Joel Davis (censored)

Doesn't quite hit the same tbh mate

Fuentes has been an effective critic of Trump lately, Trump is losing the base more than ever and the notion of "America First" is now being described as oppositional rather than compatible with "MAGA". This appears to me like a strategic form of flattery by Trump to attempt to win Fuentes back over somewhat and patch up this rift. I hope Fuentes resists the ego stroke and continues down the same path of attacking Trump. "America First" amounts to little more than an edgy campaign strategy for the establishment right unless it can resist its attempts at recuperation during its arche of ascendency. The goal can't be to simply be accepted into the conservative establishment, it must be to destroy it so it can be replaced wholesale. https://t.me/rnintel/47726

Imagine if Tucker stopped doing that I'd like to see the results 😈

All this guy talks about at this point is how nationalists need to stop having an issue with brown people stealing our identity. He calls this "identity politics" and says it's bad and just like "the left" - only he's just doing his own version of identity politics. All politics is identity politics. The core question of Australian politics is who is an Australian, and how we can protect Australians (our interests and way of life) from those who stand against us. Having an opinion on the question of whether brown people can be Australian is "identity politics", whichever way you answer it. Rukshan is brown and is trying to steal our identity and call himself Australian, that's just as much "identity politics" as me being a heritage White Australian with pre-federation ancestry asserting that he isn't an Australian. And his suggestion that White people aren't capable of running our own country without the help of brown people, even though we built it without them, is laughable. Our race built the entire modern world and then dragged his people into it, apparently it's "identity politics" for me to point out this obvious truth. But when he claims subcontinentals are hard workers that Australia "needs" to advance economically, according to Rukshan this somehow isn't "identity politics"!? Using this label of "identity politics" as some type of epithet and equating it with leftism is beyond disingenuous. All politics is identity politics. Anyone trying to convince you not to play the game of identity politics is just trying to steal your identity. Australia was built on identity politics. Wtf do you think the White Australia Policy was? Were the founders of this country all "leftists" too because they were racists who didn't let brown people immigrate here? Or were they simply putting the interests of the Australian people first? https://fixupx.com/therealrukshan/status/1989890602625110354

All this guy talks about at this point is how nationalists need to stop having an issue with brown people stealing our identity. He calls this "identity politics" and says it's bad and just like "the left" - only he's just doing his own version of identity politics. All politics is identity politics. The core question of Australian politics is who is an Australian, and how we can protect Australians (our interests and way of life) from those who stand against us. Having an opinion on the question of whether brown people can be Australian is "identity politics", whichever way you answer it. Rukshan is brown and is trying to steal our identity and call himself Australian, that's just as much "identity politics" as me being a heritage White Australian with pre-federation ancestry asserting that he isn't an Australian. And his suggestion that White people aren't capable of running our own country without the help of brown people, even though we built it without them, is laughable. Our race built the entire modern world and then dragged his people into it, apparently it's "identity politics" for me to point out this obvious truth. But when he claims subcontinentals are hard workers that Australia "needs" to advance economically, according to Rukshan this somehow isn't "identity politics"!? Using this label of "identity politics" as some type of epithet and equivocating it with the Left is beyond disingenuous. All politics is identity politics. Anyone trying to convince you not to play the game of identity politics is just trying to steal your identity. Australia was built on identity politics. Wtf do you think the White Australia Policy was? Were the founders of this country all "leftists" too because they were racists who didn't let brown people immigrate here? Or were they simply putting the interests of the Australian people first? https://fixupx.com/therealrukshan/status/1989890602625110354

Great to see such a robust defense of National Socialism by the entire Western world at the UN a couple days ago 🫡

Pauline chasing down Albo as the most favoured PM Need to get Sewell in these polls

One Nation close to overtaking the Liberal vote 🤯

After JDM knocks out Makhachev it's gonna be time for all you foreign Aryan niggas to finally cop to the brute fact that the Australian master race are the true vanguard of the racewar

>Mainstream media reporting on Tom's bail application >The top comment

There is absolutely no point to defending Trump against the Epstein-related allegations that are obviously being weaponised against him by the Democrats rn. The fact that Trump had his first Thanksgiving dinner as president with Epstein back in 2017, and lied about his continued and close friendship with an obvious Mossad kompromat agent, is indefensible. Legal Indian/Asian immigration is worse for White America than illegal beaner immigration. The only good thing about Trump winning the election last year is the right-wing finally shooting past him into a more radical position through the horrific realisation of how deeply and profoundly ZOGGED he is.

Finding out Trump is gay feels like what I think it would feel like to find out your Dad is gay Like yeah we knew he was a kikeslave and a fraud, but he still had aura But the Jews made him suck Bill Clinton's dick on camera to get their permission to beat Hillary? Like dude

It's so over for MAGAtards Bill Clinton about to get a second president impeached for giving him a blowjob Meanwhile Hillary's sitting in the cuck chair while the man who beat her to the presidency throws it back better than she ever could The Jews have made such a mockery of us with this whole America thing Jesus Christ https://fixupx.com/AFpost/status/1989454760106410319

Or you could just cum in a White woman and make White children and not rationalise creating mutt children and eternally cursing your bloodline If anyone knows this guy irl please smack the fuck out of him cheers https://fixupx.com/vrilliumlive/status/1989560308885540981

Every time you hear one of our politicians talk about ‘social cohesion’ think about this image. It is an image of the victims of the Bataclan massacre an hour before it began 10 years ago. Muslims slaughtered 130, with a further 683 maimed. Victims were castrated, raped, disembowelled and tortured before execution. French authorities suppressed this fact for ‘social cohesion.’ Social cohesion is code for White genocide.

Someone sent me this. Happy to talk to any of these conservatives that spend all their time crying about us on social media rather than actually advancing anything productive. I think it would be good for people to see it made clear how weak their rhetorical position is when directly confronted.

The biggest media/politician responses to our activism occurred in the aftermath of 3 events this year. Our Australia Day march in Adelaide, the March For Australia on August 31, and last weekend's protest against the Jewish Lobby in Sydney. The common thread in all 3 events was that on each occasion our men stood proud in uniform without balaclavas on. The message I am receiving from this is that there's nothing the system fears more than proud face out White men standing up for our nation against Jews and Third World Immigration. The concealment of identity has practical utility for various obvious reasons. But a movement that always takes the safe option is not a movement with revolutionary potential. At some point, risks have to be taken. They know that so many of you privately hold these beliefs, social media reveals this - but what they truly fear is you publicly expressing them. They want to shame you back into the shadows. They know if a critical mass stand proud in the light, the people will rally behind us and we could become unstoppable.

Hearing reports that the retards on The Daily Shoah were slandering me as disavowing Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. This after pushing lies that the NSN are "crypto-Zionists" (even though we've been all over the news for the past week in Australia for protesting against the Jewish Lobby) because we defended ourselves in a streetfight with pro-Palestinian counter-protesters. I offered to debate Mike Peinovich on this subject, Mark Collett offered to host it, but he declined. Why are these supposed "national socialists" in America obsessed with slandering the currently highest profile national socialist organisation in the world? A difference of opinion over facts is one thing, but to advance lies about us to your audience is straight up subversive. Shameful!

Frontpage of the Sydney newspapers today, a week after our protest Meanwhile Dutch newspapers are reporting our LARP as even more nuanced than it actually is 🤣

The Dutch newspaper article on the NSN says that the podium that Sewell stood on during his speech at the March for Australia rally was built by the NSN to be an exact copy of Hitler's podium.