Mark Time

“In war the morale is to the physical as three to one.” - Napoleon

In New York, around 3,000 drones recreated the Twin Towers in full scale. September 11 marks 25 years since the terrorist attack, which killed exactly 2,977 people. @IntelSlava

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSh2HswKn5Y 25 years ago today...

Whoah I had cheese curds tonight. Myth confirmed

Q told me to eat more cheese curds

From the description, it looks like they primarily focus on the New Testament while Heirs is a treatment of all Scripture.

What if there was a book that dismantled any notion of extant Jewish favor with God? Through an examination of 539 verses, The Heirs of Abraham is exactly that. https://www.amazon.com/Heirs-Abraham-Mark-Time/dp/B0DFXLK769/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1

https://newchristendompress.com/products/the-seed-of-abraham Has anyone read this book? If someone has a copy, can you compare the text to the Heirs of Abraham, my book?

India could send 7 million people to every country in the world and still have people leftover

Also who uses commas like this?

Ok yeah let's make a clock with the population of India and then legally mandate it in every home, school, and business in America. It'll be like that dumb 20 Seconds to Nothingburger nuke clock but real.

India puts their population at 1,479,239,020 as of September 4th 2026.

Uhhhh yea I totally agree 😈

My brother in remphan, you started the tit-for-tat war

— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 NEW: A U.S. official says the United States is considering not responding to Iran’s latest attacks ‘The President wants to avoid being dragged into a tit-for-tat exchange’, the official said. The White House is reportedly worried about rising oil prices and low interceptor stockpiles. @Middle_East_Spectator

For more details and the full court ruling you can read it here: https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2026/D08-25/C:25-1354:J:Lee:aut:T:fnOp:N:3597567:S:0

Granted, this is just the 7th circuit, far from the law of the land. Nevertheless, this is judicial cowardice at its worst. The judge's opinion in US v. Andregg essentially boils down to punting the question away to precedent. Let me ask you this, your honor. Were any of the facts of the present case in the minds of those justices in 1969? Could they even conceive in their most feverish nightmares the grotesque horrors that usher forth from today's screens at the depraved behest of artificial intelligence? No, your honor, they didn't and they couldn't. This is a case of first impression. You had every opportunity to stand in the gap. Instead it is *you* who has been found wanting in the sight of God and man. At the final judgment will you recite your timidities before that final Judge: "Lord I was only following precedent"? Not so. Your only hope will be to say: "Lord have mercy on me, a sinner."

We deserve God's wrath

tl;dr United States government rules it may be legal to possess CSAM (Child Pornography) if it's AI generated Dawg, last week the United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals made a decision which will unironically change the way CSAM (Child Pornography) is handled in the United States. Under United States v. Anderegg, Anderegg was charged with distribution and possession of Child Pornography. Anderegg used Stable Diffusion AI to generate hyper-realistic depictions of children having sex. While charged with CSAM, Anderegg appealed the decision and argued it was not possession of CSAM because the "children" in the images were not "real" children. Rather, Anderegg and his attorneys argued that it is not illegal to possess obscene material which does not harm anyone. The courts official ruling: By 1969 ruling of Stanley v. Georgia, you are protected by the United States First Amendment to privately possess obscene material in one's home. Hence, because the images are completely computer generated, and no actual child was used to create the pornography, the United States government cannot constitutionally criminalize someone's private possession of those obscene images in their home under this statute