现已上线！2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF
前往频道在 Telegram
◼️ Only Computer Questions ◼️ Previous Year Questions ◼️ Hindi & English Language ◼️ One Liner & Poll MCQs
显示更多📈 Telegram 频道 Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF 的分析概览
频道 Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF (@computer_science_it_notes_pdf) 印地语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 38 296 名订阅者，在 教育 类别中位列第 4 895，并在 印度 地区排名第 10 512 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 38 296 名订阅者。
根据 21 六月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 1 297，过去 24 小时变化为 -7，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 0.16%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 N/A% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 60 次浏览，首日通常累积 0 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 0。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 नदी, नांगल, परियोजना, भाखड़ा, संविधान 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台：
“◼️ Only Computer Questions
◼️ Previous Year Questions
◼️ Hindi & English Language
◼️ One Liner & Poll MCQs”
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 22 六月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 教育 类别中的关键影响点。
38 296
订阅者
-724 小时
-1277 天
+1 29730 天
帖子存档
■ SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Procedure for amendment of the Constitution and election of members of Rajya Sabha.
■ SOVIET CONSTITUTION (USSR, now Russia)
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental duties and the ideal of justice (social, economic and political) in the Preamble.
■ FRENCH CONSTITUTION
#sourcesofconstitution
◇ Republic and the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity in the Preamble.
■ WEIMAR CONSTITUTION OF GERMANY
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency.
■ SOVIET CONSTITUTION (USSR, now Russia)
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental duties and the ideal of justice (social, economic and political) in the Preamble.
■ US CONSTUTUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental rights,
◇ Independence of judiciary,
◇ Judicial review,
◇ Impeachment of the president,
◇ Removal of Supreme Court and high court judges and
◇ Post of vice president.
■ WEIMAR CONSTITUTION OF GERMANY
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency.
■ AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Concurrent List,
◇ Freedom of trade,
◇ Commerce and inter-course, and
◇ Joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament.
■ CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Federation with a strong Centre,
◇ Vesting of residuary powers in the Centre,
◇ Appointment of state governors by the Centre, and
◇ Advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
■ IRISH CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Directive Principles of State Policy,
◇ Nomination of members to Rajya Sabha and
◇ Method of election of president
■ US CONSTUTUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental rights,
◇ Independence of judiciary,
◇ Judicial review,
◇ Impeachment of the president,
◇ Removal of Supreme Court and high court judges and
◇ Post of vice president.
■ BRITISH CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitutuon
◇ Parliamentary government,
◇ Rule of Law,
◇ Legislative procedure,
◇ Single citizenship,
◇ Cabinet system,
◇ Prerogative writs,
◇ Parliamentary privileges and
◇ Bicameralism.
■ GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT 1935
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Federal Scheme,
◇ Office of governor,
◇ Judiciary,
◇ Public Service Commissions,
◇ Emergency provisions and
◇ Administrative details
■ PARADISE OF THE LAWYERS
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is too legalistic and very complicated.
◇ They opined that the legal language and phraseology adopted in the constitution makes it a complex document. The same Sir Ivor Jennings called it a “lawyer’s paradise”.
■ ELEPHANTINE SIZE
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics stated that the Indian Constitution is too bulky and too detailed and contains some unnecessary elements.
◇ Sir Ivor Jennings, a British Constitutionalist, observed that the provisions borrowed were not always well-selected and that the constitution, generally speaking, was too long and complicated.
■ AN UN-GANDHIAN CONSTITUTION
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is un-Gandhian because it does not contain the philosophy and ideals of Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the Indian Nation.
◇ They opined that the Constitution should have been raised and built upon village panchayats and District panchayats In this context, the same member of the Constituent Assembly, K. Hanumanthaiya, said: “That is exactly the kind of Constitution Mahatma Gandhi did not want and did not envisage”.
■ UN-INDIAN OR ANTI-INDIAN
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is ‘un-Indian’ or ‘anti-Indian’ because it does not reflect the political traditions and the spirit of India.
◇ They said that the foreign nature of the Constitution makes it unsuitable to the Indian situation or unworkable in India.
◇ In this context, K. Hanumanthaiya, a member of the Constituent Assembly, commented : “We wanted the music of Veena or Sitar, but here we have the music of an English band. That was because our Constitution-makers were educated that way”
■ A CARBON COPY OF THE 1935 ACT
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics said that the framers of the Constitution have included a large number of the provisions of the Government of India Act of 1935 into the Constitution of India.
◇ Hence, they called the Constitution as a “Carbon Copy of the 1935 Act” or an “Amended Version of the 1935 Act”. For example, N. Srinivasan observed that the Indian Constitution is “both in language and substance a close copy of the Act of 1935”.
◇ Similarly, Sir Ivor Jennings, a British Constitutionalist, said that “the Constitution derives directly from the Government of India Act of 1935 from which, in fact, many of its provisions are copied almost textually".
■ A BORROWED CONSTITUTION
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics opined that the Indian Constitution contains nothing new and original. They described it as a ‘borrowed Constitution’ or a ‘bag of borrowings’ or a ‘hotch-potch Constitution’ or a ‘patchwork’ of several documents of the world constitutions.
◇ However, this criticism is unfair and illogical. This is because, the framers of the Constitution made necessary modifications in the features borrowed from other constitutions for their suitability to the Indian conditions, at the same time avoiding their faults.
◇ While answering the above criticism in the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, said : “One likes to ask whether there can be anything new in a Constitution framed at this hour in the history of the world.
■ CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
#Salientfeaturesofconstitution
◇ The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 gave a constitutional status and protection to co-operative societies. In this context, it made the following three changes in the Constitution:
◇ It made the right to form co-operative societies a fundamental right (Article 19).
◇ It included a new Directive Principle of State Policy on promotion of co-operative societies (Article 43-B).
◇ It added a new Part IX-B in the Constitution which is entitled as “The Co-operative Societies” (Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT).
