-scottsdale-city-council-violates-water-laws.html

Incredible information for your health and well being here!