ch
Feedback
$===>$$$$$$$

$===>$$$$$$$

前往频道在 Telegram

Dimes to Dollars DO NOT CONFUSE RESEARCH WITH FINANCIAL ADVISE. I AM NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISOR.

显示更多
479
订阅者
-124 小时
-27
-1030
帖子存档
QSI+WH=?

I heard Whip is living in Africa.. 👀

Hello from Africa.

We need a messenger

We know everyone, we see everything QSI

It’s wild that back on Aug 19th I mentioned this as an alternative to what we may feel is questionable, and today I see that
It’s wild that back on Aug 19th I mentioned this as an alternative to what we may feel is questionable, and today I see that this is exactly what some of these assets will swap back into. Don’t underestimate the original assets you own.

Ok.. so I finally just watched Emilys video. She actually made some amazing connections and confirmed them. Some how I instinctively already pointed out two things. I showed on the map how close the WQCF account is to the part where the scammers split and cashed out, It's a fine line here and without some direct confirmation from the trusted Devs we have worked with would be hard to separate. I also showed where the creator account of XXGB has had transactions with T3DN. Those things are important when it comes to figuring out exactly what part may have went rogue and who we trust. Next, we have direct emails from CryptoG tying the WQCF account to them showing CC was right.. and we know that AURAX is tracking it from the master SCC7 account ties. I'm going to make an assumption here that SCC7 is going to tie us into the CryptoRussians.ru since we have already tracked that back to Indus and Swiss Custody assets as well. Both of these things were pointed out to her when we were talking the other day after the video. After watching that and already knowing these little extra details, I know we are on the correct side of the split and Emily was super close seeing something but just didn't quite look long enough to see what we know. Connecting to Mt. Gox and connecting elon Stellar, and the XMT token, and X, all to X.com answers a lot of our questions, and makes it even more exciting! To know it all ties to Indus.Gold and Sungold is big as well. (you know what to do, those are cheap..) I'd pay very close attention to what she's talking about on how they are using these assets through trackers like the one we see AURAX has in place to look at our actions and determine intentions. They are studying us. https://rumble.com/v3d1m9i-team-mimsily-bridge-of-bridges-part-deux-august-27-2023.html

Repost from $===>$$$$$$$
There has always been some questionable things going on with the maps on the MOBI side. Its a visible split with a group that cashed out and a group that transacted with T3DN. Almost like the visible split we see inside of the CryptoG group... Kind of interesting.

photo content
+1

Repost from WhipLash347
And if you know, you know. Swiss Custody Credit Suisse Transfer of Wealth.

Over 6000 results from the WikiLeaks archives on Credit Suisse available for research #SuisseSecrets Link: https://search.wik
+1
Over 6000 results from the WikiLeaks archives on Credit Suisse available for research #SuisseSecrets Link: https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=%22credit+suisse%22

Repost from WhipLash347
Do you remember Donald J Trump's Secret Trip to Switzerland? Do you remember the US Flag being raised in Switzerland? Also in Germany. Do you know Swiss Bank is the Basel Bank? Isn't that funny Swiss Custody are tied to Luxbank. 2 Neutral Venues Plus INDUS linked to B.R.I.C.S Some just wont understand how big this statement is. Credit Suisse, Swiss Custody, Dstoq Assets, Ukrainian & German bank's. Think Scandals in the media, think Resignations, Sell Offs I posted all of them. I uncovered GESARA for this planet. Executive Orders 13818, 13848, 13959

. Lets wrap our heads around that. A company can launch its own asset and owns 100% of the shares. It can use a known Dev to help launch its token, create the ICO's and all the logistics of essentially creating its genesis block of entering the blockchain per say. It can have contracts with other legitimate domains like Indus or go-dls to offer shares as well based on a pre arranged percentage of the shares value. In all cases I have seen it is less than 30%. This means the remaining 70+ % can be controlled by the creating company or other domains that have contracts. Now this may turn out to be important. When it says "...% of the total value of..." That can have implications in the value of what one asset is worth from the original company that might only have 10B tokens released vs what it is worth holding it through go-dls that might have 2T tokens released.. If, per say the contract with go-dls says they hold 15% of the total value, does that mean 15% of the total value across all shares go-dls offers? So 15% of the value across 2T to determine the price Vs say 85% of the total value across all shares the company itself offers (85% across only 10B)? This could mean there will be huge differences in the value of 1 token held by one domain vs another. This is not crystal clear just yet. But its been a big question and something to think about.

These numbers indicate what percentage of the market index the indus.exchange domain owns Example: SRA 14% = indus.exchange’s SRA token represents 14% of the total value of SRA exchange. Other/future domains may own a another piece of the pie SRA 14% SCD 11% SPX 15% NASDAQ 17% DAX 7% NIKKEI 11% FTSE 9% HANGSENG 6% SCP 11% NIFTY 14% SENSEX 12% Join us: @QuantumStellarInitiative @QuantumStellarInitiativeChat Lobstr ✅ QSI.xmint.io http://www.QSIResources.com https://youtube.com/channel/UChCxSaSZyyvFnMINo3sUQtQ

. This last part gives us a little more insight on how the additional domains we see carrying the same assets will work. "...any ICOs launched outside of indus bubbles (or other domains like go-dls, etc) represents the main company itself. Ex: ERICSSON ICO through StellarRussia would represent 100% ownership minus any contracts previously negotiated with indus bubbles, or other legitimate domains, etc." Here is an older example of showing what percentages Indus holds of some assets listed. 👇🏻

hehhehehe yes and it has driven so many people crazy but makes me giggle From how I understand it based on old convos with Farsight is that: - country.indus.exchange represents the country's contracted share of that company and the value will reflect however the company performs in those respective countries, irrelevant of how it performs in a different country. Ex: IBM in USA could have a different value than IBM in Timbuktu - indus.industry (gold, health, etc) is a global domain, so more like a collaboration (I'm thinking SCO/BRICSTXYZ type here) Thus, any ICOs launched outside of indus bubbles (or other domains like go-dls, etc) represents the main company itself. Ex: ERICSSON ICO through StellarRussia would represent 100% ownership minus any contracts previously negotiated with indus bubbles, or other legitimate domains, etc Is that a fair assessment?

that is important info.. keep it in mind. now look at this. 👇🏻

👆🏻

Token overlap between IndusPayments and IndusX are interchangeable. some are for international settlements, some are for regional. but whichever is held can be swapped back and forth once birdges are complete and launched.

👇🏻