en
Feedback
Neil Erikson

Neil Erikson

Open in Telegram

Founding Member of UPF - First person to be convicted under Religious Tolerance Act in Australia. First person to be charged three times for disturbing religious worship. Exposed Senator Sam Dastyari leading to his removal, hence Senator Slayer

Show more
The country is not specifiedThe category is not specified
1 491
Subscribers
No data24 hours
+17 days
-730 days
Posts Archive
Plot twist: 1. I wasn’t even there during the incident. 2. That photo wasn’t even taken at the Irish Times pub. Ffs https://amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/neo-nazi-allegedly-extorts-pub-owner-after-barman-spits-in-beer-20220810-p5b8ua.html

Plot twist: 1. I wasn’t even there during the incident. 2. That photo wasn’t even taken at the Irish Times pub. Ffs https://amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/neo-nazi-allegedly-extorts-pub-owner-after-barman-spits-in-beer-20220810-p5b8ua.html

Can’t even go for a beer without some drama. Lol

Personal apology from the Irish Times pub. Spitting in patrons beers during a pandemic is extremely dangerous. Thanks to Medi
+1
Personal apology from the Irish Times pub. Spitting in patrons beers during a pandemic is extremely dangerous. Thanks to Medi for sorting this issue out.

Sheit! The fbi raided Trump

What a beast

photo content

Just been reported on that Alex Jones has to pay $AU- 71 million. This gotta be a troll

For followers who don’t understand what’s going on with my defence/case I’ll briefly explain. I was invited into a fake gay church, I asked for permission to add to the discussion and was given permission. I asked if they married sodomites and then was asked what I meant by sodomites and I replied fa##it’s etc. I was then assaulted and removed from the venue, and I was ultimately charged with disturbing religious worship. My Barrister Stephanie Wallace stated the disturbance came from the people at the venue, not me. I offended them but didn’t disturb them. The secondary argument from Mrs Wallace was the legal term of “disturbed” in relation to this charge has not been defined and will cause issues if the word “disturbed” is used for any disagreements in a church in the future. This is why it’s going to take 29 days for a judgment) There should be a precedent made by Chief Judge Kidd on where the line is when it relates to a disturbance of religious worship. I am very happy with process at the moment. Stephenie Wallace did a great job, exceeded my expectations. Chief Judge Kidd also appears to be very fair and did not allow any NZ terrorism claims by the prosecution. Legal Aid also come through and are paying for 100% of my appeal. (Yes I’m shocked too) Even if I lose I’m confident my 70 day sentence will be reduced. But I’m 50/50 on the final judgment.

Judgment day set for 29th

My Barrister is arguing the gay church disturbed themselves in closing arguments.

Court is now arguing whether god was a woman or man.

Gay Church case update: Witness Pike just admitted they used orange juice for communion and the church has closed down

Summing up my in one question and answer what happened at the hearing today. Prosecution: “How do you feel about Mr Erikson saying your church was a house of sodomy?” Witness: “I find it offensive”

Refused entry into my own court case. Rapid covid test refused.

Imagine a country annexing they’re own land without a shot being fired. If 80% of our country took the vaccine I would be sur
Imagine a country annexing they’re own land without a shot being fired. If 80% of our country took the vaccine I would be surprised if they didn’t voluntarily give the government a blank cheque to change the constitution. It’s times like these people see the flawed reality of democracy.