AIBE All India Bar Exam for law Students #AIBE
Closed channel
2 490
Subscribers
-324 hours
+137 days
+1830 days
Data loading in progress...
Similar Channels
Tags Cloud
No data
Any problems? Please refresh the page or contact our support manager.
Incoming and Outgoing Mentions
---
---
---
---
---
---
Attracting Subscribers
September '26
September '26
+21
in 3 channels
August '26
+1 222
in 2 channels
Get PRO
July '260
in 2 channels
Get PRO
June '260
in 1 channels
Get PRO
May '260
in 3 channels
Get PRO
April '260
in 5 channels
Get PRO
March '260
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '260
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '260
in 2 channels
Get PRO
December '250
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '250
in 2 channels
Get PRO
October '250
in 1 channels
Get PRO
September '250
in 2 channels
Get PRO
August '250
in 2 channels
Get PRO
July '250
in 2 channels
Get PRO
June '250
in 1 channels
Get PRO
May '250
in 2 channels
Get PRO
April '250
in 3 channels
Get PRO
March '250
in 3 channels
Get PRO
February '250
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '250
in 1 channels
Get PRO
December '24
+192
in 5 channels
Get PRO
November '24
+93
in 1 channels
Get PRO
October '24
+143
in 4 channels
Get PRO
September '24
+301
in 4 channels
Get PRO
August '24
+94
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '240
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '240
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '240
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '240
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '240
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '24
+9
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '24
+40
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '23
+41
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '23
+2
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '23
+7
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '23
+2
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '23
+6
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '23
+4
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '23
+6
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '23
+3
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '23
+3
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '23
+4
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '23
+6
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '23
+61
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '22
+4
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '22
+1
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '22
+6
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '22
+8
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '22
+3
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '22
+5
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '22
+14
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '22
+1
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '22
+51
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '220
in 0 channels
Get PRO
February '220
in 0 channels
Get PRO
January '220
in 0 channels
Get PRO
December '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
November '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
October '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
September '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
August '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
July '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
June '210
in 0 channels
Get PRO
May '21
+9
in 0 channels
Get PRO
April '21
+19
in 0 channels
Get PRO
March '21
+319
in 0 channels
| Date | Subscriber Growth | Mentions | Channels | |
| 05 September | 0 | |||
| 04 September | 0 | |||
| 03 September | +3 | |||
| 02 September | +18 | |||
| 01 September | 0 |
Channel Posts
Case: Biswajyoti Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 1842 of 2025, 2025 INSC 458 .
Key Quote: "Every consensual relationship, where a possibility of marriage may exist, cannot be given a colour of a false pretext to marry, in the event of a fall out. It is such lis that amounts to an abuse of process of law."
Significance: The judgment reinforces that only a promise made in bad faith with no intention to marry at the time it is given can vitiate consent under rape law. A genuine promise that is broken later does not retrospectively criminalize consensual intimacy. The Court cautioned against the "growing tendency" of using criminal proceedings to settle failed relationships.
Result: Appeal allowed. Proceedings terminated. No order as to costs.
| 2 |  Case: Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (Supreme Court of India, 21 August 2019).
A six-year #consensual relationship with #cohabitation and #mutual visits;
The Court held that the allegations in the FIR, even if accepted entirely, did not prima facie constitute rape because the relationship was demonstrably consensual over a prolonged period, and there was no allegation of a false promise from the outset. The SC/ST Act charges also failed because the pre-amendment law did not cover private digital insults. The FIR was quashed.
Thus, no prima facie offence under Section 375 IPC was made out. | 24 |
| 3 | 2025 INSC 458
section 69 BNS Bail application support
List below 👇 latest updates
2024 INSC 897 section 69 BNS Bail application support
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:21045
section 69 BNS Bail application support
2025 INSC 458
section 69 BNS Bail application support
https://t.me/c/1472417098/62023
https://t.me/c/1472417098/62021
https://t.me/c/1472417098/62020 | 30 |
| 4 | #Judgement and gender book of sc | 27 |
| 5 | NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:21045
section 69 BNS Bail application support | 28 |
| 6 | 2024 INSC 897 section 69 BNS Bail application support | 28 |
| 7 | section 69 BNS Bail application support | 27 |
| 8 | #EP | 27 |
| 9 |  supreme court of India overview with Adv R.Balaji Naik
#SC overview | 70 |
| 10 |  supreme court of India overview with Adv R.Balaji Naik
#SC overview | 65 |
| 11 | Nirmaljeet Singh v. Guljeet Singh & Ors.— Delhi High Court (FAO 268/2026, 24.08.2026)
- Facts: The appellant was proceeded ex-parte in a civil suit and an ex-parte decree was passed. He later sought to set it aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, claiming he was never served. The Trial Court rejected his plea, holding that summons had been served via WhatsApp and that his application was barred by limitation.
- Issue: Whether the appellant was duly served and whether the rejection of his Order IX Rule 13 application was justified.
- Held: The High Court allowed the appeal. The process server’s report showed the #WhatsApp call was answered by a third person, not the appellant, and there was no proof the #summons actually reached him. Mere transmission to a mobile number is not conclusive proof of service. The appellant’s consistent denial of receipt created sufficient doubt to warrant an opportunity to contest the suit.
- Result: The ex-parte decree and the Trial Court’s dismissal order were set aside qua the a | 139 |
| 12 | Year Case Court Core Principle
1997 D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal SC 11 procedural safeguards; Article 21 protection
2014 Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar SC Notice = Rule; #Arrest = Exception (≤7 yrs)
2022 Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI SC Bail is the rule; jail is the exception
2026 Satender Kumar Antil (Clarification) SC BNSS Section 35(3) notice mandatory; arrest is exception
2025 Nalla Balu v. State of Telangana Telangana HC Proportionality; no mechanical #arrests; free speech
Mar 2026 Shri. Ravi v. State of Karnataka Karnataka HC Notice must have crime no., offence, FIR copy
Aug 2026 K.N. Mohan Reddy v. State of Karnataka Karnataka HC ACP/DCP personally liable; ₹3L costs
Aug 2026 Mohan Gowda v. State of Karnataka Karnataka HC "Change Whitefield to Darkfield"; DGP/IGP #guidelines
Aug 2026 Karnataka HC ( #Dept. #Inquiry) Karnataka HC Dept. inquiry against #Whitefield SI | 187 |
| 13 |  Whitefield Police Case: High Court Slams DCP & ACP Over Transfer Policy | Karnataka High Court
#Arrest guidelines
Nalla Balu state of Telangana
Satyendra Kumar antale
DK Basu #guidelines
Subtraction 3 section 35 of BNSS
#Notice | 168 |
| 14 |  #Client Files SC/ST Case Against Her Own Advocate! Judge Shocked: “You May Face This Too!”
#Google review
#Review #feedback
#Defamation | 168 |
| 15 | #Client Files SC/ST Case Against Her Own Advocate! Judge Shocked: “You May Face This Too!”
#Google review
#Review #feedback | 169 |
| 16 | AIBE information full details follow in
https://t.me/+RvY1J5JaCPXcyF9h | 253 |
| 17 | UGC-NET (LAW) 1000+ MCQs Part 02.pdf | 360 |
| 18 | UGC-NET (LAW) 1000+ MCQs Part 01.pdf | 359 |
| 19 | Constitution of India AIBE.pdf | 348 |
| 20 | Only for reference For reference
Students reference
prepared by: the South Supreme Court associates | 426 |
