ch
Feedback

不要被骗子欺骗!Telemetrio 会找到并标记这些频道 👉 如果想查看标记,请订阅

Study with देव

Study with देव

前往频道在 Telegram

Tag line:- "Actions Speak Louder Than Words". Government Official Govt Of India 🇮🇳 CGHS Nursing Officer Ex- Public Health Nursing Officer (Level-8)

显示更多

📈 Telegram 频道 Study with देव 的分析概览

频道 Study with देव (@studywithdev978) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 10 885 名订阅者,在 教育 类别中位列第 18 498,并在 印度 地区排名第 34 879 位。

📊 受众指标与增长动态

自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 10 885 名订阅者。

根据 04 十一月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 50,过去 24 小时变化为 -1,整体触达仍然可观。

  • 认证状态: 未认证
  • 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 30.25%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 12.97% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
  • 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 3 293 次浏览,首日通常累积 1 412 次浏览。
  • 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 3。
  • 主题关注点: 内容集中在 nursing, officer, आयोग, अध्यक्ष, rrb 等核心主题上。

📝 描述与内容策略

作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“Tag line:- "Actions Speak Louder Than Words". Government Official Govt Of India 🇮🇳 CGHS Nursing Officer Ex- Public Health Nursing Officer (Level-8)”

凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 05 十一月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 教育 类别中的关键影响点。

10 885
订阅者
-124 小时
-97 天
+5030 天
帖子存档
And mail this to deputy secretary of health and family welfare ( Department of Health & Family Welfare) Shri Jitender Singh jitender.singh28@nic.in

Subject: Urgent Appeal for Reconsideration of the 80:20 Reservation Policy in NORCET Dear Honorable President of India, I trust this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. My name is (Your name) and I am writing to express my deep concerns and seek your esteemed intervention regarding the 80:20 reservation policy implemented by AIIMS for the Nursing Officer Recruitment Common Eligibility Test (NORCET). The 80:20 ratio rule, which allocates 80% of seats to female candidates and only 20% to male candidates, subdivided further based on caste reservation, raises significant issues of fairness and equality. Since the inception of this policy, AIIMS has conducted six examinations under this framework, resulting in over 12,000 vacancies. However, only approximately 2,000 seats have been allocated to male candidates, and these were neutral seats where both male and female candidates competed based on merit and rank. This reservation policy has a disproportionate impact on male candidates, particularly those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds who have invested substantial amounts in their education. For example, as a graduate of I paid ₹75,000 in tuition fees and ₹90,000 in hostel fees annually, totaling around ₹3 lakh per year and approximately ₹10 lakh over the four-year course duration. The significant financial burden, coupled with the current reservation policy, leaves male candidates feeling unfairly treated and financially disadvantaged. The Supreme Court of India, in its landmark judgment of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), emphasized that reservation policies should be reasonable and not exceed 50%. Additionally, in Union of India v. R. Rajeshwaran (2003), the Court upheld a much lower reservation percentage for women, justified by specific circumstances. The 80:20 reservation policy implemented by AIIMS exceeds these guidelines and undermines the principle of meritocracy. The AIIMS Director's acknowledgment of receiving less skilled nursing staff highlights the adverse effects of this policy. The 80:20 ratio results in less capable and less skilled candidates being selected, which ultimately affects the quality of healthcare services provided. The core issue lies in the reservation policy itself, which needs urgent reconsideration to ensure that merit and skills are the primary criteria for selection. I have previously written to the Prime Minister and other officials regarding this issue, but due to financial constraints, I am unable to pursue legal recourse in the high court. Therefore, I earnestly seek your support in bringing attention to this matter and advocating for a fairer and more equitable distribution of seats in the NORCET examinations. Your esteemed intervention can ensure that the principles of equality and fairness are upheld in the recruitment process for nursing officers. It is imperative that all candidates, irrespective of gender, are given an equal opportunity to compete based on their merits. I humbly request your assistance in this matter, and I am hopeful for a positive response that will bring about a just and equitable resolution. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours sincerely, (Your name )

photo content

SSC NURSING OFFICER में HEIGEST MARSK HIGH SECONDARY LEVEL में 128 और ग्रेजुएशन लेवल में 123 अब तक के डाटा के अनुसार और दोनों मार्क्स एक ही कैंडिडेट के है और फॉर्म सभी रीजन से लगाया है

एक बार सभी नर्सिंग ग्रुप में इस विडियो को शेयर कर दो https://youtu.be/b9RJl1_Ilhg

SSC NURSING OFFICER TOP SCORER CANDIDATE ( Acc. To study with देव सर्वे) Out Of 200 1. 128 2. 123 3. 104 4. 100.5 5. 98.5 6. 93 7. 91 8. 74 9. 73

SSC NURSING OFFICER TOP 6 SCORER CANDIDATE ( Acc. To study with देव सर्वे) Out Of 200 1. 128 2. 123 3. 104 4. 100.5 5. 98.5 6. 74

SSC Nursing Officer Minimum Quilifing Marks
SSC Nursing Officer Minimum Quilifing Marks

SSC NURSING OFFICER TOP 4 SCORER CANDIDATE 1. 128 2. 123 3. 100.5 4. 74

jldi se msg kr do

koi baaki hai kya ssc nursing officer ki answer key or score card ke liye presan ho rha ho

किसी से SSC Nursing officer की answer key नही निकल रही हो तो msg कर दो निकाल दुंगा

SSC Nursing Officer Answer Key Out and marks calculation link
+1
SSC Nursing Officer Answer Key Out and marks calculation link

Medical Surgical Nursing best book for bsc nursing students https://amzn.to/4cAKBiq
Medical Surgical Nursing best book for bsc nursing students https://amzn.to/4cAKBiq

SGPGI Nursing Officer / Sister Grade II Recruitment Exam | Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences | Solved
SGPGI Nursing Officer / Sister Grade II Recruitment Exam | Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences | Solved 20 Practice Mock Tests with Free Acess to Online Tests https://amzn.to/4cHjbYc