متاح الآن! بحث تيليغرام 2025 — أهم رؤى العام 
Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF
الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram
◼️ Only Computer Questions ◼️ Previous Year Questions ◼️ Hindi & English Language ◼️ One Liner & Poll MCQs
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF
تُعد قناة Computer Science Technology IT Notes PDF (@computer_science_it_notes_pdf) في القطاع اللغوي الهندية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 38 296 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 4 895 في فئة التعليم والمرتبة 10 512 في منطقة الهند.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 38 296 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 21 يونيو, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار 1 297، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -7، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 0.16%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً N/A% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 60 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 0 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 0.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل नदी, नांगल, परियोजना, भाखड़ा, संविधान.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“◼️ Only Computer Questions
◼️ Previous Year Questions
◼️ Hindi & English Language
◼️ One Liner & Poll MCQs”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 22 يونيو, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة التعليم.
38 296
المشتركون
-724 ساعات
-1277 أيام
+1 29730 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
■ SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Procedure for amendment of the Constitution and election of members of Rajya Sabha.
■ SOVIET CONSTITUTION (USSR, now Russia)
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental duties and the ideal of justice (social, economic and political) in the Preamble.
■ FRENCH CONSTITUTION
#sourcesofconstitution
◇ Republic and the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity in the Preamble.
■ WEIMAR CONSTITUTION OF GERMANY
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency.
■ SOVIET CONSTITUTION (USSR, now Russia)
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental duties and the ideal of justice (social, economic and political) in the Preamble.
■ US CONSTUTUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental rights,
◇ Independence of judiciary,
◇ Judicial review,
◇ Impeachment of the president,
◇ Removal of Supreme Court and high court judges and
◇ Post of vice president.
■ WEIMAR CONSTITUTION OF GERMANY
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency.
■ AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Concurrent List,
◇ Freedom of trade,
◇ Commerce and inter-course, and
◇ Joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament.
■ CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Federation with a strong Centre,
◇ Vesting of residuary powers in the Centre,
◇ Appointment of state governors by the Centre, and
◇ Advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
■ IRISH CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Directive Principles of State Policy,
◇ Nomination of members to Rajya Sabha and
◇ Method of election of president
■ US CONSTUTUTION
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Fundamental rights,
◇ Independence of judiciary,
◇ Judicial review,
◇ Impeachment of the president,
◇ Removal of Supreme Court and high court judges and
◇ Post of vice president.
■ BRITISH CONSTITUTION
#Sourcesofconstitutuon
◇ Parliamentary government,
◇ Rule of Law,
◇ Legislative procedure,
◇ Single citizenship,
◇ Cabinet system,
◇ Prerogative writs,
◇ Parliamentary privileges and
◇ Bicameralism.
■ GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT 1935
#Sourcesofconstitution
◇ Federal Scheme,
◇ Office of governor,
◇ Judiciary,
◇ Public Service Commissions,
◇ Emergency provisions and
◇ Administrative details
■ PARADISE OF THE LAWYERS
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is too legalistic and very complicated.
◇ They opined that the legal language and phraseology adopted in the constitution makes it a complex document. The same Sir Ivor Jennings called it a “lawyer’s paradise”.
■ ELEPHANTINE SIZE
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics stated that the Indian Constitution is too bulky and too detailed and contains some unnecessary elements.
◇ Sir Ivor Jennings, a British Constitutionalist, observed that the provisions borrowed were not always well-selected and that the constitution, generally speaking, was too long and complicated.
■ AN UN-GANDHIAN CONSTITUTION
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is un-Gandhian because it does not contain the philosophy and ideals of Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the Indian Nation.
◇ They opined that the Constitution should have been raised and built upon village panchayats and District panchayats In this context, the same member of the Constituent Assembly, K. Hanumanthaiya, said: “That is exactly the kind of Constitution Mahatma Gandhi did not want and did not envisage”.
■ UN-INDIAN OR ANTI-INDIAN
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ According to the critics, the Indian Constitution is ‘un-Indian’ or ‘anti-Indian’ because it does not reflect the political traditions and the spirit of India.
◇ They said that the foreign nature of the Constitution makes it unsuitable to the Indian situation or unworkable in India.
◇ In this context, K. Hanumanthaiya, a member of the Constituent Assembly, commented : “We wanted the music of Veena or Sitar, but here we have the music of an English band. That was because our Constitution-makers were educated that way”
■ A CARBON COPY OF THE 1935 ACT
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics said that the framers of the Constitution have included a large number of the provisions of the Government of India Act of 1935 into the Constitution of India.
◇ Hence, they called the Constitution as a “Carbon Copy of the 1935 Act” or an “Amended Version of the 1935 Act”. For example, N. Srinivasan observed that the Indian Constitution is “both in language and substance a close copy of the Act of 1935”.
◇ Similarly, Sir Ivor Jennings, a British Constitutionalist, said that “the Constitution derives directly from the Government of India Act of 1935 from which, in fact, many of its provisions are copied almost textually".
■ A BORROWED CONSTITUTION
#Criticismofconstitution
◇ The critics opined that the Indian Constitution contains nothing new and original. They described it as a ‘borrowed Constitution’ or a ‘bag of borrowings’ or a ‘hotch-potch Constitution’ or a ‘patchwork’ of several documents of the world constitutions.
◇ However, this criticism is unfair and illogical. This is because, the framers of the Constitution made necessary modifications in the features borrowed from other constitutions for their suitability to the Indian conditions, at the same time avoiding their faults.
◇ While answering the above criticism in the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, said : “One likes to ask whether there can be anything new in a Constitution framed at this hour in the history of the world.
■ CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
#Salientfeaturesofconstitution
◇ The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 gave a constitutional status and protection to co-operative societies. In this context, it made the following three changes in the Constitution:
◇ It made the right to form co-operative societies a fundamental right (Article 19).
◇ It included a new Directive Principle of State Policy on promotion of co-operative societies (Article 43-B).
◇ It added a new Part IX-B in the Constitution which is entitled as “The Co-operative Societies” (Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT).
