Justice junction

Veer Gokula Jat Balidan Diwas is observed annually on January 1st to commemorate the supreme sacrifice and martyrdom of the 17th-century Jat chieftain, Gokula Singh Jat.  Today, January 1, 2026, marks the 356th Balidan Diwas.  Significance and History Legacy of Resistance: Gokula Jat led one of the first major agrarian revolts against the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb in the 1660s, protesting against religious persecution, forced conversions, and the heavy Jizya tax. The Battle of Tilpat: In 1669, Gokula led an army of approximately 20,000 peasants against a much larger Mughal force of 300,000 soldiers. Despite being outnumbered, his forces fought for three days, causing significant casualties to the Mughal army. Martyrdom: Gokula and his uncle, Uday Singh, were eventually captured and brought to Agra. On January 1, 1670, Aurangzeb offered to spare their lives if they converted to Islam. Upon their refusal, Gokula was brutally executed at the site of the Old Kotwali in Agra (now known as Phubbara Chowk). 

मुझे पता है कुछ लोग मेरा विरोध करेंगे लेकिन सच्चाई यही है हमारे ऊपर अंग्रेजों के त्यौहार थोप दिए गए। जय हिंद इंकलाब जिंदाबाद 🇮🇳🇮🇳भारत माता की जय

⚖️ *Latest Legal Updates* ⚖️ *👉 Batlanki Keshav (Kesava) Kumar Anurag v. State of Telangana & Anr, 2025 SC* The Supreme Court quashed the rape case, citing the complainant's manipulative conduct and abuse of legal process. 👉 *Manzoor Ahmad Wani v. Ayaz Ahmad Raina, 2025 Jammu & Kashmir HC* The Court held that “sufficient grounds” under Order XXIII Rule 1(3)(b) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) must be interpreted broadly to allow withdrawal and refiling of suits in the interest of justice. 👉 *Under Armour INC v. Anish Agarwal, 2025 Delhi HC* The Court held that anti dissection rule is not inconsistent with ascertaining if the competing marks are similar by taking note of the dominant parts. 👉 *Saurabh Bhatnagar v. State of H.P. 2025 Himachal Pradesh HC* The Court stated that trial courts must not deviate from the quantity-based sentencing framework prescribed under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), as the Legislature and Central Government have already accounted for the severity of the substance's impact while framing the law. 👉 *M/S Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 SC* The Supreme Court held that the CBEC Circular dated 17th September 2010 must be applied retrospectively as it merely clarified existing notifications and did not introduce a new fiscal regime. 👉 *KRB Enterprises & Ors v. M/s KRBL Limited, 2025 Delhi HC* The Court held that for infringement the mark may be used in any other relation whatsoever to such goods. 👉 *State Represented by Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Vishakhapatnam v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi and others, 2025 SC* The Supreme Court held that an accused cannot be discharged under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) by relying on the materials submitted by the defence instead of relying on the chargesheet and list of documents submitted by the prosecution. 👉 *M/S Patanjali Foods Limited (Formerly Known As M/S Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd.) v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 SC* The Supreme Court held that the encashment of a bank guarantee by the Customs Department does not amount to payment of customs duty; therefore, Section 27 of the Customs Act,1962 and the doctrine of unjust enrichment do not apply, and the amount must be refunded with interest. 👉 *X v. FACT and Others, 2025 Kerala HC* The Court held that denial of public employment solely due to Hepatitis B infection is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India,1950 (COI), as it amounts to unjust discrimination. 👉 *State v. Neeraj, 2025 Delhi HC* The Court held that the provisions under Chapter XXV including Section 328, 329 and 330 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) are couched in mandatory language. Thus, the procedure contemplated therein is mandatory in nature....

Follow me on instagram

⚖️Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 NI Act vs Civil Recovery Suit | What’s the Real Difference? Cheque bounce होने पर - क्या केवल Section 138 NI Act लागू होती है, या साथ-साथ Civil Recovery Suit भी दायर किया जा सकता है? 🔹 Section 138 — Criminal / Penal Liability & Deterrence 🔹 Civil Suit — Money Recovery & Compensation 🔹 Cause of Action, Limitation, Proof Standard & Relief 🔹 कब दोनों Proceedings एक साथ चल सकती हैं 📌Landmark Judgment:ICDS Ltd. v. Beena Shabeer (2002) - Civil suit & NI Act complaint can proceed simultaneously. कानून का सही उपयोग वही है - जब आप सही Remedy को सही Forum पर चुनते हैं।⚖️ . . . . . . . . . . . #Section138 #NIACT #ChequeDishonour #CivilRecoverySuit #CPC1908 #India #Law #CriminalLaw #CivilLaw #Legal #Awareness #LawStudents #YoungLawyers #JudiciaryPrep #ADPO #ICDSVsBeenaShabeer #Court #Practice #Education #Studies #LawReels #Learning https://www.instagram.com/p/DS6lMF3kucw/?igsh=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

Follow this link to join my WhatsApp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/Fm92ii8iPWiAHHgbMeghVc

Supreme Court Stays High Court's Order Suspending Kuldeep Sengar's Life Sentence In Unnao Rape Case https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/sc-stays-high-courts-order-suspending-kuldeep-sengars-life-sentence-in-unnao-rape-case-1602716

Karnataka High Court Wakf Board & Not Managing Committee Has Power To Remove Any Member Of Committee: Karnataka High Court The petitioner approached the Karnataka High Court with the grievance that the Badariya Jumma Masjid had removed the petitioners from the Managing Committee without any authority. ByTulip Kanth|28 Dec 2025 11:30 AM Justice Suraj Govindaraj, Karnataka High Court  The Karnataka High Court has held that, as per the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995, only the Wakf Board can remove any member of the Managing Committee, and the Managing Committee has no such power. The petitioner approached the High Court with the grievance that the Badariya Jumma Masjid (third respondent) had removed the petitioners from the Managing Committee without any authority. The Single Bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj held, “Neither Section 64 nor Rule 58 makes a mention of the Managing Committee. When all these three provisions are read together, it is clear that the Managing Committee has no power to remove any member of the Managing Committee; it is only the WAKF Board which has the power to do so.” https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/karnataka-high-court/abdul-sattar-v-karnataka-state-board-of-waqf-2025khc45657-wakf-board-managing-committee-remove-member-1602590

S.138 Negotiable Instruments Act | Supreme Court Round-Up 2025 : Judgments On Cheque Dishonour Cases https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s138-negotiable-instruments-act-supreme-court-round-up-2025-judgments-on-cheque-dishonour-cases-516094

Telangana State Judicial Services invites online application for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) for Direct Recruitment and Recruitment by Transfer. Name of the Post: Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. of Post: 66 (Sixty-Six)