Healthy Dose of Truth - Templates & Learning Resources βοΈπππ¨π¬π¨π¦
Open in Telegram
We have templates to help you craft your own NoLs, LCAs & Affidavits, along with resources in our files section to help you understand the difference between legal & lawful as well as public & private. We're not experts; please conduct your own research.
Show moreThe country is not specifiedLaw3 163
2 747
Subscribers
-324 hours
+37 days
+10130 days
Posts Archive
Repost from YumNaturals Emporium Amandha Vollmer
Yesterday, I had the pleasure of conversing with Marcel Bessette of Private Law Trusts.
We have so many solutions available to us now so we can confidently walk away from the entrapment cult called "the system" and protect our families, our lineage, and our assets. Support is available!
Please enjoy our discussion...
https://rumble.com/v3xc394-dr-amandha-vollmer-interview-freedom-natural-medicine-home-schooling-pmas.html
Here is Marcel's website: http://PrivateLawTrusts.org
β₯οΈ ADV
Repost from N/a
Law-of-Nations.pdf2.85 MB
The Art of Passing the Buck - Vol I: The Secrets of Wills And Trusts Revealed
Two summers ago, a police officer here in Ontario tried to tell me it was mandatory somehow for me to carry ID on me. Then i quoted the names of a couple case-laws and she left me alone. Why? Cuz it was right out of their OWN Police Officers Manual, i even told her the name of it. Here's the pages from it...
-Derek Moran
Bills of Exchange Act - Canada
They reconvene and the judge says "there has been a fundamental error in the paperwork from the prosecution, they have lost some vital peice of evidence and therefore they withdraw the allegation and you are free to leave."
Basically they knew I was a man of STANDING, and had protected my rights (you only have the rights you can claim). I was a powerful force only under the rule of God and had committed no crime, so what could they do?
Ignorancia Juris Non Excuciat, Ignorance of the law is no excuse, they use this to control us.
Knowledge is power."
-Steven Quinn
"I have succesfully challenged a speeding charge in UK court (teesside magistrates). I used three letters before going to court.
1. Declaration of my own sovereignty affidavit, with an offer to rebuke it if they did not believe in my right to be a spiritual being only under the jurisdiction of god and his common laws.
2. A letter stating that I appear only under duress and threat of harassment of violence and not by my own free will, meaning I did not "STAND UNDER" their authority. Also I did not agree to any legal joinder or adhesion contracts and was making a special appearance as a man of flesh and blood not a CORPORATE ENTITY.
3. A letter stating I wished to challenge the courts SUPPOSED JURISDICTION over me a flesh and blood man and a copy of my TERMS of appearance that they had 5 days to reply to and if not, THEY would fall into DISHONOUR and the situation would be therefore resolved by their acquiescence.
I sent all letter recorded, signed for and had certified copies made.
They did not respond to any letters.
On the day I had all my certified copies of letters (done by a notary public).
Went into court, refused to be called by my slave name MR.......
Told them I was here under instructed special appearance by duress under threat to my safety and freedom.
I decided to take the "dock" (usually this will place you into admiralty law so you are screwed) by I informed them I would not be entered into any adhesion contract (by my letters) and doing so would be void ab initio.
Firstly I challenged JURISDICTION, they entered into a circular argument that said by my turning up I accepted their JURISDICTION, my reply was i am here because if I did not appear you would come for me by force. (showed them my copy of the letter stating such).
This went back and forth a while before they tried to trick me to accepting my slave title MR, I told them I was a man here under duress, as a flesh and blood individual with all my universal rights in tact.
They asked why I would not answer to MR and I told them I was not a slave.
Then they tried to get me to make a plea...... (only slaves plea for mercy).
So i asked because I was not legally trained could I ask a few questions before I make my plea as I did not UNDERSTAND (a VERY important word in word magic ;) ) the proceedings, and the judge said ok (to get me to plea, so he thought).
I asked. "Is this court based on the law of the queen of england?"
A) yes.
Q) The queens law is based on Gods Law being she is said to be gods representative on earth correct?
A) Yes.
Q) so this court is subject to GODS LAW?
A) yes.
Q) ok so Gods law is like the bible and commandments then and what they say make up the basis and structure of law used here today?
A) Yes. (this is where I knew I had them beat).
Q) Did God say that he created all men EQUAL?
A) (nervously) he says Yes.
Q) Well how come some people claim to be more equal than others then in that case, like you who claims to be able to judge me, or the queen? Do you claim to be more equal than me and thereby say you do NOT exercise the rule of GOD?
A) We are the court and we are here to enforce the rule of law.
Q) So do you claim that the road traffic act is one of Gods laws? Because he gave 10 commandments and I don't remember any of them being about driving? Being that you said we are here to enforce Gods laws and you also told me that God created all men equal, why can some men make laws to bind other men because driving laws were man made laws and therefore are void to me because I am ONLY under God being that all men are equal. Also where was the VICTIM in the crime because if there is no injury their is NO CRIME "Corpus DELECTI".
A) We need to take a quick recess and will reconvene in 15 minutes.
He goes out with clerk, prosecution and comes back 10 minutes later "ALL RISE" I stay seated (I wrote in my letter that I did not rise for anyone unless I wanted to by free will being I am a man with free will).
"βΌοΈDecember 8th, 9am, Brampton, Ontario Court House 7755 Hurontario street.... YAYOI AND DAN ARE GOING TO COURT TO GO UP AGAINST A REGIONAL SENIOR JUSTICE WITH THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
https://lakeshore.sovereignassembly.com/notice-to-ricchetti/
All are welcome to come in and be witnesses to create a public record... But only come if you plan to NOT rise upon the sentence "all rise". We will be appearing as SOVEREIGN MEN AND WOMEN.
Capacity
Capacity refers to the legal capacity that parties involved in a contract have to consent to that contract. It can be regarded as the minimum requirement that must be met before a person can be involved in contract agreements. For instance, individuals below a certain age, mentally disabled people, and intoxicated people are not capable of acceding to a contract.
Endnote
In conclusion, elements of a legally binding contract include offer, acceptance, consideration, legality, and capacity. If all of these elements are catered to, then a contract or agreement is considered valid and can hold water in court. However, if they are not, then such contracts will be rendered invalid before a court of law.
Getting control of your PERSON is getting POA for it. info to get control is in the Livesteams.
In the Livestreams you get control of your PERSON by ... (not that I'm Dean and I'm still learning but) 1. Charge for your services. They love when you do stuff for free. 2. Your PERON is a Trust. Learn at least the three main positions in a trust and create those offices for your PERSON. Know which positions in the Trust have what powers, duties, and entitlements. Know who you are in the trust, and know what your PERSON is, a Trust. It is also an Independent Nation (until they presumed that you pledged it to them along with all of your rights). That determines your PERSON in relation to them, whether it is in them or out of them. 3. Get off their voters lists. Withdraw from Public Representation. Opt for Private representation. When your Name is removed from the voters lists your PERSON becomes private.
Making the proper claims invokes Equity.
MAXIMS OF EQUITY
Maxims of Equity
* Equity is discretionary
* Equity is triggered by unconscionability
* Those who seek equity must do equity
* Those who come to equity must come with clean hands
* Equity treats that which ought to be done as done
* Equity will not assist a volunteer
* Equity acts in personam
* Equity looks to substance rather than form
* βEquity is equalityβ
* βEquity assists the diligentβ
* βEquity follows the lawβ
* βEquity is imaginativeβ
* βEquity protects the vulnerable and weakβ
* βequity is cynicalβ
CONTRACT LAW
A contract is a legal agreement or promise that exists between two parties. It can either be in written or oral form, and it is usually drafted to enable courts to pass judgment on specific issues. Whether you are a startup or established business, having a legal contract is crucial before entering into any business transaction.
Furthermore, a legal contract template includes five essential elements, which are: offer, acceptance, consideration, legality, and capacity. If any of these elements are absent, then the contract will be invalid in a court of law. Read on to learn more about the essential elements of a legally binding contract.
Offer
An offer is the statement of terms and conditions that the two parties involved in an agreement or contract agree to be bound by. It describes the offereeβs willingness to accept and be bound by the terms stated by the offeror. An offer could be a promise made by one party to act or not act in a particular manner in exchange for a commitment from the other party to do the same.
Offers become legally binding when they include certain essential factors. However, what is a crucial factor varies from contract to contract depending on its peculiar circumstances.
Acceptance
After an offer is made, there has to be an acceptance from the other party. Acceptance can only take place when both parties understand the terms and conditions offered in a contract. It can be described as proof that both the offeror and offeree abide by the contractβs terms and conditions. It is signified by the offeree agreeing to every item within the offer without making any change whatsoever.
Consideration
This element describes the exchange of one thing for another between the parties involved in a contract agreement. For a contract to be legally valid, there has to be the inclusion of a consideration. Each party is expected to provide something of value to the other party to prompt them to agree. Note that this valued item does not have to be money; it can be anything from taking specific actions to providing an item.
Legality
Another requirement of a valid contract is legality. Legality describes when the terms and conditions of a contract align with the law. If the subject matter of the contract isnβt legal, then the contract is invalid. This is because contracts can only be created for legal reasons.
PTL best edits of Dean's live streams 2022
https://youtu.be/fGyTsyWKcCU
https://youtu.be/gNlIaJoKcyk
https://youtu.be/NMcvjesiosQ
https://youtu.be/LyIxmJ48W7U
https://youtu.be/weKq-EKYpC0
https://youtu.be/2VpNhMi0ZTc
Full unedited Livestreams are uploaded to Bitchute and Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@Wolverdean...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0bRIwalbRgNP/
Quotes From Dean about your PERSON
* "Trust and Person are one and the same."
* "A Nation is a Person in Law. "
* "Your Person is a Vessel in Commerce with equal abilities and rights to all other Persons."
* "You are a few different capacities for that Person."
(... and that can be a good thing)
* "Your PERSON became a shitizen when you pledged it to Canada."
(... when they presumed you pledged it.)
* "Treat EVERYTHING IN LIFE as a contract negotiation. Contract through your Person, nothing else is recognized or has remedy available."
* "Law of Contracts, Trust Law, and Equity"
~ Dean Clifford
Did the quotes make it clear that your Person is an Independent Nation equal to Canada but not necessarily part of Canada and that the problem is that they presumed you pledged your Person to them, making you now one of them that their internal statutes apply to?
..and did it make it clear that your Person is a Trust that depending on your capacity within in the trust can either make you or break you? hence the desirability of knowing the basics of trust law?
SOME TIPS
Disclaimer:
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. Just some things I've picked up along the way that might be helpful. - Karen
Lawyers and some Paralegals are Notaries and they can't refuse if we pay them their going rate or they could be disbarred for an unconscionable act. It is also really none of their business what is in your document. A notarised document is an affidavit. It is to be truthful.
If you have properly served the AGs i.e. got a few notarised copies of your ToS and you've kept the original that you signed in front of the notary, and served the "original copies" by registered mail to the provincial and federal AGs it's pretty much a done deal. After that I would simply let the departments of the various scenarios know that you've served your T o Se to the AGs. Tell them your terms of service, that you require payment plus a liability waiver up front, and if they give you an order send them an invoice. If they force you and you make it clear that you are not to be deemed as volunteering and don't just say "no, no," but go along with it anyway, you have trapped them into a binding contract. They have accepted through their actions.
There is no reason not to go ahead with ToS and Withdrawal from Public Representation regardless of status. There is very little risk involved in acting on the Livestream Material. If you would like to qualify your signature there has been some discussion on that in this group.
TRUST LAW
Authorises Representative is the same thing as Authorised Administrator, as is Authorised Executor. All the same. Power Trustees..
https://t.me/c/1712659059/3292
What was granted into the BC Trust is your value. You are surety for it. You are Grantor which is essentially the same as Settlor.
Here is a helpful video to get a sense of the three main titles in this particular trust.
https://youtu.be/zaWyR8ks9ZI
Your mother recorded the event of your birth.
Mum doesn't need to do anything more. You are the Grantor.
The Live Birth Record is evidence that we Granted value into the Birth Certificate Trust, and the Birth Certificate is evidence of the Trust, sort of like a receipt. Both are useful. The fact that they have kept the original Live Birth Record is evidence that they are the Trustees (the order taker Trustee role)
An independent, worldwide, long-term study of the health outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-free.
A citizen led initiative, open to anyone who has chosen not to be jabbed.
https://vaxcontrolgroup.com/
