en
Feedback
PLR | Supreme Court e@journal | Supreme Court online | SC online | Law | Legal

PLR | Supreme Court e@journal | Supreme Court online | SC online | Law | Legal

Open in Telegram

SUPREME COURT e@Journal reporting on the latest judgements of the Supreme Court. Join us on Telegram. Law reports - A must for anyone connected with law, the bar or the bench. Subscription 2022 Rs. 1200

Show more
3 391
Subscribers
No data24 hours
+27 days
+1430 days

Data loading in progress...

Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '24
September '24
+11
in 0 channels
August '24
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+51
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+40
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+47
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+48
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+52
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+55
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+81
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+59
in 1 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+18
in 1 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+27
in 1 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+16
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+23
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+15
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+14
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+35
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+31
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+17
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+295
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+31
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+94
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+79
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+100
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+79
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+95
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+72
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+120
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+67
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+84
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+96
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+80
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+105
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+128
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '21
+111
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+226
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+2 656
in 0 channels
Date
Subscriber Growth
Mentions
Channels
25 September0
24 September0
23 September0
22 September0
21 September+3
20 September0
19 September+1
18 September+1
17 September+1
16 September0
15 September0
14 September0
13 September0
12 September0
11 September0
10 September0
09 September+1
08 September0
07 September0
06 September0
05 September+1
04 September+1
03 September0
02 September+1
01 September+1
Channel Posts
Join for Selected reports from Supreme Court eJournal and Punjab Law Reporter. https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr

2
*CONTEMPT* | Court deems it fit and appropriate to issue a show cause notice upon the *Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Chandigarh*, for the latter making an explanation to this Court as to why proceedings for contempt be not initiated against him for his making the above miscommunication, which but is prima facie completely ridden with lies. *[PLRonline.in]* ....... https://supremecourtonline.in/court-deems-it-fit-and-appropriate-to-issue-a-show-cause-notice-upon-the-presiding-officer-drt-2-chandigarh-for-the-latter-making-an-explanation-to-this-court-as-to-why-proceeding/ *Punjab Law Reporter* | Call 9463598502 *Join* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/IW2g8ANNmO22zpPv7YPEPv
0
3
Just save this group to use for *FREE* - LIMITATION CALCULATOR by clicking on this link : https://supremecourtonline.in/limitation-calculator/
0
4
*The LAW DIARIES* Channel. Follow us : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaLo0Vt8aKvR8U945L1D
0
5
Hindu Succession Act S. 6, 8 – Coparcenary property – Once the property had been acquired by way of succession, it would lose its ancestral character . (2023-4)212 PLR 596] https://supremecourtonline.in/hindu-succession-act-s-6-8-coparcenary-property-once-the-property-had-been-acquired-by-way-of-succession-it-would-lose-its-ancestral-character-2023-4212-plr-596/
0
6
PLRONLINE | *CPC S. 153A - enables the court which has passed the decree to exercise the power of correcting clerical and typographical mistake even though the appeal preferred has been dismissed in limine - Such provisions does not oust the jurisdiction of the appellate court to correct typographical or clerical mistakes*https://supremecourtonline.in/court-dismissed-appeal-in-limine-with-words-no-merit-dismissed-dismissal-of-appeal-in-limine-would-amount-to-merger-plronline-id-1214701/
0
7
PLRonline_26626(1)(1).pdf
0
8
Insurance |  Date of commencement of policy | What would be the date from which the policy becomes effective; date on which the policy is issued | or the date of the commencement mentioned | or date of the issuance of the deposit receipt | or cover note [ (2024-1) PLR ] https://supremecourtonline.in/insurance-date-of-commencement-of-policy-what-would-be-the-date-from-which-the-policy-becomes-effective-date-on-which-the-policy-is-issued-or-the-date-of-the-commencement-mentioned-or-d/ SUBSCRIBE: https://supremecourtonline.in/membership-account/membership-levels/
0
9
[SC] Service Law – Constitution of India, Art.136 – Post of BSF Sub-Inspector (GD) – Regular promotion criteria cannot be applied with regard to medical fitness in selection through LDCE [PLRonline 468685] https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-service-law-constitution-of-india-art-136-post-of-bsf-sub-inspector-gd-regular-promotion-criteria-cannot-be-applied-with-regard-to-medical-fitness-in-selection-th/
0
10
[SC] CPC O. 8 R 6A – Counter claim – Must be instituted before the defendant has delivered his defence or before the time limit for delivering his defence has expired. [PLRonline] https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-cpc-o-8-r-6a-counter-claim-must-be-instituted-before-the-defendant-has-delivered-his-defence-or-before-the-time-limit-for-delivering-his-defence-has-expired-2022-plronline-0600/ *JOIN HERE* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr
0
11
*PLRONLINE* | Non-signing by the attesting witnesses over the agreement - Would not invalidate the contract . https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/s/specific-performance/agreement-to-sell-does-not-require-any-marginal-witnesses *JOIN* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr
0
12
Punjab Rent Act – Leave to defend – Limitation – Tenant shall have to apply for leave to contest within 15 days of effecting service on him and no application shall thereafter be entertained. [(2023-4)212 PLR 381, PLRonline 492683] https://supremecourtonline.in/punjab-rent-act-1995-13-of-2012-section-24-1c-leave-to-defend-limitation-tenant-shall-have-to-apply-for-leave-to-contest-within-15-days-of-effecting-service-on-him-and-no-applica/
0
13
MVA S. 166 – Dependency of Brothers and Sisters – Without specific evidence of dependency, adult siblings, who are married and living independently, are not presumed to be dependents of the deceased. [PLRonline 496605] https://supremecourtonline.in/mva-s-166-dependency-of-brothers-and-sisters-without-specific-evidence-of-dependency-adult-siblings-who-are-married-and-living-independently-are-not-presumed-to-be-dependents-of-the-deceased/
0
14
Acquittal - Complainant / Father was the sole eyewitness - He had neither seen anyone killing his son nor he had deposed that
Acquittal - Complainant / Father was the sole eyewitness - He had neither seen anyone killing his son nor he had deposed that he had seen anyone burning the victim - Therefore, he is not actually an eyewitness either to the killing or to the burning of the deceased, though he may be an eyewitness to the incident which took place prior wherein a car had chased their motorcycle, pushed them towards the roadside making them fall in the bushes, thereupon assaulting the deceased and then taking................https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/plronline-in/23/12/sc-ipc-s-302-302-acquittal-father-was-sole-eyewitness
0
15
https://supremecourtonline.in/service-matter-salary-gratuity-not-paid-liable-to-pay-interest-on-the-same-for-the-delayed-period-2023-plronline-0126/ Service matter – Salary – Gratuity – Not paid – Liable to pay interest on the same for the delayed period. [2023 PLRonline 0126]
0
16
*Tender - Blacklisting of firm - petitioner has been denied a reasonable opportunity to put-forth his case against the proposed black listing of the Petitioner in clear violation of principles of natural justice. [2023 PLRonline 0124 (Tel.)]* Read HERE : https://supremecourtonline.in/tender-blacklisting-of-firm-fundamentals-of-fair-play-requires-the-person-concerned-should-be-given-an-opportunity-to-represent-his-case-before-he-is-put-on-the-black-list-2023-plronline-0124/ Subscribe: https://supremecourtonline.in/membership-account/membership-levels/
0
17
[SC] plronline.in | Order 9 Rule 13, Section 96(2) - Ex-parte Decree: A defendant has three options for contesting an ex-part
[SC] plronline.in | Order 9 Rule 13, Section 96(2) - Ex-parte Decree: A defendant has three options for contesting an ex-parte decree: https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/cpc/o-9/cpc-order-9-rule-13-ex-parte-decree-a-defendant-has-three
0
18
https://supremecourtonline.in/crpc-s-82-83-and-174-action-against-witnesses-who-do-not-appear-inspite-of-notices-directions-issued-by-ph-high-court-in-2022-plronline-0597-to-all-ds-judges-dgp-set-aside-2023-4-plr/ CrPC S. 82, 83, and 174 – Action Against Witnesses who do not appear inspite of notices – Directions issued by P&H High Court in 2022 PLRonline 0597 to all D&S Judges/ DGP, set aside. [ (2023-4) PLR 291 (SC)]
0
19
Insurance – Pre-medical check-up – Mediclaim policy – Pre existing disease – Non-disclosure – Insurer did not get the medical check up done. Insurer liable . Punjab Law Reporter read here : https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/i/insurance/mediclaim-policy-non-disclosure
0
20
https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-st-act-for-offence-to-be-constituted-there-must-be-an-allegation-that-the-accused-not-being-a-member-of-scheduled-caste-or-scheduled-tribe-committed-an-offence-under-the-ipc-punishable-for-a-ter/ SC/ST Act – For offence to be constituted, there must be an allegation that the accused not being a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe committed an offence under the IPC punishable for a term of 10 years or more against a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe knowing that such person belongs to such `community’. [PLRonline #497684]
0