en
Feedback
ETHIOPIAN LAWYER ጠበቃ

ETHIOPIAN LAWYER ጠበቃ

Open in Telegram

〽️Welcome to our LAW OFFICE (Business) CONTACT US 🌐 https://samuelgirma.com ☎️ +251-911-190-299 👉 @SAMUELGIRMA #business #ንግድ #የንግድሕግ #ህግ #ጠበቃ #legalservice #አገልግሎት #ሳሙኤልግርማ 👉 @Tebekasamuelbot #LAW #Attorney #Lawyer #ጠበቃ #ህግ #Tebeka

Show more

📈 Analytical overview of Telegram channel ETHIOPIAN LAWYER ጠበቃ

Channel ETHIOPIAN LAWYER ጠበቃ (@tebeka) in the Amharic language segment is an active participant. Currently, the community unites 16 608 subscribers, ranking 473 in the Law category and 2 073 in the Ethiopia region.

📊 Audience metrics and dynamics

Since its creation on невідомо, the project has demonstrated rapid growth, gathering an audience of 16 608 subscribers.

According to the latest data from 01 September, 2026, the channel demonstrates stable activity. Although there has been a change in the number of participants by -62 over the last 30 days and by 0 over the last 24 hours, overall reach remains high.

  • Verification status: Not verified
  • Engagement rate (ER): The average audience engagement rate is 0%. Within the first 24 hours after publication, content typically collects N/A% reactions from the total number of subscribers.
  • Post reach: On average, each post receives 0 views. Within the first day, a publication typically gains 0 views.
  • Reactions and interaction: The audience actively supports content: the average number of reactions per post is 0.

📝 Description and content policy

The author describes the resource as a platform for expressing subjective opinions:
〽️Welcome to our LAW OFFICE (Business) CONTACT US 🌐 https://samuelgirma.com ☎️ +251-911-190-299 👉 @SAMUELGIRMA #business #ንግድ #የንግድሕግ #ህግ #ጠበቃ #legalservice #አገልግሎት #ሳሙኤልግርማ 👉 @Tebekasamuelbot #LAW #Attorney #Lawyer #ጠበቃ #ህግ #Tebeka

Thanks to the high frequency of updates (latest data received on 02 September, 2026), the channel maintains relevance and a high level of publication reach. Analytics show that the audience actively interacts with content, making it an important point of influence in the Law category.

16 608
Subscribers
No data24 hours
-107 days
-6230 days
Posts Archive
252651.pdf6.89 KB

252706.pdf6.63 KB

252993.pdf6.35 KB

255898.pdf8.73 KB

256217.pdf6.42 KB

256708.pdf6.85 KB

257464.pdf6.57 KB

262248.pdf6.59 KB

247351.pdf9.33 KB

247348.pdf6.83 KB

248037.pdf6.87 KB

248089.pdf6.58 KB

248862.pdf6.48 KB

248670 .pdf6.63 KB

249083.pdf6.51 KB

......ሲጠቃለል በስር ፍ/ቤት አመልካች ክሱን እንዲከላከል ብይን የተሰጠዉም ሆነ ጥፋተኛ ተብሎ እንዲቀጣ ዉሳኔ የተሰጠዉ ዐ/ሕግ የወ/መ/ሕ/ሥ/ሥ/ቁጥር 141 በሚያስቀምጠው የማስረጃ መለኪያ መሰረት የአመልካችን ተሳትፎ ባላስረዳትና በሕጉ የተጣለበትን ግዴታ ባልተወጣበት ሁኔታ በመሆኑ በስር ፍ/ቤት አመልካች እንዲከላከል የተሰጠዉ ብይን፣ የጥፋተኛነትና የቅጣት ዉሳኔ የወንጀል ሕጉ አንቀጽ 23(4)፤ 32፣ 40፤ 57፣ 58(1) እና ከወ/መ/ሕ/ሥ/ሥ/ቁጥር 141፣142 እና 149 ድንጋጌዎችን እንዲሁም የፌዴራል ጠቅላይ ፍ/ቤት ሰበር ችሎት በሰ/መ/ቁ 97203 እና በሌሎች መዛግብት የሰጠዉን ገዥ ትርጉም ያላገናዘበ፤ በፌዴራል ፍርድ ቤቶች አዋጅ ቁጥር 1234/2013 አንቀጽ 2(4/ለ እና ሸ) እና አንቀጽ 10(1) መሠረት መሠረታዊ የሆነ የሕግ ስሕተት የተፈጸመበት ሆኖ አግኝተነዋል፡፡ በመሆኑም የሚከተለዉ ዉሳኔ ተሰጥቷል፡፡

246954.pdf6.58 KB

246931.pdf6.59 KB

246525.pdf6.65 KB

....ሲጠቃለል ለክርክሩ መነሻ የሆነው ይዞታ የአመልካች መሆኑ በተጠሪ ምስክሮች ቃል ጭምር ከመረጋገጡም ሌላ ተጠሪ መሬቱ የአመልካች መሆኑን አምኖ መልስ ሰጥቶ እያለ የዞኑ ከፍተኛ ፍርድ ቤት ሁከት አልተፈጠረም በማለት የወረዳ ፍርድ ቤትን ውሳኔ መሻሩ የማስረጃ ምዘና መርህን የጣሰ ስለሆነ በአዋጅ ቁጥር 1234/2013 አንቀፅ 2(4)ሐ)(ሸ) እና 10(1)(ሐ) መሰረት መሰረታዊ የሆነ የህግ ስህተት የተፈፀመበት ስለሆነ ተከታዩ ውሳኔ ተሰጥቷል፡፡