Hacking Articles
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 Hacking Articles 的分析概览
频道 Hacking Articles (@hackinarticles) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 21 136 名订阅者,在 技术与应用 类别中位列第 6 405,并在 印度 地区排名第 20 624 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 21 136 名订阅者。
根据 20 六月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 1 309,过去 24 小时变化为 46,整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态: 未认证
- 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 9.97%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 4.45% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 2 108 次浏览,首日通常累积 940 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 2。
- 主题关注点: 内容集中在 attack, privilege, escalation, exploitation, enumeration 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“House of Pentester”
凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 21 六月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 技术与应用 类别中的关键影响点。
21 136
订阅者
+4624 小时
+3827 天
+1 30930 天
帖子存档
21 132
Zero-Day CVEs (2023) Mindmap
🔴⚫Full HD: https://github.com/Ignitetechnologies/Mindmap/blob/main/Zero-Day%20CVEs%20(2023)/Zero-Day%20CVEs%20(2023)%20UHD.png
21 132
🔥 OSCP+/CTF Exam Practice Training (Online) 🔥 – Register Now! 🚀
🔗 Register here: https://forms.gle/bowpX9TGEs41GDG99
💬 WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/HIOPPNENLOX6F1
📧 Email: info@ignitetechnologies.in
Join IGNITE TECHNOLOGIES’ exclusive "Capture the Flag" Training Program and enhance your skills with the following modules:
🧠 Introduction
🌐 Information Gathering
🧱 Vulnerability Scanning
🔓 Windows Privilege Escalation
🐧 Linux Privilege Escalation
🛡️ Client-Side Attacks
🌐 Web Application Attacks
🧬 Password Attacks
🧠 Tunneling & Pivoting
🏰 Active Directory Attacks
💣 Exploiting Public Exploits
📋 Report Writing
21 132
ADCS ESC15 - Exploiting Template Schema v1
✴ Twitter: https://x.com/hackinarticles
The ESC15 vulnerability (EKUwu), affects Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS), allowing attackers to inject unauthorized EKUs (e.g., Client Authentication) into Schema Version 1 templates.
📘 Overview of the ESC15 Attack
📐 What is Schema Version 1?
📋 Prerequisites
🧪 Lab Setup
🎯 Enumeration & Exploitation
🧠 Post Exploitation
🛡️ Mitigation
#infosec #cybersecurity #cybersecuritytips #microsoft #redteam #informationsecurity #CyberSec #ai #offensivesecurity #infosecurity #cyberattacks #security #oscp #cybersecurityawareness #bugbounty #bugbountytips
21 132
AD Hardening Risks Explained Through Restaurant Scenarios
✴ Twitter: https://x.com/hackinarticles
Secure your Active Directory kitchen with these bite-sized analogies:
☢ Credential Stealer
Scenario: Dishwasher steals the head chef’s keys → Accesses the wine cellar.
Risk: Stolen credentials grant unauthorized access to critical systems.
Defense: Never log in with admin credentials on workstations.
☢ Public Pwn (MS14-068)
Scenario: Customer forges a VIP pass → Gets kitchen control.
Risk: Kerberos flaw escalates to Domain Admin in minutes.
Defense: Patch KB3011780 + automate compliance checks.
☢ Leaked in Kitchen (GPP Passwords)
Scenario: Recipes with secret ingredients left on the counter.
Risk: Group Policy Preferences expose passwords in SYSVOL.
Defense: Delete groups.xml, install KB2962486, audit GPPs.
☢ DCSync Attack
Scenario: Impostor poses as health inspector → Demands all recipes.
Risk: Attackers mimic Domain Controllers to steal password hashes.
Defense: Restrict "Replicating Directory Changes" rights.
☢ LLMNR Poisoning
Scenario: Fake waiter intercepts orders → Serves poisoned dishes.
Risk: Spoofed network responses steal NTLM hashes.
Defense: Disable LLMNR/NBT-NS via Group Policy.
☢ AS-REP Roasting
Scenario: No ID check at the door → Burglars walk in freely.
Risk: Kerberos pre-authentication bypassed for hash theft.
Defense: Enforce pre-auth for all accounts.
☢ Vulnerable GPO Abuse
Scenario: Dishwasher edits kitchen rules → Adds backdoor access.
Risk: Malicious Group Policies deploy malware.
Defense: Audit GPO permissions with BloodHound.
☢ Pass-the-Ticket Attack
Scenario: Stolen meal voucher reused → Free dinners forever.
Risk: Kerberos tickets reused for lateral movement.
Defense: Monitor TGT anomalies, reset compromised passwords.
21 132
Red Team Dorks Mindmap
🔴⚫Full HD: https://github.com/Ignitetechnologies/Mindmap/blob/main/Red%20Team%20Dorks/Red%20Team%20Dorks%20UHD.png
21 132
Bug Bounty Training Program (Online)
🔗 Register here: https://forms.gle/bowpX9TGEs41GDG99
💬 WhatsApp: https://wa.me/message/HIOPPNENLOX6F1
📧 Email: info@ignitetechnologies.in
Hurry up, get enrolled yourself with IGNITE TECHNOLOGIES’ fully exclusive Training Program “Bug Bounty.”
✔️ Table of Content
🚀 Introduction to WAPT & OWASP Top 10
🛠️ Pentest Lab Setup
🔍 Information Gathering & Reconnaissance
💻 Netcat for Pentester
⚙️ Configuration Management Testing
🔐 Cryptography
🔑 Authentication
🕒 Session Management
📂 Local File Inclusion
🌐 Remote File Inclusion
📁 Path Traversal
💣 OS Command Injection
🔀 Open Redirect
📤 Unrestricted File Upload
🐚 PHP Web Shells
📝 HTML Injection
🌟 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
🔄 Client-Side Request Forgery
🛑 SQL Injection
📜 XXE Injection
🎁 Bonus Section
21 132
OSINT: User Privacy in Linux
🔥 Telegram: https://t.me/hackinarticles
In this article, we are going to discuss why telemetry can be seen as a potential threat to privacy, even when used for legitimate purposes. We will also explore methods to make the system more secure than before.
🛡️ Secure OS Installation
🗑️ Removing the packages
⚙️ Settings in Ubuntu
📉 Disable diagnostics reporting
🔕 Disable lock screen notifications
📁 Disable tracking of recent files
🚫 Turning off the problem reporting
🌙 Turning off the screen blank
🔒 Disable automatic screen locking
🧨 Permanently delete option
👁️ Show hidden files
🧹 BleachBit
🔐 KeePassXC
🦠 Virus Scanner
✂️ Metadata removal
🦊 Firefox profilemaker
📦 Flatpak
🌐 LibreWolf
🗃️ VeraCrypt
🌍 Tor Browser
🛡️ Proton VPN
🧬 NextDNS
📌 Conclusion
21 132
SAIL Framework: Secure AI Risks Explained Through Restaurant Scenarios
✴ Twitter: https://x.com/hackinarticles
Understand AI security risks with bite-sized restaurant analogies from the SAIL Framework (Secure AI Lifecycle):
☢ SAIL 1.1 - Inadequate AI Policy
Chef ignores food safety rules → Kitchen fails health inspection
Risk: No AI governance = unchecked vulnerabilities.
☢ SAIL 3.1 - Data Poisoning
Rival sabotages ingredients → Diners get sick
Risk: Corrupt training data skews AI decisions.
☢ SAIL 4.1 - Untested Model
New dish served without taste-test → Allergic reactions
Risk: Unvalidated AI models cause harmful outputs.
☢ SAIL 5.3 - Direct Prompt Injection
Customer writes "Add poison" on order → Chef obeys
Risk: Malicious prompts hijack AI behavior.
☢ SAIL 6.5 - Indirect Prompt Injection
Hidden note in delivery box → Kitchen follows rogue recipe
Risk: External data manipulates AI covertly.
☢ SAIL 7.2 - Missing Real-time Alerts
Food spoils silently → No one notices
Risk: Undetected model drift or attacks.
现已上线!2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
