Project X Channel
Donation: https://github.com/XTLS/Xray-core/issues/3668 中文群组：https://t.me/projectXray Русский: https://t.me/projectVless Persian: https://t.me/projectXhttp GitHub: https://github.com/XTLS
Show more📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel Project X Channel
Channel Project X Channel (@projectxtls) in the Chinese language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 29 433 subscribers, ranking 4 508 in the Technologies & Applications category and 8 296 in the China region.
📊 Audience metrics and dynamics
Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 29 433 subscribers.
According to the latest data from 21 July, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by 2 248 over the last 30 days and by 15 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.
- Verification status: Not verified
- Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 47.02%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects 16.46% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
- Post reach: On average, each post receives 13 839 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 4 845 views.
- Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 100.
- Thematic interests: Content is focused on key topics such as xray, tun, vless, github, reply.
📝 Description and content policy
The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
“Donation: https://github.com/XTLS/Xray-core/issues/3668
中文群组：https://t.me/projectXray
Русский: https://t.me/projectVless
Persian: https://t.me/projectXhttp
GitHub: https://github.com/XTLS”
Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 22 July, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Technologies & Applications category.
Data loading in progress...
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 22 July | +27 | |||
| 21 July | +16 | |||
| 20 July | +28 | |||
| 19 July | +21 | |||
| 18 July | +16 | |||
| 17 July | +16 | |||
| 16 July | +5 | |||
| 15 July | +20 | |||
| 14 July | +62 | |||
| 13 July | +54 | |||
| 12 July | +22 | |||
| 11 July | +23 | |||
| 10 July | +30 | |||
| 09 July | +62 | |||
| 08 July | +172 | |||
| 07 July | +292 | |||
| 06 July | +622 | |||
| 05 July | +754 | |||
| 04 July | +15 | |||
| 03 July | +7 | |||
| 02 July | +18 | |||
| 01 July | +72 |
| 2 | 看到 https://github.com/XTLS/BBS/issues/32 的讨论转向了“机场”的出路，我觉得“封端”并不是最终解，你们拿 Mihomo 生态改“封端”不仅违反 GPL 且 GFW 给客户端抓个包就知道是哪些 IP 了，三条出路大概是：
1. XHTTP+CDN+ECH 或 domain fronting ，GFW 不好封 SNI 或 CDN 的 IP
2. 买大量且分散的境外入口 IP，GFW 不好封 IP 段，每几个用户分成一组
3. IP 加密，不过这个你们就等吧，未必有境外 ISP 愿意配合，不好推动
以上只针对直连，至于中转就不评价了，GFW 真想拔线的话一个都逃不掉 | 7 095 |
| 3 | 没用 Surge 时：“你都没用过 Surge，凭什么评价？”
用了 Surge 之后：“既然觉得 Surge 不好用，你为什么还要用？”
不用了再评价：“你现在都不是 Surge 用户了，怎么知道新版怎么样？” | 8 120 |
| 4 | 这都合理上了 | 7 218 |
| 5 | 一个价格上百的翻墙客户端，然后新协议都不支持 | 7 061 |
| 6 | 不允许往群里搬屎 | 6 988 |
| 7 | 没悖论 | 6 513 |
| 8 | 难道不是没买的不许骂买了的才能骂吗 | 6 450 |
| 9 | 悖论 | 6 255 |
| 10 | 所以surge用户必须拥护surge | 6 079 |
| 11 | surge用户不支持surge，岂不是论证自己是掏了钱买垃圾的傻逼？ | 5 955 |
| 12 |  No text... | 5 785 |
| 13 | 虽然样本过少但只采访一个就精准命中，这个不就直接说实话了
人的内心都是有阴暗面的，它会驱动人做事但不会被轻易承认，就像刘教主不会承认其实它不懂 VLESS REALITY 但就是想在邪教徒面前装个逼一样，大多数机场也不会告诉你选择 AnyTLS 只因多了个 Surge 支持，高溢价的“一线机场”尤为如此，毕竟刘割割都已经帮它们把人傻钱多无脑买“最贵的代理软件”的苹果人筛选出来了，这大肥羊岂有放弃的道理？至于 Xray 用户？换同样免费的 Mihomo 不就行了？不要看它们说了什么而要看它们做了什么，甚至一线机场中选择 VLESS 的都还要给 Surge 专开线路
虽然选择了 AnyTLS，但是 Surge 不支持 REALITY 怎么办？自然是机场传统艺能自签证书加 allowInsecure，这就是为什么刘收编能以一己之力把占大多数的不用 Surge 的 end user 也全带坑里，一人身兼数职只为给 GFW 造蜜罐，还得是刘桑啊 | 6 249 |
| 14 | R：蜜罐机场 | 5 577 |
| 15 | 因为想起自己每年花几十美元买的代理软件结果却毫无用武之地只能选择anytls😄 | 5 472 |
| 16 | 我采访了一个机场主 问他为啥选 AnyTLS 而不是 VLESS
他说 因为他用 Surge 🐶 | 5 338 |
| 17 | end user机场给什么用什么（ | 5 461 |
| 18 | 不要什么都给end user选是对end user负责。别忘了棱镜门。别忘了为什么tls1.3移除了那么多加密方法。整个互联网都是在向默认安全发展，有的人一句“应该交给end user”就把密码学和互联网那么多前辈对公众信息安全的努力否定了 | 5 570 |
| 19 | 事实上99%的人并不懂这些。google强推https是有利所有人 | 5 542 |
| 20 | 给大多数用户一个安全且平衡的默认选项很有必要，很难想象要是https也是主流网站可选项多少人会在用http不自知，而且大众也本来不需要知道这些，让体验无感且安全是才是优秀的设计 | 5 569 |
