T A B O O T H O U G H T S 🥀

"Though we may live without"

Now we r here back again To the place where we first met after all the up and downs,pain,anger,trama,loosing faith n trust going through some moments apart,days of ignoring each other and acting like we no longer exist,they days we felt broken and very far apart,felt like I was at the tip of death,dying emotionally and drowning in my own thoughts,missing each other but holding back from reaching out,feeling of betray and and suicide.......its all gone now,the little sparkly love left between us had the power to change everything it got our bond back,the bond that was almost about to break,forgiveness is the key,"let days pass"he says literally Evey time and finally I understand what he meant,all the bad days passed and our good old memories got as back together once again,life gave as another chance to treat each other right this time,to forgive and love unconditionally through pain,sickness,hard and taught moments,if the love is greater than the mistake there's always a chance of fixing things,and finally I got my crimson back after years❤️and smiled looking at his eyes after all we've been through and hugging him tight until he can't breathe once again like I will never regrate as if it was my last goodbye

The drowning child scenario. by Peter Singer. First, you are told that if you try to save the child, there will be a cost to you. Suppose, for example, that there is no time to empty your pockets or get undressed. So if you enter the water to save the child you’ll ruin your clothes and the cell phone in your pocket. Would you still make this sacrifice to help the child? Most people still say yes. Next, you’re told that you’re with a group of people, say five of your friends. All of them are unwilling to help this child, and they suggest that you stand down as well. They argue that you weren’t the one to put the child in peril and therefore it isn’t your problem. Would you still try to help the child? Again, most people say yes. Then you’re told to assume that, if you try to save this child, there is only a 50 percent chance that you’ll be successful. In other words, it might work, but the child is far out in the lake, and there is a fair probability that you won’t get to him in time. Would you still try to save the child? Again, most people say yes.

Consider a woman who is content in her marriage but whose husband has a habit of cheating on her. He simply enjoys cheating because it's his fetish. Would you inform her if you were the only person with knowledge of this situation? If you tell her, she will be crushed, may hurt herself, and never experience true happiness again as her marriage is all she has. However, if you don't let her know that her spouse is a cheater, she'll pass away in the dark. How would you respond? Would you tell her that her entire life has been a lie? Or would you allow her to lead her fictitious life?

happiness requires pleasurable experiences that are “in contact with reality." Imagine scientists have come up with an amazing new technology called the Experience Machine. It works like this: You go into the lab and sit down with the staff and talk to them about everything you’ve ever wanted to do in life you describe your perfect, most ideal, most pleasurable, most joyous, most satisfying possible life. Then they induce you into a coma that you’ll never emerge from. They put your unconscious body into a tank of fluid in a pitch black room and cover your head with electrodes. Here’s an artist’s rendition: Once you’re in the tank, the simulation begins. You’ll experience everything you said you dreamed of, for the duration of your life (or what can feel like a lot longer if you choose), and you’ll have no memory of going into the experience machine or knowledge that your world is only a simulation. You will experience your perfect life in its entirety, exactly as if it really happened—but in reality, none of it is real and you’re actually floating in a vat of fluid in a pitch black room. You’ll never again wake up to experience the actual world or interact with actual people, but you won’t know that, and you’ll feel like you did. If the experience machine were available to you and guaranteed to work flawlessly, would you do it? On the above situation if our respond is to let the woman to live her fictitious life, we are ethical hedonists. It means we believe that only pleasure is important in this life. But, from the experience machine thought experiment, most of us want our reality than floating on a tank and get pleasures that are unreal. So, conclusion... personally i would tell her the truth, for the best.

We know that every few seconds a child dies somewhere in the world due to a preventable cause such as hunger or a treatable disease. We also know that just a few dollars donated to a worthy charity can save the life of one of these children by providing basic food, clean drinking water, vaccines and medicines. So if you did indeed answer “yes” to every question in the scenario, the only conclusion is that you should be offering every resource at your disposal to help children dying around the world, just short of what you yourself need to support the survival of you and your family. This means that, in theory, all the money you spend on movie tickets, new clothes, haircuts, cell phones, TVs and all other non-essentials should, according to your own answers to the questions of the drowning child scenario, go to help dying children. And if you don’t do this, you’re not living a life consistent with the moral principles you claim to espouse.

The Wound of Christ from The Prayer Book of Bonne of Luxembourg, Duchess of Normandy attributed to Jean Le Noir (before 1349) [2743x3807]

‘Shield of Antoine Bastard of Burgundy in his capacity as knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece’, Pierre Coustain (1478).