644
Subscribers
No data24 hours
No data7 days
-330 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
August '24
August '24
+25
in 0 channels
July '24
+36
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '24
+27
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '24
+38
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '24
+23
in 1 channels
Get PRO
March '24
+45
in 2 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+66
in 7 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+40
in 2 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+27
in 1 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+37
in 3 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+21
in 1 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+13
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+35
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+55
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+15
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+17
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+44
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+46
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+56
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+33
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+33
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+28
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+24
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+26
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+18
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+23
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '220
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+205
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 16 August | 0 | |||
| 15 August | +2 | |||
| 14 August | 0 | |||
| 13 August | 0 | |||
| 12 August | +1 | |||
| 11 August | +2 | |||
| 10 August | +3 | |||
| 09 August | +3 | |||
| 08 August | +3 | |||
| 07 August | +2 | |||
| 06 August | +4 | |||
| 05 August | 0 | |||
| 04 August | +1 | |||
| 03 August | +1 | |||
| 02 August | +2 | |||
| 01 August | +1 |
Channel Posts
EU Info War
As of today, my Telegram channel and the official channel of The Base are both blocked in the EU. No doubt this is a direct result of the EU's recent decision to designate The Base a terrorist organization. These actions are a desperate attempt by our adversaries to prevent the spread of accelerationist ideology, and to stop our preparations for System Collapse. But our efforts in Europe will not be so easily deterred. In the coming days, we will establish alternate methods for followers in the EU to receive information and activity updates.
| 2 | I wish this headline in the New York Times was true. But, like the recent scare piece in The Guardian about me, this article is just part of a larger narrative being invented by the Leftist media to help Kamala Harris win via fearmongering. Nevertheless, targeting power stations is undoubtedly a way for a small number of insurgents to make an outsized impact. However, although they do contribute to acceleration to some degree, it's not realistic to think such attacks can cause System Collapse. The acceleration effect with power grid attacks is more psychological rather than physical. This is because, while the physical damage is repaired rather quickly, the fear lingers. Therefore, to maximize the psychological impact of such incidents, they should be made to appear as part of an organized White insurgency, even if they are in fact the work of one or more lone wolves or independent small cells. How to do this? Simply by publishing an anonymous public statement claiming responsibility or leaving evidence at the scene such as fliers or a manifesto for investigators to stumble upon (like was done at the scene of an Amtrak train derailment in 1995), or both ideally. A fictitious group name can be used. What's important is that the ideological motive is made crystal clear. And not getting caught is also helpful as well. | 377 |
| 3 |  Here we go again. Like in 2020, the Leftist media is once again trying to whip up hysteria to stop Trump and help Kamala Harris in the upcoming election. Good! I'm glad. Because like my friends at American Futurist, I also endorse Harris for president. Her victory over Trump will further crush White America's naive faith in voting as a solution. On the other hand, if Trump wins, this will have a deradicalizing effect which is not helpful at all for acceleration in USA. So, if the media wants to use me to fearmonger Harris into the White House, be my guest...I'm happy to do my part for accelerationism. | 357 |
| 4 | "Is there anyway that people in the UK can take advantage of the riots?"
Let me start out by clarifying that what I'm about to say is not meant as a criticism of the White protestors in the UK. The way they are reacting to the racial oppression which they experience daily is very natural and healthy. I deeply sympathize with them and don't mean to discourage them.
Now, my reply to your question:
When a crisis has already begun, it's more or less too late to take advantage of it in a useful deliberate manner. This is why preparation is so important. The nature and scope of these preparations largely depends on what the ultimate goal is, i.e. what do the protestors hope to achieve. In fact, evaluating this goal is the first and foremost way to judge if a political movement has any chance of being successful. The White protestors in the UK don't seem to have a concrete goal in mind. They are driven by pure instincts and raw emotions. What's needed is another layer on top, comprised of individuals who are more calculating than emotional, to harness and manage this raw energy. That missing layer is an organized revolutionary vanguard.
Two good examples of what I'm referring to are the popular uprising in Syria which led to the Syrian civil war, and the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Like the current White protests in the UK, both were fueled by widespread discontent and deep-seated disillusionment. But unlike what's occurring in the UK now, both had highly organized professional resistance movements in place to take advantage of the civil unrest. In Syria, it was the Muslim Brotherhood. In Northern Ireland, it was the IRA. Both organizations had been operating underground for decades preparaing to capitalize on the emotions of the masses and any ensuing mob violence. As far as I'm aware, no similar militant organization exists in the UK today. Combat 18 was created to fill that role but for whatever reasons, it hasn't done so effectively it seems. National Action has been eliminated. And individual revolutionary voices in the UK have been silenced with lengthy prison terms.
So, the bottomline answer to your question is that as things stand now, there is nothing that can effectively be done on the fly to take advantage of the situation. We can only hope that lessons will be learned and necessary preparations will be made for the future. These lessons will apply to every single White nation, so we should all be paying very close attention. | 340 |
| 5 | "roman. could you do a post on how a group can utilize government land for their HQ? what about abandoned buildings?"
Public land can be used as a temporary bugout location (BOL) when SHTF, or as a rural guerrilla base during an insurgency. However, there are a few challenges and potential pitfalls to avoid. Some of these apply to bugout locations and bases in general. For example, the specific spot you select should be relatively isolated and difficult to access, away from public camping areas and popular hiking trails. The biggest risk is park rangers discovering your BOL and dismantling any preparations you've made such as primitive shelters. So, keeping a low profile is important. This will limit the number of people who you can invite to bugout with you at any given spot because you probably can't prep it for a large contingent without sticking out like a sore thumb. I'd say you should keep the max number of people down to six for a BOL on public land.
You can also use hidden caches of food and supplies at the location. If hidden properly, these will be difficult for park rangers or civilians to detect. You only need enough food and supplies to last 30 days. After that, you will essentially go on the offensive and conduct raids of nearby population centers and/or target others seeking refuge in the same public land. Ideally, you'll successfully negotiate an equitable trade agreement of security for food instead, rather than simply forcibly appropriating what you need from locals. This means, in order to live up to your end of the bargain, you'll need to have enough trained and equipped manpower to defend your area of responsibility. One way to ensure this is to initially establish multiple small BOLs throughout the public land in question, i.e. one BOL per six-man squad size element. After the initial 30 days of SHTF, you can coalesce at a larger base area which you should identify and agree upon in advance. In an active insurgency scenario, having a predetermined base isn't absolutely necessary (you can establish patrol bases until you identify a secure location to setup a more permanent base, if/when possible). What's more important is having several supply caches in the AO which your forces can utilize.
In either scenario, you should become intimately familiar with the AO. You can do this simply by hiking and camping in the area often. Unless the public land has very lax firearm rules, you'll probably need to conduct any tactical training somewhere else more secure. The good news is most of what you'll need to focus on as a unit is movement and battle drills which can be done effectively without firing a shot. And that may be in line with the rules of the public land where you're training. But it still may look suspicious and attract unwanted attention. If you don't have temporary access to private land for training purposes, I'm not sure how to easily avoid this. You may just need to take your chances, if there's no other options available.
Regarding abandoned buildings as BOLs, the general rule of thumb I'd suggest is to avoid them because they can easily attract desperate civilans seeking shelter during a SHTF scenario. In general, most abandoned buildings aren't isolated enough to be immune to this. But after your 30-day supply cache runs dry, feel free to commandeer any building (abandoned or otherwise) as you see fit, assuming you have the firepower and know-how to safely clear it and secure it. | 794 |
| 6 | It's very refreshing to finally see White people collectively standup for themselves in the UK, even if only temporarily. And it's tempting to pin hope on the recent protests and think they represent the start of something more fundamentally significant and long-lasting. However, for this to be true requires an organized resistance movement with tangible goals in mind that are realistically achievable. I don't see evidence for any of this. Furthermore, I'm skeptical that such prerequisites are even possible at all in the UK. Why?
First of all, the UK is an extremely oppressive surveillance state. For White people, it's essentially like living on a prison island. The lack of freedom of speech alone makes organizing and acquiring support virtually impossible, especially for a group using political violence (which is necessary). Perhaps if Elon Musk (mischling) personally bankrolled such a movement, it would have some chance. But, unsurpringly, I don't see him putting his money where his mouth is in this situation, unlike in Ukraine for example. Anyway, let's say that somehow a robust resistance movement was able to organize successfully right under the nose of the mass surveillance state. Let's even go as far as to assume this resistance movement acquired a large amount of small arms and ammo (this in itself is a pipe dream considering UK gun laws). What would the goal(s) be exactly? To force the government to expel all migrants? Ok. Let's again assume the government agrees. This would be a drop in the bucket. What about all the non-Whites who have longstanding legal status in the UK and/or who were born there (like the perpetrator who stabbed those girls)? Is it realistic to think the government can be forced to expel them? Personally, I think not–At least not without overthrowing the government by force, which is too unrealistic to even entertain as a hypothetical.
This little thought experiment should make it somewhat clear that a pro-White resistance movement in the UK would have a significant uphill battle just to initally get off the ground, nevermind actually accomplishing anything worthwhile. I want to be wrong. And if a viable pro-White organization emerges in the UK which can actually dictate terms to the government, I will be one of the first to promote and support it while admitting I was wrong. Maybe if we hadn't been heavily promoting lone wolf ops and leaderless resistance for decades the situation would be different today. But, alas, here we are. | 324 |
| 7 | Our Race Is Our Nation
Stop trying to save your nation. As an accelerationist, you must want the complete opposite of this. System Collapse will inevitably entail much pain and suffering for most average White people in your country. Perhaps even some of those closest to you will be subjected to its harshness. There will be many victims of Collapse and very few victors. Many will become refugees and internally displaced persons, or may not survive at all. All that we once held dear in our former lives as nationalists will be destroyed. The ensuing chaos will plunge society into a brutal primitive state of existence. This is what we want. But we are not nihilists or anarchists. We have been forced to adopt this attitude out of necessity. Cleansing by fire is the only way. And we aim to rise from the ashes and establish a new order which we control. Note that I said establish a new order, not restore what existed before. As much as we may honor and admire certain facets of it, especially those related to national traditions and culture, the past was somehow inherently flawed. These weaknesses are what forced us to adopt accelerationism as a strategic solution ultimately. And it's impossible to pick and choose aspects of the past we want to keep and those we wish to discard. Our eyes must be fixed squarely on the future and a new beginning. So, abandon your nostalgia, chauvanism, and national identity. It must all go. Burn your country's flag. Our Race is our nation now. Accelerate! | 329 |
| 8 |  It's very exciting to see White people in the UK openly venting their outrage. However, civil war is not inevitable there, despite Elon Musk's claim to the contrary. This is because the monopoly on violence in the UK remains squarely in the hands of our racial enemies. It will take alot more than some low-grade civil unrest to change this status quo. It will require either overthrowing the government by force or a separatist insurgency. Neither of these are realistic options in the UK (and never will be). Instead, the System will come down hard on any White person involved in these violent street protests. And the riots will end soon, only to become a minor footnote in UK history at best.
Our nations are lost to us forever. The sooner we accept this harsh reality, the sooner we can get down to the business of establishing a new homeland for all White people worldwide. #WhiteZionism | 338 |
| 9 | Prepare To Unleash Our Strength
System Collapse can occur gradually or very suddenly. Practically-speaking, from a day-to-day operational standpoint, it shouldn't matter much to us either way. We must continuously prepare by building our fighting capacity no matter when, why, or how collapse eventually occurs. Doing so proactively and with diligence will benefit us even if collapse never occurs on its own ultimately. When we're truly ready, we can become the initiators.
When we refer to System Collapse what we're really referring to is the emergence of one or more geographic power vacuums in which federal government authority has been severely degraded or has disappeared entirely. The reasons for this could be civil war, foreign military invasion, nuclear war, or a cataclysmic natural disaster. We must get ready to take advantage of these scenarios. They all require one fundamental thing first and foremost: regional platoon-size elements of highly trained and well-equipped accelerationists.
There's no upper limit to the amount of time or resources we should invest to accomplish our goal of filling the void to come. In other words, preparing and growing stronger should be a continuous process which only culminates when we finally take control. Of course, the speed at which will build our strength is also crucial. The pace can never be fast enough. Because if it's too slow, we will miss our opportunity when the time comes. So, urgency is paramount.
Some of us who are more aggressively inclined may feel that preparing is not enough, and that we should contribute to acceleration via leaderless resistance or lone wolf attacks. But there's a potential bonus reward to being single-mindedly focused on preparation alone. If we take our preparations this seriously, we'll wake up one day and find we've readied ourselves so quickly and sufficiently that we're in a position to single-handedly cause collapse rather than merely contribute to it. Besides, collapse itself is only a means to an end. So, causing collapse is only half the battle. What comes immediately afterwards is what really counts. And that's when unleashing our strength in accumulated manpower and training will be decisive. | 405 |
| 10 | Here's a link to my interview which AF is referring to in their recent post about the lack of objectivity in domestic terrorism investigations. Politicization of counterterrorism in USA is even worse when it comes to "domestic extremists" in comparison to politicization around foreign jihadist groups. This is because NGOs like the ADL and SPLC play leading roles in the process of vilifying and targeting pro-White groups in America. These NGOs are hired by the FBI and DHS to literally tell the government what to think about the alleged "threat". There is very little to no threat analysis being conducted by the FBI itself in this regard. Instead, it almost exclusively relies upon the word of these jewish interest groups. DHS has even gone so far as to hire "anti-hate" NGOs to conduct spy ops on its behalf as a way to slyly skirt legal restrictions imposed on it by Congress which prevent DHS from gathering this kind of intelligence directly itself. So, the ADL most likely wrote that declassified FBI report about Patriot Front for the FBI, which explains why PF is considered equivalent to AWD therein. This phenomenon is also evident in FBI criminal complaints against our guys who get arrested–The background info, describing whatever group the arrested individual is associated with, is usually copied directly from the ADL website. Without the ADL and SPLC, FBI "intelligence" would be totally clueless. | 328 |
| 11 | Drone Evasion
At the end of his latest video, Garand Thumb draws a rather pessimistic conclusion about the possibility of hiding from drones. But I think his premise is fundamentally flawed in multiple ways. Most significantly, if it's a rural insurgency scenario (as he suggests), you need to operate in at least a platoon size element, i.e. 20-50 insurgents. This makes it practically impossible to evade drone surveillance. However, the primary goal in that situation isn't necessarily remaining undetected, it's establishing a no-go zone. So, yes, a drone can track you but ground forces will need to come after you to capture or kill you. That's where guerrilla tactics and using the terrain as a force multiplier come into play to even the playing field.
Of course, this is assuming drone strikes are not authorized. This would be an unprecedented politically sensitive decision which has the potential drawback of inadvertently increasing public sympathy for the insurgents. So, I don't believe drone strikes would automatically be employed by government forces in USA; although eventual escalation to that point can't be entirely ruled out either. Much depends on the degree of public support which the insurgents already have.
But if/when the government decides to use drone strikes (or other military means), positive identification (PID) of the insurgents will be a necessary prerequisite before launching a hellfire or dropping bombs. And insurgents can utilize certain techniques to prevent being PID'd. Chief among these is dressing like the classic "grey man" to blend in with the local population in the area. Second, insurgents can hide their weapons. I wouldn't want to cache my weapon if contact with the enemy is anticipated but perhaps wear a poncho or poncho-like garment of some sort to conceal the rifle you're carrying. However, if the entire platoon relies on this method, the poncho becomes a kind of distinctive uniform which facilitates PID instead of preventing it. The good news is, US Government rules of engagement typically require an insurgent to be clearly armed before using lethal force, so this method can still have merit. Plus, you can construct a ghillie suit from anti-thermal imaging material to further ensure your weapon is thoroughly concealed beneath.
Finally, I'm very surprised that Garand Thumb didn't mention utilizing bad weather as an effortless method to evade drones. If it's rainy, foggy, and/or particularly windy, this can easily ground even large fixed-wing drones. So, rural insurgents can use inclement weather conditions to their advantage by planning movements during weather events when they won't be tracked overhead by drones. This is probably the only drone evasion method, other than underground tunnels, that's guaranteed to work. | 467 |
| 12 | "I would like to hear your opinion when it comes to The Base operatives in Europe. I always have wished to move to America to further the Cause, because it seems rather very clear that the potential for a concrete struggle is strongest there, due to the catastrophic demographic conditions, the size of the rural/wild parts of the country, and the general combative zeal that is much greater than what is to be found in Europe. Considering the lack of numbers we all face, would you encourage Europeans to move to America for the sake of The Base? Would it be a good idea to 'facilitate' the passage into the country, or to allow members to settle and develop the land in Washington, if there is any potential to this initiative?"
I agree with your overall conclusion although a couple of your points are questionable. Demographics in USA are abysmal from an objective point of view (but for accelerationists this is a good thing anyway), and there is a distinct lack of zeal for combat in America as well. Those points of disagreement aside, yes, accelerationists in Europe are at a distinct disadvantage compared to those in USA. There are multiple reasons for this such as lack of firearms in Europe, lack of freedom of speech, lack of suitable geography for forming a separatist state, and deep-seated chauvanism. As such, I mostly view European members of The Base as a potential auxiliary force (i.e. foreign fighters) when SHTF in America. So, yes, European members of The Base should relocate to USA, if possible. However, this is easier said than done because in the overwhelming majority of cases it's practically impossible to obtain a longterm work permit or "green card" if you're White and from the EU, unless you possess very unique technical or scientific training and experience perhaps. Therefore, The Base is unable facilitate this. At the very least, European members should travel to USA as often as possible to become familiar with this future area of operations, with particular emphasis on the Pacific Northwest and my land in Washington State. Any European members interested in visiting and utilizing my land are free to do so. That said, please keep in mind that visiting USA in that capacity can lead to being placed on the Homeland Security No-Fly List and/or being officially banned from entering USA in the future, along with your immediate family members (as has happened to at least one European member in the past who visited). | 462 |
| 13 | Serve The Cause
Our limitations and inadequacies as a movement are largely self-imposed, stemming from one thing–A lack of courage. We are too fearful to face the risks necessary to win. We cope with this by undertaking relatively safe actions instead. But safe doesn't equal effective. In fact, for us, quite the opposite is true. We mustn't be foolhardy but we must accept some degree of risk and personal inconvenience, if we expect to triumph.
This is why what's required is an attitude of selflessness and self-sacrifice. Only an ethos of professional service to the Cause can lead to victory. As such, American Futurist argues that our operational approach should be more like a business. However, I believe we must go one step further and adopt a military mindset. We need men who are willing to fight and die in service of our People. We need men who are willing to dedicate themselves wholeheartedly to achieving the 14 Words by any means necessary. Men of courage who put the mission before themselves.
In tandem, we need a movement of supporters willing to financially facilitate our warriors' march towards victory. It would be irresponsible to send them into battle without support. Likewise, it would be reckless for these men to accept the risks involved without support. So, I've proposed a program to address this and financially compensate our warriors for their service. But the crucial prerequisite is warriors with courage. If you have the guts, I have the means. Message me. | 439 |
| 14 | A-Team Leader Wanted
Enthusiasm for professionalizing accelerationism is not overwhelming it seems. As of this writing, 35 people have voted "yes" to donating and 25 people voted "I don't know". These results amount to substatially less than the 100 donors, giving a minimum of $10/month each, necessary to fund one 6-man A-Team. Perhaps the fence-sitters will jump onboard when they start seeing some initial momentum. So, despite the lukewarm poll numbers, I'd like to launch a pilot program to test out the project's viability in actuality. The goal will be to form one 6-man A-Team in the Pacific Northwest. I'm choosing that region for the pilot program because I own land in eastern Washington which the team can immediately begin taking advantage of. However, if someone with land in another region of USA would like to participate, we'll consider potentially switching the pilot program to that alternative location instead. In any case, the first step is hiring a reliable and competent team leader to get the ball rolling. This will be a paid volunteer position essentially.
Specifically, I'm seeking someone who's been doxed in the past and/or who isn't afraid of the enemy potentially exposing his identity (I'll expect you to share your real identity with me so I know I'm paying someone legitimate. Also, it's logical to assume our adversaries will be monitoring this project and may try to dox you somehow, so you need to accept that potential risk). You must have knowledge and experience in fieldcraft, wilderness survival, and/or small unit tactics. Prior military experience is not required but is highly desirable. The starting pay is $100/month. That will increase in increments of $100 with every new member added to the team, so the potential maximum pay is $600/month for a full contingent of 6 team members (If donation levels become robust enough, we can potentially max out the team to 12 members eventually, which would mean $1200/month for the team leader). You must have a valid drivers license and be at least 21 years old with no felony convictions or other restrictions preventing you from legally possessing firearms. Ideal applicants will reside in Washington and live a reasonable driving distance from Republic, or can permanently relocate to the Spokane metro area (I'll also consider guys who live in other parts of the country where there's suitable terrain, if they have access to a secure training ground). You must also be willing to take a counterintelligence polygraph test. As the team leader, your responsibilities will include recruiting, vetting, and retaining a 6-man (or possibly 12-man) A-Team; organizing, conducting, and documenting team training sessions at least once per month; establishing a communal bugout location; devising a local SHTF action plan; and dispersing monthy payments to team members.
If you're interested in applying, please DM me @RomanWolf1. I'll initially pay the team leader from my own pocket. But as soon as he's selected, I'll post an update here and officially begin seeking donations in BitCoin and Monero. I'm willing to invest my own money to help get this off the ground. But if I can't get enough donations to sufficiently fund this project longterm, I'll need to pull the plug at some point. Let's see how it goes. | 735 |
| 15 | I want to emphasize to potential future donors that helping to professionalize accelerationism in USA would allow the A-Teams we form to provide free survivalism training to other pro-White accelerationists living in each team's respective AO. The ultimate goal of this free training is creating a loosely organized auxiliary force which can take & hold territory in the area thereby establishing a safehaven when SHTF. As a donor in an AO with an A-Team, you'd be eligible to receive this free training and join the auxiliary force. But if you were unable or unwilling to participate directly in this manner, you'd still stand to gain—Your monthly donation would help establish a secure communal bugout location in your area where you could seek refuge when System Collpase occurs. Additionally, one or more of these communal bugout locations could be the seed(s) of a future ethnostate. So, monetary donations to this potential project would be an investment with tangible benefits for our Race.
Up to this point, I've been funding accelerationist activities (and prisoner support) in USA from my own personal stash of crypto. I've burned through at least $10k of crypto in just the last couple of years (and if you also factor in the cash I invested into The Base from its inception, the grand total is easily over $30k which doesn't include the land I purchased in Washington for training). I'm not claiming this is an enormous amount of money. But, even so, my pockets are not bottomless. This is why I'm turning to you for potential support in funding this project idea longterm.
Ten dollars each month from as few as 100 donors is all it would take to fund at least one 6-man A-Team. If you haven't voted yet, please do so here to let me know if you would be willing & able to financially support such an initiative. | 712 |
| 16 | I completely agree with my comrades at AF: France is f*cked. Almost half of the French population is non-White. And just like in USA, the younger the age bracket the more non-White it is (i.e. Whites are being outbred)–Guaranteeing the continued replacment of the founding population well into the foreseeable future even if immigration was permanently halted today. Also like in USA, illegal immigrants comprise a relatively small portion of the non-White population in France. What does this all mean? Electing a right-wing government can't stop this demographic mud flow. The genie is out of the bottle and the situation is irreversible now, as it is in USA. This is the inevitable fate awaiting every EU country, just on different time scales. Some of us anticipate that this will result in a race war. But as I've already explained, our respective governments will ensure this doesn't happen. We're not strong enough to overthrow our governments. Therefore, the only way to save our Race is by abandoning the sinking ship of chauvanism and boarding the emergency life boat of White Zionism which entails establishing a new Homeland (ideally on the North American continent) for all White People, regardless of nationality, to survive and thrive into the future (i.e. achieve the 14 Words). | 535 |
| 17 | If launched, are you willing & able to donate at least $10/month in cryptocurrency to help professionalize accelerationism in USA? | 535 |
| 18 | Professionalizing
It's become clear to me that only money can command the dedication required for accelerationists to succeed in USA. This isn't because we're motivated by money. It's because time is money. And our guys have multiple things competing for their time, understandably. Plus, the riskier the endeavor, the more valuable the time we put into it is. Nothing worth doing is risk free. In fact, in our Struggle, the more worthwhile an endeavor, the more risk it inevitably entails. Our guys should be compensated for accepting this risk as well as for their time spent. That's why I believe professionalizing the accelerationist movement is the only proper and effective way forward.
What should that look like? I've already outlined my A-Team ("Accelerationist Team") concept previously. But I'll briefly describe it again here. The idea is to form as many 6-12 man teams in as many locations as possible but at least one team in each major region of USA. The regions I'm referring to are the Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, Northwest, and Midwest. So, five regions would mean a minimum of five teams (one per region). And to be operationally effective, one A-Team needs a minimum of six members. Each team would be headed by a team leader responsible for recruiting, training, and retaining his team members. Because the burden of success falls upon his shoulders, the team leader should be financially compensated between $100-$1200/month depending upon the number of members on his team each month. In other words, he would be paid $100/team member per month. Team members would also receive $100/month each. The team would be required to meetup at least once per month to train. No illegal activity. The minimum financing necessary to make this work is $1100/month for a 6-man team in one region which equals $13,200/year. To get full geographic coverage (i.e. one 6-man team in each of the 5 regions) would require $5,500/month which equals $66,000/year.
These figures are what I feel is the bare minimum financial compensation our guys deserve for their time spent and risk incurred. What we, as a community, get for this investment are fairly well-trained and competent A-Teams on standby for when SHTF. At that point, the teams would spring into action to take & hold a portion of territory in their respective regions thereby establishing a secure safehaven for others in the region to bugout to. These communal bugout locations could save many White lives, and eventually lead to the formation of one or more small White ethnostates. Also, while waiting for Collpase, each team would organize a local volunteer auxiliary force, to supplement the teams' manpower, and provide it with free training.
An alternative to the A-Team model is to invest in one larger 36-man unit in only one region for a more concentrated effort to significantly increase the chances of success for at least that one region. That would require $7,100/month which is $85,200/year. I'm not proposing 36-man units in more than one region because I think that would be financially untenable. The downside to this option is that only our community members in that one region would immediately stand to benefit (although, theoretically, any outsiders able to travel to that particular region could also be provided refuge).
If enough of us were to see the value in this, the project could be crowdfunded using cryptocurrency for $10/month. For example, a regional 6-man team would require 110 supporters to donate $10/month each. A 12-man team would require a $10/month donation from 230 supporters. And one 36-man unit would need 710 supporters to give $10 each/month. These numbers aren't staggering so, in my estimation, this project is very doable. Furthermore, I'd cover any shortfall in donations each month with my own funds. For transparency, a monthly activity report (with photos) would be published so donors can witness what training is being done, and to monitor overall progress and team status.
Much would depend on the level of crowdfunding support. Vote here so I can gauge interest. | 559 |
| 19 | It's fairly obvious to me that we don't genuinely want to win. Most guys involved in the movement are in it for purely personal reasons. The primary motivation for these people is a deep sense of alienation from mainstream society and/or feelings of inadequacy. Hence, the popularity of groups which amount to nothing more than social clubs or street gangs. The prevalence of Active Clubs is a clear example of this phenomenon. It seems like activism and being pro-White are often only excuses to socialize. I hesitate to even call this networking because networking implies some kind of deliberate constructive purpose is behind it. But there is no useful purpose to the majority of groups (Oh wait, how could I forget "waking people up"!). They exist to provide a feeling of belonging and to boost the egos of their founders.
There's nothing inherently wrong with wanting friends. The problem is when we conflate making friends with making a difference for our People. The latter requires personal sacrifice and inconvenience. You shouldn't be getting any personal benefit out of it. Rather, you should be constantly giving. I don't see that kind of selfless attitude much at all. This is why, for example, it's typical (even expected) that guys will quit when doxed. A situation like that requires accepting the stigma and negative consequences which go along with it, and continuing the struggle for our People in spite of the associated hardships. This kind of reaction demonstrates true dedication to the Cause. Yet, I see this tenacity in only a very small fraction of doxed individuals. The more common reaction is to run and hide.
I understand that many guys feel they have no other realistic option in such a scenario because of family pressure and/or to avoid financial difficulties. But that only goes to show they were in it for the wrong reasons to begin with because as soon as the going gets tough, they bow out. Which means they were never willing or able to make the sacrifices required for victory. And considering White Revolution is the only solution, we need to be prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice. Can you honestly say you're prepared to lay down your life to achieve the 14 Words (or at least spend several years in prison)? Or are you really only interested in some fun times with your bros and f*cking around like a racist frat boy or mindless football hooligan? Nevermind...I already know the answer. | 533 |
| 20 | I agree with the majority of my subscribers who think System Collapse is more realistic than both Race War and White Revolution. In my view, System Collapse is the only realistic option for the foreseable future. My definition of System Collapse includes the possibility of a CivNat civil war (in which we'll play a marginal role, at best, after it already begins [without us causing it]).
Race War is impossible without White Revolution. This is because the primary obstacle to Race War is the government. And to remove government authority requires White Revolution. But we don't have the necessary willpower or capability for revolution (maybe in 50 years).
So, we need System Collapse to do the heavy lifting for us. Like it or not, it's the only way. Accelerate! | 446 |
