豆瓣合集
Open in Telegram
我们将从投稿中筛选出真实、善意、公允的内容，努力为大家提供一个脱离平台算法，真正服务于读者的内容精选。 我们会做一些基本的事实核查，并确保稿件不泄露个人隐私、稿件的发布不违反原作者的意愿。同时，我们也请求各位读者善意对待我们稿件的原作者。 如需撤稿，请在评论区联系我们。我们谢绝营利性质或政府性质的合作，还请见谅。
Show more2 027
Subscribers
No data24 hours
+17 days
+130 days
Data loading in progress...
Attracting Subscribers
July '26
July '26
+15
in 0 channels
June '26
+48
in 1 channels
Get PRO
May '26
+35
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '26
+31
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '26
+29
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '26
+41
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '26
+40
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '25
+35
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '25
+16
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '25
+22
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '25
+33
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '25
+58
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '25
+53
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '25
+71
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '25
+62
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '25
+48
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '25
+74
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '25
+75
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '25
+59
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+60
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+50
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+70
in 2 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+41
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+68
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '24
+119
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+48
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+50
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+57
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+47
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+43
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+49
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+59
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+26
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+34
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+51
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+27
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+39
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+61
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+105
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+93
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+144
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+162
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+62
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+87
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+42
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+76
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+84
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+155
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '22
+111
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '22
+32
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '22
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '21
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '21
+34
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '21
+78
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '21
+34
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '21
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '21
+70
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '21
+77
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+56
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+46
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '21
+349
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 07 July | 0 | |||
| 06 July | +2 | |||
| 05 July | +4 | |||
| 04 July | 0 | |||
| 03 July | +3 | |||
| 02 July | +4 | |||
| 01 July | +2 |
Channel Posts
| 2 |  我特别引以为傲的一件事是，上大学的时候我因机缘巧合拿到了学校图书馆无人售货小摊的经营权，一经接手我便立马上架了卫生巾，独立包装一元一片。之后我的经营权被图书馆管理没收，在交涉的过程中，我提出要求无论如何都要维持卫生巾的销售，后面几番拉扯对方答应了我的要求。
这件事除了我和身边的朋友，没多少人知道，有一种做无名英雌的爽感。现在我已毕业多年，在小红书上搜发现卫生巾还在卖，他们有好好遵守承诺，我感觉到幸福和满足。
说点自恋的话，这个破烂的世界会因为我的存在而稍微变得好那么一点点，所以我一定一定要坚持活下去，我不能放弃生的希望。 source | 1 |
| 3 |  source | 319 |
| 4 | source | 1 |
| 5 |  source | 300 |
| 6 | source | 1 |
| 7 |  笑死哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 source | 286 |
| 8 | 笑死哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 source | 1 |
| 9 |  source | 236 |
| 10 | source | 1 |
| 11 |  source | 228 |
| 12 | source | 1 |
| 13 |  每天都得反PUA source | 214 |
| 14 | 每天都得反PUA source | 1 |
| 15 |  +4source | 186 |
| 16 |  source | 181 |
| 17 | source | 1 |
| 18 |  source | 249 |
| 19 | source | 1 |
| 20 | 从去年郑智化控诉深圳机场无障碍设施与配套服务的缺位，到近期兰州铁路局针对建议列车售卖卫生巾的女乘客发布失实声明，最终都指向同一个核心议题：公共空间，到底属于谁？
那些指责郑智化“夸大其词、浪费公共资源”的人，那些激烈反对铁路列车售卖卫生巾的男性，论调背后都藏着同一个心照不宣的预设：公共空间只属于“标准的人”，而这个所谓的“标准”，往往指向的是健全的顺性别异性恋成年男性。
于是，当不符合这套默认“标准”的人——女性、身心障碍者、老人与儿童、性少数群体等等——向公共空间提出合理诉求时，ta们的需求往往被污名化为“巨婴”，好像ta们切实存在的困难诉求，甚至不应该被作为公共议题讨论。郑智化事件的评论区里，对我来说最刺眼的一条留言是：“我们凭什么要让残疾人享受特权！”；而对铁路列车售卖卫生巾大为破防的男性最常挂在嘴边的谬论是：“今天敢要求卖卫生巾，明天是不是就要避孕套，后天是不是还要在高铁上设产房？”
这些看似荒诞的反对声，背后藏着同一句没说出口的潜台词：公共空间只属于“标准的人”，他们手握定义“谁有资格进入公共空间”的权力，而“非标准者”就该被排斥在公共空间之外。在他们看来，“非标准者”要求公共空间容纳多元的需求就是对自己固有权力的直接侵夺，这种被“夺走”什么的错觉，大约才是他们愤怒的根源。这也能解释，为什么那些专为“非标准者”设立的公共空间，总容易遭遇骚扰与恶意破坏，因为连“标准者不可入内”的边界本身，在他们眼里都成了一种不可容忍的冒犯。
世界是所有人的世界，公共空间存在的意义就在于能容纳不同的声音、承托不一样的人生。文明不是用单一的标尺筛选谁有资格站在阳光下，而是让每一个人都能毫无负担、有尊严地行走在公共空间里，都可以理直气壮地说一句：这个世界，也有我的一份。 source | 334 |
